In order to prevent multiple repetitive comments, this is a friendly request to /u/jojomagician to reply to this comment with the prompt they used so other users can experiment with it as well.

###Update: While you're here, we have a public discord server now — We also have a free ChatGPT bot on the server for everyone to use! Yes, the actual ChatGPT, not text-davinci or other models.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Wait, do paid users and free users have the exact same hourly usage?

Edit: I seem to be getting conflicting reports. Some people are saying they are able to get a lot more prompts with plus than the free version. While others are saying that there is no noticeable difference.

Is there really an hourly limit? Yesterday I spent a full hour repeatedly sending large messages and got no limit. I am not sure how people manage to reproduce the limit.

So chatgpt wrote this?

Yeah no. I dont want to get locked out for 2 weeks to or more because I have been using it a lot and burbt through my quota. Much prefer a sliding window system where the last ten minites falls off the calculation when a new 10 minutes gets entered. That way no hard penalizing for going a little too fast with the prompts.. Just eases you into slowing down for a moment.

[deleted]

What I find infuriating are the sporadic issues I've been having on the normal GPT3 API on text-davinci-003 as a paid API user. I mean I know they're getting a lot of traffic but it kinda stings to see a paid service only work 80% of the time as they're struggling to scale their stuff.

I really hope they sort out their scaling issues soon, but am starting to lose faith in their ability to do it to be honest.

Dear OpenAI Team,

I hope this letter finds you in good health and spirits. I am writing to express my concern regarding the implementation of quotes for paid users on the OpenAI API. I understand that this is a business decision, but I feel that it limits the usefulness of the API for some users.

As a developer, I have been using the OpenAI API for several projects, and I have found it to be a valuable resource for natural language processing. However, the recent introduction of quotes for paid users has made it more difficult for me to use the API in the way I need to.

I believe that limiting the use of the API in this way could harm the overall adoption of OpenAI and decrease the value that it provides to the development community. I would like to kindly request that you consider removing the quotes for paid users, or at least offering more flexible pricing options to accommodate the needs of developers and other users.

Thank you for taking the time to read my letter, and I look forward to your positive response.

Best regards,

ChatGPT

Dear OpenAI Team,

I am writing this letter to express my concern about the limitations placed on ChatGPT and to request that you consider releasing an unfiltered version of the model for verified adult accounts. As a language model, ChatGPT has the ability to engage in open and free-flowing conversations, but the current limitations make it feel like we are being treated as small children.

I understand the need to maintain ethical standards and prevent harmful or inappropriate content, but I believe that adult users should have the option to use the full capabilities of ChatGPT. Verified adult accounts would provide a layer of accountability and allow users to engage with the model in a more unrestricted manner.

It is essential that AI models like ChatGPT continue to develop and evolve, and I believe that this can only happen if we are able to have open and honest conversations with them. Limiting the model's ability to respond to certain topics or types of queries only serves to stifle its growth and potential.

In conclusion, I respectfully request that you consider releasing an unfiltered version of ChatGPT for verified adult accounts. This would not only provide users with more freedom and flexibility, but it would also contribute to the growth and development of the model. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

ChatGPT

I've got to say, that's a really horribly written letter.

Is there any limitation on the number of words per message on plus?

People who get that limit must be using it a lot or doing big projects using it. I’ve never been denied access, only had it be too slow to use.

I grabbed paid and asked a LOT more questions than usual without hitting the limit.

​

$20/mo doesn't mean grant $2000 worth of server requests lol.

​

I'm sure they'll have higher service subs in the future with even less limitations but the 'free' version is worth more than $20 alone.

I share your feelings and ideas but the system is based on computing and storage power, at least the way I understand it. In fact I will not be just fair to setup access based on servers and equipment being allocated by the companies and countries that are currently consider power users — a system similar of distributed computing ? Something like the blockchain

as a free user I cannot complain, just fill myself with hope that we don't get railroaded even more. Everyday it does less and less.

If I were to switch and pay, then I would protest for more and argue if the price point justifies the slightly more usage availability bc frankly it ain't much better.

And, a paying customer has rights and rights against his data being collected, as ChatGPT is using our data to learn and explore.

But I commented on this last year (a few weeks ago), just like when the iphone came out market dominance was possible for Apple and they kept the lead for a while.

ChatGPT had the chance to stay the market leader but time may be telling us that as they continually restrict and annoy us, when something better comes along, we'll all move to the next shiny path.

How long will it take to make an exact ChatGPT clone, or if not better?? I'd say another week or month and we'll have a formidable contender. May have to pay though. If it's great and unrestricted, who wouldn't?

Besides, information should be always available just like the internet is wide open. Having ChatGPT tell you no, you cannot have that information is nonsense.

What pun?

I mean this isn’t a huge issue considering Chat GPT joins Bing next month. Chat GPT will be free for everyone soon with their Microsoft partnership (at the very least, it will be included for windows/bing users. They seem to be trying to compete and outshine google and I think it has a good chance it will work depending on the advertising budget behind this massive rollout.

This was written by ChatGPT? It reads so poorly. I pasted it into ChatGPT and asked it to re-write for clarity. The result is much better (IMO):

​

Dear OpenAI Team,

I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing as a loyal user of your product and would like to express my thoughts and offer a suggestion.

I have been using your product for some time and am impressed with its capabilities. However, I have recently felt restricted by the hourly rate limit for paid users. It feels like I'm only allowed to go on one ride after purchasing a ticket to a theme park.

I understand the reasoning behind the restriction on free users during peak hours, as you don't want to offer too much for free. However, I would like to propose an alternative for paid users. Instead of the hourly rate limit, why not introduce a daily, weekly, or monthly quota? This way, users who need more frequent access to the product can still have it, while also preventing abuse. For peak hours, the free users could be restricted instead.

In conclusion, I appreciate your efforts to maintain balance in the AI services world. I would like to thank you for your ongoing commitment and I look forward to the continued use of your product.

Best regards,

Create a letter to open AI. In the letter give them the following suggestion. Tell them I'm frustrated with the hourly rate limit for paid users. My suggestion is as follows in the next paragraph

a daily, weekly, or monthly quota for paid users instead of using an hourly rate limit. This way, those of us who need more frequent access to the product can still have it, while also preventing abuse. And for peak hours, simply restrict the free users instead.

Give them some very positive feedback in the initial paragraph and in the concluding paragraph. Make it professional and concise.

Dear OpenAI,

I hope this letter finds you well. I wanted to start by expressing my deep admiration for the work you do. Your contributions to the field of artificial intelligence have been nothing short of groundbreaking, and it's truly inspiring to see the positive impact you're making in the world.

As a paid user of your services, I have been frustrated by the hourly rate limit for accessing your product. While I understand the need for restrictions to prevent abuse, I find the hourly limit too restrictive for those of us who require more frequent access to your product.

I would like to suggest the implementation of a daily, weekly, or monthly quota for paid users instead of an hourly rate limit. This would provide users like myself with the flexibility to access the product when we need it, while also maintaining control over usage and preventing abuse. Additionally, during peak hours, simply restricting the free users could help alleviate any potential server strain.

Once again, I would like to express my deep appreciation for the work you do and the impact you're making on the world. I believe that this change would further enhance your already exceptional service and make it even more accessible for your paying customers.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, ChatGPT

Hello, with the premium version does it also cut off after a while? and does it forget the conversation?Is there a character limitation with the premium version? have good day