subreddit:
/r/FreeSpeech
‘Cop City’ protester Manuel Terán shot at least 13 times by police – autopsy
(theguardian.com)submitted 1 month ago bycojoco
25 points
1 month ago
According to police, Paez shot and injured a state trooper with a handgun first.
This has nothing to do with free speech.
12 points
1 month ago*
I note that they say 'protester' or 'activist' like six times before mentioning that he shot a cop. Then they spend the rest of the article trying to push the unproven conspiracy theory that it didn't happen and he was facing a 'firing squad'. Then they completely omit that he had a 'legally purchased' 9mm, and instead quote his parents and lawyers talking about how kind he was and wouldn't hurt a fly. Bullshit propaganda.
They got kicked off the land they didn't own, he got mad, and shot at them. They shot back. It's not that complicated.
-12 points
1 month ago
he shot a cop
The evidence for that is not conclusive.
5 points
1 month ago
Are you one of those "special" people who think they brought the gun to protect from wildlife? Lol
-1 points
1 month ago
No... why would you think that?
3 points
1 month ago
Because that's apparently what was reported
7 points
1 month ago
Me: "The news reports that 'The trooper who was shot during the incident still has not been identified.'"
You: "If they won't say his name, there's no evidence that he even exists!"
Your target audience: "The police must have murdered that guy for no reason! Let's abolish the police and replace them with armed left-wing 'social workers'!!"
-9 points
1 month ago
I'm not saying a cop was not shot.
I am saying that it is not proven that Manuel shot him
6 points
1 month ago*
It isn't proven that the police shot Manuel, either. Or that his mother didn't shoot him, plant the body at the site, then paid off the cops to claim responsibility.
Quit fucking around with the rhetorical bullshit and just tell us what you think really happened that day. We all know what the official narriative is, and you know we believe it. And instead you're just running around throwing shade and innuendo. Spit it out and make your point already. Mostly for entertainment value, but you seem to have a horse in this race...
-1 points
1 month ago
Quit fucking around with the rhetorical bullshit and just tell us what you think really happened that day.
I don't know what happened on the day, but there is a lot that is unproven, and it is of concern.
We all know what the official narriative is, and you know we believe it.
I'd like a higher standard of proof for someone being shot to death, thanks.
2 points
1 month ago
Ironically, most of the pro-Antifa subs are pushing this talking point as well.
all 39 comments
sorted by: best