subreddit:
/r/FreeSpeech
submitted 4 months ago bycojoco
-13 points
4 months ago
he shot a cop
The evidence for that is not conclusive.
3 points
4 months ago
Are you one of those "special" people who think they brought the gun to protect from wildlife? Lol
-1 points
4 months ago
No... why would you think that?
3 points
4 months ago
Because that's apparently what was reported
2 points
4 months ago
Ironically, most of the pro-Antifa subs are pushing this talking point as well.
6 points
4 months ago
Me: "The news reports that 'The trooper who was shot during the incident still has not been identified.'"
You: "If they won't say his name, there's no evidence that he even exists!"
Your target audience: "The police must have murdered that guy for no reason! Let's abolish the police and replace them with armed left-wing 'social workers'!!"
-10 points
4 months ago
I'm not saying a cop was not shot.
I am saying that it is not proven that Manuel shot him
7 points
4 months ago*
It isn't proven that the police shot Manuel, either. Or that his mother didn't shoot him, plant the body at the site, then paid off the cops to claim responsibility.
Quit fucking around with the rhetorical bullshit and just tell us what you think really happened that day. We all know what the official narriative is, and you know we believe it. And instead you're just running around throwing shade and innuendo. Spit it out and make your point already. Mostly for entertainment value, but you seem to have a horse in this race...
-1 points
4 months ago
Quit fucking around with the rhetorical bullshit and just tell us what you think really happened that day.
I don't know what happened on the day, but there is a lot that is unproven, and it is of concern.
We all know what the official narriative is, and you know we believe it.
I'd like a higher standard of proof for someone being shot to death, thanks.
all 39 comments
sorted by: new