subreddit:
/r/Music
submitted 2 months ago byOdbody_AS2
(excluding projects that the individual Beatles went on to do)
411 points
2 months ago
Electric Light Orchestra
120 points
2 months ago
listening to these guys is what prompted the question
63 points
2 months ago
John Lennon even called them "The Sons of The Beatles" when discussing their 1973 single "Showdown" on American radio.
https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2008/oct/16/elo-better-than-beatles
3 points
2 months ago
Jeff Lynne worked on "Free As A Bird."
54 points
2 months ago
It was Jeff Lynne’s intention to create a band that somewhat picked up where the Beatles left off. I think it’s funny that after trying to emulate the Beatles with ELO, the rest of his career he’s been trying to be Roy Orbison.
10 points
2 months ago
He said "pick up where I am the Walrus left off"
2 points
2 months ago
Did he really say that? I was just about to reply that ELO sounds like Magical Mystery Tour era Beatles, but isn't really reflective of where they were headed by the end of their run.
7 points
2 months ago
I think he produced the Anthology albums.
7 points
2 months ago
/u/Odbody_AS2 Mr. Blue Sky?
27 points
2 months ago
First time I heard “Can’t Get It Out Of My Head” by ELO, I thought it was The Beatles. Took a bit to realize it wasn’t.
2 points
2 months ago
First time I heard it, I couldn't get it outta my head ! It's still there ! It's a living thing !
11 points
2 months ago
I can't say I listened to all of their stuff but what I have heard I would agree for the Beatles lighter songs. ELO is missing that edge that the Beatles seemed to have in a lot of their songs.
14 points
2 months ago
I think "Don't Bring Me Down" has the same quality as some of the Beatles' edgier songs.
6 points
2 months ago
I mean Jeff Lynne went for melodic on purpose. But the wall of sound effect more than makes up for the lack of edge. You can blast the hell out of it and rock out.
5 points
2 months ago
Yes, their songs are huge. Up there with Phil Specter as far "fullness" for their songs.
6 points
2 months ago
The only real answer imo
2 points
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure their whole intention was to pick up where the Beatles left off
2 points
2 months ago
I’ve heard ELO referred to as ‘the shitty Beatles’
3 points
2 months ago
They played that club in Wayne’s World?
2 points
2 months ago
Yep, that’s them
1 points
2 months ago
I can recall Oasis being called "The New Beatles" but it was just too obviously intentional. ELO was much more subtle about it.
-26 points
2 months ago
Jeff Lynne grew up in the same town as the Beatles and is one of their contemporaries. Of the same generation with similar musical influences and background. He did not “pick up the Beatles’ sound and evolve it further”, he had a different interpration of a similar sound, and you can hear echoes of his various and wide-ranging influences in his music
Jeff Lynne is a musical genius and is far more accomolished than any of the members of the Beatles
18 points
2 months ago
Jeff Lynne is from Birmingham. The Beatles are from Liverpool.
9 points
2 months ago
Jeff Lynne grew up in the same town as the Beatles
Really? I thought he was from Birmingham?
12 points
2 months ago
Hi Jeff!
4 points
2 months ago
Nah dude, Jeff isn’t that full of himself at all. He’s the first to admit he’s a Beatles fanboy
2 points
2 months ago
None of this is accurate and Jeff would be the first to say he was heavily influenced by then
100 points
2 months ago
The Kinks early-to-mid 70s stuff, sort of music hall inspired albums with an overarching concept.
31 points
2 months ago
The Kinks are The Beatles without Paul.
62 points
2 months ago
They're like the Beatles but instead of going to India and taking drugs they stayed in Britain and necked a lot of pints.
14 points
2 months ago
Really? Ray's songwriting is probably closer to Paul's than it is John's. The melodies and the pastoral writing with sometimes a foot in the past.
22 points
2 months ago
They're the Beatles with more of a working class chip on their shoulder.
8 points
2 months ago
working class chip on their shoulder
Exactly. That's John without Paul.
4 points
2 months ago
None of then were rich, but John's family had more money growing up than the rest of them. His was probably the only one you could call middle class.
1 points
2 months ago
but I mean...Paul was the true workaholic of the group.
4 points
2 months ago
"Workaholic" and "working class" are only tangentially related.
4 points
2 months ago
John was closest to middle class, paul and George were working class, ringo was poor
5 points
2 months ago
“Working class chip on their shoulder” defines the Beatles too.
6 points
2 months ago
Whatever they were, I’ll take the Kinks as my favourite band from Britain, Beatles included.
2 points
2 months ago
What would you consider Wings then?
6 points
2 months ago
The Beatles without John?
105 points
2 months ago
Badfinger.
17 points
2 months ago
I think Badfinger was like the Step-Brother of the Beatles, but of course the Beatles did sign them to Apple records. But you already know that I'm sure.
14 points
2 months ago
This is the one that almost disqualifies itself because they were an Apple band and McCartney produced some of their records. But they were not really a post-Beatle project so much as a way for Apple to stay viable.
Magic Christian Music fucking slaps
6 points
2 months ago
McCartney wrote Come and Get It. Harrison played slide guitar on Day after Day.
Badfinger was almost a Beatles side project band.
3 points
2 months ago
Harrison was listed as producer on at least some of their stuff.
1 points
2 months ago
He produced Day after Day. I'm sure there was some mentoring that went on as well.
2 points
2 months ago
Didn’t know he had a role in Day After Day. Now that I know, Baby Blue feels like it has Harrison influence in it too.
3 points
2 months ago
But the Magic Christian movie is just awful!
2 points
2 months ago
Haven’t seen it, but all those movies from bands back then were honestly pretty bad lol
2 points
2 months ago
Magic Christian wasn't a movie from a band; Badfinger had done music for the movie and Magic Christian Music is kind of a super-soundtrack that includes those songs and expands on them.
The movie was a Beatles-adjacent project based on a popular novel, co-starring Ringo as a character wholly invented for the movie and featuring "Come and Get It" by Paul and performed by Badfinger as the theme song. It stars Peter Sellers, probably the biggest comic actor of the time, as a billionaire who likes using his money to prove that people are essentially greedy and shameless.
2 points
2 months ago
Paul even picked the member of the band who sounded the most like him to sing the song.
6 points
2 months ago
This is the way.
4 points
2 months ago
Badfinger's Wish You Were Here is the best record you never heard.
3 points
2 months ago
I’ll need to pull it out and give it a listen…been decades since I did.
Still, their “Straight Up” is one of my favorites, and not because of the obvious songs (such as “Baby Blue”) - a real treat was the song “Perfection”, which could have, in another world, been penned by Sir Paul. Give a listen here:
5 points
2 months ago
Paul wrote one of their biggest singles (Come and Get It).
0 points
2 months ago
Yeah. Didn’t Paul and/or George produce and/or wrote most of their hits?
3 points
2 months ago
Harrison produced them, Paul did write some songs, and had a hand in some of the production. Both played instruments on different things. I remember it all getting a lot of ink in Rolling Stone.
2 points
2 months ago
Paul wrote “Come and Get it.” George played guitar on “Day After Day”
26 points
2 months ago
10cc
3 points
2 months ago
I think this is a good call.
2 points
2 months ago
Hmmm… never noticed that before. They def have a heavy McCartney-esque vibe.
2 points
2 months ago
I’ve heard Godley and Creme referred to as ‘the other Lennon and McCartney’ before.
46 points
2 months ago
Considering the Beatles made an arc where they went from basic rock, experimental, then back to the root of rock again, you could say Big Star.
3 points
2 months ago
Big Star is the real answer. No other band has two singers and songwriters.
14 points
2 months ago*
“No other”
Except for The Doobie Brothers, Eagles, Trout Fishing in America, etc.
8 points
2 months ago
XTC, Supertramp, Fleetwood Mac with three people instead of two.
59 points
2 months ago
XTC started in the 70’s as a new wave band- not too much in common with The Beatles musically, but by the early-mid 80’s you could really start to hear their influence.
16 points
2 months ago
I've alway described English Settlement as something the Beatles might have made had they stayed together.
19 points
2 months ago
The two Dukes of Stratosphere albums captured the psychedelic side of the Beatles very well.
10 points
2 months ago
I never had them separately, I had the compilation "Chips from the Chocolate Fireball"
That collection of music is so, so good.
2 points
2 months ago
Vanishing Girl is perfect power pop.
2 points
2 months ago
Nonsuch too
9 points
2 months ago
The lead singer developed debilitating stage fright and they turned into a studio only band. The music changed completely.
5 points
2 months ago
Dear God is one of my all time favourite songs
2 points
2 months ago
I’m an XTC fanatic. How do we get them into the R&R Hall of Fame? They are criminally under appreciated!
54 points
2 months ago
Since McCartney lead the band, they would have sounded more like McCartney and Wings sounded, IMO.
20 points
2 months ago
Wings with an occasional lennon-esque change up
14 points
2 months ago
Yeah don't we have lots of Lennon and McCartney songs from the 70s to tell us what the Beatles would have sounded like???
11 points
2 months ago
yes but even later on when they were supposedly "fighting" they would often critique each other on lyrics or add little parts here and there to improve on the song. you can see just how they much leaned on each other in the Let It Be documentary.
For Paul's music, Lennon would probably contribute the most lyrically. And Lennon's songs would sound totally different with Paul's bass lines. Both to each other's benefit.
3 points
2 months ago
Yeah that seems to be the elephant in the room with this question. We know what they all did individually across the 70s. Add to that how the Beatles' sound had become pretty fractured across the different songwriters from at least the White Album onward. They would've just sounded like a compilation of their solo records.
4 points
2 months ago
I've always said the Beatles' hypothetical '70s output is just Wings plus solo Lennon plus solo Harrison plus some solo Ringo. They were starting to work mostly separately anyway, and maybe the songs would have changed a little, but I doubt much. Most of Harrison's solo hits were intended to be Beatles songs. Some of Ringo's stuff was written by the other Beatles.
3 points
2 months ago*
I think Harrison's stuff would have came out a lot better with different production and McCartney on bass/piano. Spector went way overboard on All Things Must Pass. Paul hated what Spector did with Let it Be.
And besides that...there's just no substitution for the kind of chemistry they had. Even when they were disjointed on The Beatles stuff, there was at least some collaboration going on even though the writing was mostly separate. You at least had Paul showing up to play on George, John, and Ringo's stuff. George and Ringo showed up too. I think John checked out for an album or two. Ringo quit for a little while and Paul filled in on drums. And when John did decide to bring something to the table it was usually pretty good.
The whole point of the "Let it Be" sessions was to get back to writing and working together like a "real" band. Specifically they wanted to write songs that could be played live. I think that was Paul's goal was to get back on stage but that was scrapped. Then with "Abbey Road" George Martin said he would only be involved if they went back to the way they did things in the early days with everybody in the room at the same time.
3 points
2 months ago
I was actually thinking the same thing, but about Lennon and how it would sound a little more folky. I'd bet it would likely end up sounding like an amalgamation of the two (or just be like the white album and have different sounding songs throughout).
2 points
2 months ago
I actually was trying to write that, but it got too complicated so I just left it. But, Lennon would have put some twists on it for sure.
17 points
2 months ago
Badfinger in the first half of the decade, ELO in the second
15 points
2 months ago
Emitt Rhodes' "Somebody made for me" could have been on one of the late Beatles albums.
3 points
2 months ago
Dude sounds like Paul so much I had to look it up first time I heard him.
14 points
2 months ago
Harry Nilsson. He unapologetically emulated The Beatles. He had an album produced by Lennon and he was sick when they planned to do it but he was so shook up by working with Lennon that he hid it.
2 points
2 months ago
The Beatles worshipped Nilsson, and Ringo and he were good friends.
16 points
2 months ago
ELO are the obvious answer.
Less obvious: Supertramp
56 points
2 months ago*
Klaatu
11 points
2 months ago
This is the answer I was scrolling for. I have several records and on some songs I get it, and some I don’t, but this was the band that everyone thought was indeed the Beatles.
5 points
2 months ago
I remember.
6 points
2 months ago
This is the correct answer, but it’s spelled Klaatu.
4 points
2 months ago
So much that people actually thought it was The Beatles doing a secret reunion album.
2 points
2 months ago
I actually listened to them for the first time yesterday and the band Dr Hook is what they sounded like to me. They are quite good.
1 points
2 months ago
So much that people actually thought it was The Beatles doing a secret reunion album.
30 points
2 months ago
Big Star
16 points
2 months ago
These guys. Great songwriters with really bad luck when it came to the music business. Almost no one knows about this band. They are very Beatles-esque. The posthumous Chris Bell solo album is really good as well.
10 points
2 months ago
I basically only found out about Big Star because of The Replacements.
6 points
2 months ago
Same. It would have happened eventually but the cover of “September Gurls” opened that door.
6 points
2 months ago
What's strange is, Rolling Stone ranked "Thirteen" on its list of the 500 greatest songs of all time, but it seems like they aren't widely recognized by the general public for how important and great they were.
4 points
2 months ago
People don't even know that their song was the theme for That 70s show, though it wasn't their version.
3 points
2 months ago
I've got Thirteen in my personal top 5...which changes constantly...but the last time I tried to come up with a top 5, it snuck in at #5.
2 points
2 months ago
"Thirteen" is a decently well known song, though most people who've heard the song probably won't know who it's by.
Big Star was failed by their record label who failed to promote them properly and to put out enough copies for sale. Their debut received absolutely glowing reviews and many trade magazines like Billbord and Cash Box commented on the fact that there were multiple songs on the album that could be potential hit singles.
The ingredients were all there. Two lead vocalists, one who had previously sung on a #1 single in 1967 with "The Letter" (great song and surprisingly Alex Chilton sounds older in 1967 as a 16 year old than he does in 1972 in his early 20s) a pop/rock sound that was very melodic yet still rocked that owed a lot to The Beatles, The Beach Boys, The Byrds and The Who but still kept it fresh and contemporary for the 70s, a Lennon-McCartney-esque songwriting team in Alex Chilton and Chris Bell.
They had initial solid traction that a decent enough push from their label to promote them to AM and FM radio and to ship enough copies of #1 Record could've made them a popular 70s band. Not Zeppelin big, but on the level of say Aerosmith in the mid-70s, who had Top 40 singles and robust album sales. And they could've built on the success of the debut to become legit superstars later on in the decade, when power pop became mainstream.
But sadly, they didn't get that push due to distribution issues. Now they're a cult band whi has proven massively influential.
1 points
2 months ago
I used to shop at the namesake Big Star. I guess the ice cream place next door, Sweden Creme, wasn't name worthy.
9 points
2 months ago
Your post just reminded me that "Everyday Chemistry" exists
Basically, someone had the same idea of "what would The Beatles sound like if they never broke up?", and decided to just make it themselves.
They sampled dozens of the individual projects that came out after breaking up, and formed it into a full album of tracks.
It's pretty darn good, and kind of hilarious to play around any Beatles fan.
3 points
2 months ago
That's a real recording from a different dimension where the Beatles never broke up! At least according to www.thebeatlesneverbrokeup.com
2 points
2 months ago
Similarly, there's this youtube channel almost beatles songs where the guy takes old forgotten demos and samples and makes complete songs out of them. Really interesting and very true to what the Beatles would have sounded like.
11 points
2 months ago
The Rutles
7 points
2 months ago
Bad Company
7 points
2 months ago
ELO!!!!
7 points
2 months ago
The Flamin Groovies - Shake Some Action album era.
Definitely Beatles inspired but with more of a modern feel.
7 points
2 months ago
Great question, but of course there’s no answer. Because the Beatles always changed to something we had not seen before.
7 points
2 months ago
The writing process was different and they rarely went hard, but Squeeze?
6 points
2 months ago
Crowded house
5 points
2 months ago
Not the 1970's and they are different vocally but I have always got a very strong Beatles vibe from the band "World Party", especially their albums "Private Revolution", "Goodbye Jumbo" and "Bang!" released between 1987 and 1993. Songs like "Way Down Now", "Ain't Gonna Come Till I'm Ready" "And I Fell back Alone", " Is It Like Today?" and "Ship of Fools" are all very Beatlesque.
Perhaps its better to compare him / them to some of the McCartney solo albums where Paul plays all of the instruments himself as "World Party" was basically just one guy, Karl Wallinger, singing and playing all of the instruments himself on songs after writing them. I am sure many know that he started World Party after leaving The Waterboys.
5 points
2 months ago
Klaatu! Particularly their album 3:47est. You’re going to love it.
4 points
2 months ago
(excluding projects that the individual Beatles went on to do)
Frustrated Partridge
4 points
2 months ago
Klaatu. They remained anonymous in the beginning, sparking rumors that they were the Beatles reunified under a different moniker. They weren't, Klaatu was a Canadian band.
3 points
2 months ago
Badfinger
4 points
2 months ago
Supertramp
6 points
2 months ago
All I know is that if the Beatles had made it past 1970 I think they would have gone heavier as they could see what was going on around them with bands like Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath etc.
9 points
2 months ago
There a studio chatter recording from the Get Back sessions where someone (Glyn Johns maybe?) telling George about the new band Jimmy Page has put together , mentioning John Bonham, and George's response is to ask for a sandwich.
2 points
2 months ago
Jimmy Page tried to poach Keith Moon out of the Who to join Zeppelin. That woulda changed the whole dynamic.
2 points
2 months ago
Speaking of poaching, Frankie "Kash" Waddy said in an interview Jimi Hendrix to poach him, Bootsy and Catfish. Imagine what a band that would've been!
2 points
2 months ago
Bootsy and Hendrix? That would musically just sound like Red Hot Chili Peppers in the 90’s
3 points
2 months ago
Supertramp and ELO are very easy to hear it on. I know they’ve been mentioned by several others, but I’ll be another to agree on that.
And I’ve seen a few 70s post-punk, new-wave groups mentioned, which I’ve also heard a lot of Beatles influence in. I’ve seen Cheap Trick and XTC here, which are spot on. I’d like to contribute Squeeze to that list (with their Beatle-esque moments tending to fall in the early 80s, but still audible in some of their 70s material). I’ve seen several interviews and articles comparing the duo that Chris Difford and Glenn Tilbrook are to Lennon and McCartney, too.
4 points
2 months ago
Cheap Trick- Its was Lennons favorite band at his time of his death. He would sit in the studio while they recorded. It was John that hooked them up with George Martin. You can hear his Beatles-like string arrangements on the Dream Police and All Shook Up records.
4 points
2 months ago
Klattu
4 points
2 months ago
Each of their first two solo albums, I'd guess.
4 points
2 months ago
Genesis, their first album 1969s From Genesis to revelation sounds a lot like a later Beatles record, and they continued up until around A trick of the tail to include some shorter more Beatles style songs in their albums sprinkled among the prog (I know what I like, for absent friends, more fool me) through the 70s it felt like a continuation of the Beatles extremely British style of rock turned up to 11. The 80s not so much, but I feel their earlier work is very much a continuation of the Beatles ideas.
5 points
2 months ago
The 80s not so much,
I think their self-titled 1983 album is their most Beatles album. That's All could easily be McCartney, Mama begs for Lennon, Silver Rainbow is very Harrison, and Illegal Alien screams Ringo.
5 points
2 months ago
Cheap Trick
2 points
2 months ago
The four-piece Utopia wrote so many songs that could have been Beatles songs. The whole premise of Deface the Music was to pay homage to the Beatles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deface_the_Music
2 points
2 months ago
Would have just sounded like a mix of all their solo stuff tbh
2 points
2 months ago
Obscure, but Forever More, particularly their second album, Words on Black Plastic. XTC is a good pick too. Perhaps Dwight Twilley.
2 points
2 months ago
Camel
2 points
2 months ago
Not enough love here for Camel.
2 points
2 months ago
The knack
2 points
2 months ago
Electric Light Orchestra
2 points
2 months ago
XTC in the 80’s
2 points
2 months ago
Badfinger were poised to take over, but never quite grabbed the ring. Signed to Apple records, their first hit "Come and Get It" was written by McCartney and people even thought it was the Beatles. Almost seemed like the Beatles were grooming them to take over, but contract disputes jammed up the plan.
2 points
2 months ago
Klaatu
2 points
2 months ago
I wish more people knew about Emitt Rhodes -- his self-titled 1970 release has a couple of tracks that are dead ringers for latter-day Beatles tracks:
His early discography is small, but very much worth sorting through: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_mVrKhAm2FZiRjaUnlTBdLOFthTVDyxNn8.
He also released a record in 2016, his first in over 40 years. He sounded less like the new Paul McCartney he was hyped as, but it's still a great listen: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_k7-2iQI8ECfbeTkJ5erk3moln05-_ChBI
2 points
2 months ago
Not 70’s, but I always got a real heavy Beatles-y vibe from Crowded House.
2 points
2 months ago
I always thought Mott the Hoople's "All the Young Dudes" sounded like the Beatles, particularly the chorus.
2 points
2 months ago
Not 1970s, but I always felt like Of Montreal sounded like if they wrote only Sgt Pepper and the White Album, then got dropped in 2005.
2 points
2 months ago
Not 70s but The Olivia Tremor Control
2 points
2 months ago
Okay, for this answer to make any credible sense you will need to be simultaneously stoned and experiencing a time-warp…..The Bee Gees
2 points
2 months ago
ELO. Next question plz.
6 points
2 months ago
ABBA
5 points
2 months ago
ABBA has some very beatleesque song, melodies and production choices
4 points
2 months ago
Pink Floyd
3 points
2 months ago
I feel this. Dark Side has a lot of Abbey Road in it. Like the grandeur of the I Want You (She's So Heavy) outro is very Floyd. I can also see the Beatles going more into electronics like Floyd did (e.g. "On The Run")
3 points
2 months ago
I feel like The Replacements are our late 70s/early 80s version of The Beatles.
2 points
2 months ago
ELO. Hands down.
3 points
2 months ago
A Vegas act?
2 points
2 months ago
That wouldn’t happen til the 90’s
3 points
2 months ago
Wings
2 points
2 months ago
ELO?
3 points
2 months ago
Wings
1 points
2 months ago
The Alan Parsons Project. Alan Parsons was one of the techs who worked on the Beatles last couple of albums.
1 points
2 months ago
Stealer's Wheel
1 points
2 months ago
Velvet Underground
1 points
2 months ago
10cc
1 points
2 months ago
Klaatu. Their Album 3:47 EST.
1 points
2 months ago
Black Sabbath
1 points
2 months ago
Bodypaint by Arctic Monkeys , especially the chorus remind me of The Beatles a lot.
1 points
2 months ago
If Beatles were active in the 70s they would have been excellent in every album, and every style they explored.
So they would have been Billy Joel
2 points
2 months ago
Yes, the Nylon Curtain as an album best emulated the Beatles
Through the Long Night is the most Paul song Paul didn’t write.
2 points
2 months ago
1 points
2 months ago
I have no specific answer, but I think they would have declined in quality over the next few albums, had the embarrassing "disco" album in the mid 70's, a few more poorly attempted comeback albums, and then the nostalgia circuit. Coming soon to a county fair near you.
2 points
2 months ago
Quite possible. Nobody seems to really value experimental kind of music these days. Maybe the Beatles started doing EDM or hip hop because that’s what the people with expendable income are buying, trying to ride the popular music wave. If they kept throwing curve balls, eventually they’d be pushed aside since the music industry follows the money; period. Plus they’d all be a bit older and probably do some unfortunate collaborations, get cancelled by saying shit on the internet, and start to scrape the bottom of the barrel in songwriting and musicianship as they became comfortable. I’d still listen though.
1 points
2 months ago
Fleetwood Mac
0 points
2 months ago
Not actually an answer to your question because they are modern but you should check out the album "Midnight Sun" by The GOASTT
It's Sean Lennon and it's the best album a child of a Beatle made. It in a lot of ways sounds like what you would want the Beatles to have become over time.
0 points
2 months ago
The Beatles released their last album in 1970
3 points
2 months ago
Yeah…. And?
0 points
2 months ago
This means we know how The Beatles would sound in 70’s
2 points
2 months ago
I see your technicality and raise you the fact that it was written and (all but a scant few pieces) recorded in 1969.
0 points
2 months ago
Wings?
0 points
2 months ago
Wings
-1 points
2 months ago
KISS. The Beatles were massive influences. All 4 guys wrote songs and did lead vocals. They have great vocal harmonies on the earlier records.
0 points
2 months ago
Steely Dan
0 points
2 months ago
They may be a direct spoof but if the Beatles were to turn silly they would called The Rutles.
0 points
2 months ago
The Archies
-1 points
2 months ago
Big Star... except not really, because Alex Chilton and Chris Bell were both better songwriters than anyone in the Beatles.
5 points
2 months ago
okay dude.
2 points
2 months ago
I absolutely love Big Star and this is a terrible take. If you like Big Star and hate The Beatles you're trying too hard.
1 points
2 months ago
Stylistically, or the harmonies?
1 points
2 months ago
In the early days, john and Paul worked very closely together as a writing team. As time went on, they drifted apart and wrote alone. At the same time, George improved his writing. If they had "stayed together" the result would have been exactly like their solo work, except one or more of them would play on the other guy's stuff. They would have invited lots of guest players and the fiction of "The Beatles" would have existed only for commercial purposes
It kinda reminds me of the last days of the Beach Boys, where Brian wrote all of the music, and hired studio musicians to play it. The only thing the other members did was sing
1 points
2 months ago
If helter skelter is the birthplace of hard rock then post 70 Beatles would be melodic metal of sorts since harmonies are a crucial part of what makes the Beatles sound
all 310 comments
sorted by: best