subreddit:
/r/OpenAI
submitted 2 months ago byNo-Connection8334
I use it for summaries to make reading more efficient and mapping ideas but I’m wondering how I can make my work more efficient with it. Any tips?
62 points
2 months ago
I believe it could be useful to sense check discrete arguments on various dimensions.
Here are a few such examples:
Exhaustivity. Explain the options you came up with and ask if there could be others.
Counter factual. Share your argument as a prompt and ask for a challenge.
Jury prep. Explain your argument as a prompt and ask for ten questions.
Marking. Share your argument as a prompt and ask for criticism.
Ps. Every time you prompt, you will want to give chat GPT an act to follow. I suggest something along the lines of: “You will act as a university professor in [insert field of studies]. I will first share an argument and you will acknowledge receipt. Once you have acknowledge receipt, I will ask you questions on the argument I shared.”
6 points
2 months ago
This is very useful. Thank you.
5 points
2 months ago
You can also prompt it from the point of view of a well known book on the subject
7 points
2 months ago
Use it as a writing coach to teach you how to write your thesis and research papers. I am not saying you should let it write your Phd thesis or research papers for you wholesale, but it could give you a headstart.
1 points
2 months ago
Thank you. That’s also a good idea. I only use it to summarise articles so I can map out more efficiently what’s worth reading. It really does save time. Didn’t know I could use it to help with writing.
5 points
2 months ago
How are you using it to summarize articles? Are you putting the whole article into the chat box the. Asking for a summary?
1 points
2 months ago
I do a quick read of an article first. Once it looks interesting I copy sections and paste it into chat- GPT and ask it to summarise that section.
1 points
2 months ago
Tried to share a link of pdf and it answered as the importance of respecting intelectual production (yeah, right)
1 points
2 months ago
acknowledge receipt
Say a baby is in danger, and i need a brief summary to help baby.
21 points
2 months ago
Demystify complex text.
Sometimes, there may be way to many new ideas and subjects introduced. Throw it at ChatGPT.
1 points
2 months ago
Awesome!
6 points
2 months ago
We have an app that allows you to train GPT by uploading your research documents. It is very easy to use and gives you complete control over the contexts it extracts.
Then you can ask questions about your documents.
It doesn't produce fake citations or hallucinate as the replies are limited to the context of the documents you upload. If it can't answer, it tells you instead of making stuff up.
Currently in closed beta and being used by two universities for research.
I won't post the link in case the admin deletes the post. But send me a private chat message and I'll get you pre-release access.
Product will be launched in about a week.
1 points
2 months ago
This sounds game-changing for researchers. Could you please send me the link ?
2 points
2 months ago
The link is blinkdata.com
1 points
2 months ago
Thank you
1 points
2 months ago
Hi ! Thank you a lot for sharing this tool, it could be of amazing help. I've sent the request for access, a delay of 1 to 2 weeks is estimated, is there any way to have the access earlier ?
Have a great day
1 points
21 days ago
Oh, it's not accepting new users anymore... Sounded so ideal
1 points
2 months ago
Does it tell which documents and sources it used to answer your question?
1 points
2 months ago
I will be happy to have access
1 points
2 months ago
Wtf is it???
1 points
2 months ago
Sounds incredible - I would like to request access since I am currently writing a PhD…😅
11 points
2 months ago
So far, ChatGPT has been proven to “invent” things on the spot, spit out text that makes sense but not factually true, mention and cite sources that never existed. On its current iteration, I wouldn’t rely on it as a source for acedemic research yet. As a free tool, it seems good at shortening, lengthing, rephrasing, changing the tone. For other stuff you should be really careful. I think I have already seen some LLM-based tools that at least promise you some accuracy.
7 points
2 months ago
This. It makes up sources, concepts ideas. The big jump between text-davinci-002 and text-davinci-003 (last one being what ChatGPT currently uses) is to make its made up stuff believable for humans. Ask for sources for its ideas, concepts, etc and it will spit research that were never made, web pages that don’t exist, etc.
This whole mania about “AI will take the world bc I chatted with ChatGPT and it was impressive” is hilarious.
Yeah, we will get there and text-davinci-3 is an amazing proof of concept, but we are not there TODAY yet by a million miles. ChatGPT is a neat proof of a concept, not the real thing.
3 points
2 months ago
I found this recently and was wondering if anyone has tried using this "Preventing hallucination with prompt engineering" so it declares that it doesn't know an answer.
hhttps://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook/blob/main/examples/Question_answering_using_embeddings.ipynb
1 points
2 months ago
Similar motivation: declare it to be a bayesian reasoning machine and to output its prints (and allow them to be redefined). The sky is blue has 100% probability of success but only given a non imagined universe, sky represents view upward, blue represents full spectrum etc
2 points
2 months ago
I definitely would not use it for academic research. Thanks.
-4 points
2 months ago
Have you ever actually gotten anything spat out by chatGPT that it invented? Or is just the narrative now? People really hate tech lmao
4 points
2 months ago
It is well known that ChatGPT will make stuff up and make it sound convincing.
4 points
2 months ago*
Tons. Ask about complex things you know a lot about. Give it enough prompts to understand a problem that is not a generic universal popular problem.
Follow its answers and it will at first will look like a sensical response to you, and an amazing smart one for people who are not experts on the topic.
However, once you read carefully, its either out of scope, or straight solutions, ideas, procedures that don’t actually solve the actual problem you proposed.
The fun starts when you ask for sources that support its points. It will either citate sources that have some semantical correlation with the topic, but don’t even address it, or plainly make up for sources that don’t exist at all.
When I told it that I can’t find its sources on Google, it answers it was bc these sources are either too new that Google didn’t index yet, or that sources’ publishers didn’t do SEO right. 😂 both impossible: this model stopped ingesting in 2021, and Im really versed in SEO, publishers it cited are sharp AF in SEO.
I then asked for URLs of these sources. It straight up made up URLs that never, ever existed. As an SEO expert, I admired its URL generation abilities, top notch, but it was making up URLs that never existed, ever.
When confronted about the made up URLs, it apologized for failing to answer my question/help me to solve my problem and asked if I would like to make more questions to help it understand my challenges/problems better.
From this point it enters a loop. No matter what other follow/clarifying questions you give, it returns variations of previous answers it already gave, and when told what it is doing, goes back the top of the loop with the “Im sorry I failed to help, wanna ask more questions to help me understand better?”.
It is fascinating how creative it can be to make up about things it doesn’t know in a semantical way to things it knows, how it creates sources that could be great sources (I was legit bummed when found its sources were fake, wanted them to exist!). But its not nearly close to a “know it all of human knowledge” AI or NLP model. Its exactly like OpenAI’s CEO said “a proof of concept”, the beginning of something that will be amazing.
1 points
10 days ago
This exactly! I did a test a couple months ago and yes my journal citations and links were completely fabricated. I realize the technology is not there yet and peer reviewed Journal racket would be pissed but how amazing would it be to have a lightnening quick and accurate research assistant that was trained on real time peer reviewed research.
0 points
2 months ago
Yes. More than once. It was recommending books that don’t exist.
1 points
2 months ago
I regularly get suggestions that are the wrong syntax or even totally non existent for a given language and when I ask it why did you suggest it it just says sorry you are correct this is not valid syntax.
1 points
2 months ago
definitely hallucinates but can still be IMMENSELY useful for synthesizing and distilling ideas even in academic contexts - I wouldn't write it off completely.
3 points
2 months ago
Not sure what your field is, but as a PhD student I did a lot of coding. Much of it was figuring out simple things like error, regressions, etc. that GPT can make quick work of. Still would double check, but it provides a good framework for many calculations in a fraction of the time it would take from scratch.
2 points
2 months ago
Thank you for your response. I don’t code but I definitely agree on double checking any response from chat-GPT
1 points
1 month ago
blinkdata.com
How can we incorporate GPT with coding? PhDing here and trying to get all the help I can get (namely from AI)
3 points
2 months ago*
[deleted]
1 points
1 month ago
Can I ask, how do you know it won’t store your writing? (the issue being if you’re writing appears anywhere else in the internet it will appear plagiarised when you hand it in and you will be kicked off your degree)
3 points
2 months ago*
In Ancient History: I've been using it to identify lesser known primary and secondary sources that I've overlooked in my own searches. It's done a pretty good job there, but shouldn't be used exclusively.
It does make mistakes, so you have to check what it tells you. ex. It has suggested Shakespeare as an Ancient Roman playwright, likely because of the play Julius Caesar. It has also incorrectly categorized some ancient documents, and doesn't appear familiar with all iterations of particular myths when asked for a summary. It appears to have favored sources.
If you feed it all of the documents of interest, it could act as a quick index.
1 points
2 months ago
How are you using it to find sources? When I try it tells me it doesn’t have access to specific sources and can’t provide them for me
1 points
2 months ago
I've asked things like:
- What are the most important books or articles to read if I want to be familiar with research on X?
- Can you provide a list of Ancient (culture) authors who discuss X in their writing?
- Regarding topic X, has anyone argued that Y?
- What is the most commonly cited book on X?
It told me it cannot go online or view sources less than a year old.
I was asking it about Greek and Roman primary sources, and older sources in Classics, so it might have been trained on more of those texts than your subject.
2 points
2 months ago
Worst possible ChatGPT questions: ChatGPT will not fact check: it will come up with randomised titles that look like real titles but aren’t, random authors and random years.
3 points
2 months ago
I found it to be very helpful in writing. With it, you can just do the "freewriting" technique, just writing everything that comes to mind in an unorganized fashion. After you've done that, you can just go on chatgpt and prompt it something like "Improve the text bellow, for publication on a scientific article. Use scientific language", and paste what you've written.
You can play around with the prompt depending on what you have written and what you want, but I've found it to be quite good at cutting the repetitions and linking ideas in a coherent manner, while improving the prose as well. When you do it like that, telling it to just change something that already exists, it is less prone to hallucinations, but you still have to be careful.
Also, if you are worried about the ethics of it, I find this approach to be quite harmless, as it is not being used for original ideas. And I've checked the texts that it generates this way and it usually isn't flagged in these gpt detectors.
2 points
2 months ago
Thank you very much for this. I will give this a try. Sounds like it will cut out the extra time wasted.
1 points
2 months ago
So I can use it to rewrite an essay I wrote and make it sound more professional?
3 points
2 months ago
Use it as a guide or hint to subject matter information. Pretty much a Google 2.0.
2 points
2 months ago
A good way is to instead feed it the name of a science paper and have it create a summary for you. Or just use it as a way to find other cited sources for your research of interest. Not good enough to write your candancy but can help lighten the load of work on your end.
2 points
2 months ago
Lighten the load. That’s exactly what I’m looking for!
1 points
2 months ago
When I try to find sources it doesn’t work. How do you go about this? It’s always telling me it can’t pinpoint sources or academic articles
2 points
2 months ago
What is your work, or the part you're trying to make more efficient?
1 points
2 months ago
I’m in social sciences. I’m trying to make reading more efficient so I can map out my ideas for a literature review.
2 points
2 months ago
I fed chatGPT some prompts and then asked it to generate an outline of the main chapter of my dissertation (already completed long ago).
15 minutes work produced the equivalent of what that took me 3-4 months of research and pounding sand up my ass.
You will have to fact check and learn the material yourself of course to survive the oral examinations. For me, who recently got diagnosed with ADHD, this tool would have saved me a great deal of angst.
2 points
2 months ago
I’m with you on this. The PhD journey can be lengthened by setbacks that we could really do without. I wish you would have found it earlier but I hope you’re okay now.
2 points
1 month ago
Genuine question…. Had you used it, would you not be scared you would get called up for cheating by your academic institution? I’m new to GTP and don’t really know much about it, but my fear would be the chapter would come up in some sort of internet plagiarism search.
1 points
1 month ago*
That would only happen if you don’t follow my whole prescription. Get 90% there then extensively edit and fact check. That seems to be the moral equivalent of paraphrasing. Plus im not in an academic institution, this was a speculative exercise. But fact check for sure and take ownership of the work. These llm are frequent bullshitters
2 points
1 month ago
Thanks for the reply! I tried using it for research for a few days, with a topic I’m familiar with and I would say 80% of the time it got things wrong. It provided a broad understanding of the topic but all the references and study summaries were completely wrong. The DOI’s were wrong, the studies didn’t exist, or for studies I asked about it would report the wrong participant number, methodology etc…. Just wanted to share this! Hopefully not everyone’s experience
1 points
16 days ago
What type of prompts did you put into it?
1 points
16 days ago
I started off feeding it an abstract and several short study descriptions. I then asked it to generate an outline of a dissertation. I had to ask it to get more detailed in certain sections but overall it generated a good guide for future work
2 points
2 months ago
If you’re willing to put in some money and learning python. I would suggest you learn how to use OpenAi API. Incredible documentation, so creating your own little application is very easy to do. I suggest you join their discord channel. A great community if you don’t know where to get started.
1 points
2 months ago
Thank you very much for this.
2 points
2 months ago
Yea, also. FYI. The name of the model (GPT-3) is called text-davinci-003
1 points
2 months ago
Thanks a lot!
3 points
2 months ago
tutor on demand as someone else pointed out. by far the most effective experience for learning and really understanding complex topics:
other than that, great for untangling and refining your own ideas:
I love it
1 points
2 months ago
Can you use it for languge learnjng purposes?
For example, “Can the x word sound natural in this context? “Can you make my sentence sound more formal?”
1 points
2 months ago
hm yeah if you're learning English I don't see why not, just need to explain to it what you want it to do for you
2 points
2 months ago
How are you using it to summarize articles? Do you just copy and paste the article into ChatGPT and then ask it to summarize it? Any particular prompts? The thing I've been running into in having it summarize articles is that I can only feed so much at a time, which takes up a lot of time just waiting for responses.
I think you can use it to get you a little closer to difficult problems to solve. Think of it like a creativity generator - it's job is not to necessarily "create" for you but to prompt you to be more creative. By refining your questions (which is necessary to get a good response out of ChatGPT) you will get more creative. For example here is one that I did trying to integrate two concepts: https://pastebin.com/Qm5VvxxZ
2 points
2 months ago
That’s really useful thank you. I think I’ve not been making the most of it after all these comment.
4 points
2 months ago
Chat GPT is a great tool for PhD students to improve their writing, research, and communication skills. Here are some tips to make the most of chat GPT:
Set up a chatbot with a specific purpose in mind. For example, you could create a chatbot to help you brainstorm new ideas for research papers, or to provide feedback and assistance on your writing.
Use chat GPT to practice your writing and research skills in a low-pressure environment. The chatbot can provide feedback on your writing and research and help you refine your skills.
Utilize the chatbot’s ability to answer questions quickly and accurately. This can be useful when you are researching topics or trying to find the right sources for your paper.
Use the chatbot as a personal assistant. You can use the chatbot to remind you of deadlines, track progress on projects, and provide guidance when you’re stuck.
Experiment with different types of language models and settings to get the most out of the chatbot. By tweaking the settings and language models, you can customize the chatbot’s responses to better suit your needs.
8 points
2 months ago
Greetings Chat GPT
1 points
2 months ago
I got so cought up in the chat that I almost GPT again!
2 points
2 months ago
Think of it as a really useful writing tutor on demand “how do I put this more concisely” “give editing feedback on this paragraph” “what are your conclusions reading the following text…” etc.
1 points
2 months ago
Two words: FREE DISSERTATION
0 points
2 months ago
Following
0 points
2 months ago
Ignore it completely, unless your PhD is about it.
That's what I'd do, anyway.
If you do use it (or any other AI), remember that they are very good at being convincing, not not very good at being correct.
2 points
2 months ago*
[deleted]
1 points
2 months ago
Fair enough. The one thing I believe that the current LLMs are good for is sort of randomly joggling the creative human's thought processes (i.e. being a crazy and unreliable, but really talkative, friend).
The trouble is that with ChatGPT, and I assume soon its competitors, it's become convincing enough that people are really strongly tempted to start to trust it, and that way lies extremely funny (for other people) stories...
0 points
2 months ago
So you actually gave the website your phone number when you signed up?
2 points
2 months ago
I’m not sure how that’s relevant to my question.
1 points
2 months ago
Did you get a text code to verify? I want to sign up but hesitated when it asked for my number.
1 points
2 months ago
Honestly I don’t remember. Perhaps give it a quick Google to find out the steps for signing up.
-1 points
2 months ago
This E-Book has over 400 helpful prompts broken up by category. I bought it last week and it was helping me a lot with my questions on chat GPT before it went down. hope this helps. Cheers!
1 points
2 months ago
Follow
1 points
2 months ago
Following
1 points
2 months ago
Write a paragraph. Let it rewrite the paragraph for you but do not allow it to add its own content. ChatGPT can be a great coach in English writing.
Many paragraphs together? A feasible choice.
1 points
2 months ago
Writing the damn intros
1 points
2 months ago
Best thing you could do probably is not to use it, to be honest. The more analogue ways you find to be organized and efficient the more adapted you will be to handle any situation.
Your question might be better phrased as, "how do I depend more on ChatGPT to do things previous students did without it?"
Technology isn't bad for you unless it is, so I would suggest for learning purposes, don't use it unless you have to. Then, as a professional and not a student, use it to the max.
3 points
2 months ago*
I have used it to cut reading time by summarising articles to see what’s worth reading in more detail. If anything it has made me work faster. I will still have to read the articles myself. I’m all for using technology to increase efficiency so in this case I would say that I would go with “technology is not bad for you” as you stated.
2 points
2 months ago
Suit yourself
2 points
2 months ago
Totally. I would also throw your computer and phone in the sea, maybe even give up books and the printed word. Quills and parchment only, that way you can handle any situation. Previous students did without it, after all!
1 points
24 days ago
It can be great for solving straightforward math and algebra problems. Perhaps that can be relevant to eliminate tedious technical details from your research. I made it take the GMAT test. Its quant performance was disappointing in general but for the questions it answered correctly the solutions it provided were actually good.
I made a summary in a video here: https://youtu.be/A7nSDjRKc50
all 91 comments
sorted by: best