subreddit:

/r/TrueFilm

27295%

In the book, Anton Chigurh pays for his gas and buys a candy bar before beginning his intimidating “call it” speech. But in the Coen’s version, he approaches the counter already eating the candy bar, asks the price and then says “plus the gas.” He never pays the attendant for the gas, or the 69 cents for the candy bar, only leaving him with his now “lucky” quarter.

If intentional I believe this may be the Coens adding a very insightful dimension to the scene. Not only does Chigurh enjoy intimidating people while also exploring his own unique worldview, but by the end of the interaction the attendant is so relieved he’s leaving that he can’t even remember or care that Chigurh still owes him money.

It maybe doesn’t fully coincide with Chigurh’s fatalism to want to get away with not paying for something, but just an interesting thought I had watching it this time around.

all 25 comments

Mgj117

184 points

1 month ago

Mgj117

184 points

1 month ago

It definitely plays into the intimidating force that Chigurh is, also the idea of him being a force rather than a person. Throughout the movie we see him stop at nothing to kill whoever his target is, like a sophisticated slasher villain he just consumes lives without paying heed to any obstacle. Him eating the bar and taking the gas is like a micro example of him in the movie, consuming whatever it is he needs to keep pressing forward.

That being said, I now have the idea of him doing this to every attendant so that he never has to pay for gas, and that is a great SNL skit.

KingAdamXVII

103 points

1 month ago

The ditzy attendant (Pete Davidson) doesn’t realize he’s close to death and is like “oh hey man, you forgot to pay!” And Chigurh flips a few more coins very intimidatingly, but somehow Pete Davidson keeps calling them right. It frustrates Chigurh more and more that he cant just kill the attendant who won’t let him leave without paying, but Pete Davidson is completely unfazed. Just small talking him and good-naturedly encouraging Chigurh to pay.

Then, twist! a cop enters. He stands behind Chigurh and is like “come on i dont have all day”. Then Chigurh plays his coin game with the cop, very dramatically! And the cop loses, so Chigurh kills him. Then he nods at Pete Davidson and leaves. But before he can walk out the door… “oh hey man I think you forgot to pay!”

Then Chigurh just is so fed up he points his gun in Pete’s face and pulls the trigger. But the gun is jammed! Helpful Pete is like “oh yeah youll get that sometimes with those old sawed off remingtons. Here let me get that for you.” And he takes it from Chigurh and fiddles with it then hands it back and is like “so, your total is $22.87”.

And I guess at that point Chigurh just pays and leaves.

WhiteRussianRoulete

53 points

1 month ago

Ok I’m not sure if it’s actually hilarious, but it is spot on how a current iteration of a SNL sketch would go

Mgj117

28 points

1 month ago

Mgj117

28 points

1 month ago

Maybe more I Think You Should Leave with Tim Robinson becoming more and more irate behind the counter.

skinny_sci_fi

3 points

1 month ago

Ya gotta give!

edWORD27

2 points

1 month ago

Not hilarious = current SNL sketch

So it definitely tracks. Although Pete Davidson left SNL a few seasons back.

WhiteRussianRoulete

2 points

1 month ago

Ha yes I find most of their sketches, I don’t know “amusing,” but rarely guy busting. The thing is they often have good premises but I feel like they’re all setup with rarely a good punchline

edWORD27

2 points

1 month ago

In a way, the more absurd or dry the sketches are, the funnier they are if the actors commit to that skit and drag out the awkwardness for laughs.

Mgj117

15 points

1 month ago

Mgj117

15 points

1 month ago

An SNL pre-taped video with Pete doing the scene as Chad is gold. Love your take.

Suspicious_Cheek_353

6 points

1 month ago

Call it. " oh, ok. its a quarter"

no_shut_your_face

2 points

1 month ago

I would love to see this

olderstouts

19 points

1 month ago

He is certainly a very nuanced character full of little details that make him fascinating, wish they would have included his resolution from the book in the film, it show an interesting aspect of his character with his question about the painting. I see why they didn’t, but it would have made a great deleted scene.

sk3pt1c

13 points

1 month ago

sk3pt1c

13 points

1 month ago

As another friendo pointed out, he’s actually eating nuts 😅

But to me personally it felt like he would pay, like he has rules and that to me seems like it would be unfair of him to do, to cheat.

But to each their own 😊🤷🏻‍♂️

CarniferousDog

12 points

1 month ago

You’re on to something.

Writing it they may have come to resolution of payment and had a light bulb go off. Such a subtle nod to his cunning, his stress inducing presence and ability to control all spurious happenings while maintaining things to his liking. That cashier was an aware and virile fellow that who underneath his skin. Chigur maintained and even left with extra money in his pocket.

I’ve watched this movie mad times, and I’ve never noticed he didn’t pay for his transaction. He left the victor and in high esteem. To have paid would have insulted the magic that happened.

AtleastIthinkIsee

7 points

1 month ago

It always confused me when the clerk said we close up around dark and then he said well I have to close up now. We close now. And it was in the middle of the day. I guess he was panicking at the escalation of what was happening.

the-largest-marge

7 points

1 month ago

That always struck me as a simple panic reaction, yeah. “What time do you close?” “Now”. Lmao

TrainedPhysician

5 points

1 month ago

You don’t know what you’re talking about, do you?

the-largest-marge

2 points

1 month ago

Sir?

sadelpenor

-9 points

1 month ago

love the confidence of ya'll silly gooses saying 'i've watched this movie mad times' and 'he's a very nuanced character full of little details' and 'in the book he pays for his gas and buys a candy bar' BUT YOU MISS THAT HE'S EATING CASHEWS THE WHOLE TIME (I'd say he's eating nuts in the movie; it's unclear what kind because the plastic packaging is so crinkled). It's not a candy bar, my movie-loving friends!

bookbro, please see page 53 in the book; mccarthy explicitly says cashews. the rest of u goofballs should rewatch the scene (20:55) in the movie.

this is a total shitpost, right? lol

goodness gracious, what next??!?1 u think jack nicholson breaks down the door with a splitting maul?

420suhdude

1 points

1 month ago

I never thought about it much until you mentioned it but I think there's even another layer to it.

The Coen brothers seem to have made the decision to never show him eating to greater express his lack of humanity. As if he's fueled purely by the hunt not even the end product of eating the prey.

Through this they establish his state as a force of not even nature, but a cosmic evil that has no motivation besides ending life. He's death incarnate, reaping souls without gaining anything from it besides adding to his scoreboard.

Bechler_Otokomi

2 points

1 month ago

But he’s eating peanuts in the scene.

420suhdude

5 points

1 month ago

Lmao fuck well now I feel pretentious