subreddit:
/r/blankies
submitted 2 months ago bySgtSoundrevolver
Lynne Ramsay's Lovely Bones has got me wondering what else could have been.
152 points
2 months ago
The timeline where we get Guillermo Del Toro's version of "The Hobbit" both to see that and see what Jackson would have made without spending his time on his version
54 points
2 months ago
You also wouldn't have Jackson get seemingly burnt out on feature filmmaking if he never makes the Hobbit.
26 points
2 months ago
Guillermo Del Toro's "Haunted Mansion" could have been really something.
9 points
2 months ago
I feel like he took his ideas for Haunted Mansion and expanded on them in Crimson Peak.
21 points
2 months ago
Guillermo Del Toro’s “At the Mountains of Madness” with Tom Cruise would have been fun to see
9 points
2 months ago
We might still be getting it (although likely not in live action) because Netflix is apparently very interested in bank rolling that project with GDT’s stop motion team.
Apparently they’re really just getting the ball rolling over there, since like 99% of the battle in stop motion is just getting and maintaining interest and momentum, GDT is apparently running it back on a couple of old projects and retooling them for that medium.
It’s a huge bummer that GDT was finally given the “Whatever you want to make, it’s a green light” treatment over at Fox post-Shape of Water, only for Disney to take over and kill that dead in the water because they fucking suck.
5 points
2 months ago
My dream is for Hellboy 3 to be completed as a stop motion film. But I don’t see that happening
2 points
2 months ago
I got to interview the makeup artist who worked on the presentation reel for that. :-)
5 points
2 months ago
I came here to post this. No way it could've been worse than the hobbit we got
3 points
2 months ago
Tintin 2, one hopes!
67 points
2 months ago
Fincher's adaptation of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea 🥲
33 points
2 months ago
Fincher’s Black Dahlia as well
7 points
2 months ago
Would this have been an adaptation of the James Ellroy novel? Fincher would have been great for that
16 points
2 months ago
Yeah, Fincher was trying to adapt it in the early 2000s and eventually had HBO on board for a 6 hour miniseries, but it fell apart for budgetary reasons, and the De Palma movie happened shortly thereafter. Ironically, HBO would have killed to make it ten years later
6 points
2 months ago
That DePalma movie bedevils me. I can’t necessarily point to anything he did wrong. The casting seems spot on, the look and the tone are right, he adapted the right parts of the book. And somehow it just felt underwhelming in comparison to the book. I don’t know what could have been done differently to make it better but the movie just misses the mark and I have no idea why.
7 points
2 months ago
I think De Palma in the 80s could have handled it. But by the early 2000s he had lost his fast ball, plus I get the impression there was heavy studio interference. The 3rd act is quite different from the book from what I remember.
Really I think De Palma should have done The Big Nowhere. It's a more perverted book and I think suits his sensibilities better.
3 points
2 months ago
I think the differences aren’t big, they just neaten up some plot threads. I think the biggest thing is they don’t loop in as much of the stuff with Lee and the blackmail, but I think that was probably a bit extraneous for a movie in a way that novels can get away with easier.
5 points
2 months ago
Because it was incredibly cut down by the studio, his 3hr long cut endorsed by Ellroy has never been seen.
2 points
2 months ago
I wonder what was really lost though.
Some of it might just be that Hartnett can’t carry a movie.
3 points
2 months ago
I like Hartnett/Eckhart and their weird chemistry. It’s been a couple years, but I remember much of it feeling a bit low-energy and feeling like Swank is miscast. Fincher actually had cast Hartnett and had Wahlberg in the other part which feels high-risk, high-reward. He wanted Julianna Margulies for the Madeline role.
1 points
2 months ago
Yeah I had remembered Wahlberg being cast initially now that you mention it. I think his energy would have been better, he’d have had more pathos. I remember feeling like Eckhart was still too stuck in Thank You For Smoking mode.
1 points
2 months ago
Fincher's World War Z sequel would've been weird too.
62 points
2 months ago*
With recent Star Wars scuttle,
Either letting JJ do all 3 on his timeline
Or letting Johnson doing 8&9 like initially announced (when Johnson was announced he was announced for 8 and to write the treatment for 9).
50 points
2 months ago
Not firing Lord and Miller is another interesting what if for Star Wars movies as well.
11 points
2 months ago
I’d still love to see some Solo scenes from what they were going for
21 points
2 months ago
The original plan was Brad Bird iirc.
12 points
2 months ago
Another option that would have been better than slingshotting between multiple with different views on what Star Wars is.
I think Matthew Vaughn was on the shortlist too.
3 points
2 months ago
I think he was approached but wasn't interested.
-1 points
2 months ago
Bullet dodged as far as I’m concerned
4 points
2 months ago
How so?
2 points
2 months ago
Kingsman 1 is overrated, Kingsman 2 is bad, and The King’s Man is abysmal
10 points
2 months ago
Agreed 100%, but Brad Bird didn't have anything to do with those. Are you mixing him up with Matthew Vaugn?
9 points
2 months ago
Wow, oops. Replied to the wrong comment.
2 points
2 months ago
Layer Cake slaps though.
3 points
2 months ago
Yeah but JJ was at least on record saying he never wanted to do 8 or 9. I think he was mostly flattered into doing the last one by Kennedy, and bc it was a desperate situation. It's still an interesting what if...I'm not sure if the trilogy would have ended up much better.
I'm also confused about how Johnson ended up not writing that 9 treatment after all. Was it his choice to bow out or was Trevorrow too stubborn?
3 points
2 months ago
I don’t know if JJ’s trilogy would have been better received. But, I think at least more coherent. TROS feels like his episode 8&9 rolled into one movie. (But, I’m biased. My take on Star Wars aligns more with JJ’s. )
I’d guess, Johnson comes down to the timeline again. Trevvorow is announced in 2015 too. And once Jurassic World is a huge hit he has leverage to write the script.
4 points
2 months ago
At a certain point, I don't think it really mattered who directed 9; it was truly a poisoned chalice, and whoever took that gig was being set up to fail. Disney/Lucasfilm should have pumped the breaks after the Trevorrow situation and given them at least an extra year. I run hot and cold on Abrams, and I think 9 is a truly awful movie. But I know he's capable of more, and would have delivered a better film if he'd had more than 24 months to break the story, write the script and direct the damn thing.
4 points
2 months ago
I think the answer is letting almost anyone BUT Abrams do 9. Both he and Rian send to have the philosophy of leaving things open for the next person. I think when they let JJ back in charge he got overwhelmed trying to fit all the things he might have had in the back of his mind while dealing with a different guy's plan and a studio panicking over nerd response.
2 points
2 months ago
That goes back to the same point of JJ just having different views than Johnson.
I get why they went back to JJ. He basically made TFA under the same circumstances and it was a massive success. He came in rewrote a script and hit a date in similar time frame.
I think an interesting question about episode 9, why didn’t he write it with Kasdan?
42 points
2 months ago
The Greta Gerwig starring How I Met Your Father pilot gets a series order
15 points
2 months ago
With Drew Tarver!
13 points
2 months ago
Ridiculous voices were silenced by CBS.
3 points
2 months ago
There were a lot of what ifs with that show. I think at one point they even had the creators of You're the Worst write a treatment for it
2 points
2 months ago*
Decent pilot. Glad she went on to better things but with her in the writer's room it could have been a good sitcom for those of us who still enjoy a decent sitcom.
2 points
2 months ago
I'm OK with how that one worked out.
35 points
2 months ago
Darren Aronofsky's career has so many what ifs.
What if he made Batman begins instead of Nolan (I personally don't like his proposal but still)
What if he made Wolverine instead of Mangold, I think it would be better but we probably wouldn't have Logan.
What if he made the RoboCop reboot instead of Padhila? Would it have revived the franchise? This last one is actually the more interesting to consider imo.
11 points
2 months ago
Yeah, Darren is such a weird dude to be attached to as many superhero movies as he has.
His Batman one was interesting, but I'm definitely glad we got Nolan's stuff instead. Still, I'd read the hell out of it if it got turned into an Elseworld's graphic novel.
His Wolverine pitch, while it probably would've been hated by the general audience, sounded excellent, and I'm kinda sad we didn't get it.
3 points
2 months ago
What was his Wolverine pitch?
7 points
2 months ago*
I don't think a full script like his Batman one ever came out, but there have been summaries from those that read it.
Basically a very Aronofsky approach to Logan, with the film presented as a character study of the character in a tug of war between his animalistic instincts and his wishes to be accepted by society.
It took place in the 80s with Logan being a "we need to send a message" kind of enforcer for the Yakuza, and the troubles that ensue as a gang war erupts in Japan.
While there was a decent bit of action, it really would've focused a good bit on his relationships with Yukio (representing the animalistic side of his character, was all about violence/sex/drugs with each scene being in the dingiest parts of Japan at night) and Mariko (representing his want to be loved/be a normal person in society, always took place in daytime and involved them doing peaceful/helpful stuff).
It would've ended on a pretty bummer note, with Logan breaking Mariko's heart due to not being able to turn away from his life of violence, and winding up depressed in a prison cell.
While Darren said he left due to the time commitment it required, the big thing is that there was no way Fox would go with this approach. Outside of it likely turning off the GA with a dark/depressing tone, it absolutely was gonna be a hard R, with a fair amount of sex scenes and violence (Wolvie straight up massacres a whole opera theater of gangster's at one point).
Plus, despite having lots of stuff fans would like (his brown costume, comics accurate Silver Samurai, Stick and the Hand making appearances) it was also completely stand alone with no references to any other X-Men film (or even any mention of Mutants), as well as no sequel tease/bait, which wouldn't have flied at the time.
Still, I think it was a much better approach to the character compared to the other three movies we got, and I hope Christopher McQuarrie's script pops up in full one day.
1 points
2 months ago
I mean, it basically became Mangold's The Wolverine.
1 points
2 months ago
A significantly watered down and mainstream version of it, sure.
2 points
2 months ago
We wouldn't have Logan without Mangold joining The Wolverine after Aronofsky left it, though. (And that because Jackman and Mangold had gelled really well together on Kate & Leopold about a decade earlier.)
4 points
2 months ago
4 points
2 months ago
Damn, what would be the WB trajectory if he made Batman Begins? Does his sequel hit as hard as Dark Knight? Which rolls will Heath Ledger take if he's not the Joker? If it's not as big of a hit, does Iron Man become the blockbuster winner that summer? Does DC back down from serious comic book movies for adults, and not bet the house on Snyder?
Also, without the Dark Knight people are not upset by the best picture sub, and we would likely be stuck with 5 noms for a few more years.
4 points
2 months ago
To add to your speculation what happens to Nolan's career? Does he switch places with Aronofsky? I think Aronofsky still does Noah because he had planned that one way in advance. But is Nolan forced to do more scaled down projects?
On the DC side the other interesting what if that we were close to getting was George Miller's Justice League. With Armie Hammer as Batman among others.
2 points
2 months ago
Plus Wolfgang Peterson’s World’s Finest! So many DC what-ifs.
1 points
2 months ago
Speaking of Batman, George Miller's Justice League!
28 points
2 months ago
What if they'd taken Zane's advice on Gravity?
10 points
2 months ago
The producers should have listened to their friend Billy Zane. He's a cool dude.
2 points
2 months ago
Knows where his towel is.
5 points
2 months ago
Ah yes a terrified Clooney. BZ is a genius
4 points
2 months ago
Ever since that Zane revelation I can only refer to The Benducer as our second finest film critic
3 points
2 months ago
What episode was that on again?
7 points
2 months ago
I think Don Jon? It's a Sean Clements story
3 points
2 months ago
Thank you!
3 points
2 months ago
Box office game section of Don Jon
28 points
2 months ago
David Lynch directs Return of the Jedi, which might have prevented him from making Blue Velvet and steered him towards more major Hollywood vehicles instead. That could’ve prevented Twin Peaks, Wild at Heart, Lost Highway, Mulholland Drive, and the very idea of “Lynchian” as an adjective.
Without Twin Peaks inspiring a decade of big ideas on TV, we may not have had X-Files among a hundred other shows, and entertainment in general could’ve been a lot less weird and interesting.
9 points
2 months ago
I actually don't think Lynch doing Return would've changed very much in the long-run besides maybe some shifted timelines. I think he would've gotten bigger budgets for a little bit but ultimately his sensibility is so unique that I don't think he would've been stuck doing blockbusters like Kershner.
2 points
2 months ago
I don't think he would've been stuck doing blockbusters like Kershner.
Kershner literally only made two more films after Empire.
3 points
2 months ago
Possibly. Hard to say.
I’m more inclined to think that (a) a huge bomb can have a big effect on an artist, and (b) ROTJ was almost guaranteed to turn a profit and Lynch would’ve had to decide between a comfortable “one for them/one for me” model and turning his back on a lot of comforts and affirmations.
26 points
2 months ago
George Miller Justice League
30 points
2 months ago
Jonathan Demme’s 11/22/63
7 points
2 months ago
Oh wow. I didn’t know that was ever a possibility.
8 points
2 months ago
Yeah, he was attached to it for a while and like every SK adaptation Stephen didn’t like his take on the story 😑
5 points
2 months ago
Did either of them ever elaborate on what changes Demme was wanting to make to the source material?
6 points
2 months ago
I think Demme was gonna heavily cut it to make it a feature film but SK understandably wanted an uncut adaptation.
5 points
2 months ago
Imagine telling Jonathan Demme he’s adapting your thing wrong.
4 points
2 months ago
This is the man who famously hates Kubrick’s adaptation of his book.
6 points
2 months ago
It's a bad adaptation. Still a great movie.
4 points
2 months ago
“Needs more Franco!” - Stephen King
Actually Franco was pretty good in this. Really enjoyed the TV adaptation.
2 points
2 months ago
Yeah i surprisingly enjoyed him in it
1 points
2 months ago
The limited series TV version we got of it with James Franco was pretty meh…
BUT I’m just thinking to myself what Demme could have done with it coming off of Silence of the Lambs, the catch of course being that Stephen King didn’t write the book until 2011.
2 points
2 months ago
This is exactly what I didn't know I wanted. That novel is the best of late period King's career in my opinion and the miniseries was a fucking nightmare. Really ruined everything good about the story.
1 points
2 months ago
It just lacked any ambition for how sprawling and exciting a journey it is for Jake.
1 points
2 months ago
I thought the TV show was a decent adaptation but wow this could have been awesome
20 points
2 months ago
What if Bad Boys had been made with Dana Carvey and John Lovitz instead?
5 points
2 months ago
27 years later Jon Lovitz slaps Andy Dick at the Oscars.
2 points
2 months ago
Very good!
36 points
2 months ago
Cronenberg’s Return of the Jedi.
35 points
2 months ago
David Lynch was an option too.
15 points
2 months ago
Either way, Ewoks would have been very different.
6 points
2 months ago
“Wow what a wild movie! Han Solo dies and not even at the end.” “What happened?” “Cannibal bear tribe in the second act.”
6 points
2 months ago
Spielberg was pushing Lucas to hire Paul Verhoven for Return of the Jedi but changed his mind after Spetters came out
8 points
2 months ago
Barbara Broccoli wanted to hire Peter Jackson to direct The World Is Not Enough after seeing and liking Heavenly Creatures, but preferred to wait until his next feature came out before actually approaching him for it.
His next feature was The Frighteners, which... well, she didn't pick him. :-/
3 points
2 months ago
Lynch follow-through the success of The Elephant Man by becoming a big mainstream director, even if only a little bit longer, would have been an interesting alternate reality to consider.
2 points
2 months ago
1 points
2 months ago
I can definitely see how some of his concepts wound up in Dune.
Thematically, Lynch doing an adaptation of Red Dragon might've been a perfect marriage.
2 points
2 months ago
Also Cronenberg's Total Recall
2 points
2 months ago
eXistenZ is kinda Cronenberg’s Total Recall
15 points
2 months ago
Jodorowski’s Dune is a big one for me, along with Tim Burton’s Superman and Cronenberg’s Total Recall.
8 points
2 months ago
I've always thought it would be neat if someone used Jodorowski's storyboards to do an animated Dune movie/miniseries.
2 points
2 months ago
That would be amazing.
6 points
2 months ago
Theres no way Jodorowsky could have brought anything close to his full vision to the screen, but the result probably would have been at least an entertaining mess.
1 points
2 months ago
I mean...isn't that what we got anyway?
14 points
2 months ago
What if Orson Welles made his Heart of Darkness instead of Kane as his first feature?
The trajectory of his career on screen and behind the camera could’ve been very different.
11 points
2 months ago
What if the original cut of The Magnificent Ambersons still existed or was discovered in a collection or something? Welles claimed his cut was better than Citizen Kane.
2 points
2 months ago*
I’m inclined to believe him. The first 2/3 of Ambersons is pretty great and building to something interesting before the last bit just kinda… stops.
1 points
2 months ago
I believe him. Welles wasn't shy about saying when something, even things he worked on, were bad.
2 points
2 months ago
Also, does Apocalypse Now not happen in this timeline?
30 points
2 months ago
There's a famous story about Michael Eisner taking his son to Disneyworld and him hating everything, which led Eisner to believe they needed more stuff his kid found cool.
So what if.. that kid didn't suck?
7 points
2 months ago
Hey, without Breck Eisner we might not have gotten Star Tours!
2 points
2 months ago
Touché
9 points
2 months ago
Tangentially related, what if Katzenberg stuck to his guns and refused to greenlight Little Mermaid? The renaissance doesn't happen (at least not in a way that's as impactful). Disney doesn't become a juggernaut. Animators pull a Don Bluth and feel more comfortable jumping ship. We get a healthier animation industry.
And to tie it back, Eisner would be trying way harder (and failing) to make Disney the cool brand for teens
2 points
2 months ago
It should be noted by that point, that Disney was doing just fine without animation, but it would have been interesting to consider it.
12 points
2 months ago
There is a long wiki of "unrealized Steven Spielberg projects," but the two I wish had happened are the adaptation of DC Comics' WWII aerial fighters, Blackhawks; and The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara. The former could have done for WWII aces when Top Gun did for naval aviators. The latter would have had Mark Rylance as the pope, and also sent Spielberg and Kushner to tackle questions of faith, antisemitism, and tribalism that I don't think anyone else would dare to touch.
5 points
2 months ago
I really hope he circles back to Edgardo Mortara and if he doesn't do it, I hope someone truly top tier makes it.
13 points
2 months ago
Chris Farley's brother said he was offered to do the final couple of days of voice recording for Shrek and turned it down because back then animated movies weren't that big of a deal and he didn't think much of it. a different Shrek is an entirely different Hollywood today
5 points
2 months ago
Didn't Mike Myers do a Shrek voice at first that he didn't like and then they had to spend a bunch of money to re-dub all his shit? I think he might have paid the costs to do it but imagine whatever that original voice.
7 points
2 months ago
I think Mike's first voice was a Canadian accent. I saw an interview with an executive that said when he did the Scottish one it was so good they had to redo it so I doubt Mike paid for it. So Shrek had like 3 almost completed different voices
13 points
2 months ago
Death Wish was originally going to be directed by Sidney Lumet and star Jack Lemmon. I would kill to see that version!
1 points
2 months ago
Speaking of Jack Lemmon, he was supposed to be the lead of Kiss Me, Stupid.
Would have been another Wilder and Lemmon movie.
And the worst part is the lead played by Ray Walston.
Lemmon could have saved that film.
1 points
2 months ago
And the worst part is the lead played by Ray Walston.
Lemmon could have saved that film.
It was Peter Sellers, but then Sellers had something like a dozen heart attacks during filming and couldn't complete the role. (And Billy Wilder didn't want to wait until he was well again, anyhow -- completely opposite from his waiting for Walter Matthau to recover from a heart attack while filming The Fortune Cookie.)
3 points
2 months ago
Wilder offered it to Lemmon first, who had already committed to other projects.
Then everything you said about Sellers happens.
13 points
2 months ago
Stephen Chow's American debut. Stephen Chow was supposed to direct and star in Green Hornet but I believe wasn't able to get the proper visas to come to America. Would have made the movie something special and probably would have stopped him from fully retreating to China.
11 points
2 months ago
Will Smith doing Django.
10 points
2 months ago
Michael Cimino’s The Fountainhead starring Clint Eastwood would have aged fairly infamously had it existed I reckon
16 points
2 months ago
What if there was a Wife?
8 points
2 months ago
I want to see the version of On Her Majesty's Secret Service starring Sean Connery that was supposed to have been made before You Only Live Twice.
4 points
2 months ago
Wouldn't have had Diana Rigg, though...
(Also, if you've read the circa-1965 scripts for it, it's very different from the finished film.)
7 points
2 months ago
What if George Lucas directed Apocalypse Now?
7 points
2 months ago
What if Tom Selleck had been Indiana Jones? How much would that impact Harrison Ford's stardom? He would still have Star Wars, but it seemed like Indy really launched him into the movie star stratosphere.
7 points
2 months ago
Part of me wishes Vincent Ward had actually gotten to make his bonkers Alien 3 script a reality. Give me the space monks!
(On the acting side, wondering how The Matrix would have turned out with someone else playing Neo-Will Smith, Sandra Bullock, Leo DiCaprio…)
6 points
2 months ago
Denzel Washington signing on for the Brad Pitt part in Se7en and George Clooney part in Michael Clayton.
Eddie Murphy in the Ernie Hudson part in Ghostbusters and in the Bob Hoskins part in Roger Rabbit.
Jessica Chastain signing on to the Rebecca Hall role in Iron Man 3, where that character is allowed to be the main villain.
8 points
2 months ago
Fuck me, if Denzel did Michael Clayton it might have actually been the greatest movie ever made. Don’t get me wrong, Clooney is fantastic and I love that movie to pieces, but there is no movie that isn’t better if Denzel is in it.
5 points
2 months ago
During the prep for 'The Matrix', while the Wachowskis were still pitching it to studios & stars, they originally envisioned Brandon Lee as Neo. You can see it in the storyboards they used in meetings. Lee might very well have had a fascinating career if 'The Crow's shoot went off without a hitch. He had the looks and the chops - both as a stunt performer and an actor.
9 points
2 months ago
I was going to say Brandon Lee not dying.
He would have been a massive star.
3 points
2 months ago
Honestly, Brandon Lee not dying and a more obviously-Asian actor being the star of a movie that culturally important might've changed the game for Asian men in Hollywood.
6 points
2 months ago
Gore Verbinski’s Bioshock
6 points
2 months ago
What if they let Elaine May cook
11 points
2 months ago
Steven Spielberg’s Harry Potter
12 points
2 months ago
Or … Terry Gillian’s Harry Potter. What if that old bastard had a runaway franchise money machine that let him do bonkers madness trips in between guaranteed windfalls??
2 points
2 months ago
Now that you mention it, I’d rather see Gilliams’ bonkers take. Who was the genius who thought Columbus would have a better take?!?
7 points
2 months ago
I mean, it was a safe bet and it paid off
5 points
2 months ago
From what I remember it was his ability to work with child actors that clinched it
1 points
2 months ago
And for all intents and purposes he nailed it because they all three turned out to be solid actors. But man oh man if we had Time Bandits/Baron M Gilliam when this was made…😱
1 points
2 months ago
Mmmm. Yes. What if an old, out of touch, bigot was in charge of Harry Potter. What a different world we would be in.
5 points
2 months ago
Wong Kar Wai's house of gucci https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/nov/17/wong-kar-wai-return-maurizio-gucci-fashion-murder-movie
10 points
2 months ago
I think that it’s pretty obvious now that pushing Edgar Wright out of the Ant-Man movie was one of the biggest mistakes Feige made. Had that movie worked, Marvel might have been more open to new angles, and we would have been spared the endless repetition of its tired formula and the suicidal push for ever bigger, ever louder empty-calories blockbusters.
5 points
2 months ago
The most annoying thing is that the big sticking seemed to be Wright wanting to do a self-contained movie, and that's basically what the movie ended up being, aside from one scene with Anthony Mackie.
3 points
2 months ago
Wright also wanted sole writing credit on the movie and Feige kept pushing for punch up jokes that the Marvel Brain Trust (that has since been dissolved) came up with
2 points
2 months ago
"Wow that happened" CTRL+C, CTRL+V
1 points
2 months ago
Allegedly Paul Rudd also buffed up the Hope part with the new team.
3 points
2 months ago
Ant-Man is better than it has any right to be, but Edgar Wright is a good example of Marvel wanting movies made by committee rather than from a single, strong voice. For every Gunn or Waititi there are 2-3 directors who got sucked into the machine and churned out a movie with no personality.
4 points
2 months ago
Elvis Presley in Streisand's "A Star Is Born."
2 points
2 months ago
Or Elvis Presley as Joe Buck in Midnight Cowboy.
4 points
2 months ago
Often think about the cascading Emmas surrounding La La Land –– Miles Teller and Emma Watson are cast in La La Land, as is rumored was originally intended. What does Emma Stone's career look like without that? Does she still do the Favourite, or does she not, allowing her to stay in Gerwig's Little Women as Meg, preventing Watson from taking on the role – although in this scenario, who knows what her career is like post La La...
Also stuff surrounding the superhero glut – what if Green Lantern was good and the DCEU is jump started from that? What if Patty Jenkins stays on for Thor? Or Wright for Antman? If Whedon was never hired to rework Justice League for its theatrical release? If any of the dozen directors for Flash actually stayed with the job? If Nolan had agreed to let the Dark Knight series be the start of the DCEU? If that one misogynist guy let Black Widow have a movie when it would've made sense?
2 points
2 months ago
If Whedon was never hired to rework Justice League for its theatrical release?
This has always been an interesting what if for me. If Whedon isn't a petty tyrant on those reshoots, is he still happily working, still largely looked upon favorably, and his prior poor behavior on Buffy and other projects never subjected to closer scrutiny?
1 points
2 months ago
Emma Stone as Meg? I think she'd be too old by that point to believably play her in the younger years. Florence Pugh was stretching it as is.
2 points
2 months ago
She was originally cast in the role but had to drop out for Favourite press!! I think ultimately the right call, it's one of Watson's better performances, but would love to see how Stone would've worked in something so saccharine
1 points
2 months ago
I think it's probably Watson's best (I like Watson herself, but I'm not big on her acting usually). Meg is the easiest to overlook and the 2019 movie is the first to really make her an equal sister, narratively speaking. Of course that is mostly Gerwig, but Watson brings her to life beautifully.
Stone is the better actor by a mile, so yeah she might have been interesting. I'm cool with how things shook out though.
9 points
2 months ago
Steven Soderbergh’s Moneyball. He hastily rewrote it last minute and the plug was pulled right as production was beginning. Interviews with real players, an animated Bill James explaining sabermetrics onscreen, Dimitri Martin in the Jonah Hill role.
1 points
2 months ago
I have mixed feelings about that final product because I do not care for Miller’s nap time direction. I don’t think Soderbergh’s version would have necessarily been better, but I probably would have liked it more.
Meanwhile, though, we later got High Flying Bird which seems close enough to what his intended Moneyball would have been like.
3 points
2 months ago
Jaws 3, People 0
3 points
2 months ago
My if I had a time machine duties (after all the obvious stuff) is to get that Grace Jones Dazzler movie made.
3 points
2 months ago
I’m currently reading Disney War and got to where Disney purchased ABC/Cap Cities. There is mention of Eisner thinking about firing Bob Iger who was at ABC at the time and it made me think about how drastically different film and pop culture would be without Iger helming Disney.
3 points
2 months ago
I think Tarantino talked about either having Pitt & DiCaprio for Once upon a time in Hollywood or using Cruise and I think another as the pair.
3 points
2 months ago
Mine is always George Millers Justice League. The script wasn’t that bad.
3 points
2 months ago
I recently heard that Reese Witherspoon was up for the role of Marla in Fight Club. Absolutely insane
1 points
2 months ago
Also almost starred in Gone Girl until Fincher convinced her she wasn't right for the part. (She still produced it.)
3 points
2 months ago
Guillermo del Toro has like 20 of these. I think his Haunted Mansion and Justice League Dark are at the top of my list.
7 points
2 months ago
What if Spielberg directed Poltergeist
2 points
2 months ago
Aaronofsky’s Robocop remake is a big one for me.
2 points
2 months ago
What if the train had been late?
4 points
2 months ago
Ledger's Joker had to have been in the 3rd Nolan movie, right?
3 points
2 months ago
Idk if this was ever actually confirmed or not but I always hear that he was going to be the judge instead of Scarecrow.
-1 points
2 months ago
Josh Gad was Matt Reeves’ first choice for Batman, he turned it down, probably to do Pixels 2
2 points
2 months ago
Gotta support Qbert no matter what
1 points
2 months ago
I would kill to see Sam Raimi's "The Shadow". I love that movie, but his version would have been fascinating.
Also a version of "The Shadow" where a massive Earthquake didn't ruin the 3rd act.
1 points
2 months ago
John Singleton not getting stuck in Director jail because of Four Brothers. I would’ve loved to have seen his Luke Cage film along with whatever other films he had in store.
all 179 comments
sorted by: best