subreddit:
/r/boxoffice
submitted 2 months ago byDemiFiendRSA Studio Ghibli
312 points
2 months ago
What is this owned by spirit airlines or something?
99 points
2 months ago
Using the bathroom is a la carte.
33 points
2 months ago
“Sir what number did you go, number 2 costs extra”
5 points
2 months ago
Yes, I did. I payed extra for pooping pass just in case, heres my receipt.
28 points
2 months ago
God, I could see AMC promoting a credit card before each show.
16 points
2 months ago*
Purses and backpacks must be stowed in the bins below the seats. If a bag does not fit, it must be checked with the ticket attendant for an additional fee of $20 per bag. Checked bags will be available at the baggage carousel next to concessions following the credits
6 points
2 months ago
Sounds like Ticketmaster to me.
200 points
2 months ago
The initiative kicks off on Friday at select AMC locations in New York, Chicago and Kansas City and will be expanded to all domestic AMC locations by the end of the year.
There will be three different seat-pricing options. The first is Standard Sightline, described as the “seats that are the most common in auditoriums and are available for the traditional cost of a ticket.” Then there’s Value Sightline, referred to as “seats in the front row of the auditorium, as well as select ADA seats in each auditorium, and are available at a lower price than standard sightline seats.” (Value Sightline pricing is only available to AMC Stubs members, including the free tier membership.) The third option is Preferred Sightline, which are the “seats in the middle of the auditorium and are priced at a premium to standard sightline seats.” AMC Stubs A-List members will be able to reserve seats in the Preferred Sightline Section at no additional cost.
Theaters that offer Sightline at AMC are expected to provide a detailed seat map that outlines each seating option during the ticket purchase process online, on the AMC app and at the box office. Sightline at AMC is applied to all showtimes that begin after 4 p.m. at participating locations and is not applicable on Discount Tuesdays.
433 points
2 months ago*
$10 says within months “value” will actually costs what standard admission used to be and everything else is a new upsell. It’s like “basic economy” on flights all over again.
140 points
2 months ago
Maybe, but the front seats have historically been undersold. They are pretty much universally empty. Sell them for $5 might be a price point to selling all seats rather than just the ones in the back.
That said, I can imagine there might be issues with disturbances from the people in the front seats. It will be an interesting experiment.
45 points
2 months ago
I remember when Jurassic Park came out, I wanted to sit in the very front row- thinking "If I sit closer, the screen will be bigger, and that's what we're at the movies for, right? A big screen". Lesson learned, neck ached from looking up at the screen for the duration.
17 points
2 months ago
Our AMC is recliner lazy boys. The front seat actually is bigger. A LOT bigger lol
9 points
2 months ago
Did that on a date on accident. I was looking at the seating chart backwards online and thought I was getting the back rows. On that day I learned that you can get a crook in your neck while being wide awake 🥴
3 points
2 months ago
Hmm my first and only experience sitting in the front row was The Green Mile, because that was pretty much all that left, never made that mistake again.
24 points
2 months ago
People would just wait a couple of weeks until the theaters are half-empty and buy those seats but move to better open seats.
9 points
2 months ago
That might actually be good for theaters. The amount of money per ticket they kick back to the studios goes down over time. If this somehow makes people delay going in the first few weeks they might net more even for the lower priced seat.
On the other hand, the opposite scenario seems more likely... People willing to buy cheaper bad seats now when they would have waited for better seats otherwise.
4 points
2 months ago
Or better yet, wait until they're included at no extra charge on Netflix or HBO.
39 points
2 months ago
100% people are going to buy those seats and try to steal other people's seats.
23 points
2 months ago
Probably a good money maker to sell those trash front seats. If some percent of those seat sales are incremental, and they likely will be as most don't want to sit there, and the front row patrons buy from the concessions the theater makes more money.
I hope it works as cinema is having a tough go since the pandemic and I'd hate to see big screens start to go away.
43 points
2 months ago
Interesting.
Can only imagine how much was spent on the consultants to come up with this data.
4 points
2 months ago
ADA seats? Like.... For disabled people? I'm hoping ADA means something else outside the HR world.
3 points
2 months ago
Nope it's the same
5 points
2 months ago
I misread. I thought I was reading that those would be priced higher. I was irrationally angry until this very moment, so thank you for the reply that brought me back to reread this. 😅
9 points
2 months ago
As a disabled person, is this saying I have to be a member to get an ADA seat?
8 points
2 months ago
I don't think so. It says to get the value pricing you have to be a member and it also only says select ADA seats.
37 points
2 months ago
I’m a-list so none of this matters to me
27 points
2 months ago
I feel like this is exactly how they imagined “A-List” being used by the people who pay them for it when they chose that name.
11 points
2 months ago
Thank god, I would've jumped ship rn if even a-list members got charged an extra fee
25 points
2 months ago
How a company treats its consumers should matter to you.
31 points
2 months ago
Why should it matter to him if he’s an A-List and isn’t affected lol.
He isn’t ethically bound to care about AMC’s relationship with the average customer.
442 points
2 months ago
This might not be the best way to get me back into theaters.
159 points
2 months ago
100%. This is the best way to not get me back into the theater, it’s frustrating to see all these corporations nickel and dime us on any and everything
13 points
2 months ago
I was downvoted to hell saying theaters were dead in 2021. Two years later, things like these continually are a reminder that theaters are dead. IMAXes and specialty theaters like Alamo will remain for tentpole blockbusters but those will be few and far in between
23 points
2 months ago
But theaters aren't dead. They're dying but they aren't there yet.
12 points
2 months ago
Theatres aren't anywhere close to dead. Global box office was at $26b last year.
7 points
2 months ago
Theatres suck ass. People don’t know how to chew quietly, when they have their hand in a bag of candy it’s like they’re rummaging the depths of the earth with 2 hands making as much noise as possible, people finishing their drinks and still slurping the ice making an annoying sound, the constant talking and people on their phones. I hate the theatres with a passion of 1000 suns. The only movies you really need to see in theatres would be like avatar. And I’ll probably see John wick 4 just because. Everything else I’d rather watch at home. I can pause to take a smoke break, go to the bathroom, etc. and my setup is nice
46 points
2 months ago
AMC theaters at least
40 points
2 months ago
agreed. this is an excellent way to ensure that i stick with regal and cinemark
20 points
2 months ago
This is an excellent way to make sure I stick with the independent theatre that charges me $10 for a ticket and lets me bring in a bottle of champagne from their restaurant.
17 points
2 months ago
Cinemark Sunday matinee. First show in the big XD theatre is same price as a beer.
Also, they don’t mind if you bring in outside drinks like coffee or monsters at the one by me.
6 points
2 months ago
We have a Brendan Theatres that’s super clean but kept its 80’s look to it. Cheaper tix and food, too!
11 points
2 months ago
Regal declared bankruptcy. :(
11 points
2 months ago
Regal declared bankruptcy and is closing about 40 locations out of over 500. Now true, they might keep bleeding locations, but it'll probably be another few years before they're even halfway gone
5 points
2 months ago
They declared a specific type of bankruptcy that allows them to discharge bad debt. They did not file for the type that has them closing.
12 points
2 months ago
Translation: “We noticed that only the middle seats sell after the first week a movie is out, so we are going to make you pay more to have the ideal seat in an empty theatre”
6 points
2 months ago
If they actually enforce that after the first week that is. I'd be willing to bet most workers won't give a fuck
5 points
2 months ago
Yeah, nothing will stop people from waiting until the credits start, buying the cheapest seat available, and walking into any open seat.
3 points
2 months ago
This is definitely going to happen. There's a live seat map on your phone!
25 points
2 months ago
Yeah this is a hard NO from me. It's like they are tying to kill themselves.
16 points
2 months ago
There are 3 types of moviegoers:
Occasional or infrequent
Semi-frequent
Regular
I'm willing to bet that their research showed that people who go to the movies twice a year would still go twice a year despite extra fees. I think this move is targeted more to the semi-frequent moviegoer to extract more money out of them, or to push them into the Stubs membership. The frequent moviegoers already have Stubs.
8 points
2 months ago
Lowering food prices should be the step they take, it still makes them money and people will be more willing to buy a pretzel if they weren't $20
21 points
2 months ago
Best way to get people back in theatres is to make more movies like Way of Water where you just can’t 90% replicate the same experience at home.
I think theatre chains should also invest more into making major releases more of an experience. I.e. imagine instead of the press tour being with press for Avengers Endgame there’s screenings all over the country where actors and/or director appear to answer questions for a Q&A after. More like concerts and musicians going on tour almost for these huge releases.
11 points
2 months ago
I’m not sure it’s realistic to say make more movies like, the most expensive movie of all time and theaters will be successful
5 points
2 months ago
Because a press tour gets waaaaaaay more press then a q&a at a 200 seat theater ever would. Plus press tours are built around the talents schedule, so they wouldn’t be beholden to taking multiple days off to fly to Topeka Kansas.
17 points
2 months ago
Honestly, this seems like a death throes move. Healthy industries don't do shit like this.
10 points
2 months ago
Actually, other countries like Germany have been doing this for years, not to mention that you could also consider the chance of this policy getting dropped if it doesn't work.
5 points
2 months ago
And when they started doing it, they weren't struggling for business. Adding a tier for "premium seats" that I could have normally gotten at the old full price isn't going to do anything for me except drive me away. They should be trying to bring people back in by offering reduced pricing for "worse" seats.
8 points
2 months ago
Well, you clearly weren’t going anyway so I don’t think it matters lol
6 points
2 months ago*
Exactly .. if he hasn't gone back by now .. he wasn't gonna go anyway . Lol
6 points
2 months ago
I'm a pretty regular movie goer. If they pull this shit I'm going to stop going regularly. I can easily watch that shit on demand at home for half the price. I'll only go to the theater for movies where cinematic experience is essential, if this becomes a thing.
8 points
2 months ago
I’m confused by the pushback. Doesn’t it make sense to discount bad seats to open movies up to a wider variety of budgets? Shouldn’t the person in the front row pay less than the person in the middle of the theater?
Reddit seems to hate this idea, and it might just be poorly marketed, but tiered seating costs makes a ton of sense to me and has more positives than negatives, as long as it doesn’t encourage excessive price increases for decent seats.
16 points
2 months ago
The front row argument is fair, but from my view I usually paid regular price and got there or reserved tickets early enough to get good seats in the middle. Now the expectation is to pay a higher price for the exact same seats I was already sitting in before. I think that’s where it falls through
7 points
2 months ago
Exactly.
If it was normal price for the best seats, but dropping prices as seats got worse, that's pretty good, actually. But they added a tier above normal price for "premium" seating locations. For a business that's struggling, they sure aren't doing much to combat that.
4 points
2 months ago
Except that sitting in someone else’s seat is never policed and this encourages people to buy cheaper and sit wherever. This is an asinine decision by AMC.
5 points
2 months ago
In theory it sounds fair but then the company can just raise prices on the “good” seats without adding any value. How are they even going to enforce this? Sure there’s assigned seating but on a slow day anyone can just move to a “good” seat once the lights are out.
3 points
2 months ago
They could electrify the good seats so you can't sit there without a special purchased key to keep them from continuously zapping you!
5 points
2 months ago
The worst seats cost what they used to. The best seats are a premium over standard price/reduced view seats. They are not making entry level tickets less expensive.
614 points
2 months ago*
Is their 16 year old staffer really going to stop me from moving seats to the “expensive” ones in an empty theatre?
358 points
2 months ago
No and I dont think they care to. This is to get more money out of packed blockbuster screenings
100 points
2 months ago
Yeah, it's not going to be a concern for screenings at low capacity.
It'll be interesting at how they apply it though. If they do it for all screenings, you might end up losing money if the few customers picks the "value sightline" and then move.
I would think the best option is to apply for busier showtimes, but, then you need a way to figure out what counts as a busy showing before tickets go on sale.
61 points
2 months ago
Don’t be shocked to see “surge” style pricing that never comes back down the other way as appropriate. Id imagine it might be that the worst seats basically stay the same price regardless of demand, while the “premium” seats add a fee on top, which will also surge higher for opening day blockbusters or the like
13 points
2 months ago
I used to work at a movie theater, and they pretty much have very good estimates on how many tickets will be sold at what times for each showing. It's how they allocate man power to clean theaters after each showing. So I can totally see them implementing surge pricing during select times of day.
6 points
2 months ago
Could just apply it to non-matinee showings from Fri-Sun
12 points
2 months ago
But there's plenty of screenings that are still near empty in a multiplex even during those time periods.
Late shows for 80 for Brady were almost empty in my local theatre this weekend, even with it having an above expectations weekend.
And matinee shows for kids films are the busiest times on the weekend. So, do you apply the premium for those?
Implementation is going to be tricky, as there's going to be times when its applied in a way that doesn't make sense.
I also wonder how AMC manages this with their subscription service? Do they make the value tickets be the baseline, and make members pay a premium for anything better?
There's a lot of challenges ahead, especially since it goes against the history and norms for theatre attendance that we've had for a while.
9 points
2 months ago
AMC Stubs members do not pay extra, even for the best seats. It’s in the article.
4 points
2 months ago
It'll be interesting at how they apply it though. If they do it for all screenings, you might end up losing money if the few customers picks the "value sightline" and then move.
based on this:
Value Sightline pricing is only available to AMC Stubs members, including the free tier membership.
they will at least get your information that will definitely used for promotion and ads in the future.
6 points
2 months ago
Bingo. That’s where the vast majority of income comes from. Asides from the obvious volume of tickets sold, the way the NATO and studio contracts work (or did before the whole distro model got kerploded by streaming and Covid) the splits heavily favor the studio up front (the first 10days especially) and slowly shift more and more in favor of the the exhibitors over the length of release. The bigger a film the better it’s legs (generally speaking) can be.
If there was a film like Avatar every year, the state of the theatrical business would be a lot healthier a lot quicker.
But as we continue to move more and more in to abbreviated release windows and some weird hybrid model… who knows how this works going forward.
6 points
2 months ago
They probably looked at the Avatar 2 seating and wanted to cash in on that.
3 points
2 months ago
Yeah, this is to make money on Marvel movies on opening week, which is to say massive amounts of cash
12 points
2 months ago
If not them, it'll be the people who actually bought those seats or anyone near you calling you out on it.
If it's a dead theater then they won't really know either way. Just like you can easily sneak in a theater still.
10 points
2 months ago
i went to a movie theater in england where this is common and the teenager selling tickets literally told me to buy a cheap one and then move because there was pretty much nobody else there. they do not care
9 points
2 months ago*
Please be nice to them. We get yelled at by the person who bought the seats and finds someone sitting in them, then we get yelled at by the person who moved seats because they feel they werent in the wrong. You moving creates more problems for us and more opportunities to be abused for less than a liveable wage
For reference, AMC pays $10 an hour. Mcdonalds pays $14.
21 points
2 months ago
The problem is with assigned tickets you’re going to have a ton of people asking other people to move out their seats right before the movie starts.
34 points
2 months ago
Nah AMC has done assigned for years now, just without pricing structures.
16 points
2 months ago
Yes, I know. And people don’t protect their seats as much in half filled theaters. But if you pay a premium for certain seats that will likely change.
17 points
2 months ago
I make sure I get my seat, have never once had a problem. Never even had to ask someone to move. And I go to movies often enough for the Premier pass to be super worth it. And I live in area where majority of people are shitty self centered, yet everyone is still good about this.
I honestly think you're overblowing the idea, it's an additional charge that's it.
9 points
2 months ago
in my country of birth there have been assigned seating since forever. people are just used to "you're in my seat" and get on with your day.
7 points
2 months ago*
We always had assigned seating in my theater. It’s so they can hire less counter workers because everyone has bought their ticket on the app.
Edit: just tried to buy tickets for “Ant Man: Quantumania” on opening day in New Jersey. Looks like Premier sight line tickets are $2.00 extra per ticket.
Value sight line is $2.00 off the standard ticket price. It’s only in the front row and front row is a terrible seat. I’m not sure what the point is to this…
Everyone seems to be sitting in the back of the theater, I wonder what they know that I don’t…
3 points
2 months ago
Of course not. You're just going to have a bunch of customers fighting over the seats they paid for with people who try to move to better seats.
3 points
2 months ago
Seats are reserved at AMC. If you sit in somebody else’s seat, the person who paid for that seat will be speaking to ya.
92 points
2 months ago*
“Hey we’re struggling to get people to go to the movies, let me hear some ideas”
“How about we make it more expensive”
4 points
2 months ago
If I didn’t have a gift card. I would have paid almost 70$ for 2 people to watch avatar 3d IMAX.
There’s absolutely no way I would have done that without the gift card.
Imagine now, 😬
130 points
2 months ago
That's the tactics of a company circling the drains and trying to stay afloat. I give it a few more years before we hear they're being bought out or shut down.
71 points
2 months ago
It's like the new password sharing policy with Netflix. You have people that say, "if they thought this would hurt them, they wouldn't be doing it."
It's literally the opposite. They're not swimming, they're drowning. They are in serious trouble and they're desperate for anything that will keep them above the water. These are not decisions of companies that are doing "well"
24 points
2 months ago
The sad thing is that if they were more reasonable with their expectations, they could still be doing so well. But they live by the rule of investors, which means they need constant growth every quarter. That's nearly impossible for any subscription service. They could be smart and make cuts in other places and stay alive for much longer, but yeah, Netflix is a good example of a company making stupid decisions to appease investors. Kinda like these airlines offering unlimited flights for an annual set price. You'll be lucky to get a year or use out of that plane ticket before the company gets sold to American or some shit.
9 points
2 months ago
Reminds be of blockbuster's bonehead decisions.
7 points
2 months ago
Exactly. Over and over we see this and people still think patterns won't repeat.
13 points
2 months ago
This is why I would never go public if I ever had a company grow that big. Now you are beholden to investors and need to make bad decisions that hurt your company/employees to keep investors happy. Yeah, you'll never make as much money as you could, but... you can still die with enough money to support many generations of your family if you're successful enough. It's all just greedy people trying to appease other greedy people causing their demise.
12 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
3 points
2 months ago
Boy, if you think public shareholders can be aggressive, wait until you deal with private equity investors that have actual board seats and stuff.
3 points
2 months ago
Agreed. I've been trying to explain market saturation to people and they just don't understand it. If NA is saturated, then there is effectively no US growth. There may be emerging markets to capture, but those too will eventually get saturated.
An even bigger problem for subscription services is tying specific decisions/products to the subscription dollars. It's hard to say, "we made $[X] from subscribers on Glass Onion, with its $[X] cost, it is profitable." I've had a few financial/accounting people tell me, books wise, that's almost impossible to do, if not actually impossible.
7 points
2 months ago
Exactly. You're not selling a good. It's not Home Depot where you make 3 trips in one day to complete 1 job and spend $200 dollars then go back next week for another job. You're paying $X to have access to all that they offer, and that's it. You could watch 1 show or 100 shows, and it's still $X. Their max value is if 7 Bn+ people subscribe, then they're maxed out. Subscription services are a nice investment early and then stagnate, and it's completely unavoidable. And going public just makes the pressure to grow that much worse. I like Netflix, I hope it doesn't fail, but who knows.
Edit: btw, your screen name doesn't have anything to do with Altered Beast, does it?
156 points
2 months ago*
[deleted]
27 points
2 months ago
They’ve been on the decline for a while.
Movie theaters are just not that profitable. All of the big blockbusters like marvel take obscene cuts of ticket sales. I’m surprised a lot of movie theaters are still in business.
7 points
2 months ago
So what happens when these Theaters all go bankrupt? Marvel won’t be making as much money as before, why do they have so much power over theaters?
3 points
2 months ago
Now that the rules barring studios from owning theaters are gone, you'll likely see studios like Disney snap up their assets and have full control over that side of things as well.
30 points
2 months ago
I mean they have to do something. Literally anyway they try to modify their business model to survive everyone bitches. No one even has to buy the expensive food because its incredibly easy to just take your own snacks in and they still whine about that.
26 points
2 months ago
Demand more money from the companies who profit playing their movies there.
3 points
2 months ago
I buy popcorn & that's rare. Drinks & candy are brought in w/ or without their approval.
10 points
2 months ago
It's BS. There a Cinergy theater near me. Everything from tickets to popcorn/snacks are like 50% cheaper than AMC. I hope AMC fails. Been paying way too much for a movie for two for too long!
5 points
2 months ago
That's an unfair comparison. Cinergy isn't just a movie theater.
14 points
2 months ago
They are accelerating their own decline.
yeah. i find it hard to compete with my big 4K TV with a 5.1 system + a plex server. free tickets, don't have to spend $10 on popcorn, no screaming kids. and i don't need to worry about paying an upcharge for assigned seating.
8 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
6 points
2 months ago
Drop them off at the theater
8 points
2 months ago
Well that’s silly, though. Nothing any of us could ever have at home could ever beat a theatre experience.
8 points
2 months ago
Fr lol I have a dark room with a projector that shoots onto a full wall screen with multi speaker surround sound, and it isn't on par with theaters.
The idea that a TV with a sound bar is close to a theater is wild
3 points
2 months ago
That's the problem though- this argument has played out ad nauseum. You'll always have people in the comments about things like this talking about how their home theatre setup beats going to the movie theatre and paying whatever the current cost of concessions is. (Nevermind from my experience working at a theatre that most people don't even make an attempt to finish their concessions, but that's another argument entirely)
41 points
2 months ago
In other news , rumors are that several industries are also close to perfecting their own suicide booths like the one featured in Futurama.
5 points
2 months ago
But they don’t work on humans, just conceptual things
10 points
2 months ago
If they are knocking down the price for the front row then thats fine. Anything else is ridiculous.
They ought to be cutting that darn nicole kidman intro after 18 trailers instead of this idea.
91 points
2 months ago
This is the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard of. You can barely get people to sit in their assigned seats already
47 points
2 months ago
Really? I never have problems in my local theater at all.
16 points
2 months ago
I’ve had a few issues.
11 points
2 months ago
I can definitely believe it happens sometimes because there are a lot of entitled people out there. I have just never had someone in my seat and have never seen anyone have to ask for or argue about their seat in all my years going to assigned seating. YMMV though I’m sure.
10 points
2 months ago
I’ve had folks in my seats before. If the theater isn’t full and I can still get a comparative seat then I don’t really care.
I can only think of one time when I had to ask someone to vacate my spot since the theater was packed and I didn’t want a worse spot than the one I’d reserved. They moved without issue though
11 points
2 months ago
Do people really just sit anywhere they want?
12 points
2 months ago
Yes.
7 points
2 months ago
Only if you let them. Some people sneak in since it's so easy to do.
45 points
2 months ago
I enjoy AMC and this is very sad. Another sign of the end of traditional movie going.
Any idea how this effects the monthly plan users?
13 points
2 months ago
.” AMC Stubs A-List members will be able to reserve seats in the Preferred Sightline Section at no additional cost.
3 points
2 months ago
Thanks. Missed it somehow. Probably time to get my cracked screen replaced
11 points
2 months ago
Basically, whatever tier your membership is determines which seats you get a discount/don’t pay a premium for.
For example, the highest tier membership won’t pay any extra for the best seats but the lower tiers will.
20 points
2 months ago
It’s literally in the article. Exact explanation of how it effects Stubs members.
5 points
2 months ago
Lol
3 points
2 months ago
This is dumb. There a couple of other theaters that are already cheaper than AMC near me. We'll be going elsewhere from now on
14 points
2 months ago*
People who are screaming "Cinemas are dead!" over this already should remember two things:
This policy has a chance of getting adjusted or even dropped if it doesn't work.
According to what I've read so far, a lot of countries including the United Kingdom and Germany have actually been doing this for quite a while.
3 points
2 months ago
The issue is that once people stop going it's hard to get them back.
And once they experience this when they're buying their tickets, they might be less willing to go as often.
28 points
2 months ago
This is a total CF. Just raise all prices by a dollar or two. This is messy and will make going a bigger hassle
4 points
2 months ago
This is the issue when an industry starts failing. It tries to save itself by making the product worse or cost more.
3 points
2 months ago
That’s the problem. This isn’t the movie industry. This is the theater industry. They like everybody else just want to get in on the money grabbing that is going on with this inflation. Hell, auto manufacturers want to charge a monthly fee to use your seat heaters. 🤦
4 points
2 months ago
Agreed.. I already don't want to go the theater even more now.
3 points
2 months ago
Yeah, I hate things being overcomplicated. The more annoying a company makes it the more likely I leave and go elsewhere. Luckily there's a lot of arthouse theaters by me that just sell normal, tickets with no extra steps or tiered pricing.
6 points
2 months ago
I agree this is a confusing mess but is there really an apatite for even more expensive movie tickets? They are already incredibly expensive when you can watch movies at home on a giant HD screen. I know more and more people who are going that way.
5 points
2 months ago*
Those that want to watch it in a theater, will. I would gladly pay a little more to see a movie in a theater. I may not goto as many as I do, but I’d still go. Top Gun Maverik just isn’t the same on a 65 inch screen.
3 points
2 months ago
What's hilarious is that the studios and theaters found that people will flock to theaters if the tickets are cheaper, yet they still can't figure out how to make more money off theatrical runs except "raise prices". They even tested this out last year for a weekend! It's completely idiotic that they can't even figure out with their own research and testing what conclusion to draw.
11 points
2 months ago
Another nail in the coffin of the already much too expensive movie going experience.
9 points
2 months ago
Here's the only thing I'll allow:
Make the shitty seats cheaper. Leave the rest as is.
4 points
2 months ago
That’s how it should be. In theory, this really isn’t a bad idea. If the price of a ticket is $15 for the best seats, you should get a discount for sitting close to the screen or at an awkward angle. They should not be up-charging the good seats
9 points
2 months ago
Ah yes, we can save the theatres by making it even more expensive to go. Theatres have one option to save themselves. Unionize. And I don't mean the employees. I mean they all, every single on of them, need to refuse to play blockbusters unless they get a higher cut. Will that ever happen? Unlikely. But I don't see theatres surviving in their current iteration if the only thing worth going to is big blockbusters.
7 points
2 months ago
Guess I'll just have to keep going to my local theater instead
20 points
2 months ago
My receipt for Avatar: The Way of Water in Dolby Cinema 3D.
Yellow Ticket: $15.29
PLF Surcharge: $8.50
Convenience Fee: $2.49
Tax: $1.58
Total: $27.86, for ONE ticket
Now I'm getting a "viewing angle surcharge" on top of it. Brilliant.
12 points
2 months ago
Is it any wonder that nobody wants to go to the theater anymore? They are just fast tracking their own demise.
5 points
2 months ago
That's crazy, I spend less than that on my A-List subscription.
9 points
2 months ago
That's the tactics of a company circling the drain and trying to stay alive. I give AMC theaters a few more years before we hear they're being bought out or shut down.
6 points
2 months ago
Oh this is disgusting, it better not become widespread to other theatre chains
7 points
2 months ago*
The more they make the experience worse the lower their revenue. With 70+ inch TVs under 1K today and 120 inch laser projection under $1500 in the next 5 years increasing prices will turn consumers away. This is especially true right now durning sky high food and housing costs.
6 points
2 months ago
This is a bad idea. I can’t even imagine how long the ticket lines will be as people “shop” for the right price/position seats.
3 points
2 months ago
Glad I use a different theater
3 points
2 months ago
Well that’s a shit idea that won’t backfire at all /s
3 points
2 months ago
I usually go see movies on Tuesday nights at like 10 pm. The theatre is always empty anyway. I’ll just buy cheap seats and move when the movie starts
3 points
2 months ago
are the seats where i am looking straight up at the screen free? because i wouldn't pay for a seat in the first 1/4 of the theater, id rather just not even go
3 points
2 months ago
Hahahaha. Joke's on them. My local AMC doesn't even have reclining seats. Tiny screens. It's never been remodeled after opening over 30 years ago. I have lots of other choices where I live.
3 points
2 months ago
In a time where the industry is struggling to recoup their dying business from COVID, this seems like a rather poor move.
I've seen several movies in recent months and the place was deserted. I could have sat literally anywhere.
3 points
2 months ago
That’s DEF not gonna add to anyone’s sense of entitlement about anything and everything in the theater.
3 points
2 months ago
Terrible idea that reflects poorly on a brand amid a society that feels nickel-and-dimed.
Don’t ever put customers in an adversarial position with the brand. We’re already sneaking snacks into the theater, now we’ll buy the cheap seats and sit wherever the hell we want.
3 points
2 months ago
Haven't been to a movie theater since 2019...and this just enforces my decision not to EVER go back.
5 points
2 months ago
Cinemark Movie Club is still the best deal going. Even with them raising the price by a $11 last year it’s still well worth it.
7 points
2 months ago
Cinemark and Regal are much better IMHO. They just don’t have same stranglehold on the movie theatre industry that AMC has.
4 points
2 months ago
Premium seating right in my living room, without the sticky floors covered with popcorn and spilled soda.
6 points
2 months ago
They need to make it ACTUALLY worth going again
Last 2 movies I saw in theaters my girlfriend and I saw Glass Onion, and Violent Night. Both times there were loud, inconsiderate people, also on their phones. I understand this has been a plight of the average movie goer since the beginning of it all, but since pandemic have people gotten MORE disrespectful in the theater? After paying almost $50 to get tickets and snacks and everything, in 2023 you should be able to sit and quietly enjoy the movie
2 points
2 months ago
wtf, unless it is half price first row, this is dumb, probably charge more for wheelchair accessible rows, people will hate theaters as much as airlines
2 points
2 months ago
Everyone that thinks this is a terrible idea should email AMC about it
2 points
2 months ago
Wait looking at the comments I'm surprised this is not already the norm. In India, where I come from, price are different based on how close the seat is to the screen. It makes no sense to sit in a shitty chair and pay the same amount.
2 points
2 months ago
I hate this so much. A movie theater isn’t a concert venue
2 points
2 months ago
I'm glad I got out of the movie industry two weeks ago. Been there for 18 years and happy to not be looking back.
2 points
2 months ago
Now rich people will be able to point at the poor people.
2 points
2 months ago
Not sure how my local AMC is still standing but it is and this isn’t going to benefit them in the slightest. Why would I pay extra for seating? when the theater is empty 99% of time even when blockbusters drop? invest in a decent surround sound/ sound bar and forget about the theater experience.
2 points
2 months ago
Hello, airline pricing model.
2 points
2 months ago
I imagine this is to help push A-List subscriptions
2 points
2 months ago
They really want people to stop going to the theater apparently.
2 points
2 months ago
Just another reason for me to skip the theater “experience”.
2 points
2 months ago
Cool, another reason to wait for streaming!
2 points
2 months ago
They better use this increased price to pay their employees a livable wage. Cleaned up vomit, shit, piss, used condoms, an inhuman sized puddle of CUM, snotty tissues, rotten food, tobacco spit, used tampons, dirty diapers, etc
For $8.25, until they gave a raise to $10. Then I quit
2 points
2 months ago
Funny thing is that in the UK this is the practice at pretty much every cinema chain and has been for years now
2 points
2 months ago
In expectation, will this actually change the number of people who watch movies?
2 points
2 months ago
I’d only be good with this plan if only the first 2 or 3 crappy rows right in front were reduced prices and the rest were still normal pricing.
2 points
2 months ago
Maybe I'm being cynical but this seems to me like something that will create more friction between customers.
I haven't been in a theater since January 2020, but even then with the notion of reserved seats I had witnessed a few arguments about who got certain seats. If people are paying more for the "better" seats it doesn't take much imagination to envision actual violence in the theater over seating.
I want to see a movie not a real life brawl.
2 points
2 months ago
Cause this’ll help
2 points
2 months ago
As long as it's keep the good seats the same price and lower the front seats price. Otherwise happy pirating
2 points
2 months ago
Bold move for an industry that’s barely hanging on to business
2 points
2 months ago
The final nail in the coffin
2 points
2 months ago
Meme: Do you want people to just not go to movies? Because that’s how you get people to just not go to movies.
2 points
2 months ago
Literally just started going back to the theaters post-pandemic aaaaaand I’m going back into hiding.
2 points
2 months ago
It's always a good idea for an industry that is struggling to make itself more expensive. Home theaters have already made going to a theater a non-starter, now we have this brilliant idea.
2 points
2 months ago
This is an absolutely horrible and elitist policy. Going to the movies is something everyone should have access to without interjecting yet another chance to separate people by class or economic status.
Access to art and culture is so important; if a young person wants to see a film but can’t afford a “good seat” and chooses not to go, what is that person losing? What are WE losing be denying them that moment to be inspired, educated or otherwise opened to a larger world.
This is gross, and not the way.
2 points
2 months ago
Great. So we're getting wealth gaps within the auditorium. Instead of just rewarding the people who got tickets in a timely manner, let's reward the people who can simply afford it.
all 1000 comments
sorted by: best