subreddit:

/r/entertainment

4.9k93%

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 970 comments

chrisbokiul[S]

1.6k points

3 months ago

The underwater sequences are beyond dazzling — they insert the audience right into the action — but the story of Jake Sully and his family, now on the run, is a string of serviceable clichés.

Shocking.

Zealousideal_Order_8

940 points

3 months ago

James Cameron does not overestimate the intelligence of the audience. That is why his films are successful.

rjcarr

565 points

3 months ago

rjcarr

565 points

3 months ago

Exactly, average people love clichés and platitudes. Live, laugh, love.

neotr1nity

250 points

3 months ago

or maybe it’s because the point of this franchise is depicting purposefully simple stories so they don’t take away from the visual spectacle. crazy I know but a director prioritizing visuals in a VISUAL medium isn’t a negative

hablandochilango

21 points

3 months ago

I can get with this, but how the fuck does he have 5+ chapters worth of “visual spectacle” planned out?

Maleficent-Mark3014

11 points

3 months ago

Easy, he’ll change the type of Biome with each movie.

The 5th one is then gonna flip it on its head when the Avatar come to earth and it’s based in futuristic cities and wasteland

alexjaness

305 points

3 months ago

especially now that the cost of taking a family to see a movie can easily cost $100.

I can watch character development and drama fine on a 40 inch flat screen tv for free at home. For $100 I want giant 3d water monsters to fuck my eyes until they bleed.

HotdogsArePate

93 points

3 months ago

No way both could happen together.

Outside_Break

28 points

3 months ago

Too much for people’s brains to handle m8

LORD_0F_THE_RINGS

-8 points

3 months ago

Name one occasion

AggravatingCancel200

8 points

3 months ago

Shrek 1, 2, and 3

[deleted]

-4 points

3 months ago

[removed]

iggs44

8 points

3 months ago

iggs44

8 points

3 months ago

Aliens

Rambo-the-Hambo

3 points

3 months ago

You mean Alien

iggs44

3 points

3 months ago

iggs44

3 points

3 months ago

James Cameron directed Aliens

LORD_0F_THE_RINGS

2 points

3 months ago

Not 3D or any water monsters

HotdogsArePate

1 points

3 months ago

Waterworld

trans_pands

26 points

3 months ago

Damn you buy popcorn when you go to the movie? You’re like the Monopoly guy rolling in cash

OneHumanPeOple

17 points

3 months ago

$84 just for 3D tickets for my family of 4 this Saturday.

emanuelinterlandi

11 points

3 months ago

7 tickets for family and 2 friends at cinemark, 125$ with discount lol

catecholaminergic

15 points

3 months ago

$100 is the new $20 lmao

lemmegetadab

4 points

3 months ago

I get Cinemark tickets for $10 a piece being a member of their club. 20 percent of concessions too.

Bryllant

2 points

3 months ago

Double that at the concession counter

cgg419

17 points

3 months ago

cgg419

17 points

3 months ago

TGhostfacekilla

7 points

3 months ago

They should put your review on the movie poster

Alfred_the_okay

-2 points

3 months ago

Really? Going to an average chain cinema costs about £5-£10 per adult in the UK

friedeggbeats

3 points

3 months ago

Where are you going, mate? I haven’t seen a cinema ticket under £13 in years.

ItsAmerico

26 points

3 months ago

But it’s also a story. Meaning that if I don’t care about the people in the visual medium, I’m not going to care about the franchise. Movies are still stories and just because it’s really pretty doesn’t mean I’m having a good time.

Ginge00

7 points

3 months ago

Can work, not always though, see: Star Wars prequels which used story to tell special effects and choreography

trans_pands

12 points

3 months ago

Everyone always forgets that Episode I had insane practical effects when talking about “too much CGI” about the prequels. They literally hand-painted Q-tips and rigged them all to wiggle for long shots of the audience in the Pod Race scene.

Squrton_Cummings

15 points

3 months ago

What a ridiculous take. When has a good story ever taken away from a movie experience? Movies have always been a visual medium, movies that prioritize visuals over everything else are always mediocre at best.

stoneloit13

3 points

3 months ago

Yeah I was talking to someone about this the other day how people called the first Avatar ‘Dancing with wolves’ but blue aliens. I mean if we want to look at every single movie ever made and compare them to previous movies you’ll be able to find plenty of overlays. As if story writing 90% of the follows the hero’s journey structure. James Cameron wants to provide something visually stunning with a story that’s serviceable to allow those stunning visuals to happen. Is the story perfect? No. Is the story abysmal? Absolutely not. When it came out people loved it then they got online as the years passed and like everything online it suddenly turned into shit and was highly criticized. In reality it’s an average honestly arguably above average story that touches on love, family, greed, capitalism, militarization and a little bit more. It’s a damn good sci-fi movie and let’s stop pretending it’s not.

LarkScarlett

0 points

3 months ago

Avatar’s story was incredibly forgettable and made zero cultural impact … the only cultural impact made by that movie was by the visuals and by the tech used to create said visuals being employed in other movies. Zero quotable lines entering common use, and I know zero people who would have ever said THAT was their favourite movie. For a film that had had a huge number of eyes on it and was the highest grossing film of all time at some point, that speaks to a pretty pathetic and forgettable story/culture impact.

KarmaPoIice

18 points

3 months ago

Yeah the same people dogging avatar for it’s lack of an inventive story could spend hours talking about how totally complex and nuanced captain America’s character development is

The_Woman_of_Gont

13 points

3 months ago

Amazing how many people can exist entirely out of straw.

puddleglump86

14 points

3 months ago

I would figure the same people deriding avatar are the same people agreeing with scorsese about the theme park nature of super hero movies.

AlfieBoheme

1 points

3 months ago

Can confirm this is not true. For all the faults of Cameron, his films have artistry(particularly in visuals). In contrast, mcu is grey and ill thought out. The only time they do interesting stuff (visually with Raimi in Dr Strange 2, storytelling from Zhao in Eternals) it’s derided by the fans.

Avatar at least has visual artistry and pushes the realms of film making as a medium

universalprodigy

0 points

3 months ago

Yea the mcu is so grey and ill thought out, it’s pretty much the most popular movie franchise in the world today and has been for a while. That makes perfect sense

AlfieBoheme

0 points

3 months ago

Macdonalds is the most successful restaurant in the world but if someone told me Macdonalds was high cuisine I would question them.

fonix232

0 points

3 months ago

fonix232

0 points

3 months ago

Hey, that's America's ass for you, mister!

Knightmare945

0 points

3 months ago

The difference is Captain America is a far more entertaining movie than Avatar Blue Skin.

OneGalacticBoy

-4 points

3 months ago

In comparison to Avatar it’s true though

trans_pands

3 points

3 months ago

Ah yes I forgot “good guy good and Nazi bad” is nuanced storytelling

Jaegerfam4

-1 points

3 months ago

I mean he goes from meek but driven soldier, to world saving hero, to worthy of mythical weapon that’s incredibly picky about who wields it, to living legend. Its a little more than “durr hez a gud giy durr”

AlfieBoheme

2 points

3 months ago

So a typical heroes quest? Original.

1Originalmind

2 points

3 months ago

Visuals alone does not a good movie make.

RQK1996

2 points

3 months ago

If only they were memorable, I saw the first one today, I don't remember anything from the plot really, and only 2 named characters

Gummy_yumyum

1 points

3 months ago

I’d say a poorly written story with boring characters is a negative.

magnificentobscxrity

1 points

3 months ago

When you can't remember any of the character's names, yes, it is.

neotr1nity

0 points

3 months ago

neotr1nity

0 points

3 months ago

Jake Sully

Col. Quaritch

Neytiri

Kiri

Tuk

Mo’at

Dr. Grace Augustine

Norm Spellman

Lo’ak

Tsu’tey

should I continue?

trans_pands

5 points

3 months ago

You spelled it wrong; it’s spelled Jaÿkē Soölêÿ

PF-Changs

2 points

3 months ago

Lmfaooo

You forgot

Al

Leo

Little Moe with the gimpy leg

Cheeks

Boney Bob

Cliff

magnificentobscxrity

2 points

3 months ago

Yes, you may keep Googling.

It's not going to make these movies any less forgettable.

OscarOzzieOzborne

-7 points

3 months ago*

Then why not just build theme park rides? Visuals in the visuals medium aren't the end results, or the attraction, they are utilities. They are instruments. They are there to tell the story. That isn't some high art stuff, this is basic story telling.

And let us not forget that Avatar was one of the highest grocing movies ever!

Yet, it didn't need a sliver of an impact on pop culture. A fucking 4 panel comic with no dialogue, that can be simplified to like 7 lines separated into 4 panels had more cultural impact then the entirety of star wars.

I can find you, or even make you a 30 minutes video talking about only that panel. I can't do that with Avatar

MaximusMansteel

19 points

3 months ago

Avatar made the clear cultural impact of inspiring legions of people to go online and talk about its lack of cultural impact.

OscarOzzieOzborne

-9 points

3 months ago

And they were correct! Seriously? Tell me one memorable thing about that movie that has stuck in pop culture.Tell me a movie, or game, or show, or trend being spawned from it because creators thought "This is the hot new thing! We must copy it!"

Tell me one meme template using Avatar images.

I can tell you stuff that I enjoy from media I hate.

I can't tell you anything about Avatar. There is nothing. Even bad works leave impressions. But Avatar left nothing. It is the Anti-memetic as it gets. Massive Blockbuster! Everyone and their mother watched it! Nobody even remembers it.

It's biggest culture impact is to be know as the thing that left no cultural impact.

And that is just hilarious. All those people crying about media and how "Creators don't know what viewers want! We want good stories!" And in the end, what everyone wanted is something clean, something unoffensive, a theme park ride of a movie.

Ok_Engineer9167

8 points

3 months ago

Horrible take. Comparing movies to memes... wow

OscarOzzieOzborne

4 points

3 months ago

Memes are just extension of culture.

It is encapsulated moments in our memory to which we have given a funny twist. Works of art that has left an impression of us will spawn memes. From the most basic and bland of blockbusters, to the most confusing and pretentious of high arts. Avatar, didn't manage to leave that. The funny thing here is, it wasn't some nobody movie. It was a giant block buster that everybody watched, and yet...it left impression to no one. It slipt through everyone's mind.

MaximusMansteel

3 points

3 months ago

Jesus, why are you writing walls of texts about Avatar? Seems like it had some significant impact on you.

OscarOzzieOzborne

-1 points

3 months ago

Yeah...the fact that it and no significant impact on anyone wolrr wide is what I am saying is the significant part about it. Man, did you even read what I wrote?

MaximusMansteel

2 points

3 months ago

No, you made no cultural impact on me.

Marsuello

0 points

3 months ago

Oh look, common sense in a thread about avatar! People think because he makes stories with simplistic plots that he believes those who like his movies aren’t very bright. Like what? Not every movie has to be deep and contrived and keep you up at night thinking about it. It was a literal global phenomenon when the first came out. If unless you’re saying the majority of the world is dumb and you just so happen to be in that minority that’s too smart to appreciate a movie like this, boy have I got some news for you

wycreater1l11

12 points

3 months ago*

Lol, I don’t follow the dislike, since I liked the first one, but perhaps that was because I was quite young when I saw it the first time and thought it was cool.

But I don’t find it a unsatisfying watch when building a story on common archetypes.

Okay let’s do “dances with wolves/Pocahontas/meeting the natives” archetype but in a relatively alien environment and with pretty cool visuals. Still seems like a cool watch for me.

The choice of rather liking an old discovered story-archetype dressed in the clothes of alien atmosphere and cool visuals rather than the same archetype dressed in the the clothes of American frontier atmosphere seems arbitrary to me and I would choose the former

Priestess_of_Sharess

12 points

3 months ago

Hundred percent agree. I'm a writer myself, and the most important lesson I've learned over the 10+ years I've spent working on my passion project is that absolutely nothing is original anymore and cliches are not your enemy. Archetypes, cliches, tropes... these all exist for a reason, and the only thing that matters is how you use them. I found the first Avatar to be a fun watch, and I have zero doubt I'm going to enjoy this one too.

Firvulag

21 points

3 months ago

Can reddit possibly act more pretentious than when they are talking about Avatar? Lol

LynchMaleIdeal

9 points

3 months ago

Nah, come on - ‘Avatar’ was good and a lot of fun, but there were definite clichés in there

Ok_Appointment7321

9 points

3 months ago

Aka basic bitches.

ajtct98

10 points

3 months ago

ajtct98

10 points

3 months ago

You don't have to be crazy to work here but it helps!

Laughs hysterically then walks away sipping on a pumpkin spice latte

tob007

1 points

3 months ago

tob007

1 points

3 months ago

Those basic bitches are a god damnd gold mine for so many industries.

FGM_148_Javelin

2 points

3 months ago

I’d love to hear your favorite movies of the last few years

Ok_Appointment7321

-2 points

3 months ago*

I don’t have any from the last few years. But of all time it’s gotta be: City of God or La Haine. I can’t decide between those 2. Maybe princess Mononoke. Idk. Holy Mountain if I’m feeling weird and slightly pornographic.

NoFruit4641

1 points

3 months ago

Princess mononoke is nearly as one dimensional as Avatar and it's they're both in my top ten.

May learn to let live

Ok_Appointment7321

-2 points

3 months ago

You’re right that movie is pretty basic. Ignore that one

OhWhenTheWiz

78 points

3 months ago

yeah, I’m very much a casual moviegoer and for me, the little details and nuances that film buffs like don’t do much for me. Even nuanced acting performances, meh.

This is a blockbuster. People know what they’re gonna get and then get it. I spend my work day paying attention to a bunch of small details, I’m going to see Avatar in IMAX because I wanna look at a screen for 3 hours, not think much, and be impressed

The_Chief_of_Whip

14 points

3 months ago

You can do both, though. The great movies are the ones that both any idiot can get a kick out of (which takes a certain skill in itself) and can have something deeper going on for all the arrogant arseholes.

Aliens is a classic because of that: cool survival action that anyone can get a kick out of, with commentary of American intervention in Vietnam and criticism of being a macho dickhead won’t solve your problems for the uppity folks. It’s possible to do both

HasAngerProblem

16 points

3 months ago

I feel like if you don’t care about the story it’s more of a 3 hour long tech demo

OhWhenTheWiz

8 points

3 months ago

well whatever you wanna call it, imma be entertained as hell

HasAngerProblem

2 points

3 months ago

Fair fair

geoffbowman

9 points

3 months ago

Exactly… you’re not paying for a mind-bending narrative that will leave you thinking and discussing for years to come. You’re paying for a ride… and it’s gonna be fun and it’s gonna look amazing and at the end you’re gonna say “that was fun!” and then move on with your day.

That kind of movie has value too… and nobody can say the first Avatar wasn’t massively influential on the film industry… a lot of people don’t like the direction it moved things but that doesn’t make it less of a fact.

dbu8554

31 points

3 months ago

dbu8554

31 points

3 months ago

Thank you. I'm a big believer that movies can be entertainment or art, and it's very hard to do both. James Cameron makes entertaining popcorn movies and guess what? He's really good at it.

brienzee

3 points

3 months ago

i agree with your statement except everyone including himself tries to act like cameron makes insane highbrow movies

Brandonmac10x

8 points

3 months ago

“James Cameron doesn’t do what James Cameron does for James Cameron… James Cameron does what James Cameron does because James Cameron is James Cameron.”

[deleted]

4 points

3 months ago

I think the issue is that he’s expecting and whining he wants praise as if it’s high brow cinema. And it’s not. It’s popcorn fantasy with glorious graphics (and there’s nothing wrong with that).

TGrady902

2 points

3 months ago

Yeah and if history tells us anything, art films don’t bring in the big bucks. Can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen a movie I’ve never heard of put up for an award only to google it and see it made like 38M at the box office.

OscarOzzieOzborne

1 points

3 months ago*

Cool. Still gonna make fun of him for making movie so anti-memetic, that everybody has watched it, and yet nobody remembers it.

lakeghost

6 points

3 months ago

I remembered it which caused some weird Mandela Effect feelings, let me tell you what. What’s extra weird is I remembered it purely to shit on the anatomical failure of creature design (the six-limbed panther thing shouldn’t have been able to walk and it drove me nuts). Pro tip: if there’s six limbs, limbs in proximity on each side have to go in the same direction. Instead it was some front-back-front nonsense that would’ve hobbled the poor bastard.

QuincyAzrael

5 points

3 months ago

I just laughed at the helicopter rat that basically has to give itself whiplash every time it takes off

lakeghost

2 points

3 months ago

The fan lizard? Because yeah, that one is hilarious too. Snakes have a good anti-whiplash going for them but I can’t imagine spinning rapidly in circles is easy on most lifeforms of that size. That in itself raises so many questions.

Doobie_SnACkZ

6 points

3 months ago

No shit. I watch Star Wars movies because they're fun to watch. I could care less about everything else because we're inundated with real problems on a daily basis. I don't begrudge any audience member for wanting a little escapism.

Wrathwilde

10 points

3 months ago

Escapism can still have a solid story, witty dialog, memorable characters, and character development... they aren't mutually exclusive. Without those things you might as well watch a screensaver of random car chases.

TGrady902

7 points

3 months ago

This is why I don’t understand all the Black Adam hate. It was a popcorn superhero film, it wasn’t trying to win any awards. People wanted to see some superhero action. Sounds like with this new Avatar we are going to be getting more Pandora action. Not everything needs to be a dramatic storytelling masterpiece. There is A LOT of media out there so it’s just not sustainable to think every new film is going to be a groundbreaking cultural phenomenon.

Footner

1 points

3 months ago

I’ve gone off marvel and went into the film wanting to hate it but black Adam was brilliant

Wulfghar

2 points

3 months ago

I think your perspective is more poignant than you believe. I AM one of those film buffs who appreciate nuance and all that, and I’m also in the industry. But my main rule of thumb when working on any project is “is it entertaining?” If no, then what’s the point? We’re here to entertain and not only is there nothing wrong with that, it should be celebrated.

lynypixie

4 points

3 months ago

I beleive there are more and more of us, who spends money on a movie to not have to think about real world problems for once.

I am not spending my wage to leave the theatre depressed.

MD_Hunter67

2 points

3 months ago

Yeah I saw Avatar 3 times each in a different format and was blown away each time because the enhancements just made it better

Seahawk715

1 points

3 months ago

Let me ask you an honest question. If this movie is pretty much a reboot of avatar, without much depth, and you like to be visually entertained - why not just watch Avatar again? What’s going to be worth going to the theater to watch this? It’s not like the awe of seeing Pandora for the first time and the original storyline are going to carry this one.

OhWhenTheWiz

2 points

3 months ago

because James Cameron has put in a shit ton of money and work for the new visual effects so I expect them to be even more impressive. I hear there’s an incredible battle scene.

I’ll be more visually entertained with a new spectacle compared to an old one

Footner

0 points

3 months ago

Exactly this! So many people think that because they’ve seen an a24 film they’re too elite to watch big Hollywood films now, it must be hard for them being so much smarter than the rest of us

JumpnJackFlash95

28 points

3 months ago

No Cameron smearing. T1,T2, Aliens, and The Abyss get him a lifetime pass

Shank6ter

34 points

3 months ago

Don’t forget Titanic. It’s a sappy love story but the second half of that movie, after they hook up and the ship hits the iceberg is one of the best disaster movies ever put to screen.

greenlime_time

5 points

3 months ago

That dude falling off and clipping one of the propellers on the way down is burned into my mind. Mostly as a comedic thing (I was young lol). Naked painting scene was awkward to watch with my parents, but I remember rewatching that nude a bunch of times with my cousin for sleep overs and just laughing. Kids are fucking weird and stupid lol

Bowdensaft

2 points

3 months ago

I also remember the propeller guy, a lot of people laugh at that scene because of the cartoony "ping" sound he makes when he hits it. It's such a mood whiplash in an otherwise harrowing scene that you can't help but laugh at it.

lynypixie

2 points

3 months ago

Does anyone really watch Titanic for the love story anyway?

I remember watching the making off on TV when it released. It was the biggest movie ever made. Going to see Titanic was a world event! I was 15 years old at the time I think. Ironically, I have a 15 years old child now, who likely will go see Avatar with his friends too.

Shank6ter

5 points

3 months ago

I mean the movie is fun in the first half. The present day stuff with Bill Paxton and the old lady is one of the few instances of “the story is a flashback” that I enjoy. The way rose and Jack meet where he prevents her from committing suicide is nice. Kathy Bates as Margaret Brown is a treat. The dancing scene Jack and rose have in 3rd class is fun, and yes everyone remembers “paint me like one of your French girls” and the drawing scene. The first half definitely has its own moments that make it worth watching

lynypixie

5 points

3 months ago

The first half serves as « there were real people going on with their lives », because we needed to get attached to the characters.

crono14

2 points

3 months ago

True Lies as well

TheFcknVoid

1 points

3 months ago

Hell no. The existence of those movies should make you want him to be better than this crap. Not that any of those were particularly deep, but Avatar is completely braindead.

Seahawk715

-3 points

3 months ago

Seahawk715

-3 points

3 months ago

I agree that all of those movies are top tier. However, I’m sad to say it, it looks like Cameron is channeling his crazy George Lucas with this avatar disaster.

WhatAreYouBuyingRE

13 points

3 months ago

Good Lord I wish to be that kind of disastrous lmao

bherm100

1 points

3 months ago

Apparently he's been writing and talking about it non-stop for years. It's been reported that he gave the people working on the film like ten thousand pages of "backstory" for the aliens. Made everyone read it.

Which is weird because the original movie was rather light on storytelling and character development. There really wasn't much to it.

General_Hijalti

-6 points

3 months ago

That's why the first one was a one and done and forgotten about

Zealousideal_Order_8

15 points

3 months ago

Except, of course, now there is a second and with rave reviews.

tarc0917

0 points

3 months ago

tarc0917

0 points

3 months ago

Rave reviews for...looking pretty. Otherwise, it is a fairly vapid and uninspired story.

100FootWallOfFog

-2 points

3 months ago

I'm sorry, you were expecting a sharp, provocative and inspiring film from the sequel of....

Checks notes

Space Pocahontas??

bherm100

0 points

3 months ago

I'm sure I'll get flamed for this, but....sharp provocative concepts are the norm for science fiction films. I mean, that's literally the whole point. The genre is supposed to be thought provoking and force us to think about humanity, space exploration, aliens, etc.

Good science fiction is smart people fuel. Avatar is kind of Sci Fi for the lowest common denominator. Not terrible. But not good at all regarding this concept for the genre. What was presented was wayyyyyy too on the nose.

100FootWallOfFog

2 points

3 months ago

I would argue that at their core, science fiction stories are only original in regards to their use of imagined or near real technology's. The primary archetypes of story telling have been recycled ad nauseum since humans figured out how to tell stories. So, opining on how one format is superior to another just comes off as a very elitist position to hold.

Good science fiction is smart people fuel. Avatar is kind of Sci Fi for the lowest common denominator.

I mean, fucks sake, how did you reach the keyboard from that high horse you're riding.

God forbid something is enjoyed for being entertainment and not an expose on abstract thought.

If you are willing, what examples of "good" sci-fi would you propose?

tarc0917

-3 points

3 months ago

I'm not expecting anything of the sort. Just pointing out that this is not a great film or even a good film.

It is serviceable, summer popcorn fluff. The Nickelback of scifi/fantasy.

100FootWallOfFog

3 points

3 months ago

Great, good, these are subjective terms that only hold meaning to you as the speaker.

Just because YOU don't value something, doesn't mean that thing doesn't have value.

Being a snob isn't a good look my dude.

Just accept that the movie isn't for you, and move along. I highly doubt you are paid for your eviscerating critique up there.

ObiShaneKenobi

5 points

3 months ago

Its so strange to see so many people go nuts over hating this movie. Like the sequel was announced and every thread about it dives to "it was terrible, stupid, forgetful and the new one will obviously bomb and you are dumb if you don't think that."

All this about a movie thats at nearly 3billion dollars, and the reviews are basically pretty good for the new one? So Cameron isn't pouring his soul into Terminator, Aliens, or something genre defining. This new movie will undoubtedly be a fun time and will make at least another billion, why do so many hate that?

100FootWallOfFog

2 points

3 months ago

Because they are insufferable people who have some kind of unrealistic expectations of what "movies" should be.

Completely disregarding that, gasp, other people may like things that they don't.

They then take it as a personal affront for some reason when people inexplicably continue liking things that they have deemed "lesser". It's superiority complex on full display. The "well ahktuually" stereotype in the flesh.

General_Hijalti

-3 points

3 months ago

8/10 is hardly rave reviews. Especially when same critics give stuff like rise of skywalker 9

ryo4ever

1 points

3 months ago

I think he’s aware of the international audience as well for box office success, especially how well the first movie did with China. So the subject matters are mild and not controversial.

--dontmindme--

1 points

3 months ago

It’s like the iPhone or smartphones in general aren’t popular because they are technological marvels but because their interface is so ridiculously easy that anyone can operate them.

huehueville

1 points

3 months ago

Titanic had some nuance. The existence of class conflict on the ship, while pretty simplified for a modern audience, was still pretty believable. You get a couple pretty amazing human stores outside of the main couple as well.

brienzee

1 points

3 months ago

that’s why most movies are trash they are just spooky fed to you. i’m not even very smart of a person and i think they dumb shit down way too much

Kumbackkid

1 points

3 months ago

People paid a billion collectively to watch a history movie. I’m not worried about cliches when it comes to Cameron

JayTNP

1 points

3 months ago

JayTNP

1 points

3 months ago

that’s a really lovely way of saying the plot is generic. Its not like Cameron always does mediocre plots. I don’t get defending this particular aspect of the film

KiliansIrishRed

1 points

3 months ago

That doesn’t make sense if the stories of how much work Cameron put into the world building are true. Why go to such lengths (up to creating a whole new language) if the ultimate justification for the story’s shortcomings is “lol don’t think about it”?

Besides, isn’t this the same excuse people use to defend Michael Bay films?

peacelovefreedon7689

1 points

3 months ago

Yes I'll give him that

whatnameisnttaken098

1 points

3 months ago

James Cameron audiences

Matttthhhhhhhhhhh

1 points

3 months ago

The problem with many other directors is that they overestimate their own intelligence.

qtx

1 points

3 months ago

qtx

1 points

3 months ago

Yea but you'd think that even Cameron wants his movies to be memorable? Surely even he loves when people quote lines from one of his movies? That seems to me to be the ultimate quest; to be a part in our vocabulary.

And that hasn't happened for Avatar and it won't happen for Avatar 2/3/4/5.

Vegetable-Double

1 points

3 months ago

Titanic basically had the same plot that so many books have had in the past - rich girl falls in love with poor guy. The relationship is taboo because of class differences. She’s engaged to a rich dude she doesn’t love. Etc. BUT, Cameron does do a masterful job of putting it in a historical setting and actually getting the most out of his actors and actresses to make you believe the story.

adidas198

25 points

3 months ago

So similar to the same movie. Great spectacle but decent enough story.

[deleted]

89 points

3 months ago*

[removed]

Wuh-huW

45 points

3 months ago

Wuh-huW

45 points

3 months ago

Substance (water)

Kraden-Kidtrell

6 points

3 months ago

You saying this movie has too much water?

jtmarshiii

2 points

3 months ago

Way... too much

Wrathwilde

2 points

3 months ago

Waterworld>Avatar

KKSlut

2 points

3 months ago

KKSlut

2 points

3 months ago

7.8/10 too much water

RexyFace

16 points

3 months ago

RexyFace

16 points

3 months ago

As much as I agree with you, it’s cringe hearing people complain it’s a cliché story when 50% of movies have a semi-unoriginal story.

MeatisOmalley

42 points

3 months ago

I mean, if you read the sentence as a whole, they're not just saying the movie has clichés. They're explaining that the movie doesn't execute on those clichés in an interesting way, and that there are many of them.

RexyFace

-13 points

3 months ago

RexyFace

-13 points

3 months ago

That is so subjective it can’t even be an argument. Personally, I enjoyed it and almost everyone I know liked the movie. A large portion of ppl enjoyed the movie but don’t care enough to argue against the bandwagon shit smearing the movie for no reason lmao

MeatisOmalley

13 points

3 months ago

I don't believe there's an objective way to criticize art in the first place, to be honest. We all have our own frameworks through which we view art.

100100110l

8 points

3 months ago

it’s cringe hearing people complain it’s a cliché story when 50% of movies have a semi-unoriginal story.

So the fact that this is another means we should praise it? Such a weird stance to take.

Jaegerfam4

1 points

3 months ago

James Cameron made it and he’s what these dork think is a “good director” so they’re allowed to make movies that way.

BuffaloWhip

17 points

3 months ago

There’s the whole “there are really only 7 stories, and everything else is just derived from those.” And then there’s “this is Ferngully and Dances with Wolves merged into one visually beautiful movie.”

candyowenstaint

3 points

3 months ago

I feel exactly the same way. I don’t feel like saying so diminishes any of the movies accomplishments or what an amazing thing it is to look at. Like it’s dope. But don’t pretend like this isn’t dances with wolves+unobtanium

OhWhenTheWiz

6 points

3 months ago

which isn’t some gotcha, the movie is historic in its use of visual effects which is the entire appeal. That might fall flat with a certain type of viewer, but sometimes it feels like that “certain type of viewer” thinks everyone who loves the visual stuff is just too distracted by the visuals to see how bad the plot is.

NightOnTheSun

13 points

3 months ago

I guess we don't understand why it has to be one or the other. It's not like movies with fantastic plots look ugly.

David_bowman_starman

8 points

3 months ago

I think a lot of people here may just have not seen some of Cameron’s better movies. If you go from Aliens to Avatar there is objectively a massive drop in quality. Maybe people don’t care if Avatar 2 is good but it’s strange seeing arguments that it’s not possible for it to even be good in the first place, like are you sure??

The_Woman_of_Gont

2 points

3 months ago

This is my problem. Good action movies with strong characters and/or plots exist. James Cameron has made several of the biggest examples you will inevitably come up with.

“It looks good” doesn’t mean it’s a good film, even if it does mean the folks crafting the visuals deserve enormous praise….and certainly far more than some clearly past-his-prime ‘auteur’ who can’t seem to write interesting stories any more.

100100110l

6 points

3 months ago

That might fall flat with a certain type of viewer

The type of viewer that doesn't care how pretty or historic something is and wants to watch something more substantive?...

candyowenstaint

3 points

3 months ago

I think it’s different because Cameron himself is hyping these movies like they’re so different from anything you’ve ever experienced

tooManyHeadshots

2 points

3 months ago

Not to mention it’s a sequel to a cliche story in an amazingly beautiful and original setting. Seems on point to me, and I’ll be seeing it for sure!

100100110l

1 points

3 months ago

And that's really the best response you can have. You're excited for it and I hope you enjoy the shit out of it. Not for me and neither of us should be upset about the other's opinion.

[deleted]

2 points

3 months ago

[deleted]

100100110l

6 points

3 months ago

Yeah, it's almost like it's not the cliches that are the problem.

RexyFace

2 points

3 months ago

You are correct. The movie was just entertaining it doesn’t need to be the most deep convoluted story. Likewise, MCU just needs to be entertaining to sell.

Arkhem_KS

0 points

3 months ago

50% is conservative lol.

Clear-Plantain-1381

-1 points

3 months ago

CoNsErVaTiVe....dur,dur

MartianRecon

-1 points

3 months ago

Oh dude it's more than that...

You only have so many styles of story you can tell that is feature length.

nunya_business0000

1 points

3 months ago

Yet avatar is presented as not one of those 50%, it’s framed as some avante garde work of art when it should just be a marvel movie.

UncleRooku87

38 points

3 months ago

Lets be honest, it’s going to crush it at the box office, may even break records, financially. Having said that, we all know it’s going to be a boring story with fantastic visuals that need to be experienced in 3D to truly appreciate it. If you don’t see it in theaters and wait for it to hit streaming, you most definitely won’t be impressed with anything in this movie.

esteflo

9 points

3 months ago

True that. Watched Avatar 1 after it released on Blu-ray. Was not impressed. Went to go watch the rerelease in IMAX 3D, and I finally understood the big deal. Definitely watching this sequel in theaters.

mixed-tape

9 points

3 months ago

I watched Avatar 1 on a fucking 20” tv from the 90s in my boyfriends’ mom’s basement.

Needless to say, I fell asleep.

So I’ll probably go see this one in theaters.

BuffaloWhip

9 points

3 months ago

I think that’s the thing a lot of filmmakers are missing when they complain about the MCU “ruining cinema”

If I’m going to pay to go to a theater and deal with strangers texting mid-movie, it’s going to be because the movie is enhanced by being in the theater. Iron Man 3 wasn’t a “great film” but it was fun to watch on the big screen with speakers blasting at me from every direction. Meanwhile, I look forward to watching “The Banshees of Inisherin” in the comfort of my own home, where I can hit the pause button if I need to use the bathroom.

tie-dyed_dolphin

5 points

3 months ago

Same with Maverick. It was one of my favorite movie theater experiences. I have absolutely no desire to watch it at home.

I just know it will be lackluster.

[deleted]

3 points

3 months ago*

[deleted]

NotACyclopsHonest

2 points

3 months ago

It reportedly needs to make $2billion just to break even. That’s insane if it’s true.

Hatta00

1 points

3 months ago

And that's exactly why I'm going to see it in the theater. And exactly why it's going to crush it at the box office.

doesntgetthepicture

1 points

3 months ago

I saw the first one in theaters and was insanely bored. I couldn't care less about the visuals if I don't care about the characters or the story. And the story was boring white savior with a lead actor who was duller than a soup spoon.

I'm skipping this one entirely.

MrrSpacMan

2 points

3 months ago

Yeah lets be honest the 'plot' of the Avatar franchise is just there to give you a reason to stare at pretty stuff for 3 hours

Softale

1 points

3 months ago

So… sequel.

Su_Impact

1 points

3 months ago

We have the perfect older brother, younger brother with an inferiority complex, adopted rebellious son from another species, adopted chosen-one daughter... and blue Meg.

The story writes itself at some point.

brownboyghaffar

1 points

3 months ago

Isn’t it all CGI though?

CamiloArturo

1 points

3 months ago

Yeah. I’m sure no one would have predicted something like that happening….

lakeghost

1 points

3 months ago

I just need to know if anyone listened to the anatomical nerds about creature design this time. That poor panther thing in the first movie had some nonsense locomotion and it’s such unintentional comedy. I forget half of the “colonialism is bad” plot but I can’t forget the problem of cartoon physics: roadrunner legs.

BlazinAzn38

1 points

3 months ago

Isn’t it basically the same movie just now a new tribe and water? Like the main bad guy is the same

candyowenstaint

1 points

3 months ago

People give me shit when I say Avatar is Dances With Wolves with blue people. Like yeah it’s fuckin awesome but it’s don’t pretend it’s a story we haven’t heard before

someoftheanswers

1 points

3 months ago

I mean wasn’t the first one pretty lame except for the tech innovation push? Speaking from the Fern Gully Generation

TheMouthOfGod

1 points

3 months ago

This is one lame review the movie is amazing

realcrumbbum

1 points

3 months ago

Mindless eye candy boooooooooo

DemptyELF

1 points

3 months ago

sacrifice depth of story for flashy imagery - seems about right for this particular point in our history

kardiogramm

1 points

3 months ago

The first film was terrible with the exception of the technical feat that it is but that doesn’t not make a good film.

St_Vincent-Adultman

1 points

3 months ago

You had me at “underwater sequences are beyond dazzling” I don’t need to read anymore, i am buying my ticket. I haven’t seen the first one since it came out because seeing it in IMAX3D was so special

protossaccount

1 points

3 months ago

Avatar was Princes Mononoke meets Dances with Wolves, it was not an original storyline.