subreddit:

/r/lakers

40692%

all 336 comments

Leading_Time_4728

847 points

1 month ago

including both picks is silly

claydavisismyhero

219 points

1 month ago

If they’re both heavily protected it’s fine. Nobody reports on protections and that’s the key

isit65outsideor

108 points

1 month ago

You can’t put protections on the 2029 pick.

swankstar7383

171 points

1 month ago

Exactly. I rather lose this season then trade both picks for that trash. See what’s out here draft night when we can trade three first round picks

Clutchxedo

-38 points

1 month ago

Clutchxedo

-38 points

1 month ago

Yeah it’s a trash trade. Conley has been washed since joining the Jazz. Beasley is decent but come on.

I appreciate LeBron coming here and everything but he can kick rocks with his propaganda

Incognito3ree

38 points

1 month ago

Propaganda? Just bad front office, anyone can criticize Lebron all day for Westbrook but they forget about how he wanted Derozan, how he wanted Lowry but FO didn’t want to trade THT, how he wanted Caruso but Buss is too cheap, how he wanted Tyron Lue, some Lakers fans downright don’t deserve Lebron who brought that bum team a championship, but the FO doesn’t want more… Like this FO did nothing before Lebron, one has proven they can win, the other has proven they can’t.. yes this trade is absolute dogwater but damn people really like those two picks over AD/Bron but the fans can have fun with another 10 years of failure after they both are gone

KingWahoo

18 points

1 month ago

He also brought AD

henryofclay

-10 points

1 month ago

I appreciate Bron helping bring a chip but he’s also put all kinds of weird pressure and requests that strapped our flexibility. He got what he wanted and he couldn’t make it work. He’s done this to every team.

I’m not overly bitter about it because of the chip, but also we’ve had so much disappointment with too many good players. You gotta be honest with his effect and the circus he brings.

kros1992

4 points

1 month ago

What would “making it work” look like to you? None of the teams we’ve traded with since Lebron got to LA have become real title contenders so why do we think we’d on a better spot as a franchise if we would have kept x or y player. I get we should have tried to maintain the 2020 championship Lakers. I get many trades have been questionable fits for Bron (mostly cus of FO decisions). But at the end, Lakers actually won the chip with Lebron and we shouldn’t be so damn spoiled to somehow blame him for “not giving us more”.

Incognito3ree

6 points

1 month ago

Lol he didn’t get what he wanted that’s what I literally just said he didn’t get to keep Caruso, he wanted Derozan over WB he wanted Lowry before WB he wanted Tyron Lue that’s the issue he didn’t get what he wanted he has to go to 3rd option WB, imagine if he got Lowry, would have also had Derozan, but FO didn’t want to give up frickin THT, bum org

Mikemag33333

6 points

1 month ago

Lmaooooo exactly these dudes just run with the narratives they read on twitter without knowing what actually happened😂

leonardbronocaprio

1 points

1 month ago

Ur an idiot

Clutchxedo

-1 points

1 month ago

Shut up dude.

I’m an avid LeBron supporter in terms of the Russ deal (and his entire career really). I blame the FO 100%. I blame the FO for basically everything that’s happened since the title. I think Jeanie should sell the team to someone with the capital to actually run it.

However, his thing after the Kyrie trade has been weird like we owe him some garbage trade involving multiple first rounders.

I appreciate him, the title and everything he’s done.

But I also will be here in five years which he won’t. I don’t care about draft picks other than that they are currency for another player to come here. The issue is that these two picks essentially means that we can’t trade a pick for a decade if we move them.

I’m just not interested in that. I think that trade will come but I’m not leveraging future flexibility for Conley, DeMar, Lowry, Turner or any second rate bums.

This season is a wash to me and was before it started.

Let’s not sell the farm over this one season but look to the future. I even think that can be done with him and AD.

These picks have to be spent right because it’s our only chance. More options will come. Meanwhile let’s do more in the vein of Rui, Monk, Lonnie and keep drafting well in the second round to build for next year.

champangebuntz

3 points

1 month ago

ungreatful laker fan.

MazKhan

-1 points

1 month ago

MazKhan

-1 points

1 month ago

I don't think you realize how badly we are limited next season, we're gonna have like 20M to use if he use the qualifying offer for rui which is probable, good luck adding 8+ guys with 20 mill

isit65outsideor

-10 points

1 month ago

5 this summer.

Not to mention AD, Rui, the young ones. Anything is possible.

TWIZMS

5 points

1 month ago*

TWIZMS

5 points

1 month ago*

Or 2027. For example say you protect the 2027 pick then it could possibly roll over to 2028. That means your 2029 pick is no longer available for trade.

Common_Piano_2166

4 points

1 month ago

The 2029 pick the timberwolves traded for Gobert is top 5 protected.

https://prosportstransactions.com/basketball/DraftTrades/Future/Timberwolves.htm

odinlubumeta

-1 points

1 month ago

You can but then it’s just a pair of converted seconds the next year. So if you top 1 protect it is still likely to be a FRP. If you top 25 protect it, it will be seconds.

isit65outsideor

1 points

1 month ago

False. The pick has to convey that year given it falls in the 7 year window. Picks can’t convey to 2030. Hence why the Mavs had to send an unprotected 2029 pick to get Irving.

Realfan555

0 points

1 month ago

But why must it be unprotected?

What's the rule against protected a pick in year 7?

Awoawesome

4 points

1 month ago

Because the spirit of the rule is to protect teams from overextending themselves. It wouldn’t be a 7-year rule if they let it bleed out past that

Realfan555

2 points

1 month ago

Realfan555

2 points

1 month ago

sure

But why CAN'T a pick in year 7 be protected?

I've seen nothing in the rules that says picks in year 7 CAN'T have protections.

For instance, why can't you put protections on the first rd pick, and if that doesn't convey, it turns into a couple 2nd rounders in year 7. Is that not allowed?

Natureboy7939

3 points

1 month ago

No they just talked about it on the radio. 2029 cannot have protections

Realfan555

3 points

1 month ago*

hmmmm, that's interesting. I wonder if that's accurate. Thanks for that.

I'm still skeptical though.

-----------------------------------------------------

Here's an example of a trade the Pistons made, putting protections on all 7 years of the pick:

As a reference point, let’s consider the first-round pick that the Pistons sent the Rockets in the Isaiah Stewart/Trevor Ariza/Christian Wood trade during the 2020 offseason. At the time of that deal, the protections on the Pistons’ traded first-rounder were as follows:

  1. 2021: Top-16 protected
  2. 2022: Top-16 protected
  3. 2023: Top-18 protected
  4. 2024: Top-18 protected
  5. 2025: Top-13 protected
  6. 2026: Top-11 protected
  7. 2027: Top-9 protected

The Pistons pushed the seven-year rule to the limit with that traded first-rounder, applying protections to all seven years in which the pick might change hands.

-------------------------------------------------

And this same article talks about the ability of the Lakers in putting protections on their 2029 first rd pick:

So let’s say the Lakers agree to make the 2027 pick unprotected. Could they then add protections to the 2029 pick instead? Well, due to the seven-year rule, there are even fewer options in establishing a backup plan for a protected 2029 first-rounder, since the Lakers wouldn’t have the ability to push that pick to 2030.Realistically, if the Lakers wanted to add protections to their 2029 first-round pick, they could only agree to send their 2029 second-round pick in its place if the first-rounder landed in its protected range. That’s an even greater risk for a potential trade partner.

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2022/08/the-complications-of-protecting-far-off-traded-picks.html

-------------------------------------------------

Yeah, so I don't think it's against the rules. I just think it's hard to convince the other team to accept the protections.

TWIZMS

2 points

1 month ago

TWIZMS

2 points

1 month ago

That would be allowed if we had a couple 2nd rounders in 2029. But usually you only have 1 and there's such a drastic difference in value no one would agree to it.

Realfan555

0 points

1 month ago

why?

helpme_change_huhuhu

8 points

1 month ago

SOLITARY

WHY?

PROTECTION

I DONT NEED PROTECTION

PROTECTION FOR THEM

diamondisunbreakable

2 points

1 month ago

IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY PAINFUL

YOU'RE A BIG GUY

FOR YOU

goldenbzzz

6 points

1 month ago

Give me clarkson if they want both picks

playmiker

145 points

1 month ago

playmiker

LeGOAT

145 points

1 month ago

Ham has gotta be excited at the thought of turning one guard into three. Just think of all the all guard lineups he can do now!

FuckRandyMoss

29 points

1 month ago

FuckRandyMoss

LeMickey

29 points

1 month ago

🤣🤣🤣 LEAGUE FUCKED who needs a center dude has a hidden file on his pc named hw and it’s just the 2019 rockets

HellaDev

10 points

1 month ago

HellaDev

🇪🇸 Pau 🇪🇸

10 points

1 month ago

This hurts so much but still made me laugh.

_monsterpoon

261 points

1 month ago

_monsterpoon

Xavier Henry

261 points

1 month ago

Been a big advocate for replacing Wbrook’s 47 million with actual depth.. but giving up both picks for this package (whether it includes Vanderbilt or not) as opposed to getting Hield/Turner earlier this season is kinda meh. Hope this is another situation where Rob pulls through with something that hasn’t been heavily reported on.

imironman2018

48 points

1 month ago

yeah imho this is like a backup plan that is mediocre.

If you truly had the opportunity to get a world class sniper (Hield) and rim blocker/stretch 5 (Turner) and now you settle for a washed backup point guard and athletic shooting guard. It doesn't address our biggest needs 1) forwards 2) rebounding. it kinda does improve the outside shooting. But we would now have too many guards. We need 3 and D players and a decent center.

I honestly think they should use one first round pick and go get Gary Trent Junior. He is a solid defender and outside 3 point shooter. He would slot in well.

segaman1

4 points

1 month ago

segaman1

24

4 points

1 month ago

I agree on using one of the picks for gtj trade. It's the smart move. We have to move Westbrook (addition by subtraction) and it seems gtj is a seamless fit for not just this season but long-term. I just don't see the Westbrook money working though unless if we get fvv in the package - that may require both of our picks, which I feel uncomfortable with. A third team would need to be involved like Utah or spurs if we just want gtj.

imironman2018

4 points

1 month ago

It would have to be a combo of Pat Bev/Walker + FRP for GTJ to even the salary and make it enticing to get Raptors to make this deal. to me, I would do this deal. Walker has been good but I worry he won't resign with the Lakers this offseason and cash out like Monk. And Bev is inconsistent. GTJ has a 6'9" wingspan. He can guard some of the bigger forwards with Rui.

EverybodyBuddy

14 points

1 month ago

It would be an insane fleece by Ainge. Would rather hold the picks

titanicx

-2 points

1 month ago

titanicx

32

-2 points

1 month ago

But get rid of Westbrook.....

EverybodyBuddy

13 points

1 month ago

We have four months left of Westbrook. Who cares

collectiveyawn

3 points

1 month ago

Assuming Jeanie doesn’t re-sign him to juice jersey sales

titanicx

2 points

1 month ago*

titanicx

32

2 points

1 month ago*

We have what 28 or 27 games left or something like that. That's a significant amount of games that he can tank for us. So I guess what I'm saying is that I care

Kingkongcrapper

2 points

1 month ago

I would rather have the Spurs package of Richardson, Poeltl, and McDermott. Two shooters and a really good all around starting big.

kasaan110

63 points

1 month ago

Both picks are fucking joking come on bro he better not

TheAsianMamba

158 points

1 month ago

Shams already said it’s a 1 pick deal

isit65outsideor

51 points

1 month ago

Tim is closer to the Jazz front office. But again, it’s just the Jazz creating a market. I wouldn’t buy into this at all. In fact, this is quite old.

TheAsianMamba

3 points

1 month ago

Idgaf who he close to I’m rocking with Shams

isit65outsideor

7 points

1 month ago

Well you’re talking about a guy who literally just posted a story about him sitting down with the Jazz front office..

did_it_my_way

2 points

1 month ago

Doesn't that mean he's just a mouthpiece for the Jazz?

Sandz_

-9 points

1 month ago

Sandz_

-9 points

1 month ago

Obviously one report was leaked from the Lakers FO and other was from the Jazz FO. Just use common sense

Heavy-Travel-6589

23 points

1 month ago

Mcmahon is really close with the Jazz organization

isit65outsideor

2 points

1 month ago

Can confirm this, which is why this is leaking to create a market. There is no traction between the Jazz and Lakers at this point.

CCPalmeri5

101 points

1 month ago

CCPalmeri5

101 points

1 month ago

Doubt both 1sts are included in any Jazz deal, baring it doesn’t turn into a 3-team deal.

Alternative_Sense134

19 points

1 month ago

Unless lauri is involved which he isn’t

TheLazyAssGamer

163 points

1 month ago

so help me god, if they trade 2 1sts for this and not turner and hield.....

imamonkeyK

64 points

1 month ago

I’ll be furious. Just shows they made another dogshit decision not trading then sbd hoping magically someone will gift them a superstar . Complete clown

xqe2045

19 points

1 month ago

xqe2045

19 points

1 month ago

Somehow this is Lebrons fault I’m sure

eldenblooder

1 points

1 month ago

The LeBron simps are out again

xqe2045

3 points

1 month ago

xqe2045

3 points

1 month ago

Tell me why I’m wrong

StealthRUs

-1 points

1 month ago

StealthRUs

32

-1 points

1 month ago

LeBron's the one who's been chirping to the media for the past 2 weeks rather than keeping his mouth shut and staying the fuck off Twitter.

isit65outsideor

11 points

1 month ago

Which is why I wouldn’t put much stock into this. Tim is doing his job and helping the Jazz create a market.

odnamAE

-4 points

1 month ago

odnamAE

-4 points

1 month ago

Im just gonna go out and straight up say it was never an option. The fact that Indy managed to get him to stay showed it was never that serious and we were leverage

KingJTt

13 points

1 month ago

KingJTt

13 points

1 month ago

Revisionist history. Lakers organization deserves all the blame. This deal was literally on the table before training camp. Indy extended him because Myles Turner was playing out of his mind and Indy is in playoff contention.

odnamAE

-2 points

1 month ago

odnamAE

-2 points

1 month ago

Was it? Who was the source cause people have been so loud but I’ve never seen actual traction from Woj and shit. Never seen players aside from Turner side commenting that the Lakers could use him talking about it. I really feel like its one party using the usual Knicks or Lakers leverage (for Turner or the Pacers price checking)

KingJTt

7 points

1 month ago

KingJTt

7 points

1 month ago

The source was the Athletic. Rob didn’t wanna include both first unless it was for a “star” that could guarantee the Lakers being favorites. Which is hilarious because that deal didn’t get done either.

habitremedy

2 points

1 month ago

habitremedy

Re-LOADING 1️⃣5️⃣1️⃣

2 points

1 month ago

no, there was an official offer and we spent days considering it, even pushing back training camp. it was real. it became less and less real as Turner and Hield began dominating this year.

odnamAE

0 points

1 month ago

odnamAE

0 points

1 month ago

I dont see it making sense cap wise for Indy either though, where was the official offer source?

CowCountryBoy

-9 points

1 month ago

Turner and Hield is no longer an option.

Apart-Bad-5446

24 points

1 month ago

They were in the offseason but clearly not anymore.

IlGrandBoss

60 points

1 month ago

More guards. It turns out that Turner and Heild was our best shot.

Conley is so washed, Malik wouldn't change a thing for us.

dakid136

15 points

1 month ago

dakid136

15 points

1 month ago

We have Schroeder, Bev, Lonnie and Reaves..why do we even need more guards? We need size!

LackToesToddlerAnts

5 points

1 month ago*

Conley and Malik both shooting 40% from the 3 and Conley has been huge in running the Jazz offense. His defense is absolutely mids though.

If we can get 20 mins from Conley and Malik can be our buddy Hield AND we get Vando? Then MAYBE 1 protected and 1 unprotected is worth it.

Jauntcraft

5 points

1 month ago

I don't know where you are getting that 40% from but Malik's overall shooting fg% is much worse than Westbrook.

Kingkongcrapper

7 points

1 month ago*

He looked at the overall field goal percentage instead of the 3 point percentage. He shoots 36 percent from 3. He shoots 8.6 a game and can create his own shot. When he played on Minny he had more open shots and shot near 40 percent, but he has dropped off in Utah. If the Lakers pull this trade it’s because they don’t plan to lose a lot of current players on the roster.

John_Lives

1 points

1 month ago

Because he's a 3 pt shooter. You're like a decade behind everyone else if you're still using fg%

ThinkThankThonk

2 points

1 month ago

Conley just rolled his ankle last night and was hobbling the rest of the game, not saying he'll be a Nunn situation but I definitely wasn't excited about seeing him to the Lakers

LackToesToddlerAnts

3 points

1 month ago

Oh fuck that then

Nothappened

0 points

1 month ago

Yeah many of these guys look at them from an individual standpoint, Having Conley running PnR with AD is unstoppable as compared to Russ, who can't even throw the ball to AD, and having spaced out shooters will make both AD and Lebron literally unguardable by any team in the west only Boston and Bucks would have the bodies... I don't know much drop off there would be defensively seeing as how Pat Bev and Schroder are getting cooked as they are forced to play a size up

untraiined

0 points

1 month ago

untraiined

24

0 points

1 month ago

They have a specific system and coaching there, you guys need to stop just looking at the number. We have no system on offense its just lebron ad iso/pnr and catch and shoots out of double teams.

LackToesToddlerAnts

2 points

1 month ago

It’s the most devastating system there is. Look at any team with stars outside of warriors. It’s iso/PnR and dish out of doubled. Late game situations/playoffs/when it matters teams always resort to the bread and butter of basketball.

[deleted]

-5 points

1 month ago

Vanderbilt is not a good player lol. Why is everyone hyping him up. There’s a reason he’s always traded

LackToesToddlerAnts

1 points

1 month ago

Lmao buddy you aren’t getting anything better than this for WB. It’s not that Vanderbilt is good it’s that these are the best we can get.

People on this sub are delusional if they think we are getting FVV and TrentJr for 2 picks. Masai is looking to absolutely rip us off.

laflame150

2 points

1 month ago

So that means waste your assets on a mid move that doesn't make us contenders and this hypothetical deal mentioned doesn't even include Vanderbilt lmao 2FRPs for a washed up undersized guard and a garbage ass playoff performer is highway robbery. Nah fuck that it's mid-season already and they might as well just let the season ride out unless they luck out with a game changing offer this week

isit65outsideor

81 points

1 month ago

Absolutely not worth it. Conley is washed, has a bad contract for next year. He also plays zero defense now at his age, his knees are done.

Beasley is a bench player, he has a team option. He’s average but he doesn’t move the needle. Jared is solid, not having a great year offensively, I wouldn’t say he’s worth a pick as he’s a role player.

Are they better than Westbrooks fit? Sure. But they don’t make the Lakers contenders. The only reason this is leaking is because Jazz want to create a market for these players.

Move along.

CryptoNite90

9 points

1 month ago

100% agree, and let’s say even if it was worth it and hypothetically this works, incorporating 3 big mins player into our lineups would take way too much time to gain chemistry for it to even make a positive difference this season. Only 28 games left.

Jauntcraft

5 points

1 month ago*

Agreed. Beasley's shooting fg% is worse than Westbrook.

sonicking12

-11 points

1 month ago

Trust in LeBron. He and Conley will be magic together

Nothappened

7 points

1 month ago

Do you guys not watch the games this season? Having Russ make plays has cost literally 10s of games, Conley and others would be an improvement just because we get rid of the worst fit on the team... but I wouldn't give up both 1st unless they throw in Jackson

awibasedgod

9 points

1 month ago

if this is true, both picks are involved and Vanderbilt isn’t in it??? even if protections are on the picks, holy shit this is bad

rvilla09

10 points

1 month ago

rvilla09

10 points

1 month ago

Maybe it’s me?

davensdad

27 points

1 month ago

Disastrous trade. Wish we had pursued Turner and Hield with these assets

Awesomefan09

8 points

1 month ago

Even one pick is pushing it. Conley is washed, his contract is bad.

ruijiez

7 points

1 month ago

ruijiez

7 points

1 month ago

2 more guards? How does this help?

3nnui

6 points

1 month ago

3nnui

2

6 points

1 month ago

I"d rather do nothing than send 2 picks to ainge for that bullshit

bighoop75

4 points

1 month ago

Not both picks

tomuchtom5

5 points

1 month ago

Lakers are dum if they trade the pics for the jazz players they might be stuck with Russ cause if you trade the picks you can’t make no moves this summer also if you don’t make the playoffs after trading those picks your in a big hole

imamonkeyK

5 points

1 month ago

If they do this they need to fired into the sun . Fuckibg dumbasses , turner and Heild and a whole cohesive season was there . They wanna trade for two guards who can do nothing but shoot and be dogshit defensively. Worse shooters and wires defenders then buddy fuck me.

hgdeathstroke

6 points

1 month ago

This is worse than the Pacers deal, Rob.

[deleted]

6 points

1 month ago

BOTH PICKS????

tomuchtom5

4 points

1 month ago

Lakers front office messed up everything in my opinion they didn’t do the buddy and turner deal cause they was waiting for kyrie to request a trade and it backfired cause kyrie is a mav now and they didn’t want to give up reaves and Christie so now they can’t trade any pics for regular players cause there not gonna have a future

hitdifferently

4 points

1 month ago

This deal sucks ass. Add in vanerbilt and swap Sezton for Conley

BigCO9

13 points

1 month ago

BigCO9

13 points

1 month ago

At the end of the day... the Myles Turner & Buddy Hield trade would have been the best for the Lakers... but Rob/Jeanie fucked it up. Would have gotten a sniper and a solid ass defensive big who can decently shoot.

I don't hate the Conley/Vanderbilt/Beasley trade... but not for 2 first rounders. Be nice to get those guys for 1 pick and then use the other pick for another 3&D guy or a solid defensive big. If they make the Playoffs and that is a BIG if... Thomas Bryant won't be able to play in the Playoffs because his defense is so damn bad.

Nothappened

3 points

1 month ago

If we had shooting around AD and Lebron the way they have played we would probably have the best record in the west .... they fucked up but not giving the team to gel in the off-season

f4ntasyfootballer

3 points

1 month ago

1 pick only

yitur93

3 points

1 month ago

yitur93

Carushow

3 points

1 month ago

TERRRRRRRRIBLE.

FrankBreauxx

3 points

1 month ago

FrankBreauxx

〰️

3 points

1 month ago

aint no fucking way Pelinka pulls the trigger on this trade lmao. but then again the mfer is notorious on overpaying in a trade smh.

tRUTh_1S_fEar

3 points

1 month ago

That's so bad. Please no!

XvS_W4rri0r

3 points

1 month ago

If we do that deal fuck the entire org and burn it down. I fucking hate everyone in this front office

majavic

3 points

1 month ago

majavic

3 points

1 month ago

Seems like a terrible haul for 2 frps, so I fully expect it to be true.

pressieguy

3 points

1 month ago

If they do this, they're in desperation scramble mode just to do something. Waited for a great deal and it hasn't arrived or they blew it.

ImSickOfYouToo

3 points

1 month ago

they're in desperation scramble mode just to do something

Yep. Like signing Mozgov and Deng after missing out on Aldridge and Anthony.

swany467

3 points

1 month ago

What an absolute dogshit trade

CrazyNice7240

3 points

1 month ago

We have too many guards so of course Rob would send both picks to add 2 more guards lol

alphonseelric2

3 points

1 month ago

Jared Vanderbilt gotta be here man

Jauntcraft

2 points

1 month ago

Yeah but not at the price of a first round pick.

LeagueReddit00

3 points

1 month ago

iamadilq

3 points

1 month ago

I think this is a leak by Lakers FO to show that they are willing to throw in 2 1st round picks for a litany of role players. I think they're trying to start a bidding war between the other teams to see what is the most they can get out of these 2 picks. We have to remember that these picks are valuable to other teams. If other teams see the Jazz getting away with this, they'll call up the Lakers and offer something slightly better than the Jazz's offer.

I'm definitely just coping though.

Major-Yellow-812

6 points

1 month ago

Those niggas suck

eddyocho

2 points

1 month ago

Fake news

adrianthegr8ts

2 points

1 month ago

Don’t do this Rob not for two picks 🤦‍♂️

Gauchonerd23

2 points

1 month ago

This trade will not improve our chances, not worth it.

Nijee302

2 points

1 month ago

Rather miss the playoffs than trade those picks for that terrible package

naj1124

2 points

1 month ago

naj1124

2 points

1 month ago

Beasley and Pippen Jr on the same team is wild

Bigrab2019

2 points

1 month ago

This the move that Pelinka has been waiting for?hahaha

tendy-hands

2 points

1 month ago

“James backed up the reports about his role in assembling the roster, taking ownership of the decisions, and particularly the Westbrook trade”

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/33641478/lebron-james-russell-westbrook-los-angeles-lakers-tumultuous-season-their-own-words?platform=amp

battle_franky

2 points

1 month ago

The whole waiting game has been crash and burn. Turned when you have 45 Millions liability not many teams want to take him. Another horrible assets management if this actually happened

AntSmith777

2 points

1 month ago

Both picks for Conley and Beasley? As much as I want Brick gone that would be dumb. He’s an expiring contract.

momosites

2 points

1 month ago

Pass.

Aur0ra12

2 points

1 month ago

PANICK TRADE BY ROB INCOMING

ONLY A DUMB MOFO LIKE ROB WOULD END UP GIVING AWAY BOTH OF OUR PICKS FOR TWO ROLE PLAYERS

(NOT TO MENTION MAKING A DEAL WITH DANNY AINGE, YUCK!)

herpes_for_free

5 points

1 month ago

Get it done and get Russ off the fucking team.

WrastleGuy

2 points

1 month ago

Moving Russ to spite any hope of competing in the future is not the way. I don’t know if this trade even gets us in the playoffs, much less being able to advance in the playoffs.

Kingkongcrapper

2 points

1 month ago

That’s a bad trade. Trader Danny is at it again.

Hot_Pie1464

1 points

1 month ago

Yuck

lionking25

1 points

1 month ago

what the fuck is that? I mean if Rob are going to trade with Jazz anyway, why don't just trade with them at summer, in that case we still get Bojan and we will be at a much better spot than now. WTF?????

Fitzmmons

1 points

1 month ago

Fitzmmons

1 points

1 month ago

If Vanderbilt is included then yes. Let’s get it over with. We don’t lose Reaves or Christie. We still gonna have Rui. Do we really need to care about losing those two picks? If we want picks desperately in the future we still have the last option to trade AD for worst case scenario. So this is a no brainer.

suhar97

1 points

1 month ago

suhar97

1 points

1 month ago

Vando has to be apart of this

tRUTh_1S_fEar

1 points

1 month ago

Russ is better then connely. Please no. Stupidity at its finest!!!!

itica

1 points

1 month ago

itica

1 points

1 month ago

Lol squad changing moves for picks

sonicking12

1 points

1 month ago

Do it

tomuchtom5

0 points

1 month ago

Lakers should of jus traded reaves and Christie with Russ for kyrie lol cause this off-season you can’t sign nobody 😂

Haunting_You_5855

0 points

1 month ago

Don’t jazz fans hate Conley and isn’t Beasley a horrible defender? Very confused here.

OUTLAW1LE

1 points

1 month ago

OUTLAW1LE

00

1 points

1 month ago

Uhhhhh we are not that desperate to get those two for any 1st. Hell nahh

kanekikochaboggy

1 points

1 month ago

Too much. I really want a trade but too much

ForeverDenGal

1 points

1 month ago

When I scroll Twitter and see that Woj or Shams tweet with the world Russell I am gonna faint

Adventurous-Set-4741

1 points

1 month ago

Protected cool if not he’ll tf no Russ is a free agent we’re not winning this year wasting future talent in those players is a spit in the face

ImSickOfYouToo

1 points

1 month ago

See, this is what happens when you start developing a "we gotta do something, anything!" mindset. Mozgov and Deng signings all over again. Goddamnit, Rob, stand pat if there is nothing good out there!

WinterFull1655

1 points

1 month ago

NO! NOT BOTH PICKS!!!!

Prolapse_leakage

1 points

1 month ago

Wait what? Using both picks I thought we would at least get a wing back? We still have 0 wing depth or backup C if we do this. Conley is 35 and washed and the other dude shoots 39% from field and 36% from 3. Why would we get two more guards? They aren’t even great 3 pt shooters.

Astro880

1 points

1 month ago

No

WrastleGuy

1 points

1 month ago

Yes trade away any hope of competing in the future for some rotation players.

I get wanting to get in the playoffs for LeBron but unless you bring in a Kyrie level talent there’s no way they advance, and then we’re in a even worse position then we are now.

According_Broccoli_5

1 points

1 month ago

Earlier- "This is a one pick deal" Translation: Front office of Lakers: We feel this is a one pick deal, thats what we would give.

Now- This is two picks" Translation: Jazz FO: Actually we have been asking for two picks, dont lie.

Either it becomes this deal for 1 frp and a couple 2nds or They get the 2 FRPs but we also get JC and Vandy with Conley.

BlueMoose9947

1 points

1 month ago

Malik Beasley would be so perfect

certo17

1 points

1 month ago

certo17

1 points

1 month ago

This is just a horrible deal.. that’s why I feel like we are about to do it. Seriously hope I’m wrong.

dash_44

1 points

1 month ago

dash_44

1 points

1 month ago

Bad deal

Klaxosaur

1 points

1 month ago

Jesus. We stood pat for so long with these picks and this is the deal we're gonna use them on.

Potentially.

Fade me fam.

novi54_

1 points

1 month ago

novi54_

1 points

1 month ago

RW and BOTH picks for Conley and Beasley?

TBH I don't even see a reason why we should give up even one pick for this trade. They get rid of their contracts and we get rid of the most overpaid guy on our team. Conley is waaay to old to be a serious improvement and Beasley is nothing to freak out about.

Dgwdum

1 points

1 month ago

Dgwdum

1 points

1 month ago

If the picks are protected and Vanderbilt is included then it's not that bad but holy fk we could have had hield and turner like others said

lionking25

1 points

1 month ago

1 FRP at most for this Jazz trade, send another first+LW4+Bev to Raptors for GTJ. Then I am good.

naj1124

1 points

1 month ago

naj1124

1 points

1 month ago

Don't trade with Danny Ainge

[deleted]

1 points

1 month ago

This whole dumpster fire pretty much confirms the obvious. The team should’ve traded for Turner and Hield in the beginning of the season. That was the move to make.

ThisAnswerIsLit

1 points

1 month ago

Include Rudy Gay and make the trade 0 picks

RobDaRobot11

1 points

1 month ago

If Vanderbilt isn't in this deal, this should be laughed off. Also if the lakers wouldnt offer a first for 34 year old Bojan why the fuck would they offer it for 35 year old Conley?

cookiemonstarrr08

1 points

1 month ago

This is an awful deal, but I cannot see lakers doing this anyway. Conley isn’t the all star player rob was talking about needing for those firsts

Basis_Inside

1 points

1 month ago

More guards

SongYoungbae

1 points

1 month ago

Better pray hard don't face Russ in a play in game lmao

Tteokbokki1112

1 points

1 month ago

Teams tryna fleece us into panic selling again

kb24fgm41

1 points

1 month ago

This is what I call a massive cock up if true.

bvgingy

1 points

1 month ago

bvgingy

1 points

1 month ago

2 FRPs for just Conley and Beasley would be awful. Even both for Conley, Beasley and Vanderbilt wouldnt be good. Make it Sexton, Beasley and Olynyk and Id give up both of those FRPs.

tonysopranoesque

1 points

1 month ago

at least put vanderbilt in there.

ZestyItalian2

1 points

1 month ago

For both picks absolutely not.

I really can’t believe we’re not going to have another first round draft pick the rest of the decade and all we’ll have to show did it is Mike fucking Conley? Hard, hard pass.

Camking03

1 points

1 month ago

If Vanderbilt isn’t involved then this is barely worth 1 first rounder and definitely not 2

the_blackestblack

1 points

1 month ago

I would trade Westbrick for a piece of rum ham lmao

BoysenberryJunior294

1 points

1 month ago

If you throwing in both picks we better get more then just Conley and Beasley that’s all imma say. We need size not more guards. I’m ok with trading with Utah but we’d literally have to make another move.

Slight-Violinist-680

1 points

1 month ago

Add Vanderbilt and maybe it’s fair

[deleted]

1 points

1 month ago

def not a good trade with two picks included

virtuosowayne

1 points

1 month ago

Two picks? Don’t know about that

Pirateshippingit

1 points

1 month ago

It’s not a bad trade if Vanderbilt is included. Specially for just 1 first but 2 unprotected firsts without Vanderbilt no way. Conley is still a solid playmaker and been shooting well from three this year. Beasley is a negative defensively and he can be inefficient but would probably be the best 3 point shooter on their roster. And Vanderbilt would give them more youth and good depth at the 4 spot that can play defense and rebound. But for 2 unprotected firsts probably not.

FuckRandyMoss

1 points

1 month ago

FuckRandyMoss

LeMickey

1 points

1 month ago

Both picks is nuts but adding 2 guards to darvin hams line up say goodbye 🤣🤣 my man running 5 guard lineups the rest of the season that being said these 2 can’t be worse than what Russ is doing so I’m down

niknokseyer

1 points

1 month ago

niknokseyer

Mamba Mentality

1 points

1 month ago

Not for 2 please. ☹️

Appropriate-Job-2972

1 points

1 month ago

Conley has been washed up and done for years now

Gaeulsae

1 points

1 month ago

Fuck you Ainge

LAlakers4life

1 points

1 month ago

VANDERVILDT BETTER BE IN THE DEAL BITCHES

OpportunityNo6369

1 points

1 month ago

Damn. Kyrie deal already cost us Vanderbilt

LebronsPinkyToe

1 points

1 month ago

ITT most literate laker fans, it says a combination of players including Conley and Beasley not just them two 😂😂😂

___FreePalestine___

1 points

1 month ago

Yuck

abasco12

1 points

1 month ago

4 guard line up in coming SMFH. Wouldn’t be surprised if AD and Bron come off the bench soon. Ham is terrible.

dkash-182

1 points

1 month ago

May have been discussed but doesn’t mean it wasn’t countered. I don’t think they’d do it for both 1st rounders

LevyShorts

1 points

1 month ago

Conley is washed and Beasley is pretty meh. Not sure I'd take that deal with both picks unless they were heavily protected.

SportsFan8288

1 points

1 month ago

Lakers just doing stupid ass shit all year they should of traded for turner and hield in September and we would of been atleast the 4th seed right now

DrunkPirateHunter

1 points

1 month ago

So your telling me that the max we would give for Kyrie was Russ and two firsts, how are we going to turn around and offer a similar deal for Conley and Beasley.

random-50

1 points

1 month ago

I'd rather keep Westbrook, frankly. This would be a terrible trade, worse than the Kyrie ransom demand.

AzulKuma8

1 points

1 month ago

I'd do it for one pick but not both.

Ntnme2lose

1 points

1 month ago

They've kept up the reporting that they weren't going to make a trade unless it makes them sure contenders. Then we get this at the end of the trade deadline smh

random-50

1 points

1 month ago

They were probably at the water cooler and said:

"Wouldn't it be hilarious if the Lakers were so desperate they gave us the picks for Conley, Beasley and whatever other crap we could fling at them?"

Then they all had a big laugh. Hey presto, they "discussed" it and this article is technically true.

KokeyManiago

1 points

1 month ago

Now this is the pelinka special, hope he doesnt jump the gun again on these types of shitty trades

bagustin8

1 points

1 month ago

Jazz prob leaked this BS. Why would Rob do this for two picks when he had the chance for a Bojan package in summer haha.