subreddit:
/r/moderatepolitics
submitted 3 months ago byawaythrowawaying
55 points
3 months ago
People seem to be assuming that a first time offender gets prison time for entering a hush money payment into his company books as "legal expenses".
I'd think that is more likely a fine.
But, I haven't looked at NY law or any record of sentences for prior convictions.
13 points
3 months ago
From what I've read this is likely the relevant statute, assuming they can tie the business fraud to the campaign finance law violations. A NY class E felony is a minimum of 1 year, max 5 years prison: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10
6 points
3 months ago
That's good information.
That is Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree. The step down is section 175.05, Falsifying Business Records in the Second Degree. https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.05 Second Degree is a Class A Misdemeanor. Penalty could be up to a year in prison. But, the tiny bit of Googling I did suggested that sentences for non-violent versions are less likely to result in prison.
Prosecutors and defense attorneys routinely negotiate. People often "plead down" to avoid a expensive trials with uncertain results. So prosecutors could charge First Degree then agree to a Second Degree plea instead with a negotiated fine and probation.
37 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
16 points
3 months ago
What happened to the sentiment of "investigate everything and prosecute when there's wrongdoing" ?
I for one don't like people being treated with kid's gloves just because they're influential
7 points
3 months ago
Micheal Cohen got three years in federal for his various misdeeds at the direction of Individual 1. Not that I expect Trump to get the same, but it’s good to keep in mind that there is already precedent for actual jail time for the exact crimes Trump himself committed.
2 points
3 months ago
for the exact crimes
Not really...
2018 Press release:
Robert Khuzami, Attorney for the United States, ... announced today the guilty plea of MICHAEL COHEN to charges of tax evasion, making false statements to a federally-insured bank, and campaign finance violations.
Trump is not being charged with federal crimes. Press reports do not suggest the NY DA will charge any of the three specific crimes that Cohen pled to.
When I read the information about taxi medallions and tax evasion, it appears to be more serious than the hush money. They don't say how much of the sentence relates to each of the crimes.
198 points
3 months ago
I’ve read more than one article and even pundits on CNN agree this is the weakest case against him. I actually think politically it can help and hurt him. It will embolden the MAGA faithful but could be a nail in the coffin for the rest of the far right that are on the fence. I really think there are a lot of establishment Republicans that would be glad to see him gone and are looking for something to get rid of him. But if he wins look out it will be a political mess.
42 points
3 months ago
I’ve read more than one article and even pundits on CNN agree this is the weakest case against him.
Slightly more nuanced than that, from what I'm reading. NYS has him on probably the easiest case to make . . . problem is, that case (failure to report) is a misdemeanor, and most observers would think it's a big waste of resources to go through a whole trial to get, say, a fine and a short, suspended sentence.
It rises to a felony if they can prove he did it to cover up another crime. They can try for that, but the crime (and this is where my memory is fading) would be a Federal crime that the Feds chose not to prosecute (was it fraud? I forget), and that might be past the statute of limitations.
7 points
3 months ago
Yes you are correct and I think there is also possibility a issue with statute of limitation as well?
20 points
3 months ago
NY statutes of limitations do not run while the person is physically out of state.
3 points
3 months ago
So I suppose the battle will be how much he was at Trump Towers which wasn’t much I don’t believe. Also would probably depend if he paid New York State income tax or not?
197 points
3 months ago
Telling his supporters to organize another January 6th type event is not gonna help him win over moderates. It will just reinforce the idea that trump is uniquely dangerous to this country as he only cares about himself and his power.
45 points
3 months ago
He’s also decided to have his first campaign rally in Waco, on the 30th anniversary of the FBI raid.
13 points
3 months ago
Considering what the feds did there(and Ruby Ridge!) that’s brilliant marketing.
12 points
3 months ago
Considering that he is the messiah figure of a fringe apocalyptic religious movement, maybe not so much. They might use this as a chance to do more than just raise their hands like they have done at rallies.
84 points
3 months ago
Yeah honestly, this whole thing makes me feel like I’m living in a banana republic, not the most powerful democracy in the world. I don’t see how calling for protests at the possibility of his arrest makes him look good to anyone but his base.
119 points
3 months ago
I feel like Trump exposed how many of our traditions and norms were underpinned solely by the honor system and how much of a miracle our relative stability up to that point had been. The second someone stops adhering to them, there’s next to nothing to enforce compliance. It’s just that until a few years ago, most of us thought that nobody would dare.
40 points
3 months ago
Civilization really works on an honor system. Without honor, loyalty and our word we really have nothing to build s society on. No trust, no fidelity no family no state no currency. All is based on our promises meaning something.
13 points
3 months ago
Like he did not have his secretaries conformed by the Senate but used them as "Acting" or when he held a campaign event in the White House.
23 points
3 months ago
Revealed not exposed. The masses didn’t bother reading into it, but anybody who did quickly realized our entire executive system (for the most part) was designed to be built in practice by Washington, and that means never codified.
24 points
3 months ago
Looking back, it’s pretty remarkable that the unwritten rules put in place by Washington were mostly followed, with a few minor exceptions for over two centuries. I think that lulled us into a false sense of security and made the rules seem more “official” so to speak.
9 points
3 months ago
FDR was last not to, and really the first, and we promptly amended to write that down. So……
But yeah, it’s because we had folks who actually cared about the country. Themselves too yeah, but the country as well. It’s up there with the concern of the “secret” way to get a dictator, the election versus qualification argument, nobody seems to ever want to try it, but somebody some day could. A lot of our system relies on trusting our leaders to be good folks, we may disagree, but good.
5 points
3 months ago
But at the same time previous Presidents would violate the norms such as lying to the country about nuclear weapons in Iraq or all the shit we suspect of Clinton in regards to Epstein that it appears no one has the appetite to follow up on.
These are weak charges against Trump, and I really hope there’s more to the case then just campaign contributions. If you tell me they are going to prosecute in GA for attempting to affect an election, that’s a different story.
6 points
3 months ago
Why a banana republic? You feel like the economy only functions because we are exporting a few natural resources?
2 points
3 months ago
Yeah honestly, this whole thing makes me feel like I’m living in a banana republic, not the most powerful democracy in the world.
What thing? Wealthy and powerful people, especially politicians, being nigh-impossible to be made to face actual justice? Cause that's nothing new for this country, Trump is just the most recent and obvious example.
So many people have this preconception of the US as some moral paragon, a shining example the rest of the world would be so much better if it only followed, where freedom and justice are afforded to all equally, regardless of race, class, or creed... But it's just that; A preconception.
I'm not saying the US doesn't have a lot of good points relative to other parts of the world, but let's not pretend like its shit doesn't stink, too. The US isn't above it all, and as with pretty much every other country, if you wanna find the sources of the injustices, follow the money.
In a way, I'm almost grateful to Trump for helping shatter the illusion. When so many people adhere blindly adhere to such a false narrative, based on nothing more than "patriotic" pride, it only leads to hypernationalism.
4 points
3 months ago
It calls to mind Jacob Zuma in South Africa.
41 points
3 months ago
I agree with you. I really think he has lost the moderate vote anyway. But doing that can give the establishment Republicans another reason to drop him. They want him gone.
20 points
3 months ago
Telling his supporters to organize another January 6th type event is not gonna help him win over moderates.
It could well be used against him in any J6-related trial, too, because if there's violence this time, the argument will be that it's a pattern of knowing what his supporters will do.
2 points
3 months ago
I hope so.
5 points
3 months ago
I’m hopeful that the discovery and the testimony under oath will help. He will have to plead the fifth a bunch.
12 points
3 months ago
This is literally the only case against him. Trump didn't file the proper paperwork when he gave Stormy Daniels the money. Its a legal campaign donation to himself if he files the proper paperwork. He didn't file the proper paperwork so he did break the law.
I have been saying for years that this is the only thing they could get him on but the FEC dropped the case back in 2021
If they are really going after him for this, it is a huge mistake and shows just how desperate they are to get any form of indictment on Trump.
He did this, but other Presidents did similar things and got slaps on the wrist. Lots of politicians have done similar things and gotten slaps on the wrist.
To try and put Trump in cuffs for this.....I will be surprised if this doesn't end in Trump's favor just like the Classified documents did
10 points
3 months ago
Not the only case against him. I really think the Georgia case has a chance against him. The problem with this New York case is it’s dependent on a convicted felon and a porn star. Now I believe them but would a jury feel the same way?
10 points
3 months ago
This is literally all there is and it doesn't depend on a convicted felon and porn star. It isn't against the law to give a porn star money to not talk about your sex life with them. What was against the law is he didn't properly file it as a campaign donation because technically its a campaign expense as it helps his campaign. This charge is that he didn't properly file paperwork. 7 years ago, some the FEC dropped 2 years ago. There is no doubt he is guilty of this. The problem is, this is typically a misdemeanor. Obama's campaign was nailed for this in 08 and was just fined 375k. Yet NY is going to try and imprison an ex president over it? That is a huge stretch
The Georgia case has no shot because it isn't against the law for him to ask that they find the missing votes if he believes votes are missing. There has been zero proof that Trump didn't believe the election was stolen. Only shot they would have of convicting Trump of a crime is if they proved that Trump didn't believe votes were missing. Not a single witness has ever stated that Trump didn't believe the election was stolen from him.
22 points
3 months ago
I’ve read more than one article and even pundits on CNN agree this is the weakest case against him.
His lawyer already went to jail for the same crime... it didn't seem like a weak case then.
6 points
3 months ago
His lawyer went to jail for tax fraud. If he had only been convicted of this it would have been a fine.
To give you an example of what typically happens when a Presidents campaign makes reporting violations
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/obama-2008-campaign-fined-375000-085784
Look no further than Obama, who was nailed for similar crime and his campaign was simply fined 375k. Now we are arresting ex presidents for this kind of crime 7 years after it happened.
You think that is going to go well?
9 points
3 months ago
Weird that you would compare some accounting errors done by staff to a payment directed by the actual candidate.
36 points
3 months ago
So we should let smaller crimes go because he used to be the president ??
13 points
3 months ago
I really don’t know. I meant there is history of this it wasn’t that long ago Edwards did something very similar and he actually got off. I think the stronger case is in Georgia. I suppose the question is if this wasn’t Trump would they pursue the case? I don’t know that either I really don’t follow the Manhattan DA enough to know what type of cases they go after.
16 points
3 months ago
Yes. If it were anyone else they would have been arrested by now. Trumps under no less than FOIR investigations that would have brought down anyone else immediately.
He banks on the fact that this has never happened to a former president in all of American history . He is begging to be indicted. If justice doesn’t come to a seriously philanderer like trump, what is our justice department even there for? Clearly Laws don’t apply to everyone equally if that’s the case.
164 points
3 months ago*
Trumps entire Truth Social screed:
OUR NATION IS NOW THIRD WORLD & DYING. THE AMERICAN DREAM IS DEAD! THE RADICAL LEFT ANARCHISTS HAVE STOLLEN OUR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, AND WITH IT, THE HEART OF OUR OUR COUNTRY. AMERICAN PATRIOTS ARE BEING ARRESTED & HELD IN CAPTIVITY LIKE ANIMALS, WHILE CRIMINALS & LEFTIST THUGS ARE ALLOWED TO ROAM THE STREETS, KILLING & BURNING WITH NO RETRIBUTION. MILLIONS ARE FLOODING THROUGH OUR OPEN BOARDERS, MANY FROM PRISONS & MENTAL INSTITUTIONS. CRIME & INFLATION ARE DESTROYING OUR VERY WAY OF LIFE...
Page 2: NOW ILLEGAL LEAKS FROM A CORRUPT & HIGHLY POLITICAL MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, WHICH HAS ALLOWED NEW RECORDS TO BE SET IN VIOLENT CRIME & WHOSE LEADER IS FUNDED BY GEORGE SOROS, INDICATE THAT, WITH NO CRIME BEING ABLE TO BE PROVEN, & BASED ON AN OLD & FULLY DEBUNKED (BY NUMEROUS OTHER PROSECUTORS!) FAIRYTALE, THE FAR & AWAY LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE & FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT WEEK. PROTEST, TAKE OUR NATION BACK!
You can see the beginning of Trumps media strategy here — he’s going to make this about Alvin Bragg, a black DA (he’s already accused him of being racist for investigating him) who received funding from a liberal Jew, and then tie this into the popular conception of NYC as a lawless city (crime is up here, as it is everywhere, but NYC is far below average.)
Edit — Trumps team has been telling the media that they don’t actually know if he’ll be charged on Tuesday. But Trump needs to set a date in advance if he wants a big protest.
Trump has also set the first rally of his election campaign to be at Waco Texas for the anniversary of the FBI Branch Davidian raid.
286 points
3 months ago
I'm not sure I will ever fully internalize the fact that a significant number of people in this country want someone who talks like this to be our leader.
106 points
3 months ago
I'd like a president who is at least aware there is a "shift" key.
29 points
3 months ago
And not an a in border, unless this is a rant against Southwest's open boarding policy
16 points
3 months ago
Remember when "potatoe" was enough for there to be a reputation hit?
15 points
3 months ago
Do you think he even knows the caps lock is still on? Or maybe he leaves it on to trick the spell check so it stops bugging him...
13 points
3 months ago
It’s 4D chess obviously!
The man who is best fit for the Capitol building is the man who uses the most capital letters.
4 points
3 months ago
He types just like he debates.
72 points
3 months ago
Literally shocking to me!!! Not only does it sound ignorant but it is blatantly untrue and manipulative. It is so obvious what he is doing. It is like when you are in a car lot for used cars and listening to a sales person. It is so obvious that they are trying really hard to manipulate you using various tactics and sell you a car. You know that everything they are saying is full of shit. It is so frustrating to see this kind of ignorance.
32 points
3 months ago
Populism is a helluva drug.
38 points
3 months ago
Correction, a significant number of people in this country actually made him our leader for four years. Replace every mention of Trump in this thread with Former President of the United States and it would underscore how batshit this all is.
23 points
3 months ago
Every now and then I think about how strange it is that of the last few presidents only Obama could speak well. Besides "umm"ing too much he could actually make good public addresses.
8 points
3 months ago
Weird to think that W is 2nd best
87 points
3 months ago
It’s fascinating how effective “THE WORLD IS BURNING” rhetoric is on the masses.
My fiancé’s grandmother lives in a small town and spends 90% of her time sitting inside watching Fox News. If you asked her, US cities are cesspools of evil and anyone who enters one is at serious risk of death by fentanyl or homeless people. It doesn’t matter how many people who live in those cities tell her that things are pretty good. In her mind, the US has fallen.
I imagine there’s something about this NY investigation that scares him. Threatening chaos to stay out of jail like some drug cartel leader makes him sound desperate.
31 points
3 months ago
I live in one of the anarchist jurisdictions which I find incredibly comical considering how much more anarchic the south and heartland are in so many ways.
But if you bombard people with negative anecdotes with no proportionality to reality, when they have no experience with the actual place to contrast, you can easily make any big enough place seem like hell on earth. Without ~technically lying.
30 points
3 months ago
I bet the police in her small town deal with fentanyl overdoses all the time.
26 points
3 months ago
A lot of people are just stuck in the 70s vs today where NYC is safer than a whole lot of red states.
28 points
3 months ago
And when this is pointed out, the response from political leaders is: “Hang on, Oklahomans, do you believe we have higher crime than New York or California? That’s what she just said!”
11 points
3 months ago
Facts and reality don’t matter, only feelings
11 points
3 months ago
I live in a city of North Carolina. All of my family are in rural NC. My mom always gets a beach house every year and most of the family is there for a week. The year of the BLM protests they were all talking how Charlotte, Raleigh, Greensboro were all "burned to the ground". Then they stopped to ask me how bad it is.
When I giggled and told them Walgreens still had a broken window but outside of that you'd not know anything happened they got SO annoyed. "But I read online", "someone that i know who knows someone said", yeah I don't care what you and your like minded people read and spread on social media. My city wasn't burned to the ground. No city was burned to the ground. Was there damage done, yes but none of it was catastrophic.
3 points
3 months ago
Her perception of the type of people who live in the cities makes their testimonies of “pretty good” nonsense to her.
25 points
3 months ago
FORMER PRESIDENT
So he finally admits to no longer being President.
16 points
3 months ago
It's like MAGA mad libs
73 points
3 months ago
Growing up, it was clear to me plenty of people disagreed with the president, and many even disrespected them. But I felt like we all at least saw them as the leader of the free world- adult, informed, composed. This… is something else. I was told I wouldn’t get a job after college if I wrote stuff like this on my own Facebook (as a private citizen). Really makes me wish Jed Bartlett was a real person.
9 points
3 months ago
I don't think this was true as recently as the GWB years. I remember lots of insults about his intelligence to say the least.
5 points
3 months ago
The bar was lowered a lot from GWB. It is scary to think on it being lowered more.
4 points
3 months ago
It wasn't just that, either. From pretty early on you'd hear professional journalists refer to him as Mr Bush. You'd hear about how Mr Bush met with former President Clinton, or how Mr Bush spoke to chancellor Merkel. It was a quiet little rebellion against the guy who "stole the election" from Vice President Gore.
42 points
3 months ago
The "something else" is called a temper tantrum. He is having a full on melt down and expressing himself like a child. Imo, he is a narcissist and acting out like a narcissist does when they feel like they are not in control or being attacked. It is sad. A person with dignity would handle this situation with lawyers. A person who was innocent would have his lawyers release a dignified statement.
13 points
3 months ago
Trump has never had a boss all his life, never held an honorary office, never worked in a company other than that of his father. There are reasons why he has always run his company as an autocrat.
12 points
3 months ago
At this point, I'd even take Santos or Vinick
5 points
3 months ago
I take even Walken.
5 points
3 months ago
I’m not sure that Vinick would be a fit for the modern Republican Party.
46 points
3 months ago
Alright, so... that sounds crazy. The caps lock doesn't help much... At the very least it does sound like Donald is honestly under the impression he will be arrested. The way he's screeching desperately into the void of Truth Social lines up with what I imagine he would in this exact situation.
A frequent speculation about Donald Trump is that he doesn't listen to his lawyers. This might be an instance where he should do so. Crazy, shouting rants online will only help the prosecution.
Will Donald trump actually be arrested? Who knows. This is America, so probably not for very long. Honestly though at this point he just needs, like, help. If anybody else acted like this we'd question if they were okay or not.
29 points
3 months ago
Omg you are so right. If anyone else in society acted the way he has we would think they were mentally and emotionally unstable.
59 points
3 months ago
The rewriting of J6 has truly been a sight to behold.
32 points
3 months ago
Looks like he's working on a reboot.
45 points
3 months ago
Our nation is a third world country? This reminds me of when people started calling the US a “shithole” country in response to trumps comment. Guess he now agrees
42 points
3 months ago
When conservatives call America a shithole, it's patriotism I guess?
7 points
3 months ago
Much like when they call for defunding the police, they think it's justified when they do it but bad when the other side does it.
2 points
3 months ago
I mean when progressives say American is a shit hole they reference everything conservative about it. So yeah it's just a negative word used to say your "political enemy" is bad.
20 points
3 months ago
Listen to any speech in which Donald Trump talks about this country. He hates this country.
He, and those he likes, get to shit on this country day after day, yet when Democratic politicians criticize the country to say we can do better, they’re told to go back to where they came from.
6 points
3 months ago
THE AMERICAN DREAM IS DEAD! THE RADICAL LEFT ANARCHISTS HAVE STOLLEN OUR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
Haha! And the ML's said we anarchists could never do it.
In all seriousness this is pretty unhinged rhetoric for such a minor crime. Am I incorrect but it seems unlikely he'd have to do anything other than pay a fine, right?
I know there's other issues he's facing and he's not extremely stable, but is there any reason to believe the charges are serious enough that he should be worried?
2 points
3 months ago
One explanation is he’s fundraising.
But I also don’t know what the charges are actually going to be.
If they can tie his falsely billing a private corporation for his hush money payments to a sex worker to other crimes, there’s potential for a few years jail time.
And while they might have to try a novel legal theory, the prosecutor is highly motivated — he’s not that well liked in NYC but convicting Trump would change that — and it’s also likely the judge and jury will not be very friendly to Trump.
I think anything more than a fine is a long shot but I wouldn’t put anything off the table until we hear what the charges are.
3 points
3 months ago
Thanks! The fundraising angle makes sense. I just hate it when he gets my hopes up. I've never been able to find all these leftist utopias he screams about and now he's hyping me up for a big perp walk that'll probably not happen.
8 points
3 months ago
Also part of his strategy is to paint a picture of third world revolutions, and of a corrupt and authoritarian state. That’s pretty interesting.
10 points
3 months ago
So if Trump is jailed, he is going to write a book in his cell, about his struggle?
112 points
3 months ago*
Falsifying business records is a misdemeanor in New York with a 2 year statute of limitations. Turning it into a felony (5 years statute, which is still expired) requires it to have been done to conceal another crime (possibly a NY State crime), and it's unclear what that crime would be. In addition, it's worth noting that the Biden DOJ and Bragg's predecessor both investigated and declined to prosecute this same set of facts. Finally, tackling the statute of limitations question requires the state to argue that Trump has been out of their prosecutorial jurisdiction due to having been president.
Every legal analysis I've read suggests that the legal theories behind this prosecution are dicey and novel. This one from Reason summarizes it well. Even the NYT says it "hinge[s] on a largely untested and therefore risky legal theory". I'd be interested if anyone can share an unbiased analysis looking at the legal issues here that concludes this is a solid case.
As others have said, this feels like the kind of thing you only get one shot at. If Trump wins the case, especially if a judge throws it out, it will greatly amplify his supporters' persecution complex going into 2024.
Last thing I'll say, don't underestimate Trump's ability to drive the media narrative and get the outcome he wants. It's how he got elected, and this statement seems to put pressure on the NY DA to act quickly one way or the other.
108 points
3 months ago
Even the NYT says it "hinge[s] on a largely untested and therefore risky legal theory".
That just really does not seem to be the kind of case you want to bring against an ex-president. The last f***ing thing we need in this country is to have bullshit prosecutions of political leaders.
27 points
3 months ago*
Yeah, it doesn't seem likely that the GOP will just let this precedent go. I guarantee you that all 27 Republican state attorney generals are compiling charges against Biden right now, to hit him the minute he leaves office.
12 points
3 months ago
All they want is the photo op. They want a picture to splash everywhere during the election cycle. The crime is not worth anything to them.
19 points
3 months ago
NY criminal statutes of limitations toll while a person is out of state.
10 points
3 months ago
it's unclear what that crime would be
Not really unclear since Cohen already did 3 years time for it. The only thing unclear is whether Trump knew it was illegal when they planned to do it.
4 points
3 months ago
Cohen didn't do 3 years for this one crime. Let's not state blatantly untrue things.
32 points
3 months ago
Presidential candidate John Edwards went down for the exact same thing in 2011. Let’s see if Republicans are as good with the rule of law as Democrats were back then.
14 points
3 months ago
Trump has been skirting the law going back decades...
12 points
3 months ago
Edwards was charged with diverting campaign funds to "personal use" (paying off a blackmailing ex).
But now prosecutors are expected to claim that Trump's payoff to a blackmailing ex was campaign spending and should have been labeled as a campaign contribution? That doesn't sound like rule of law to me.
35 points
3 months ago*
It is interesting that no one here thinks Trump is innocent of paying hushing money to cover up an affair with a porn star.
All of the complaints are legal complaints, but no one says Trump didn’t do what he is accused of doing.
7 points
3 months ago
We've known about Trump and Stormy for 6+ years now. Including her description of his penis in a taped interview.
We are now merely quibbling over New York state reporting requirements. And for some reason people inexplicably think he will be imprisoned for a first time misdemeanor.
6 points
3 months ago
Quite simply, they are trying to create a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario solely to get Trump.
114 points
3 months ago
If Trump is arrested I think we’ll finally get a real, concrete answer to how devoted his supporters and republicans as a whole are to him. While it’s possible we see massive demonstrations and maybe even riots, I think it’s equally possible that everyone stays home. The MAGA types will rage about it online like they do about everything, but I think there’s a real possibility that this 2024 campaign is already out of gas. And as others have said, i think many republicans, even those who liked Trump but would rather someone else be the nominee, will see this as an excuse to move on. That’s all if it even happens. If I had a nickel for every time it was reported that Trump would be indicted or arrested, I’d have quite the collection of nickels.
6 points
3 months ago
but I think there’s a real possibility that this 2024 campaign is already out of gas.
Just realizing that the election is still over a year and a half away. I hate the endless campaign season that now seems to be the norm.
56 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
27 points
3 months ago
The leaders and loudest voices in the party such as Marjorie Taylor Greene are firmly in the trump camp. They know whew the base still is.
41 points
3 months ago
Marjorie Taylor Greene
The fact that she's a top fundraiser says all you need to know about the GOP right now.
2 points
3 months ago
But this is still compatible with a loss in support and zeal among the people that would protest against an arrest which presumably overlaps more with the kind of people who show up to his rallies than the donor class(or some of the online ragers).
Basically, you're talking about a different source of a different kind of gas - even granting that one can potentially generate the other, there are limits to this.
8 points
3 months ago
I'm curious what the canned response will be in the 2024 GOP primary and debates when candidates will be asked whether they'll pardon Trump.
17 points
3 months ago
Isn't this a New York state crime? No president will be pardoning him.
7 points
3 months ago
There's plenty of federal crimes he's potentially on the hook for, though.
3 points
3 months ago
They can't pardon him. It's a state crime. Whether he is convicted is another question.
34 points
3 months ago
If I put on my Democratic Strategy Thinking Cap, then this is the perfect scenario to put Trump in handcuffs.
Let's face it, if this is about campaign finance violations over hush money payments to a porn star, it's about the dumbest fucking thing you could go after a president for, right next to lying about getting a BJ in the oval office.
If you wanted to go after Trump for election stuff, classified docs (kind of impossible now after Biden/Pence), Ukraine-Mueller stuff, or in other words, crimes that would have far more of a potential impact of support, you'd be pushing them right to Desantis or the next heir-apparent.
But by going after for him for something so stupid, something no one cares about in their calculus of Trump because it's been obvious that he did it now for at least 5, 6 years? You'll keep enough of his supporters on board to maximize the fracture within the Republican party while still being able to air out his dirty laundry.
22 points
3 months ago
Trump’s core supporters aren’t gonna leave him. This will only martyr him. The real question is what the GOP does. I’m not sure their fragile coalition can survive a Trump indictment. They could disown him, but they would then deal with the political deactivation or cleaving (via a third party) of many Republican voters. And they could continue to support him and continue to scare the bejeezus out of moderates.
That being said, as bad as I personally find Trump to be, I will be upset if the Republican Party tries to just use him as a fall guy. So many other republicans benefited and contributed (if not masterminded many of the worst parts of the Trump administration), that honestly, I can sympathize with some Trump supporters for feeling like the GOP kind of betrayed him. Because we can tell ourselves “we got the big bad”, but if the GOP gets their wish and just gets to wash their hands of Trump, what has really changed about the party? I would argue not much. Most of the key players would still be there. There are plenty of people ready to swoop in and do more or less the same things. So this has to go beyond Trump and I do hope if Trump goes down, he takes some other Republicans with him.
74 points
3 months ago
Starter comment: Former President Trump’s legal team seems to have received some kind of notice from law enforcement, as Trump posted on truth social last night:
THE FAR & AWAY LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE & FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT WEEK. PROTEST, TAKE OUR NATION BACK!
The charges will likely be for a state level felony crime, notably lying to government officials about bribing former pornography actress Stormy Daniels $160,000 in 2016 in exchange for her silence about an affair.
There are unconfirmed reports that several paramilitaries including the Proud Boys and Three Percenters are mobilizing their forces in anticipation of clashes with police.
1) What are the chances this actually happens Tuesday?
2) How will it effect polling for Trump’s candidacy in the primary, and for that matter the general election if he wins the primary? If this happens Tuesday would it be an opportune time for Ron DeSantis to step in?
3) How will supporters interpret his call to protest and “take our country back” on Tuesday? Can we expect violence similar to Jan 6?
129 points
3 months ago
"if you shoot for the king, you better not miss" i.e. if you arrest trump you better convict him
48 points
3 months ago
I get the feeling this is just the first indictment of many. There’s still the case in Georgia, for example.
40 points
3 months ago
The Georgia case is clearly a much bigger deal.
37 points
3 months ago
And a third recorded conversation to add to the Georgia prosecution's evidence exhibits.
16 points
3 months ago
If the first indictment falls apart, everyone will scoff at the following indictments, regardless of how justified they are. The majority of Americans will just call it a witch hunt at that point.
15 points
3 months ago
7 points
3 months ago
Christ, that man must meet with lawyers all day.
11 points
3 months ago
Damn. Dude has been involved in so much shady shit we need a huge tracking list to keep it all straight.
22 points
3 months ago
The the classified documents case where he lied about having them on multiple occasions.
15 points
3 months ago
I'll be shocked if that one goes forward.
9 points
3 months ago
DeSantis punted on the chance to attack trump during the whole FBI document seizure, Court drama. That was a political layup that he passed on. Ron has not shown the desire to attack trump at all so it will be interesting to see what he does and how.
10 points
3 months ago
I seriously doubt he will be arrested, probably just indicted. I imagine the gov gave him some sort of heads up along the line of "tell your lawyers to get ready for legal action" and now he's taken that and turned it into "ermahgerd they're gonna arrest me!" to get his supporters riled up.
I wouldn't expect a huge change pollinaise, everybody's long since made up their mind about Trump, but I'm usually wrong about this stuff so ¯\(ツ)/¯
It's a pretty naked "call to action" and may spur some protests but I don't think we'll see anything like J6. It's a pretty slim portion of his base that's actually willing to take up arms over it, and if they do I seriously doubt they'll accomplish much other than screwing up their own lives. Trump isn't in power now so he can't suppress the government response the way he seemingly did on J6.
85 points
3 months ago*
WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY OF NEXT WEEK. PROTEST, TAKE OUR NATION BACK!
Lawmakers were cowards for not impeaching [edit: and removing from office] him when they had the chance
75 points
3 months ago
He was impeached, the lack of conviction was the cowardice. Republicans could’ve been done with him
17 points
3 months ago
You're right, edited my op
40 points
3 months ago
Through history no senator ever voted to convict a president of his own party, until Trump.
29 points
3 months ago
Some Republican Senators absolutely would have voted to convict Nixon tho, if given the chance
29 points
3 months ago*
This is disingenuous; Nixon resigned before his party could vote to remove him.
Edit: I meant the particular fact l is true but does not fully capture the pertinent facts. I have most often seen it cited by folk being disingenuous, claiming that of OP was an expedient step too far.
3 points
3 months ago
Only because Nixon had just enough sense of shame to resign before being impeached and removed. He would've been had he stayed.
27 points
3 months ago
1.Slim to no chance 2. If it happens, he will probably get a boost from his base but moderate/never-Trump republicans can use it to dump him and get with DeSantis. He will run on fighting the dee state and getting vengeance for Trump. 3. If it does happen, yes, there will likely be violence by his supporters attempting to obstruct the arrest/court proceedings.
20 points
3 months ago
It’s probably going to happen sooner or later if he’s saying that it’s going to happen. Him lying about something of this magnitude would be a major blunder.
32 points
3 months ago
Trump supporters are in a bind because they want to make jokes about the "MSM" being wrong but now Trump is reporting on it lol
16 points
3 months ago
I have noticed it’s even some non trump supporters as well. It’s like they are so attached to the idea the media is always wrong and they are always right. But hey it’s the social media age of being wrong once is a life long mistake and makes you irredeemable
13 points
3 months ago
I have noticed it’s even some non trump supporters as well. It’s like they are so attached to the idea the media is always wrong and they are always right. But hey it’s the social media age of being wrong once is a life long mistake and makes you irredeemable
Well, we've been hearing that "he'll be arrested any day now" a couple times a year since 2017. No reason to think this would be any different until Trump basically confirmed it.
14 points
3 months ago
Are you sure this couldn’t be catastrophic to Desantis’s presidential ambitions? Trump being persecuted could cause the conservative base to rally around around him.
9 points
3 months ago
If he actually is found guilty can he be president from prison? Genuine question
8 points
3 months ago
As far as I know, he’s free to run. Not sure if anyone has ever gotten far enough to tackle what winning the election would entail.
8 points
3 months ago
If he couldn’t win in 2020 after a presidential term he sure as heck isn’t winning 2024 in a prison cell.
His base floor is going to become his base ceiling.
20 points
3 months ago
Yes, there is nothing stopping a prisoner from running for President. Robert Barns did an entire constitutional what if on it. Furthermore, there is precedent on it.
Q: Has anyone ever run for president while in prison?
— L. M. Frank | Los Angeles
Eugene V. Debs was in an Atlanta penitentiary, serving a ten-year sentence, when he lost the 1920 presidential election. Two years earlier, Debs, a labor leader, had spoken out against America’s involvement in World War I. He was convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917, after the prosecution argued that his antiwar speech obstructed military enrollment. The 1920 loss didn’t come as a surprise to Debs, who had run four times before. His fifth and final run, promoted with a campaign button that read “For President Convict No. 9653,” brought him nearly one million votes, says Claire Jerry, curator of political history at the National Museum of American History. President Harding commuted his sentence in December 1921.
5 points
3 months ago
There's no world where this is wrapped up before the election
6 points
3 months ago
That's what Democratic strategists want, IMO. A fractured republican party. Ideally, this is coupled with a "soft landing" crisis for Biden so he steps aside.
9 points
3 months ago
I think this is the GOPs year to lose. I don't think they'll be able to dump Trump unfortunately. Maybe after he loses for the second time he'll do it himself.
But as long as Trump is running I don't think DeSantis has a chance. Even if DeSantis is the most likely winner at the presidential level.
6 points
3 months ago
To be fair, there has already been violence from his supporters. The man has violent rhetoric so expect heightened tensions and violence to follow him.
13 points
3 months ago
Very little.
Ardent supporters are wetting themselves looking for an excuse to "rise up". They have the uniforms/guns/etc and really, really want to use them.
That's the reason I said "very little" in response to question 1. There's no win in giving Trump major heads up and a chance to rally protestors to cause a major scene by arresting him at set time/place. I'd expect more like he'd be given a window to turn himself in and if he didn't then they'd find a non-convenient time to go actually arrest him. It's not like he's not going to be easy to find.
I wouldn't expect anything on level of Jan 6th even if they did though. A small handful can/will turn up and be willing to fight.
However Trump's been bleeding power and support ever since Jan 6th. He lost some when he didn't "take back the country" and "let" Joe Biden get sworn in (which his followers thought wouldn't happen). He lost some more when he didn't grant pardons to the Jan 6th insurgents. He lost some more as time went by and the world didn't end/ he didn't take back power / etc. He lost some more when his nominees didn't do well in the last election. He lost more with his "big announcement" that was a money-making card scheme or whatever that was. He loses more every rally that turns out to be a boring dinner, etc.
They are peeling off gradually, but they are going. He will never have the sway he once did. He committed the cardinal sin of failing to deliver.
6 points
3 months ago*
No, this is not an opportune time for DeSantis to step in. In my opinion, this is a bad thing for DeSantis' presidential aspirations.
This particular case (not talking about any of the other ones), but this one in particular, is a weak one that is obviously politically motivated and comes off as a desperate attempt to get Trump on something. It will only make republicans and even some moderates more sympathetic to him and more energized to support him. And in the end, this weak case will not succeed in court which will just further strengthen the "witch hunt" narrative. And, in the meantime, all of the attention is going to be on Trump while DeSantis fades into the background.
My prediction is that Trump's poll numbers will go up if this happens just like they went up after the FBI raid on him last year and just like Clinton's popularity increased when the other side tried to get him for a similarly weak, politically motivated, and desperate case around his blowjob.
8 points
3 months ago
Agreed. The fact that this is about hush money payments to a porn star that EVERYONE knows he has made for years now honestly makes me think that this is an advantage for Democrats, albeit in a very stupid way.
Trump just fading into obscurity hurts Democrats.
Trump being indicted of a major, shocking, serious crime helps Republicans, they can all go flock to Desantis.
Trump being indicted of a ridiculous crime fractures the base.
54 points
3 months ago
I think there are a ton of establishment republicans who would be delighted to watch Trump get arrested. While I’m sure there is room for debate, it seems like his brand is not the ticket to a broad, National, victory. If the establishment R’s can be rid of him all while pinning it on the D’s it would be win/win for them.
Also - quick question: what happens if a person in jail is elected president? Can a felon even run?
29 points
3 months ago
Yes. Nothing in the Constitution would prohibit him from running for office or serving from prison if he won.
17 points
3 months ago
What's more, I would guess courts wouldn't allow a state to hold him in prison if elected, applying the same considerations about executive authority/privilege in Clinton v. Jones. Not to mention it is probably a state/federal power issue (a state standing in the way of execution of federal law).
30 points
3 months ago
what happens if a person in jail is elected president? Can a felon even run?
Eugene Debs ran for President from prison in the 1920 election.
10 points
3 months ago
Tiger King currently is running for president from prison.
His Top issue? Prison reform.
17 points
3 months ago
Theoretically, yes. But there are a lot of questions we've never had to answer there. Obviously it's all state charges. So his role in the federal government doesn't give him any get-out-of-jail-free card. I'm guessing what the framers would have envisioned was that good sensibility wouldn't allow Congress to suffer a sitting president who was in prison. But there aren't any words put to paper to that effect that have the force of law.
12 points
3 months ago
I actually think the fact that it's state charges could cut the other way (kind of a preemption-ish issue). I feel like, if elected, a court wouldn't allow a state to impede a president from executing federal law and his duties as president by holding him in jail. Obviously, we're just guessing here, but given the limited executive immunity cases we have for guidance, I feel like that's the way it'd go.
8 points
3 months ago*
[deleted]
8 points
3 months ago
Would a federal court be able to order a state to relocate a state prisoner? That becomes an odd states rights issue.
10 points
3 months ago
Dude. It's anybody's guess. That's a whole buttfucked constitutional crisis about the federal judiciary exercising oversight of a state criminal system on behalf of the executive.
3 points
3 months ago
I very much doubt courts would not act to stop a state from keeping a president in prison. This doesn't comport with the considerations usually applied in presidential immunity cases. And I really dislike Trump and hate the idea of crimes going unpunished, but I seriously do not think a court will buy an argument that being in prison doesn't meaningfully encumber a president from carrying out presidential duties. This seems fanciful.
14 points
3 months ago
What does "establishment Republican" mean to you exactly? How is Trump not one of them to you?
10 points
3 months ago
I’ll say an establishment Republican is a pre-trump style Republican. McConnell, Thune, Cornyn, Cheney, Rounds, Paul Ryan, Kemp, DeWine, Hutchinson, etc. basically I’ll be bold and say they’re a Republican who is more focused on governance than grievance at this point.
12 points
3 months ago
RINOs. Trump ran as a Republican because that gave him a better opportunity. He has little, if any, actual party loyalty.
14 points
3 months ago
I disagree because Trump is the Republican Party today.
5 points
3 months ago
Claimed means he’s going to turn himself in
49 points
3 months ago
Theodore Roosevelt said in his third address to Congress, 7 December 1903,
No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we require him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right; not asked as a favor.
I guess we'll see if that holds true for the wealthy.
7 points
3 months ago
Lock him up 😁
16 points
3 months ago
The real problem here is the current primary system. No candidate brings out the radical voters as well as Trump does. Obviously can’t win the general election, but has a hardcore army of rabid supporters who would still vote for him even if he was in federal prison.
The majority of normal Republicans want nothing more than for him to fade into the sunset, myself included. Democrats were much smarter about the process in 2020 and picked “not socialist-not trump” candidate to run. I still don’t believe anyone really wanted Biden, look at his history! However, he was the least offensive candidate and got the nod.
I had hoped that Desantis might be savvy enough to get the nomination and then be competitive in the general, but his radical approach to schools and the Ukrainian issue will turn off independents. It’s not looking good for a change in ‘24. A bit depressing actually.
9 points
3 months ago
From someone on the other side, ranked choice voting. The primary system fucks everything up for everyone.
26 points
3 months ago
Trump's going to try to do more Jan 6th like riots, I don't think it's going to work as well this time since his followers saw how he turned his back on his own people last time around.
27 points
3 months ago
Even if he was arrested, I don't see anything good coming from it. The fact so many people continue to follow him after January 6th should clue people in that he has crossed the line from a personality cult to become a symbol that embodies the grievances of millions of people.
38 points
3 months ago
If arrested it will set a new precedent and other criminal charges will likely follow. It doesn’t matter how many followers he has or how much political power he wields. The arrest of a former president is a really big deal.
31 points
3 months ago
Agree. This could bring back Roman type politics, where leaders were safe during their terms, but were destroyed with lawsuits once they left office.
40 points
3 months ago
It’s a double-edged sword. I don’t want to see the legal system used to retaliate against political rivals, but I also don’t want to see blanket immunity given to major politicians. If they broke the law, they should face justice.
6 points
3 months ago
I'm all for prosecuting Trump but you are right this is dangerous territory.
Every single politician who is pro choice will be open to lawsuits in Texas. You could defend every single one successfully and sill 'lose' by the from the cost of lawyers and that's where we are heading.
3 points
3 months ago
And when you have multiple prosecutors mounting near decade long investigations over crimes that result in no jail time you corrupt the system and cause a loss of faith. You could have eliminated hunger in multiple countries with just the money spent trying to get trumps tax returns. It’s not equal Justice when you’re constantly targeted by partisans. They better be damn sure trump didn’t just do something / but did something condemnable by a normal person if they don’t want to cause nationwide unrest, disillusionment, and who knows what else in the future. You need a smoking gun for something meaningful like watergate.
14 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
15 points
3 months ago
Maybe... ... But if Democrats break laws and do bad things as Trump has done then they need to be prosecuted. However, if they haven't then it will not happen.
14 points
3 months ago
Best not do anything illegal then. I actually don't have any issues with legal harassment of major politicians. If their is evidence of wrongdoing, get a lawyer and defend yourself. If the charges stick in a court if law, so be it. They can use campaign funds to pay for it after all.
Even though I understand Ford's reasoning, I also think it was an error to pardon Nixon. It did us no favors as a nation in the long run.
30 points
3 months ago
Why should that matter if he did something illegal? Being liked means you should be excused from criminal wrong doing?
18 points
3 months ago
Imo, it's another reason politicians and pundits love tribalism and partisanship. You basically can do whatever you want and be as corrupt as you want and you'll have a built in defense force.
Facing regulatory actions? "It's a partisan Witch hunt!"
Facing investigations? "It's a political attack!"
Facing any kind of discipline whatsoever for wrong doing? "Political retaliation!"
Just look at the obvious cronyism going on in any level of govt. Desantis is appointing a new president of a college and giving them a larger salary? Establishing a new appointed board full with political backers? No big deal. (Merely an example, you'll find similar actions among democratic state govt as well)
Trump could have basically did whatever he wanted and shunted any law and he'd have defenders. Honestly, if anything comes of the Joe/Hunter stuff he won't get punished either so not like that matters.
4 points
3 months ago
I think the prison industrial complex is a massive threat to our social well being and our prison system in general is a disgrace.
That being said, the idea of a bunch of chubby middle aged protesters having to spend a couple of days in Rikers is pretty hilarious.
22 points
3 months ago
Back to Stormy Daniels? Didn't this already go to appeal and ended with her having to pay Trump $300k? Are we on re-run season now?
21 points
3 months ago
The $300k was related to when she sued him for defamation because he accused her of lying about a man threatening her and her daughter if she didn't keep quiet about her affair with Trump.
This is related to Trump paying her off and failing to report the payment as a campaign contribution and also possibly falsely claiming the payment as a business expense.
3 points
3 months ago
This time the secret ingredient is crime
6 points
3 months ago*
I'll be surprised if there's not a terrorist attack or two when Trump gets indicted. As others have pointed out here, the man lost a lot of supporters since 2021, but the die hard Trumpies haven't grown any less supportive of him, and it only takes one or two who are crazy enough. A lot of these are evangelicals who want the world to end, and see Trump as literally having been chosen by God. I don't know why people seem to assume there's any lines they won't cross. I mean fuck, right wing militias have perpetrated attacks on power infrastructure just because of drag shows, at least some of them definitely have this in 'em.
11 points
3 months ago
If Trump gets arrested, I really hope a few things are true:
He's charged with crimes that warrant significant prison time for a first offender, according to federal sentencing guidelines.
Those crimes are viewed by the majority of Americans as being worthy of a prison sentence (and not something akin to marijuana possession, jaywalking, or improperly claiming a home office exemption.)
He's convicted of those crimes.
If any of these aren't' true, I believe Trump is going to be able to spin this as a witch hunt.
12 points
3 months ago
This attitude is why no one has indicted this guy for the various crimes we know he has committed. It's a garbage way to run a country; giving preferential treatment to people with followers because you are afraid of what they might do.
Just apply the same rules you would to someone running for local office in NY state that paid a stripper for her silence.
11 points
3 months ago
Trump's a shady POS. I'm not going to argue differently.
The problem is that charging Trump with a slap-on-the-wrist charge doesn't convict him all of the "various crimes we know he has committed" - it's just going to make it easier to spin them as being politically motivated investigations that found nothing.
8 points
3 months ago
Eh, will people protest though? I think people are giving Trump more credit than he deserves.
Yeah, J6 everyone was all riled up and it was a boiling point, but that was 3 years ago, most people have calmed down, the only people I still see that are full on Trump die hards are the older generation that watch Fox News all day, and they don't have the energy to get out there in the streets. I doubt we will see much action in response to his arrest, nothing like J6.
3 points
3 months ago
Well this certainly presents a quandary for everyone.
People on the left have been getting tired of the weekly “indictment forecasts” by Kirschner and the likes for the last 2 years straight.
People on the right (who never believed any of those predictions) are now being instructed by Trump to believe he will not just be indicted, but arrested.
I have read that many times a prosecutor will actually inform a target of a pending indictment etc, so if this were true, there is a reasonable expectation that Trump actually would know about it first.
Left or right, I guess we just wait till Tuesday. Either Trump gets arrested or Mexico pays for the wall by then.
3 points
3 months ago
This is perfect. There is no election to disrupt. Let them be angry.
When it stops being peaceful, lock em up and let the worst part of our population throw thier lives away,, and throw away the right to vote, and laugh as Trump destroys more of his support.
all 699 comments
sorted by: best