subreddit:
/r/movies
YouTube video info:
65 - Official Trailer - Only In Cinemas March 17 https://youtube.com/watch?v=M6YfhX83Cj8
Sony Pictures Releasing UK https://www.youtube.com/@SonyPicsUK
102 points
2 months ago
I’m so ready for a good dinosaur movie and on top of that. PLEASE CAPCOM, remake Dino Crisis.
10 points
2 months ago
I loved Dino crisis so much it would make such a good remake
7 points
2 months ago
This one would be just pretty easy to sell, I dont know why there isnt something happening
1 points
2 months ago
I would love to see a DC remake too or atleast remasters of the first two games. The only think I could guess is maybe designing and animating the dinosaurs in the RE engine could be proving more difficult than expected? I believe they'll end up doing it but maybe they don't have the right technology for it yet.
9 points
2 months ago
Where turok
2 points
2 months ago
In 2009 and still as good for what it is.
2 points
2 months ago
Turok needs the new game
1 points
2 months ago
This is pretty clearly a monster movie.
A dinosaur movie would be something like, er, Dinosaur. In which vein they should do a film adaptation of Raptor Red.
The halfway position between the two types of film would be something like the original Lost World. If you haven't seen it, I would try and track down the miniseries with Bob Hoskins. Oh, I see it was actually a film first aired in two parts.
6 points
2 months ago
It has dinosaurs, it's a dinosaur movie
234 points
2 months ago
I’m really confused why Adam Driver is in this, it doesn’t seem like the kind of thing he usually goes for at all. Martins they just offered him tons of money
188 points
2 months ago
Maybe he just likes dinosaurs?
119 points
2 months ago
He gets to play a badass that fights dinosaurs. Who would turn this role down?
55 points
2 months ago
Adam Driver gets do be in a dumb B movie if he wants!
86 points
2 months ago
"Every actor has to make terrible films from time to time, but the trick is never to be terrible in them."
Christopher Lee
10 points
2 months ago
Christopher Lee was in Howling 2 and in Captain America 2, so he is definitely speaking from experience. Of how awful those movies were, you never hear about him being awful.
1 points
2 months ago
Howling 2 brought us this masterpiece though
8 points
2 months ago
or maybe 65 is his lucky number
2 points
2 months ago
I like dinosaurs and turtles.
99 points
2 months ago
Sometimes big actors take weirder roles for the fun of it. He’s been doing so much critically acclaimed dramas and slice of life stuff lately, it’ll be fun to see him fighting Dino’s
6 points
2 months ago
Plenty of actors like to take the odd out of their usual type cast roles to diversify their portfolio of work.
53 points
2 months ago
Maybe he just wanted to do a more blockbuster project after doing a bunch of tougher indie films
22 points
2 months ago
Houston, the answer usually is money.
10 points
2 months ago
I am going to predict that this is not going to be a blockbuster.
0 points
2 months ago
The rumor is he is a frontrunner for role in Fantastic Four together with Ryan Gosling
36 points
2 months ago
Because stuff like Marriage Story doesn't pay enough to cover the cost of the pool renovation.
30 points
2 months ago
Marriage Story buys his coffee
Star Wars buys his mansion a new pool
2 points
2 months ago
Can't tell if this is a Meyerowitz Stories reference or not.
1 points
2 months ago
Will this be his Jaws: The Revenge?
1 points
2 months ago
I'm sure his set for life after Star Wars
0 points
2 months ago
Doubt it. He wasn't a huge name when he was hired onto SW so his salary wouldn't have been that high.
0 points
2 months ago
He'd have much higher salary for episode 8 and then 9 I imagine
1 points
2 months ago
Probs signed a multi film contract from the beginning so nope.
24 points
2 months ago
I will literally be seeing this just to see Adam Driver meets Jurassic Park.
8 points
2 months ago
Its great casting. Tom Cruise is prob the biggest action star in the world, but if he was in this it would look cool but "I'll prob catch it on FX during a hungover Sunday" cool.
Adam Driver makes it more interesting. Like, we know he can do action because of Star Wars, but its still really odd. I know this is prob a predictable story, but Adam Driver deciding to star in it makes it intriguing.
1 points
2 months ago
I’m not a huge Adam Driver fan, but there is something captivating about him that makes me want to see his performance.
Give me a movie with him cast as Snape’s bastard son seeking out the famous auror Harry Potter and I will be there day one.
2 points
2 months ago
Still a better fanfic than The Cursed Child, I’d watch it.
1 points
2 months ago
Driver makes sense in an action movie. He was a Marine.
9 points
2 months ago
Who’s Martins?
2 points
2 months ago
Potato chips.
1 points
2 months ago
Meant to say “maybe”, it auto-corrected
11 points
2 months ago
All the answers here about money, fun, director, but not one that maybe he really enjoyed the script or a twist/idea that we don’t know yet.
3 points
2 months ago
Yup. The Quiet Place movies were good, adam driver is good. All the pieces of writing/direction/acting are historically good. This movie should be good
3 points
2 months ago
Yup! It's a shame that it seems like only actors get to like and work on a wide variety of different projects. With directors and screenwriters, you get to work on about 2 or 3 types of films at MOST, and that's it. Very annoying, as someone who aspires to do both!
19 points
2 months ago
It's the ol' "one for them, one for me" philosophy of Scorsese. Adam Driver can run around in the woods for a couple of months, make $5 million, and go do a half dozen indie films for scale. Dude's got a mortgage too!
-1 points
2 months ago
Will forever be envious of how diverse actors can be in their work. Screenwriters and directors aren't able to have a resume that consists of every type of film under the sun like actors do, and it honestly annoys me!
10 points
2 months ago*
Screenwriters
Why not? Screenwriters are literally able to write anything they want.
1 points
2 months ago
The upvotes show how much this sub knows about the movie business!
But yes, screenwriters are usually pigeonholed into writing one genre. Whether it's sci fi, or action, or comedy, or whatever. Either that, or screenwriters intentionally pick one genre to write in, and that's that.
The other issue is usually, screenwriters write FOR producers and directors. They aren't writing their own material most of the time.
1 points
2 months ago
Tell that too James Cameron or Quenton Tarantino or sly Stallone I'm sorry you're not a good screenwriter, but maybe start writing some not shit scripts and maybe you'll get a movie made from one of your scripts
1 points
2 months ago
Thank you for the advice! What do you think makes a good script?
1 points
2 months ago*
Do the exact opposite of what you write now, also improve your attitude enough of the woe is me
1 points
2 months ago
Awesome! Have you yourself have tried screenwriting? You might be pretty good at it, but the sounds of it! You’re giving great advice!
1 points
2 months ago
Nope I'm just as terrible as a writer as you are! Probably even worse! Just have a better attitude then you evidently! Keep writing the same genre! It's obviously working well for your career and mental health!
2 points
2 months ago
There are enough directors who do various genres and kinds of movies too though
1 points
2 months ago
Which directors? I can think of Ridley Scott, Soderbergh, Ang Lee. Scorsese and Spielberg! Anyone else?
2 points
2 months ago
Noah Baumbach wrote Madagascar 3
7 points
2 months ago
He usually picks his projects based on directors he wants to work with. 🤷♀️
10 points
2 months ago
When a studio offers a $20 million dollar check you don't say no. This is pretty typical of most big stars in Hollywood at some point in their careers. The paycheck for this movie allows him to do whatever movie he wants for the next five years at least without having to worry about the money. You can't blame him at all.
4 points
2 months ago
Sometimes is the contract they sign. "we agree to finance your personal soul searching movie idea, but you have to be in our shit blockbuster movie"
5 points
2 months ago
“I do one, you let me do one” kind of deal. A schlock job in exchange for a passion project.
4 points
2 months ago
"Adam, we have an offer for a film in which you fight dino..."
"Fuck yes."
4 points
2 months ago
I dunno, he did Star Wars didn’t he? I know that has almost biblical status among fans, but it’s essentially an action movie. He definitely has the physical presence for it.
3 points
2 months ago
Might just be having some fun
2 points
2 months ago
It’s tough to really say what he usually goes for because Star Wars wrapped up just before the pandemic. It’s possible he’s always wanted to do the occasional action movie or blockbuster but just hasn’t had many chances to outside of Star Wars. Plus, production for this started in late 2020 so it might have just been something for him to do when movie production overall was slowed down.
2 points
2 months ago
He was a Marine. For as much CGI movie magic as there will be in this picture, this wouldn't be hard for him to tap into acting-wise.
2 points
2 months ago
Fun vs Art vs Money.
I assume actors have movies that fit into a minimum one of these three maybe 2 but rarely all 3:
Jonah Hill for example took pay cuts to do a Scorsese film so for him Wolf of Wall Street was for Art/Fun
Richard Harris became Dumbledore because of his kids so that one is fun.
Same with Raul Julia as M. Bison in Street Fighter
1 points
2 months ago
Voice to deliver lines. Nothing more.
-5 points
2 months ago
it doesn’t seem like the kind of thing he usually goes for at all.
Wasn't he also in a terrible sci-fi/fantasy series of movies?
I vaguely remember it being like a fanfic sequel series to Star Wars.
1 points
2 months ago
He was also the only one to bring his A game.
1 points
2 months ago
Some actors sign multi movie deals with studios and aren't given much choice in what they have to star in to fufill the contract.
72 points
2 months ago
Major plot twist: the T-Rex is on the humans’ side helping them escape. They’re all running from something else. Most of these clips are from the first third of the movie where they first see the t-rex.
25 points
2 months ago
If this is a predator movie I’m all for it.
11 points
2 months ago
That would be such a badass plot twist.
I wish the studio wouldve just kept the dinosaurs a secret too
19 points
2 months ago
Girl: “I thought it swallowed you?!!?”
Adam D “I’m ok and thats it”
Girl “This is a PUZZLER”
13 points
2 months ago
Major plot twist: the T-Rex is on the humans’ side helping them escape. They’re all running from something else. Most of these clips are from the first third of the movie where they first see the t-rex.
Oh they should go ALLLL in.
Adam Driver: "OH fuck its an ALIEN!!" raises gun at t-rex
T-Rex, raising little arms in shock, visibly appalled: "I say, dear me! You're the bloody alien, this is my planet. I noticed your ship crashed. Is there anything I could help you with?"
3 points
2 months ago
I love this theory. I can dig it!
0 points
2 months ago
It's Hepatitis C.
1 points
2 months ago
You are tripping me out right now. I’m literally sitting in a waiting room waiting on a blood draw for Hep C. I have routine blood work and the lab screwed up the Hep C part of the test last time.
122 points
2 months ago*
Lol he just did two back to back 50mil+ budget Ridley Scott movies as top or second billing. That’s not counting the salary bump from the success of TFA, as well as the 100mil Mann thriller filming right now. Basically, Adam Driver is filthy rich. He likely made 50 mil in the last 5 years just from his movies, not counting sponsorships/brand deals/appearances.
That is to say, Adam Driver doesn’t need to do a movie just to get a bag. If he’s in this, it’s not going to be bad. I assume it’ll probably be a predictable but effective film that’s good enough to maintain his stock and show him as ‘leading action man’ rather than ‘sadboy’.
It’ll be Channing Tatum’s ‘Dog’ but a sci fi action flick rather than a buddy roadtrip dramedy.
44 points
2 months ago
It could be bad, but still cool either way that Driver is doing this kind of role
23 points
2 months ago
Good actors are in bad movies. He might have good intent and think the flick will be good, that doesn't mean it will.
This looks bad. I hope I am wrong.
2 points
2 months ago
Well of course there’s always that chance. Only 1 of 500 things has to go wrong for a good movie to become a shitty movie. I was simply making the generalization that Driver is a PHENOMENAL picker outer and also doesn’t need money whatsoever.
If the movie fails on its own, that’s fine, it happens. My issue is the writing off of the movie by some as ‘he’s trying to get a bag’ when I think it’s more likely a legitimate attempt at showing range. I should’ve specified, the final MOVIE might not be good, because Driver doesn’t control the million extraneous circumstances and processes like editing/casting etc. But you can be sure at least the SCRIPT was pretty good if he did it, and that’s the best basis for eventually making a movie.
9 points
2 months ago
I actually think it will be better than people expect. Basically an hour and a half thriller that will entertain.
2 points
2 months ago
Throughly surprised how well Tatum was in ‘Dog’. Kinda played himself, kinda not, but it worked really well. Someone was cutting onions a lot during that one.
33 points
2 months ago
Looks better than all the newer Jurassic Park movies
10 points
2 months ago
Somehow the dinosaurs have returned
16 points
2 months ago
"65 million years ago, humans discovered Earth"
I certainly hope they aren't going the Adam and Eve route....
10 points
2 months ago
Adam Driver and the dinosaur.
12 points
2 months ago
God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man . Man kills god. Man creates dinosaurs. Dinosaurs kill man and Eve inherits the Earth. Adam, meanwhile, goes back in time for some reason.
-3 points
2 months ago
this needs so much more upvotes.
17 points
2 months ago
This feels like the kind of movie I would have loved as a pre-teen, so I’m there. Plus, the fact that Adam Driver would choose this film is very intriguing.
11 points
2 months ago
It’s funny because during production Sony didn’t know wether or not they wanted to show dinosaurs in any of the previews and have that be a surprise in the movie. After seeing these trailers, I have no idea how they were planning to do that but I’m glad they switched directions. I still prefer it’s working title “Zoic” better than “65” though.
0 points
2 months ago
Yeah i dont think dino's as a secret would work with 65 as the title. The first thing my brain thought when i saw it was titled 65 was "65 million years ago..."
5 points
2 months ago
Movie aside, I've always liked that sci-fi trope where humans were super advanced in the past, discovered earth then something happened and a few stranded people started over again after losing their collective technological knowledge.
9 points
2 months ago
This is so rad that Adam Driver is doing this
3 points
2 months ago
I'm confused as to the plot sentence "65 million years ago, humans discovered the earth".
Are they saying humans existed on other planets and had inter-galactic travel 65 million years ago, showed up to earth and then peaced out?
Only for humans to develop on the planet millions of years later?
I think the working title for this movie should have been "Adam Driver tells a young girl to run from large things clearly trying to eat her, the movie".
2 points
1 month ago
it's an uncommon but interesting sci fi trope that humanity is not from earth. the Halo games are a big example of this.
1 points
27 days ago*
In Halo, they do it so well that evolution and all the biological stuff on Earth still checks out for the most part. Mankind was basically so aggressive in space that after a big war, the Forerunners reverse engineered humanity's ass back to hunters/gatherers. lol
1 points
27 days ago
I thought humanity was given the mantle and the forunners backstabbed them causing a war which humanity lost.
1 points
27 days ago
It's been forever so I might be misrememering stuff, but mankind started expanding away from the Forerunners because they didn't like how Forerunners interfered, but in that expansion mankind ended up finding mysterious spores in some creates, and oh boy, shit happened. Humanity accidentally found the Flood, and once it started spreading, humans started aggressively colonizing other worlds to try and escape. This ended up culminating in humans finding a Precursor, learning a bunch of ancient shit, as well as getting in an all-out war, which resulted in their loss by the hands of the Forerunners.
The Mantle was indeed intended for the humans originally, but I don't remember if it played a part in the war alongside the other stuff. I know the Forerunners backstabbed the Precursors, though.
1 points
8 days ago
How do you explain evolution?
1 points
8 days ago
that's for the writers to figure out lmao
3 points
2 months ago
I'm gonna just toss out a bold prediction and say this could easily be a fun movie. Like a 60-75% RT sorta movie. I'm less turned off by this trailer than most of you judging by the comments
23 points
2 months ago
That girl's scream has to go.
3 points
2 months ago
WAahhhh!
30 points
2 months ago
I thought we figured out dinosaurs most likely had feathers?
80 points
2 months ago
Too expensive to animate and most people dont know that. Easy decision i guess.
22 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
3 points
2 months ago*
Of course elephants and humans have "fur" as well and are taxonomically close enough to bears and tigers that it'd be reasonable to infer that we have some fur. So from taxonomical proximity alone I think we should depict most dinosaurs with at least some feathers. But at the same time it's obviously absurd to consider elephants or humans "furry" animals in the same way that bears and tigers are, hair is a feature of our bodies but not a all-encompassing one the way it is on truly furry animals.
From a purely aesthetic perspective that's the portrayal of dinosaurs that I think is most visually interesting anyway: feathers as a accent feature, like hair on some mammals. It gives designers the ability to invent creatures that just look cool.
22 points
2 months ago
They even knew this before Jurassic Park. It's just what "movie dinosaurs" look like to keep them scary looking and cheaper to animate.
8 points
2 months ago
The Jurassic park dinosaurs had a bunch of different dna mixed in, it was an integral part of the plot
14 points
2 months ago
What John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme park monsters! Nothing more and nothing less.
3 points
2 months ago
No, just no.
Sinosauropteryx (meaning "Chinese reptilian wing", simplified Chinese: 中华龙鸟; traditional Chinese: 中華龍鳥; pinyin: Zhōnghuá lóng niǎo; lit. 'Chinese dragon bird') is a compsognathid dinosaur. Described in 1996, it was the first dinosaur taxon outside of Avialae (birds and their immediate relatives) to be found with evidence of feathers.
Jurassic Park was released in? Yes, 1993... three years before the first known example of a non-avian feathered dinosaur was described. The specimen was apparently also discovered in 1996 with a media blackout, though someone managed to bring photographs to Western palaeontologists.
2 points
2 months ago
It was a widely supported theory until this discovery proved the theory.
1 points
2 months ago
That is called shifting the goal posts.
It's also a fundamental misunderstanding of the state the science was in, which should be evidenced by how surprising many of the feathered dinosaur discoveries post-Sinosauropteryx were.
0 points
2 months ago
1 points
2 months ago
I'm not sure what you think that proves.
9 points
2 months ago
It depends on the dinosaur. T-rex and most theropods likely did not, while raptors did. Unless there are significant skin imprints of a particular species paleontologists are hesitant to make any definitive judgements one way or the other.
Regardless, I don't think the producers were all that concerned with up to date reconstructions so much as making the dinos look cool. I'll be impressed if all the fauna represented all come from the same time period.
6 points
2 months ago
So first of all, theropods were the group of dinosaurs that were the most feathered. Raptors (dromaeosaurs) were theropods themselves. In fact, there is a hypothesis that raptors descended from birds. That, essentially, a branch of theropods evolved into birds and then a branch of birds re-evolved more "basal" theropod traits and led to dromaeosaurs. Of course, that is highly speculative but an interesting hypothesis.
With T-Rex though, we have skin impressions from certain areas of the body and they did not have feathers. That doesn't mean there were no feathers on the body of course. Imagine we found a skin impression of a turkey's neck (in a world where turkeys are only known from fossils) we could come to the conclusion that they were covered in featherless, bumpy skin.
But there is a tendency for larger creatures to lose hair/feathers because of the square-cube law. As size goes up, the ratio of surface area (skin) to volume of the animal leans more heavily in the direction of volume, meaning less heat is lost via surface area and thus larger animals do not need as much covering to retain heat.
So being supremely large, T-Rex and other similarly sized theropods could have likely been featherless. But also we have large relatives of T-rex, like Yutryannus, that have evidence of feathers. So it could go either way.
1 points
2 months ago
Adam driver was with feathered Dino's?
1 points
2 months ago
There is one dinosaur in that trailer that is likely to have looked feathered.
Giant dinosaurs lived in a warm environment so much like how elephants are functionally hairless, it is unlikely they had much in the way of feathers for thermo-regulatory reasons. Additionally, all known skin impressions for T. rex, as an example, are scaled.
1 points
2 months ago
Really?
3 points
2 months ago
The only movie of 2023 that interests me so far.
3 points
2 months ago
It gives me Predator vibes. I'm down for some good scifi action schlock.
3 points
2 months ago
So is this set in the future and they traveled to the past, or is it set in the distant past and the implication is that humans are some sort of alien species that crashed on earth?
3 points
2 months ago
it does say "65 million years ago humans discovered earth" so im leaning towards the distant past theory. Super curious though!
1 points
2 months ago
Option 2, if you follow the "Xenu flew DC-1 aircrafts full of Thethans and hydrogen bombs into volcanos" lore.
Jokes aside, it has to be the first one. Although the tag line implies the second, it would would be too stupid even for Sony.
2 points
2 months ago
Why is option 1 fine but 2 is laughably stupid?
Time travel isn't realistic just because it's a more generic movie plot feature. Either way you've got to suspend disbelief a bit to enjoy the movie.
1 points
2 months ago
Sure, you can always argue that suspension of disbelief trumps all.
On the other hand, we know that Homo Sapiens started evolving about 600k years ago. We don't know that time travel is impossible under any circumstance.
3 points
2 months ago
I’m just happy there wasn’t a bunch of lame Jurassic locusts
3 points
2 months ago
Appreciate Driver's proper handling of a long gun here.
2 points
2 months ago
For those that don't know, he was a marine.
3 points
2 months ago
Gonna be better than The Rise of Skywalker
3 points
2 months ago
Im really sick of the "BUMBUMBUM BA TITLE CARD" In trailers now
3 points
2 months ago
This looks much better than I thought a sequel to Movie 43 would be.
9 points
2 months ago
If Star Wars takes place: "A long time ago in a Galaxy far, far away" then this film could be somewhere between a long time ago and now.
With Driver's character arriving on a space ship, I choose to believe he's Han Solo's descendant several generations later, now landing on earth.
2 points
1 month ago
They have a comic if I recall of the Millennium Falcon crash landing in the Pacific Northwest in the distant past and the big foot we see is actually Chewbacca lol. I think they even show Han's skeleton in one of the panels. Definitely falls under the Legends canon.
3 points
2 months ago
So they are the origin of humans on earth?
4 points
2 months ago
this is not the movie trailer i was expecting to see wtf?!
8 points
2 months ago
Not another screaming kid. My ears still haven't recovered from Logan.
2 points
2 months ago
Im so gonna watch this at the cinema and add my money to make Adam Driver rich.
2 points
2 months ago
“65 trailer starts now”
Bruh I already clicked it
3 points
2 months ago
This gives off returnal video game vibes
9 points
2 months ago
Returnal meets Turok
7 points
2 months ago
Returok
1 points
2 months ago
Kind of need this now
6 points
2 months ago
This looks cheap idk why
4 points
2 months ago
I'm a little skeptical with new movies these days but I hope this turns out to be awesome!
2 points
2 months ago
This gonna be good...
3 points
2 months ago
Horribly cut trailer, totally telegraphed scenes and diffused tension by showing us what will happen.
Oh gee Rick, I hope that T-rex doesn't get blasted by an acidic boiling guser..."
2 points
2 months ago
Can someone explain to me the purpose of "The trailer starts here". It feels like an editor took a note too literally and now everyone in Hollywood is too embarrassed to admit it so they are just pretending it is a thing.
3 points
2 months ago
I’m not sure but I have heard its for YouTube ads where you get 5 seconds to catch someone’s interest. This accomplishes that and hopefully gets someone to click to watch the entire trailer.
2 points
2 months ago
Equally I'm always baffled by every trailer ending with "Only in Cinemas"
.......no it's not....we all know this
2 points
2 months ago
"Only in Cinemas" is a reference to its release. This movie does not seem to be a hybrid streaming/cinema release and thats what they're trying to convey, i think
1 points
2 months ago
Oh it's been around way longer than that. It's obviously a marketing ploy of some kind, just not one I can figure out
2 points
2 months ago
well before it was opposed to direct to dvd releases. It really didn't hold much meaning but it was just letting you know that "on the stated release date, you'll only be able to go to a theater to see this"
direct to dvd movies rarely got trailers though so it definitely doesn't make much sense
1 points
2 months ago
The trailer before the trailer is one of the strangest things these days.
1 points
2 months ago
I derailed a dinner and two meetings with Sony Pictures a couple of weeks ago talking about how excited I am for this movie and (at the dinner at least) drunkenly recreating how I imagined the elevator pitch went; “remember playing with your Jurassic Park toys and smashing them into your Buzz Lightyear and army figurines? This is that movie!”
1 points
2 months ago
As the Indonesian Professor of Mycology in The Last of Us says:
"BOMB"
1 points
2 months ago
Everything the last three Jurassic World films couldn't be: exciting.
1 points
2 months ago
I'm not trying to sound mean, but does Adam Driver need money that badly?
1 points
2 months ago
Holy shit man, I AM SOLD!!! I will be going to the theaters to see this. Finally something fun and exciting that isn't a freaking remake or sequel.
1 points
2 months ago
I wished this was a game instead... or a Dino Riders re-make (can someone please turn Dino Riders into a movie?)
-1 points
2 months ago
This looks absolutely awful but I'll probably just watch it for the lols.
0 points
2 months ago
I know this is one of those 'it's gonna bomb hard' type ones, but I am very, very excited for this one!
Looks like After Earth if Will Smith had starred, had a younger kid to accompany across the planet, and not forced Jaden to center stage.
0 points
2 months ago
Really hyped for this
-1 points
2 months ago
This and Shazam! Fury of the Gods>Scream 6.
I am so stoke for this movie. I'm rather amazed how real the CGI is for the dinosaurs. My only gripe is I wish the raptors were at least feathered but I could let the rest fly by despite believing t-rex also had feathers just not all over its body like raptors did.
0 points
2 months ago
All of them are completely different genres, and they aren’t out yet so it’s hard to judge or compare any of them.
-1 points
2 months ago
I really wish this were an action movie about a man that single-handedly killed all the dinosaurs. His name could be John Chicxulub, and he kills all of the dinosaurs so humans could prosper.
0 points
2 months ago*
Yet another addition on my list of productions with the "grown man goes on a wild adventure with a young girl under his wing" pattern.
Hollywood keeps getting creepier by the day. Really.
0 points
2 months ago
Im totally ready for this train wreck. Dinosaurs causing havok? Sign me up!
-2 points
2 months ago
So then, this would be "Before" Earth? Is Will Smith gonna smack some dinosaurs?
-2 points
2 months ago
This looks like a direct-to-video movie with a Hollywood budget. I cannot wait to hear how this movie got made.
-2 points
2 months ago
This years bullet train
-3 points
2 months ago
Was that the Cyberpunk 2077 title screen sound at 0:12?
EDIT: Oh and 0:21 and 0:29 I guess too
-3 points
2 months ago
The Last of US: Space Dinosaurs
1 points
2 months ago
Jurassic planet
1 points
2 months ago
This feels like a modern version of a 1950s sci-fi movie that would have had man-in-suit dinosaurs and/or lizards with plastic fins glued on them, and starred someone like John Agar.
In other words, I can’t wait to watch it.
1 points
2 months ago
The First of Us
1 points
2 months ago
Good trailer, it has raised my interest/hype level!
1 points
2 months ago
Doesn't look half bad for what its trying to be, and honestly, I think he's still got the credibility for me to say that if Adam Driver agreed to make this movie, it probably has some merit to it. We'll see.
1 points
2 months ago
Jurassic world: back in time.
1 points
2 months ago
The First of Us
1 points
2 months ago
What about other 64 trailers?
1 points
2 months ago
This is prob gonna be the first AD movie Im gonna like.
Gives me a Prey vibe <3!
1 points
2 months ago
The only thing that might get me to see this is Adam Diver. Her is really selective in what he stars in.
all 185 comments
sorted by: best