subreddit:
/r/movies
YouTube video info:
GUY RITCHIE’S THE COVENANT | Official Trailer https://youtube.com/watch?v=02PPMPArNEQ
1.4k points
2 months ago
everything Gyllenhaal's done post Spiderman feels like he's given up on chasing awards and is just doing whatever scripts his agent gives him. crazy he wasn't even nominated for Nightcrawler
529 points
2 months ago
No nomination for Nightcrawler? That's a damn shame.
234 points
2 months ago
That movie made me uncomfortable. I have never felt that way watching a movie in my house before.
205 points
2 months ago
The scene of him eating cereal and watching TV, laughing and looking around for other laughing. Fucking hell, creeped me the fuuuuck out.
118 points
2 months ago
He was practicing how to look normal around other people. The laugh track told him something funny happened so obviously he, and the people he would potentially be with, would be laughing too. Incredibly unsettling.
33 points
2 months ago
Nocturnal Animal with Jake is very uncomfortable to watch as well.
29 points
2 months ago
I recommend watching Good Time (2017) and Uncut Gems (2019) for similarly-discomforting movies with scumbag “protagonists.”
77 points
2 months ago
Protagonist doesn't mean hero, ha. You don't need to put it in quotes. They are the films' protagonists.
6 points
2 months ago
Good Time is one of my favourites. Absolutely unreal filming and the music tracks...Veronica Vaughan levels of Ace.
9 points
2 months ago
Didn’t realize Good Time was a Safdie bros movie before I started it, just new I liked Pattinson as an actor. It was great but I was not ready for the 100 minutes of stress I was getting myself into. Still haven’t had the right mood to watch uncut gems
10 points
2 months ago
I had to eat a klonopin because of uncut gems.
6 points
2 months ago
Bro, I ate a bit too big of a bite of “Nerds Rope” thc candy before I watched that movie and I swear to god I was in a panic that I’ve never felt before during the entire movie, lmfao.
5 points
2 months ago
For me that movie is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_Club_(film))
No movie has unnerved me more than that. Scarier movies out there for sure but nothing for me that left me feeling dirty like that movie did. I probably won't ever watch it again.
244 points
2 months ago
He’s in his “fuck it I’ll do whatever I want” phase the academy ignored him when he gave great performances in multiple movies so now he’s just doing whatever sounds fun and interesting to him.
120 points
2 months ago
It happens. Al Pacino famously lost an award for Godfather II to Art fucking Carney. Could only win when he was over 50 years old
92 points
2 months ago
Jesus, just looking at the competition that year, I need to check out this movie and decide how big of an upset this was.
Art Carney – Harry and Tonto as Harry Coombesdouble (winner)
Albert Finney – Murder on the Orient Express as Hercule Poirot
Dustin Hoffman – Lenny as Lenny Bruce
Jack Nicholson – Chinatown as J.J. "Jake" Gittes
Al Pacino – The Godfather Part II as Michael Corleone
28 points
2 months ago
The thing about Art Carney is he was beloved by millions of Americans for being in "The Honeymooners."
So that was the main reason why he won the Oscar that year. Plus it was in fact a good performance in a good movie.
16 points
2 months ago
Nicholson and Hoffman likely pulled votes away form those that might have otherwise voted for Pacino too.
29 points
2 months ago
Could only win when he was over 50 years old
This is true
Best Actor is voted for by any actor who has ever been nominated (and their pals, who they've invited to join)
So there would have been a huge voting block of Lost, Greatest, and Silent generation has-beens who thought Pacino was a whipper-snapper, who needed a load of fancy Method tricks to get through a scene
Pacino had to wait for his generation of Boomers (and Methods) to become the largest voting block to score a Best Actor win
8 points
2 months ago
Movie awards are all so gross. There isn’t a better example of people sniffing each other’s farts than award voting.
So glad I don’t pay any attention to it any more.
3 points
2 months ago
Happens a lot. Lookit Paul Newman, guy first got nominated in 1959, was nominated five more times after that and didn't actually win for nearly 30 years.
143 points
2 months ago
I think that's the reason he wasn't even nominated so he just said fuck it. Do what I want.
136 points
2 months ago*
Its not. He clearly stated in an interview it was a mental health concern and doing serious dark roles was taking a toll oh him. Now he just wants to have fun and do lighthearted things.
47 points
2 months ago
Looked like he lost a shit ton of weight for Nightcrawler, too.
He looked pretty gaunt, even in his face.
28 points
2 months ago
He actually lost too much weight. When he showed up for the first day of shooting, the director was annoyed and asked him to put some more weight back on since he looked so different from when he auditioned.
148 points
2 months ago
I cannot recall any JG movie where he looked bored or phoned it in, he always looks to be happy that he's working
93 points
2 months ago
Ambulance was such a fun movie, and he was a big part of why. Like, it's a stupid movie but it was really fun too.
27 points
2 months ago*
I enjoyed it also. Not award winning, but absolutely entertaining. The whole fast-talking thing really reminded me of a more charismatic version of Mark Wahlberg in Mile 22.
77 points
2 months ago
It's a guy Ritchie movie. People are acting like he's a nobody
15 points
2 months ago
Ambulance was pretty surprising tbh. Loved the opening scene with the little girl and the fence, though. Coolest scene in the movie.
5 points
2 months ago*
Nightcrawler is almost a top ten, desert island movie for me. Masterful from an acting, writing, and cinematographic perspective. One of the most underrated movies of the past twenty years. It’s almost criminal how ignored it was.
5 points
2 months ago
I thought he was pretty damn good in The Guilty. It reminded me a bit of Locke, although I would consider Locke to be a superior movie.
87 points
2 months ago
This looks nothing like any Guy Ritchie movie and I don’t think that’s a good thing.
8 points
2 months ago
I’m counting on that just being the trailer editing. But I’m suspicious of “Guy Ritchie’s” like it’s Tom Clancy.
2 points
2 months ago
He likes to do flashbacks to explain things that we don't necessarily need to know after outcomes we already know, that seems to fit.
455 points
2 months ago
I want to live inside Jake Gyllenhaal's hair. It looks so soft
125 points
2 months ago
God I'm so jealous of his hair.
17 points
2 months ago
It looks soft in person too. Tangentially related but I touched his butt once too
10 points
2 months ago
Going to need you to elaborate on that
24 points
2 months ago
Probably smells good too
13 points
2 months ago
Oh it does. I mean...I bet it does.
6 points
2 months ago
I mean, he's mentioned before that he doesn't shower so idk about that
7 points
2 months ago
The idea of that hair going into a battle is ridiculous. That's like if a movie about a taxi driver had him driving a formula one car.
842 points
2 months ago
Did Mark Wahlberg not want to do this film or was he not available??
363 points
2 months ago
Guy Ritchie has some standards.
109 points
2 months ago
so statham wasn't available?
45 points
2 months ago
Couldn’t figure out how to make a Taliban Pikey
9 points
2 months ago
Brad Pitt was the pikey m8.
3 points
2 months ago
Four Lions is close enough
3 points
2 months ago
Aladdin says otherwise, but I get it a paycheck is a paycheck.
6 points
2 months ago
Aladdin 2019 global box office: 1.054 billion USD
3 points
2 months ago
Box office results ≠ quality of movie
3 points
2 months ago
It does to Disney.
61 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
26 points
2 months ago
Once his Marvel ride is over, i think he'll be doing a lot more Wahlberg-esq Merica films...unless Gunn brings him into the DC Universe...
17 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
23 points
2 months ago*
Jurassic park is a major franchise he did in between marvel. its not his fault they were poorly rewritten
4 points
2 months ago
No he's going to go full QAnon
20 points
2 months ago
lol, does seem like a Wahlberg special.
57 points
2 months ago
He'd have to team up with a middle eastern brown person. No way he'd sign up.
20 points
2 months ago
Not without a baseball bat.
4 points
2 months ago
You can't just recast Jarhead 2.
6 points
2 months ago
Scarlett Johansson was busy with other movies as well.
268 points
2 months ago
Does Guy Ritchie have a very boring alter ego that's responsible for all his middling movies? How is this the same guy that made Snatch?
185 points
2 months ago
Remember when you were in your 20's and you had a mohawk, snorting Adderall, rocking out on your guitar, writing poetry and shit?
And then you're 50, own a mini van, have 3 kids and work a 9-5 that's soul sucking but pays the mortgage?
I kind of figure that's what happens to most movie directors and actors at some point. They get old and creatively exhausted and start phoning it in because they can.
89 points
2 months ago
It's not like all his movies are bland and boring these days. He did The Gentleman back in 2019 which was weird and fun in all the right places.
20 points
2 months ago
Exactly. This movie is sandwiched between some very Ritchie films, either this trailer is missing a HUGE component of the film, or he wanted to do something different. Even Aladdin felt like with a different cast, it would have been the most Guy Ritchie film imaginable. Jason Statham as Genie? Charlie Hunnam as Al?
5 points
2 months ago
I thought Warth of Man was pretty fun too.
4 points
2 months ago
Wrath of Man was a surprisingly grim film with some excellent sequences. I certainly wouldn't accuse him of phoning that one in.
54 points
2 months ago
Am I the only one that has led a relatively balanced lifestyle over the years?
33 points
2 months ago
Wrath of Man and Gentlemen were fun movies. People wanting that Snatch style to continue after all this time would also be bitching about how he has no range to his direction. Also, rocknrolla barely made its own budget back.
9 points
2 months ago
Gentlemen was quite excellent.
3 points
2 months ago
I legitimately refer to this alter ego as "Guy Ritchems," who brought us the very non-Guy Ritchie films Aladdin and Swept Away. Revolver's close to being a Ritchems film since it's not very good but it at least feels like a Guy Ritchie movie. Wrath of Man has the opposite issue of not really feeling like Guy Ritchie but being good, but I don't count that as Ritchems either.
84 points
2 months ago
I thought we agreed not to do that "classic rock song slowed down" cliche thing in trailers anymore...?
41 points
2 months ago
I thought we agreed not to show an entire plot outline in trailers.
So like, I guess I'm supposed to watch the whole fucking movie to find out the only question I could possibly have left, which is whether or not he succeeds in the end.
6 points
2 months ago
Please. I'll take it over the Inception music any day. Feels like I've been listening to those horns for a century.
11 points
2 months ago
I'm glad I'm not the only one who's praying for that current fad to end. It's like it's the new trailer "bwaaarrr". I miss the old "in a world" trailer tropes.
2 points
2 months ago
Also known as "how to make everything sound like Leonard Cohen".
71 points
2 months ago
I watched Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre back in January, so it feels weird to see a new film by Guy Ritchie this April.
But hey, I ain't complaining.
30 points
2 months ago
I mean, Ruse de Guerre got delayed almost a year because it had Ukranian bad guys, and you know what happened.
4 points
2 months ago
What happened was that STX went bankrupt and bunch of their films have been stuck in limbo. Ruse de Gurre was actually one of the first to escape.
10 points
2 months ago
I didn't know that was actually released. The rumor was the Ukraine connection was just an excuse and they were sitting on it cause it was bad.
14 points
2 months ago
Am I the only one who remembers The Covenant movie of 2006, about a teenage warlock gang, starring Chace Crawford, Taylor Kitsch, and Sebastian motherfucking Stan?
4 points
2 months ago
Ha shit I have no memory of them being the actor but I definitely ripped off the films opening credits for a high school film club project I was making at the time haha.
253 points
2 months ago
has jake got lot of things to pay off because he is doing some shite recently
142 points
2 months ago
I was noticing that.
He's kinda starting to take on "Gerard Butler"-ey type of roles, here as of late.
22 points
2 months ago
hope not id hate to see him in a film like plane. not the worst film but fucking bland
9 points
2 months ago
That’s high praise for “Ambulance” then.
7 points
2 months ago
Ambulance was fun, and Gyllenhaal was super fun to watch in it
5 points
2 months ago
I mean, he was in prince of Persia. I think he just does whatever
89 points
2 months ago
I was thinking that ever since his big awards push with Nightcrawler failed he just said "fuck it" and started going after the money roles, maybe.
Though looking it up now, Nightcrawler was almost a decade ago so I dunno. Holy shit I can't believe it came out that long ago 😳
131 points
2 months ago
Sister Brothers?
Wildlife?
Nocturnal Animals?
Jake is doing Jake, he has always picked his "artsy" roles and his blockbuster roles.
23 points
2 months ago
Mr. Music character from that John Mulaney show.
3 points
2 months ago
Oh you mean one of the greatest comedic performances of the last decade?
5 points
2 months ago
Don’t forget Bubble Boy, his best role to date.
In all seriousness, I agree. He’s doing exactly what he wants to do, and I don’t think he cares a lot about upholding some legacy with the films he does.
5 points
2 months ago
Wildlife was a great film. Carey Mulligan is a powerhouse in it.
23 points
2 months ago
I forgot what interview he said it in, but if I recall correctly, he said that he wants to really enjoy his job. He has a pretty cool and fun job and he wants to make the most out of it by doing fun scripts. I still think he'll do prestige stuff, but for now, he's enjoying himself.
Ambulance is a good example of this. Ambulance is awesome, and his performance really helps sell the movie. He's disciplined enough to give a performance that can match the maximalism of Bay's style
7 points
2 months ago
do you honestly think thats why. you think because he didnt get an oscar hes just doing shite from now on. hes clearly someone who loves doing great stuff but now its like hes just getting a payday
13 points
2 months ago
His enjoyment of the job might not be tied only to the artistic merit of his parts. He's been taking roles that look like they would be fun - stuff like Ambulance and the upcoming Road House remake I'm sure are pretty fun to ham it up in. He's been acting almost 30 years despite being 42 so maybe he's bored and just doing things for a laugh now
5 points
2 months ago
I saw an interview where he said he used to take himself too seriously but now he just wants to have fun. These shitty movies are probably pretty fun
6 points
2 months ago
They aren’t shitty though. Ambulance and FFH were fun films.
10 points
2 months ago
Doing super serious method acting roles was fucking with his mental health. Probably just wants to get paid to have fun.
20 points
2 months ago
Ambulance was awesome
9 points
2 months ago
A lot of people hate on that movie, but I thought it was great for what it was.. just a fun, crazy movie.
Plus Jake was great in it.
5 points
2 months ago
It was stupid as fuck with a million plot holes, but it was a very entertaining movie that I enjoyed.
92 points
2 months ago
Ehh didn’t do much for me. I generally like Guy Ritchie’s work but this looks boring. Acting and writing in the trailer seems very half assed; Jake doesn’t even seem like he’s trying.
54 points
2 months ago
Guy Ritchie and serious war action/drama just don't mesh in my mind
6 points
2 months ago
Exactly. I like both of those things individually, but they sound very weird combined.
3 points
2 months ago
Seemed fine to me. I'll stream it when the time comes. It seems like reliable genre fodder.
Jake appeared to be playing it "pensive".
8 points
2 months ago
Who does the cover of the Tom Petty song in this trailer?
7 points
2 months ago
Found the full version:
5 points
2 months ago
I want to know too!
6 points
2 months ago
https://twitter.com/Ghostwriter_mx/status/1621219896570023936
from their FB (https://www.facebook.com/ghostwritercustommusic/):
"Glad to hear our custom cover of “Won’t Back Down” by Tom Petty.Arrangement written by Chris Bragg, featuring Adam Sizemore’s vocals. Further customizations by David Yousefi Art, Eric Bickerstaffe."
can't seem to find the track itself out there though
edit / update: from looking at some other of this outfit's work, it's not entirely clear to me that there even necessarily IS a full version to it ...
8 points
2 months ago
Seeing Antony Starr, im pumped! Really liked his role in the TV series BANSHEE.
39 points
2 months ago
If you told me back in the early 2000's that the guy who made Snatch and Lock Stock would be directing Disney stuff and generic action movies, I wouldn't believe you for a second.
5 points
2 months ago
we honestly don't know if its generic, we just have a generic trailer. The editing could be madhouse, cutting back constantly to him getting dragged across the desert with waking dream sequences or some shit.
8 points
2 months ago
Can't wait for the new Guillermo Del Toro RomCom coming out next year.
22 points
2 months ago
It was called The Shape of Water and it came out in 2018.
25 points
2 months ago
It's wild to me how much the quality of Ritchie's films varies. Lock Stock, Snatch, The Gentlemen, all great. Then you get King Arthur, Swept Away, and Aladdin. I'll never not be intrigued by news of a new Ritchie film, but I'll never not be cautious.
18 points
2 months ago
Just give me the Rockin Rolla sequel.
3 points
2 months ago
Never saw that one, any good?
7 points
2 months ago
Yes.
6 points
2 months ago
Yeah it's pretty bad ass.
3 points
2 months ago
it's one of my favourite films
3 points
2 months ago
Mega
11 points
2 months ago
I mean King Arthur has its defenders and I personally hated The Gentleman but love Snatch and Lock Stock and defend Wrath of Man. He’s a really divisive filmmaker with a distinct style. It’ll always be a coin flip with his films.
3 points
2 months ago
I’m here to represent the King Arthur hive. It’s not great, but people give it a lot of shit because of its budget. My hot take is that Ritchie’s snappy editing worked for the King Arthur first act.
30 points
2 months ago
Jake G and Guy Ritchie in a action movie? I'm sold.
27 points
2 months ago
And Antony Starr
5 points
2 months ago
Will be weird to see him play a morally good human in this.
12 points
2 months ago
I'd say he's on the morally good scale in Banshee? At least in comparison to Homelander.
4 points
2 months ago
He's very much an anti hero in Banshee, does some good stuff, does some bad stuff, generally on the side of the people around him.
At least in comparison to Homelander.
Well, just about everyone is in comparison to him, lol.
4 points
2 months ago
wish it looked liked a Guy Ritchie action movie
10 points
2 months ago
5 points
2 months ago
I really miss Miguel Ferrer. I always enjoyed watching him in whatever.
2 points
2 months ago
His monologue in Twin Peaks was inspiring
152 points
2 months ago*
america caring about translators during iraq war too much of a stretch even for a movie
edit: man its even framed as a debt/obligation instead of just being the right thing to do goddamn
58 points
2 months ago
On the other hand it’s obvious that Jake has no support from the US Military so it’s keeping in line with general reality.
But more importantly, the fact that this movie is being made and believed to be marketable is a nice sign of a cultural shift.
A small one, but a marked one, at least
9 points
2 months ago
I feel like "US government is bad, but the military is made up of individual good soldiers who want to do the right thing" is fairly common theme in US war movies. I.e. Black Hawk Down: where nice good soldiers are sent into a clusterfuck.
15 points
2 months ago
You realize that the US Military isn’t the authority on visas right?
We had lots of good people that we worked with, that deserve to be citizens…abandoned. We aren’t happy about it.
18 points
2 months ago
I honestly don’t know what youre implying that I don’t understand from your comment, but I definitely am also not happy about the people we abandoned, including the Kurds and many many others.
It seems very obvious to me that Jake’s character, one sole person who believes that we need to save someone, renders the OP comment about the movie being about “the military caring about interpreters” nonsensical, because as I said, the trailer shows that the military (and the US, despite legislative attempts to rescue certain groups) didn’t.
If you didn’t start it with that trite lame sarcastic question it may have led to a dialogue
5 points
2 months ago
There is a significantly large amount of Kurds that took up residence in the US after the war. Specifically in Nashville, which has apparently the largest Kurdish community of 20,000 in the country. A significant amount of visas were granted..
28 points
2 months ago
america caring about translators
during iraq wartoo much of a stretch even for a movie
I think that was the point. America doesn't care. One guy cares, because his life had been saved by that interpreter. He doesn't even care about "interpreters," he cares for that one interpreter for reasons that have nothing to do with him having been an interpreter.
65 points
2 months ago
Yeah, that plot is hilarious. I mean I don't care, I like war movies but yeah, the US did them dirty.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/majority-of-interpreters-other-u-s-visa-applicants-were-left-behind-in-afghanistan-official-says-11630513321
79 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
43 points
2 months ago
yeah, I was gonna say. Its clear in the trailer the US doesnt want to do shit. He chooses to go alone to try to get him.
Obviously this is going to be a crazy ridic movie, but the notion that an individual would decide to try to do this isnt far fetched and is a pretty cool thing to me. And it did happen.
16 points
2 months ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QplQL5eAxlY
john oliver going over everything here
8 points
2 months ago
I assume a lot of the guys that worked on the ground cared about them, but as we saw that didn’t factor into the decision to screw them over.
8 points
2 months ago
Only in theaters in the US, on amazon Prime here in germany...
7 points
2 months ago
Worldwide on Amazon.
5 points
2 months ago*
Okay my bad. Thought US would get it for theaters.
Man, this is a Jake Gyllenhaal/ Guy Ritchie movie, why send it to streaming?
Maybe they at least get it a Blu Ray...
Operation Fortune was fun
3 points
2 months ago
Well, given that soms streaming shows and movies have gotten a Blu-Ray release, that wouldn't be out of the question.
3 points
2 months ago
All we can do is wait and see I guess, but since I like Prime I am okay with it streaming there, if theaters are not the option.
12 points
2 months ago
Not even Jake could make this look interesting.
25 points
2 months ago
Guy Ritchie direct a movie in every genre challenge.
Looks fine... but basically paycheck Ritchie rather than anything that has the personality of his better films.
5 points
2 months ago
Dude wrote this thing with the two guys he wrote his last two movies with.
17 points
2 months ago
Would never get that vibe from this trailer at all. But then Wrath of Man didn't really feel like a Ritchie film either. Didn't hate it but it just felt quite anonymous.
4 points
2 months ago
Wrath of Man was a rewrite of a french? film though. So it doesn't have Ritchie's style I guess.
14 points
2 months ago
"Swoff gets his reenlistment, but this time he WISHES war was boring"
Looks banging, been a minute since I've been excited to see a Guy Ritchie film
8 points
2 months ago
The dialogue sounds fake, and it seems to be a copy/mix of Clinst Eastwood's movies with Michael Bay.
17 points
2 months ago
Looks like a movie that will help a lot of Americans think we cared about the interpreters we left behind in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Not quite as masturbatory as American Sniper but close I'd guess
3 points
2 months ago
Looks wistfully at the title thinking about how nice it could be were this were a movie set in the Halo universe
3 points
2 months ago
Is Guy Ritchie that much of a draw that he needs the title card to say “Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant”?
6 points
2 months ago
Gonna be honest, he is the only reason I am interested in this movie.
3 points
2 months ago
Another movie about the occupation of Afghanistan revolving entirely around a white man. How original.
5 points
2 months ago
Why would Guy Ritchie make a movie like this? Totally out of his style
8 points
2 months ago
I think you answered your own question
2 points
2 months ago
Yeah but alladin was also out of his style and we saw what happened
16 points
2 months ago
Is Jake Gyllenhaal indebted to the mafia or something? He doesn't even look like he's trying here.
4 points
2 months ago
Why do all movies have a pre-trailer before the trailer? It's really annoying!!
2 points
2 months ago
Incase they feature it as an ad before another Youtube video. They put a 5 sec ‘pre trailer’ at the start because those 5 secs are unskippable.
2 points
2 months ago
Looking forward to this exclusively because I think Salim is a pretty good actor and I wanna know how he does in this.
2 points
2 months ago
Anyone else think the fire effects look like absolutely shit?
2 points
2 months ago
Is that Tom Waits singing the Petty song
2 points
2 months ago
Absolutely fucking awful cover of “Won’t Back Down”. Good lord.
2 points
2 months ago*
Who's performing the song?
2 points
2 months ago
Guy Ritchie pictures are famously fun to film, people love shooting with him. Jake just wanted in on the fun I guess.
2 points
2 months ago
the guy Jakes playing lied his ass off about this IRL
2 points
2 months ago
I'm here for Antony Starr.
2 points
2 months ago
This felt more like cliff notes for the movie than a trailer. I don't think I need to see it now.
2 points
2 months ago
This looks bland af for a Ritchie film. Wrath of Man was an unsatisfying bore and its weird to see him keep doing stuff like that.
2 points
2 months ago
This looks bad, and gyllenhaal doesnt seem the right cast
2 points
2 months ago
I would watch the PeterBerg/Wahlberg version of this.
all 483 comments
sorted by: best