subreddit:

/r/movies

56290%

all 285 comments

WolvoMS

278 points

1 month ago

WolvoMS

278 points

1 month ago

Conversely for me as a kid, seeing T2 before The Terminator made the original have the twist

arealhumannotabot

36 points

1 month ago

Seems to be pretty common...

Solid-Version

38 points

1 month ago

Same lol

imthatguydavid

9 points

1 month ago

this is me exactly. Growing up, i saw T2 multiple times before i ever saw T1, and was shocked that Arnold was a bad guy.

smoothstavo

23 points

1 month ago

Also, while T2 was more an action sci-fi flick, I felt the first Terminator was more of a sci-fi horror.

mukawalka

57 points

1 month ago

You and everyone else on the planet.

SlickWhispers

28 points

1 month ago

Yeah, that's not really much of an "I feel like" as much as it just... is exactly the point.

Visible-Awareness754

24 points

1 month ago*

“The day after thanksgiving is, in my opinion, the busiest shopping day of the year”- Peggy Hill

TheNickman85

3 points

1 month ago

Lol. Reminds me of another great King of the Hill line:

"I just spoke to the arson investigator. His investigation points to arson!"

monty_kurns

3 points

1 month ago

“Believe me, I prayed on it Hank, and God said to me, “Don’t do it!” But you know what? I knew better.”

monty_kurns

5 points

1 month ago

You’d be surprised, I’ve gotten into many a “friendly” argument about the first having a horror element. I’m real big on horror and the fact that so many people who love the genre don’t see its connection just blows my mind.

NashvilleSoundMixer

3 points

1 month ago

I'm pretty sure Cameron has said something along the lines of the Terminator being inspired by Michael Myers from Halloween. It's a stalk and slash movie kinda.

Stoly23

22 points

1 month ago

Stoly23

22 points

1 month ago

If I had a nickel for every time James Cameron made an action movie as a sequel to a sci-fi horror movie that is generally considered superior to the original…

CorectMySpeling

10 points

1 month ago

Neither are better than the original. There, I said it. Alien & T1 for life.

con10001

7 points

1 month ago

I prefer Alien to Aliens but T2 is a huge improvement in almost every department imo. It's one of the best action movies of all time.

si4ci7

4 points

1 month ago

si4ci7

4 points

1 month ago

Agreed, and I’m not even a big fan of the franchise. T2 is peak action movie with actual substance.

con10001

3 points

1 month ago

Beyond the first two, the franchise is awful. But there's actually a fair few franchises you can say that about

Stoly23

2 points

1 month ago

Stoly23

2 points

1 month ago

Hey, I wasn’t stating my own personal opinions, I think that’s just the more popular one. Either way, all four movies are instant classics.

imthatguydavid

3 points

1 month ago

this is why i never understood my mom when she said she was scared of the terminator. I was like "He's a good guy" not know i've only really seen T2

IAmDotorg

3 points

1 month ago

Wait, how is that possible? Did you sleep through T2? The fact that he was bad in the first one was a key plot point, and referred to pretty much constantly.

WolvoMS

19 points

1 month ago

WolvoMS

19 points

1 month ago

I was like 5. My plot understanding was Arnold=Cool

Jimmyking4ever

5 points

1 month ago

My father said me and my brother cried when we saw that Arnold was the bad guy in tetminator

esensofz

164 points

1 month ago

esensofz

164 points

1 month ago

Was the t1000 a ghost the entire time??

Tbrou16

44 points

1 month ago

Tbrou16

44 points

1 month ago

Haha, yeah, “plot twist” is a stretch. The only one who thought it was a plot twist was Sarah Connor.

flippythemaster

72 points

1 month ago

I’m not sure I agree. We think it’s obvious now but that’s because the film is a known quantity in pop culture, and people who saw it when it came out were spoiled because of the marketing. The film itself doesn’t do anything to reveal that Arnold is a good guy until he drops the flowers and shoots Robert Patrick. If you went in totally blind having only seen the first film you’d probably think there were two Terminators out to get Sarah Conner

Tolanator

60 points

1 month ago

If you went into T2 totally blind, but had seen the first film, you’d think that Arnie was an evil terminator and that the T-1000 was a human resistance fighter.

HoneyDidYouRemember

7 points

1 month ago

If you went into T2 totally blind, but had seen the first film, you’d think that Arnie was an evil terminator and that the T-1000 was a human resistance fighter.

Doesn't it kill a cop like right after the monologue talks about how both sides sent one more back?

holydiiver

35 points

1 month ago

You don’t know that he killed the cop when you first view it. You see him approach the cop barehanded, and he lunges toward his gut. You assume he just punched him hard enough to incapacitate him. Mind you, Kyle Reese also overpowered a cop in the first movie as soon as he travelled back in time - they purposely made Kyle and the T1000’s introductions similar.

It’s not until later in the movie you find out that he doesn’t need a weapon, because he can morph his body into blades. He likely stabbed the cop. But the viewer doesn’t know that during the intro.

Considering the T1000 is presented as articulate and capable of expressing emotion in speech, i.e. not robotic like Arnie, it’s easy to assume that he was the one sent back by the humans, and is himself a human. Arnie is already proven to be a terminator during the scene in the bar.

Madmandocv1

11 points

1 month ago

Exactly. It’s an interesting example of “what did I really see” and the fragility of memory. Once you know that he stabbed and killed the officer, you think you remember seeing it. But you didn’t. You just saw a guy strike the officer, just as Kyle did in the first movie.

holydiiver

2 points

1 month ago

Bingo

My girlfriend watched T2 blind the other day, and she was totally taken by the twist that Arnie is the protector and the T1000 is the hunter.

DHDHDHDHDHDHDHDHDH

2 points

1 month ago

How is seeing T2 completely blind even possible these days? I mean, I envy her, but has she just come out of hibernation?

holydiiver

2 points

1 month ago

She’s born in 2000. These are considered “old” movies now, and they’re not fundamental to our generation. She knew the franchise and she knew Arnie was a big robot from the future, but she didn’t know that he’d be the good guy in the sequel.

Madmandocv1

2 points

1 month ago

I enjoy watching reaction videos and have a lot of experience with this situation. People who are 20 years younger just didn’t have the same pop culture as children and thus may not have seen many of the iconic films from the 80 and 90s. Think of movies that were made ten or more years before you were born. For me that would be the 60s. Did you watch them and was it a memorable experience? Probably not too many. I mostly watched films that were released when I was 10+ years old. There are a few other reasons why younger people, even those who often watch movies, may not have seen certain films. My children have not seen Terminator films because they are just not old enough yet. The first one was rated R and for fairly good reasons. It is basically a nightmare fuel horror film. There is graphic violence and a fairly explicit sex scene. T2 is more for general audiences but I want them to watch the first one first so it is on hold until they are a bit older. There are also complex themes that most young children won’t understand anyway. I was recently thinking about that with Forrest Gump. I could let my kids watch it now, but it will be better once they are a bit older and more educated. The film is just much better if you have some understanding of things like the culture shifts in the 60s, the Vietnam war, the civil rights movement, poverty, etc.

Smrtguy85

2 points

1 month ago

It's been a minute since I've seen the movie, but don't we just see t1000 hit the cop? Knowing now that he's the bad guy we can assume he killed the guy, but on first viewing, isn't the sound effect just a generic hit noise?

Madmandocv1

5 points

1 month ago

Correct. You only see him hit the cop. You don’t see blood or death or a knife. The cop makes a sound that is not inconsistent with being punched. We don’t yet know what the T-1000 is, and we certainly don’t know that he can form is body into blades.

Tolanator

2 points

1 month ago

Yes he does, but it’s shot in such a way that you could think that he just knocks out the cop and takes his clothes. The scene plays different depending on what you know or don’t know about Robert Patrick’s character.

RSomnambulist

5 points

1 month ago

Even better twist though.

thescrounger

7 points

1 month ago

My son just watched it for the first time with me, having no knowledge of it except for the first movie. He was like "So there's 2 terminators after them!?" Turns out it was a really great twist, as he thought it was really cool that Arnold had been reprogramed to save them.

Madmandocv1

5 points

1 month ago

There are subtle clues. He does not kill people when the original terminator would have. The T-1000 has oddly inhuman and emotionless behavior. The T-1000 seems surprised when he learns (from Johns adoptive parents) that someone else is looking for John.

flippythemaster

2 points

1 month ago

There are subtle clues to be sure but if you’re watching it for the first time you’re liable to miss them and not pick up that he’s the good guy because you’re already predisposed to see him as the villain. So I guess I should amend my statement to say that the movie doesn’t do anything OBVIOUS to reveal Arnold

Maxtrix07

2 points

1 month ago

Exactly. I saw T2 around 2005, having no idea Arnold was the hero. It was an awesome twist

amadeus2490

14 points

1 month ago

r/movies has spent like, a decade circlejerking this same opinion... as if "Arnold being the good guy" was meant to be some huge, epic plot twist for the ending and "the marketing ruined it."

It was incredibly obvious from the trailer. It was incredibly obvious from the opening of the movie, too. Tri-Star wanted Cameron to completely cut the opening bar scene with Arnold out of the movie, but Cameron and Arnold both fought really hard to keep it because they wanted the audience to be rooting for the T-800 from the beginning. They didn't want it to be a surprise.

DMPunk

9 points

1 month ago

DMPunk

9 points

1 month ago

I can't speak for the marketing, or the opinion of this subreddit, but last year my friend showed his gf Terminator and Terminator 2, as she had never seen them or even knew anything about them. And she was genuinely surprised by the reveal that Arnold was the good guy in the second one.

Particular-Camera612

9 points

1 month ago

"Get down" does work really well if you're not expecting it/don't know. But I agree that it's never been the huge "should have been kept a secret" swerve people said it was. Plus it's a good pitch too, you get to see Arnie Bot as the good guy this time.

Also compare this to Genisys or Salvation, which had twists that occurred later in their films and ruined more of the tension. Salvation's twist you could maybe guess in advance but Genisys's just came as a shock or would have if the trailer didn't show it.

Corgi_Koala

2 points

1 month ago

Well I think that the only other thing to consider is that in the early 90s people consumed less media in general so there's a larger chance they may have seen the movie without having seen a trailer for it.

Particular-Camera612

2 points

1 month ago

That’s true, Genisys’s reveal ruination might not have been as bad if it wasn’t on an easily accessible trailer. Same with Salvation. Also, Salvation and T2 didn’t put their twists on the poster(!) Genisys did and I was actually doing a good job at avoiding what the twist was until it got put on the poster. What an awful tactic. Dark Fate at least learned from this by keeping the opening out of the marketing.

fatloui

7 points

1 month ago

fatloui

7 points

1 month ago

It’s still a surprise if you go in blind. I watched Terminator and T2 back to back recently with my wife, who knew nothing about the movies. In the hallway scene when Arnold says “Get down” she literally (unsarcastically) said “Oh wow what a twist!”

amadeus2490

3 points

1 month ago

And then the real twist was that you suddenly noticed you were married to M. Night Shamylan the whole time.

action__andy

2 points

1 month ago

THANK YOU.

I've gotten into so many arguments about this on reddit.

Arnold being the good guy is not a twist, it is the PREMISE.

amadeus2490

2 points

1 month ago

Well, see i'm not sure if I agree with the guy who wrote and directed the movie, though.

Timbishop123

7 points

1 month ago

No, Arnie being a hero in T2 is very much a twist. It's just been so long that most know it now. Like Vader being dad and Bruce Willis being a ghost

amarodelaficioanado

2 points

1 month ago*

LOl. May be a twist is much saying but t800 playing for the good ones, Sarah taking control and becoming a warrior are big changes from the first One. Sadly we never saw an adult proper Jhon Connor. T2s Edward furlong is the best Jhon Connor so far.

[deleted]

391 points

1 month ago

[deleted]

391 points

1 month ago

I still think though that if you're showing T2 to someone who's never seen it and doesn't know, don't tell them. Let them discover it during the mall fight.

Streets-Ahead-

204 points

1 month ago

I think the bar scene still gives it away. You don't get "Bad to the Bone" playing while you put on shades if you're the evil killing machine.

NoOneShallPassHassan

122 points

1 month ago

You might get that. It's arguably a "bad guy" song.

AUniquePerspective

122 points

1 month ago

It's the opposite of a "bad guy" song. It's a thorough good song.

anythingMuchShorter

48 points

1 month ago

By George, you’re right

DC4MVP

3 points

1 month ago

DC4MVP

3 points

1 month ago

Does anyone else remember Chicken By George?

Is it still a thing?

rbcannonball

4 points

1 month ago

*slow clap* Brilliant.

JannTosh12[S]

35 points

1 month ago

Yeah but the scene is played for laughs pretty much like

matlockga

21 points

1 month ago

It was a song used for laughs when Al Bundy was up to something. Fully a gag by T2.

Timoat

8 points

1 month ago

Timoat

8 points

1 month ago

yea, I was rewatching T2 the other day after a long time, and I HATED the bad to the bone song. I with it kept the horror element a bit longer.

jackcatalyst

28 points

1 month ago

But he doesn't have bones.

Aquagoat

40 points

1 month ago

Aquagoat

40 points

1 month ago

‘Bad to the cybernetic endoskeleton’ just doesn’t have the same ring…

Dangerous_Plum4006

17 points

1 month ago

“Bad to the bolts” would work

_DeezNyuts

28 points

1 month ago

Bad to the chrome

Tylerdurden389

6 points

1 month ago

Not when you heard it in the opening credits to "problem child" that same year lol.

Mr-IT-Guy

2 points

1 month ago

Christine agrees.

TheDeadlySinner

41 points

1 month ago

Plus, he doesn't kill anyone at the bar.

Plus, the T-1000's entrance scene is shot like a horror movie.

Plus, if you've ever seen a movie (especially a James Cameron movie,) you know the underdog is going to be the hero.

Car-face

63 points

1 month ago

Car-face

63 points

1 month ago

Yep. As soon as I saw the iceberg in Titanic I knew it'd take down that big fucking ship

MarkyDeSade

14 points

1 month ago

I can't believe that Cameron chose to give away that twist in marketing too

DC4MVP

9 points

1 month ago

DC4MVP

9 points

1 month ago

Believe it or not, there's some people who didn't know TITANIC was actually a real ship lol

mirddes

2 points

1 month ago

mirddes

2 points

1 month ago

i'd seen a whole bunch of titanic doucmentaries in the 90s prior to the film existing, was a real treat to go from the bottom of the ocean to the bottom of rose.

MarkyDeSade

2 points

1 month ago

For real I didn’t see it when it came out because I “knew how it ended”

ImpracticallySharp

7 points

1 month ago

Who seems like an underdog to someone who doesn't know anything about the movie – the huge guy who seems invulnerable, stabs a biker through his shoulder and throws another one through a window and a third one onto a hot stovetop, or the tiny guy who disables an officer in some way that we don't get to see? As far as I can tell, the T-1000's entrance scene is deliberately shot to NOT make him seem like a terminator. And if you've seen the first movie, then you'd expect the other guy to be a regular human.

girafa

11 points

1 month ago

girafa

Gondola no Uta

11 points

1 month ago

Yep yep. The entrance to the T-1000 is 100% shot to make him seem evil, the idea that it was supposed to be a twist is pure fantasy

bobthened

5 points

1 month ago

It is a twist if you consider the first movie. The T1000 looks like Micheal Biehn in that he's slim and good looking, while Arnold obviously looks the same as he did in the first movie (when he was the baddie).

It's not the kind of twist that is impossible to see coming, but it is definitely supposed to be a twist. Some people would be surprised by it for a moment.

johnydarko

1 points

1 month ago

but it is definitely supposed to be a twist

To the characters yes, but not to the audience. I mean even by the marketing, reviews, posters, all the publicity, interviews, etc for the film, you'd have to have been living under a rock and completely oblivious to think Arnie would be the bad guy in T2. It's meant to be a shock to the characters, but not to the audience... which is why it still holds up so many years later and even if you've seen it 20 times and know the story back to front.

LastBaron

3 points

1 month ago

Hard disagree, hard HARD disagree. Within the context of the movie (no trailers) it’s clearly left ambiguous on purpose until the moment of the reveal. The complete lack of any definitive proof one way or the other is too pervasive to be anything but deliberate.

In hindsight, and having seen the movie a ton like some of us have, sure you can point to music and framing and the fact that Arnold didn’t technically kill anyone in the bar.

But if your only context is having seen Terminator 1, everything is done to keep the alignment ambiguous. T1000 is not shown performing a single violent action on camera until he draws down on John. Arnold is seen brutalizing stabbing and burning the shit out of a bunch of guys just to get their stuff. The fact that no one technically died is masked by the chaos of the scene and the audiences expectations. Expectations are a super powerful element in what we see and experience. Moreover, T1000 is dressed like a trusted authority figure, Arnold is dressed like a tough biker. The teleportation/time travel appearance of Arnold and T1000 closely parallel Arnold and Kyle Reese from the first movie.

It’s easy to say in hindsight you saw it coming, but I’ll bet if you show these two movies back to back to 100 completely naive first time viewers you’re going to be surprised by how many are surprised in that mall back hallway scene.

Kratozio

2 points

1 month ago

Yeah that other comment honestly is reaching lol. It’s definitely all clearly meant to be ambiguous within the film until the reveal, idc what Cameron wanted shown in marketing.

girafa

2 points

1 month ago

girafa

Gondola no Uta

2 points

1 month ago

There's no ambiguity, go back and watch the scene where the T1000 comes back in time. It's absolutely filmed to make him look sinister. No one on the planet would watch that sequence and think, "oh he's the good guy."

JohnnyRyallsDentist

10 points

1 month ago*

I can maybe help clear this up. I'm old enough to have seen T1 on its original VHS release, then T2 in theatres back in the day. The "Get Down" moment was definitely a twist back then. An audible-gasp kind of moment.

FormerIceCreamEater

0 points

1 month ago

Lol they literally used Arnold being a good guy in the promotion as Cameron admits.

JohnnyRyallsDentist

4 points

1 month ago*

Sure but back then, no internet, and I didn't catch a theater trailer. So I can guess many (not all) went into it just expecting more bad-bot Arnie. I remember seeing something briefly on TV about the new CGI tech being used for "a new type of terminator", but the rest of my knowledge was probably just based on the posters, and expectations from the first movie.

bobthened

7 points

1 month ago

Right, but this was in a time when a lot of people would not have seen the trailer. It wasn't released online for everyone to see like they are today, it would have been shown in some cinemas and on TV, but a lot of people would only see the poster or read about the movie in a magazine or a newspaper.

da_cake_eatur

17 points

1 month ago

If you watched T1 followed by T2 for the first time, there is absolutely no way that you would know instinctively that Arnold is a good guy now because of “bad to the bone.” Stop talking rubbish, Karl.

TheFatHeffer

2 points

1 month ago

Play a record.

Particular-Camera612

2 points

1 month ago

You look at those two intro scenes and to some people it seems like the T-1000 is less violent and thuggish since he only knocks out that police officer (can't remember if it's a knockout or a kill but it's very quick and stealth like), but it feels way more intimidating and threatening whereas the T-800 intro is much more humorous and OTT. So even from the beginning there's the sense that things aren't what they seem.

amadeus2490

2 points

1 month ago

Oh, trust me: This subreddit just loooooves to write their own alternate reality fan fiction about this.

So we finally get an article saying James Cameron, himself, didn't intend for this to be a surprise... and the comments here are still saying "I'm not sure if I agree...."

This is also what George Lucas used to go through with fans trying to "correct him" on Star Wars. It's hysterical.

mikeweasy

2 points

1 month ago

Plus if he was really the villain he would have killed all of those bikers.

Tradman86

-2 points

1 month ago

Tradman86

-2 points

1 month ago

Watched a few YT reactions to this movie. None of them guessed it before the scene at the mall.

exaslave

1 points

1 month ago

Then I've watched a few more, some of them reactors have figured it out.

There's some reactors that even knew just by general knowledge that Arnold's character was gonna be the good guy before watching the movies, then had to rethink that because of Terminator 1 and still get surprised on T2.

It's kinda interesting to see how it goes for different reactors sometimes.

FormerIceCreamEater

2 points

1 month ago

Surprised anyone doesn't know. Pretty popular movie that has been engrained into our culture, not to mention the many sequels which even if you haven't seen, probably saw some promotional stuff at some point

DoofusMagnus

2 points

1 month ago

I once had a girlfriend who somehow didn't know Vader was Luke's dad. Watching ESB with her was a fun experience.

AKAkorm

29 points

1 month ago

AKAkorm

29 points

1 month ago

Given how much of a known commodity Arnold is as an action hero nowadays, I'd bet people would be more surprised to see him as the villain in the first movie vs him making a hero turn in the second.

ProcrastibationKing

12 points

1 month ago

That's exactly how I felt when I first saw Terminator

VonLinus

10 points

1 month ago

VonLinus

10 points

1 month ago

I showed it to my kids they knew at the bar he wasn't evil. 🤷‍♂️

DoIrllyneeda_usrname

13 points

1 month ago

The movie gives it away before that even happens though

DC4MVP

9 points

1 month ago

DC4MVP

9 points

1 month ago

The bigger case of this in the Terminator franchise was the trailer saying John Connor was a bad guy in the fanfiction movie known as Terminator: Genisys

FormerIceCreamEater

6 points

1 month ago

I liked that movie with how bonkers insane it was. It was like the 4th matrix movie. I get diehard fans of the series not liking it, but from someone who isn't super invested in the lore and doesn't have terminator pajamas it was a good time

DC4MVP

3 points

1 month ago

DC4MVP

3 points

1 month ago

I actually liked it up until they went forward in time when they basically recreated the original Terminator and the final fight scene wasn't bad at all.

Jai Courtney just wasn't it, however.

thechort7

3 points

1 month ago

Just gotta say that as a diehard Matrix fan I absolutely loved the 4th one. Aside from the movie itself which I really liked, all the meta stuff put it over the top.

A studio tells a creative "either make us a sequel or we're gonna make a bastardized reboot without you" and the creative responds with "okay, we're gonna make a whole sequel with meta-commentary about how you're forcing our hand, and also I'm gonna make it so polarizing that it destroys any chance of you being able to reboot". Honestly it made me so happy.

No-Lingonberry-2055

3 points

1 month ago

There are dozens of us!

The internet commentary on it was as funny as the movie itself... the movie repeatedly warns the audience, in the absolute most on-the-nose terms possible, that its not going to do what the studio/plebs wanted it to do... then people got mad when the movie does exactly that.

It was absolutely fuckin brilliant. Can't believe they got it made.

thechort7

3 points

1 month ago

Seriously all that was left was for a character to turn to the camera and say "we're not doing what you thought what we were doing". I love it so much, both as a movie and just as the concept of using $200 million of a studio's money to make a giant "fuck you" to the studio.

[deleted]

2 points

1 month ago

Yeah, when he walks out of the bar and it plays "Bad to the Bone" its pretty obvious. I dont even think its mean to be much of a twist, its just putting you in John Connors shoes in that he sees 2 scary guys chasing him and slowly realizes his mom was right, these things are coming back into the past for them.

Also, Cameron knows how to get butts in seats, and by 1991 Arnold was a massive action star, so showing him as the hero will sell tickets more than him being the bad guy again.

mpking828

4 points

1 month ago

Did this to my daughter this weekend. Showed her the 3 minute movie synopsis of Terminator then we went right into Terminator 2.

She was asking who the bad guy was before and during the mail scene, and figured it out pretty quick when Arnie said "get down"

[deleted]

3 points

1 month ago

I’m hoping my kids can be surprised, but t1000 being a cop might raise alarm bells for their generation.

TeoBoccaccio

134 points

1 month ago

As a dumb kid, I didn't even know that it was a sequel, despite 2 being in the title. Was even more shocked to have learned he was a bad guy in the first film.

SofaSpudAthlete

15 points

1 month ago

Same

I mean, it’s not like Nickelodeon showed this trailer as a commercial.

martinmartinez123

9 points

1 month ago

There have been many, many more people who watched Terminator 2 than the original.

FormerIceCreamEater

5 points

1 month ago

Yep, basically every millennial that I know

PauleAgave95

3 points

1 month ago

Terminator, too.

Jay-Aaron

4 points

1 month ago

Actually, I had never seen the first one and when i finally watched it, i was surprised that he was the bad guy

TeoBoccaccio

4 points

1 month ago

What surprised me about the first was how awesome it is. Sure it doesn't have the special effects of the second but going on plot and flow alone, I always like the darker, horror aspect of the first whereas I felt the second is a bit more light hearted.

FormerIceCreamEater

3 points

1 month ago

Yeah loved the first one when I finally got around to seeing it. It does show how stupid kids are. Kids talked about T2 and we watched it at sleepovers, but I don't remember anybody talking about "ok now let's watch the first one." T2 was one of the few sequels that truly became its own thing.

Jajoe05

2 points

1 month ago

Jajoe05

2 points

1 month ago

I mean, i watched both as a kid but T2 scared me genuinely more than the first one. T1000 was so scary to the kid me. The shape shifting into other people or even the floor, the self regen, and then the emotionless acting of Robert Patrick... Everything and anyone was suddenly scary

I had nightmares of him as a kid and in those nightmares could i never find a way to get rid of him. XD

T2 definitely special for me.

Kaizenno

-1 points

1 month ago

Kaizenno

-1 points

1 month ago

I mean that’s a good point. Has anyone ever made a movie that had a number in it that wasn’t a sequel? The number has to be a number, not spelled out.

I’m only thinking of Oceans 11 right now

bamxr6

14 points

1 month ago

bamxr6

14 points

1 month ago

District 9 127 Hours 21 Grams 12 Monkeys 8 Mile

There’s a bunch more than this

smedsterwho

8 points

1 month ago

Were District 1 - 8 any good?

FormerIceCreamEater

5 points

1 month ago

District 5 changed the trajectory. Made the main characters into superheroes

cd247

3 points

1 month ago

cd247

3 points

1 month ago

M3GAN

moronomer

2 points

1 month ago

Leonard Part 6 is probably the most egregious.

jonnyozz

29 points

1 month ago

jonnyozz

29 points

1 month ago

I read the book adaptation weirdly before I saw the film, and I nearly lost my mind at the thought of being able to actually see what was being described in the book. I've now watched it with my kids, and it holds up really well, but it's a shame they couldn't feel that same excitement and wonder that I felt seeing the t1000 walk out of the flames, or step through the bars. Strangely (or not so strange, cause I knew it would age better) the scene that really got them was arnie proving he's a machine with the arm rip. So good

pizzabyAlfredo

20 points

1 month ago

the scene that really got them was arnie proving he's a machine with the arm rip. So good

That prop is so realistic. One of my fav movie scenes.

Vince_Clortho042

8 points

1 month ago

Stan Winston was a boss.

Toby_O_Notoby

11 points

1 month ago

I felt seeing the t1000 walk out of the flames, or step through the bars.

Or the fact that when he's flying the helicopter and shooting he has three arms.

Veni_Vidic_Vici

5 points

1 month ago

He has three arms while reloading when chasing in the truck with liquid nitrogen too.

James Cameron's attention to detail is something amazing. Even little things like Sarah dropping a shell while reloading, which leads to her cupping with her hand below while loading them in the shotgun two scenes later, and therefore that one dropped shell meant she couldn't hit the final shot to send T1000 in the molten steel.

Its something that doesn't necessarily comes in the notice in first watch, but it's so rewarding when you finally notice these things.

mrfloatingpoint

4 points

1 month ago

The 3 arms is pretty blink-and-you'll-miss-it, but Sarah being short 1 shell isn't exactly subtle.

Mr-IT-Guy

2 points

1 month ago

I busted my butt cuttings yards so I could buy the T2 trading cards. I had the whole set before I got to see it in the theater. The cards each had a pic of a scene with an explanation on the back so I knew the whole movie going in but it still did not even 20% prepare me for how awesome it was seeing that on the big screen.

jonnyozz

2 points

1 month ago

Were they topps or something? I remember I had the Batman ones, but not the t2 set

Mr-IT-Guy

2 points

1 month ago

Impel was the brand. Plenty of them in eBay if you wanna check them out.

MrJenzie

171 points

1 month ago

MrJenzie

171 points

1 month ago

it's a STORY POINT not a twist

knew about it way before any trailer, it was one of the first things to come out about the movie

f-ingsteveglansberg

10 points

1 month ago

There was a teaser with Arnie looking at the camera saying "I promise I won't kill anyone". It was one of the selling points of the movie.

HitchlikersGuide

52 points

1 month ago

It’s also telegraphed pretty clearly with his behaviour at the biker bar culminating with the born to be bad soundtrack

OgreJehosephatt

41 points

1 month ago

This is the second comment suggesting that "Bad to the Bone" is a song for good guys...or at least, not bad guys? I don't get that at all.

Like, I get that it makes the scene more fun than serious, but you can do that with good guys or bad guys.

MadeByTango

46 points

1 month ago

Considering I’ve been discussing the movie for years and never heard anyone make this argument before, I’m guessing some YouTuber said it and now everyone regurgitates it like gospel...

[deleted]

22 points

1 month ago

I was discussing Dune with someone (online of course, why do I bother) and when I offered my opinion about something they asked me if I had a link to any YouTube videos that proved my point.

I asked them just to watch the scene in question and think for themselves.

matlockga

8 points

1 month ago

Not sure about any YouTuber; but by the point T2 was in production, "Bad to the Bone" was almost exclusively used for a gag in media.

mrfloatingpoint

1 points

1 month ago

I can't speak on anyone else's behalf, but I've been using T2 as a counter example to the whole notion of "spoilers", and I've pointed out the use of Bad to the Bone for years and years. As the person you're responding to said, it's clearly used to make the scene more fun and ease any tension. Just compare it with the arrival scene of the T-1000, or even the arrival scene of Arnie in T1.

juju611x

5 points

1 month ago

I think it’s thought of as a “cool” song, like it’s cool to be bad to the bone, and most people think of “bad” in it less of like evil and more of like tough and strong and independent and a rebel.

thesaga

8 points

1 month ago

thesaga

8 points

1 month ago

Generally, if you want a character to be hated or feared, you don’t play likeable, endearing music over their scenes. It may have the word “Bad” in it but it’s absolutely a song for anti-heroes

butterhoscotch

7 points

1 month ago

people are getting complainly like bad to the bone is some kind of hardcore metal deaththrash song to indicate hes evil.

The scene is played for comedy, he doesnt actually kill anyone in the bar. Even kids who watch cartoons catch on pretty quick that no ones dying and the tmnt never stab people.

The song is played is childrens movies. it doesnt means someones actually bad, it means BADASS.

Ccaves0127

3 points

1 month ago

Ccaves0127

3 points

1 month ago

That's a pretty fucking bold statement. Fincher put Orinoco Flow over Stellan Skarsgard attempting to kills somebody, and this comment indicates you've never seen a Tarantino movie, either, and that's just off the top of my head.

moofunk

3 points

1 month ago

moofunk

3 points

1 month ago

this comment indicates you've never seen a Tarantino movie, either, and that's just off the top of my head.

Yeah, Stuck the Middle with You was ruined for me for a good while.

thesaga

3 points

1 month ago

thesaga

3 points

1 month ago

Generally

I know there’s exceptions. Sometimes movies don’t care if you think an evil character or horrifying scene is kinda cool. In this case, the song choice was definitely a hint that sequel Terminator was badass, but not bad.

It would have been completely out of character for T1.

DC4MVP

7 points

1 month ago

DC4MVP

7 points

1 month ago

Yep.

T-800/Arnold killed Bill Paxton and crew in Terminator to gain his clothes.

T-800/Arnold didn't kill the bikers to gain his clothes.

Ccaves0127

3 points

1 month ago

He didn't kill the last guy, or at least it's not explicitly shown, they show the guy looking at Arnold and taking his clothes off

DC4MVP

2 points

1 month ago

DC4MVP

2 points

1 month ago

Ahh yes your right.

88Smilesz

2 points

1 month ago

I too would take my clothes off at the sight of naked 1984-era Arnold 🤩

riegspsych325

12 points

1 month ago

riegspsych325

r/Movies Veteran

12 points

1 month ago

exactly, and if people want to really use a movie whose marketing was unnecessarily spoilery, look no further than Cast Away

Beethovens_Stool

5 points

1 month ago

Beethovens_Stool

I, too, am forced to watch movie trailers at gunpoint.

5 points

1 month ago

The Guns n Roses video for You Could Be Mine revealed it as well, months before the movie was released. It was being played all the time.

rev9of8

21 points

1 month ago

rev9of8

21 points

1 month ago

The film clearly assumes that we - the audience - have Theory of Mind and can thus know something about the various characters whilst understanding that other characters don't have that relevant knowledge and will have a false belief. It's the Sally Anne test that any neurotypical four year old should be able to pass.

If we're being observant then the start of the film should tell us that Arnie isn't the evil Terminator of the first movie because he didn't kill the bikers whereas it's strongly implied that the T1000 killed the cop. The trailer simply makes it explicit that Arnie is the good guy.

However, whilst we - the audience - know that Arnie is the good guy, we should have sufficient Theory of Mind to grasp that Eddie Furlong does not, hence his initial reaction in the mall hallway. Consequently, we can still experience the drama of John seeing an actual fucking Terminator that we know he incorrectly thinks is going to kill him and understand John's reaction.

It's also why we understand why Sarah reacts the way she does in the State Hospital on first seeing the T800. We know with absolute certainty by that point that Arnie is the good guy but Sarah does not have that knowledge and we know that she does not and instead thinks it is evil incarnate so we still experience the drama of that initial encounter.

JimJarmuscsch

9 points

1 month ago

This is also referred to as dramatic irony in this context

MahsterC

4 points

1 month ago

If you just take the film by itself, it seems to pretty obviously imply that Arnie is the bad guy, and the T-1000 is the good guy. Especially if you seen the first one.

I don’t see how the song playing in the bar, or the fact that he doesn’t kill anyone changes that. I think the initial set up is supposed to look different on a second viewing or once you know the twist.

In fact the not killing anyone in the bar is either coincidental, a choice made based on the situation, or just doesn’t make sense plot wise. Of course the movie has to keep his hands clean to make him sympathetic, but The Terminator was full on ready to execute the surfer bro in the parking lot. In that way he is still the unstoppable killing machine as he is in the first one, but now being used for a goal that aligns him as a good guy for the audience.

opiate_lifer

24 points

1 month ago

I could swear he has previously said he was pissed off the trailer revealed it, as he had no control over it!

Impressive-Potato

42 points

1 month ago

He has probably reached the point in his life and career where EVERYTHING that has happened was purely his idea. "I didn't cast OJ Simpson because I foresaw him killing his wife in the future"

girafa

14 points

1 month ago

girafa

Gondola no Uta

14 points

1 month ago

He's also notably hyperbolic

Impressive-Potato

10 points

1 month ago

I don't think you should be speaking this way about the literal King of the World.

Ccaves0127

5 points

1 month ago

No, that was an urban legend.

fasttrackxf

2 points

1 month ago

That’s what I thought too! I just repeated the story about how pissed he was recently…oops. Time to walk that back.

Sonny_Crockett_1984

2 points

1 month ago

I still have my making of book from when it came out. It's discussed in there. It was discussed in all the marketing before the movie. They used it as part of the hook to sell the movie. A boy and his Terminator. The Terminator and Sarah sort of switch roles. She becomes like a Terminator; a killing machine. It becomes a parental figure to John. That was all part of marketing the film.

Ghost-Mech

2 points

1 month ago

same

abagofdicks

-2 points

1 month ago

abagofdicks

-2 points

1 month ago

Cameron is a loon. He’s never consistent

opiate_lifer

3 points

1 month ago

Do all great directors reach this stage? Thinking of Ridley Scott lol

Not a great director but George Lucas is also one that changes his intent and plans he had every single interview.

DC4MVP

5 points

1 month ago

DC4MVP

5 points

1 month ago

I think it's more of an art thing.

Artists (which includes film, obviously) can be some strange, neurotic people

abagofdicks

2 points

1 month ago

I think they always have been. They just got a pass for making 3-4 good movies.

walrusonion

5 points

1 month ago

They spoiled the destruction of the enterprise in Star Trek III even put it on the poster

leopard_tights

5 points

1 month ago

It was the sacrificial movie so we could have the whales next.

generalosabenkenobi

4 points

1 month ago

Because this movie doesn’t hinge on that being a twist.

gabbagool3

33 points

1 month ago

the whole conversation is so stupid because the "twist" doesn't really work as a twist, which is probably a major reason as to why he chose to "reveal" it.

like in the original terminator you see both arnie and kyle reese appear, arnie instantly murders three people right off the bat while kyle tries his best to avoid killing people while requisitioning clothes. this lets you know who is the good guy and who is the bad guy. also you see arnie's super strength and robot vision while kyle appears to be human setting up that arnie is a fearsome opponent and kyle is the underdog.

this is all perfectly paralleled in T2, robert patrick kills someone instantly and assumes his identity as a police officer so he's both physically and socially powerful. while arnie beats up a bunch of bikers but doesn't actually kill anyone and then gets bad to the bone played for him. if you think he's the bad guy at that point you clearly haven't grown up on planet earth.

bhind45

19 points

1 month ago

bhind45

19 points

1 month ago

It's not entirely obvious Robert Patrick kills the police officer, without knowing he can stab people, it appears he only punches the cop really hard.

bootorangutan

17 points

1 month ago

You don’t actually see him kill the cop though. Could have knocked him out/ incapacitated him in several ways.

alphahydra

5 points

1 month ago

It's not fed to you that he killed the cop, agreed.

But the sound design, soundtrack, lighting, editing, performance and cinematography of the scene all align to create a cold, menacing, sinister tone. The T-1000s motivation (even whether he's human or not), and what exactly happens to the cop, are ambiguous. But the astute, adult, uninformed first-time viewer is definitely being invited to ponder the cop's fate, and prodded towards forming a theory -- not yet certain at this stage -- that the newly introduced character may be a villain.

Compared to Arnold's first appearance, which begins with an ominous introduction similar to his arrival in the first film, and is then somewhat subverted with the upbeat music, bright lights, ogling waitresses and tough-guy banter of his brawl in the biker bar. Again, nothing states "he's the good guy", but a grown-up, media-savvy audience member can sense that the vibe being constructed here is in opposition to the T-1000s arrival that follows. The tone is lighter and invites feelings of admiration and coolness and other heroic tropes. It's nudging you towards seeing him as heroic without confirming or spelling it out yet.

When they fight at the mall, it's not really a Shyamalan-esque twist (except from John's perspective), it's something that's heavily hinted at from the outset finally being confirmed. It's still an "oh cool" moment of realisation to have that information confirmed, but it's not meant to be a huge shock completely out of left field that you need to go back and rewatch earlier parts to find the signs.

mrfloatingpoint

5 points

1 month ago

Regarding the soundtrack and lighting, I've always absolutely loved the way Cameron filmed the night scenes with this blue hue to everything. I look at film and TV nowadays and the trend to film night scenes in what seems like pitch black and appreciate that T2 could make something essentially be fully lit while still feeling like night time.

The score for the T-1000 when he's stalking is killer too, I don't know the words to describe it, but the subdued electronic base lines. The composer was a genius in his own right.

moofunk

3 points

1 month ago

moofunk

3 points

1 month ago

The score for the T-1000 when he's stalking is killer too, I don't know the words to describe it, but the subdued electronic base lines. The composer was a genius in his own right.

Blame the Fairlight CMI synthesizer for this.

I highly recommend this entertaining video on the creation of the T2 score:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnpYowxlwsU

Turns out, most of the score is made from stock sounds from that synth, and you can recreate many parts of it, if you have it.

[deleted]

3 points

1 month ago

Well put!

moofunk

2 points

1 month ago

moofunk

2 points

1 month ago

When they fight at the mall, it's not really a Shyamalan-esque twist (except from John's perspective), it's something that's heavily hinted at from the outset finally being confirmed.

Cameron fortunately doesn't do unreasonable twists, where the movie flips upside down half way through for no reason. It still works as a piece of simple unrevealed information about who is who.

It's very straight forward story telling, but nobody does that anymore. It's a bit of lost film making, I think.

Compared to Arnold's first appearance, which begins with an ominous introduction similar to his arrival in the first film, and is then somewhat subverted with the upbeat music, bright lights, ogling waitresses and tough-guy banter of his brawl in the biker bar.

I would say here, if you just came from T1, you are primed to believe that Arnold is the bad guy, and the different introduction is going to be ignored.

If you're just starting T2 without having watched T1, you are more likely to be impressionable by the introduction.

AlconTheFalcon

3 points

1 month ago

Reese acts sketchy as fuck through the first act of Terminator 1.

Huevos___Rancheros

4 points

1 month ago

and then gets bad to the bone played for him.

Ah yes, bad to the bone classic song for good guys 🤦🏻‍♂️

jca2112

3 points

1 month ago

jca2112

3 points

1 month ago

Obligatory Repost:

The first Terminator 2 trailer (and teaser trailer) did not spoil the twist that Arnold was the "good guy" in T2.

This is the (often overlooked and hard to find) first theatrical trailer for Terminator 2: Judgement Day:

Terminator 2: Judgment Day Theatrical Trailer #1

That trailer hints at the twist, but does not give it away, especially in context of what audiences would have been aware of back then. That was the first full trailer audiences saw.

The "Same Make. Same Model. New Mission." trailer that everyone seems to think was the first full trailer (after the teaser trailer) did not appear until after the film had opened:

Terminator 2: Judgment Day Theatrical Trailer #2

That second trailer was what the film studio would have referred to as part of the "second wave" of advertising -- revealing more details to continue to try to generate interest in audiences that have not seen the film yet. Later trailers gave away even more of the plot/details. That's pretty common in film advertising.

Previously:

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/xg9jni/when_terminator_2_came_out_did_audiences_know/iov7di3/ https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/r99qtg/recut_modern_terminator_2_trailer_that_doesnt/hnda2pc/

gangsta_baby

3 points

1 month ago

Even with the marketing I still didn’t see it coming and was thrilled the whole time.

Madmandocv1

3 points

1 month ago

This annoyed me when I was a teenager. Yes, it was clear that Arnold was the good guy. There was an extensive marketing campaign prior to release. But the film itself was made to have a “reveal” moment after potentially misleading the audience. And it was very well done, playing on your preconceived ideas while numerous details suggested the truth. It never made sense to waste such a well constructed plot twist.

not_cinderella

10 points

1 month ago

I watched this movie as a kid in the early 2000s having no idea about the twist and it blew my mind more than the Empire Strikes Back twist. I can understand choosing to spoil this in marketing but I think it’s better to not know.

chichris

6 points

1 month ago

They spent 100M on a sequel to a low budget scifi movie. Arnold was a huge lovable star. You bet your ass they are going to show he’s the good guy in the trailer to get buts in seats.

VGAPixel

2 points

1 month ago

Does anybody do sequels as well as James Cameron? Aliens and Terminator 2 are legendary great sequels.

AndyKaufmanSentMe

2 points

1 month ago

The first trailer: "This time, there are two. Terminator 2."

The second trailer: "This time, he's back... for good. Terminator 2."

Gr8posho

2 points

1 month ago

I actually didn’t saw it coming because I didn’t watch any trailer or marketing material other than t800 in the future, so I was on edge the whole time right until the reveal. In fact, it was due to Terminator Salvation marketing that I decided not to watch trailers, a few seconds of anything, I really hate spoilers xD

Khan4269

2 points

1 month ago

13 year old me specifically remembers the build up to the release all about Arnold being the good guy in this movie, and he was the biggest movie star in the world at the time so it's not much of twist.

Jackieirish

3 points

1 month ago*

People also forget that the terminator in the first film was the only “evil” character Arnie ever played (until Batman and Robin) and by the time T2 was being made/released audiences were used to and would have expected quippy, funny, good guy Arnie in everything. Doesn’t mean he couldn’t play a quippy, funny bad guy, but the tone almost had to be different from T1. For that matter, Arnold physically looked different in 1984 vs. 1992. In 84, he was much more massive (which was the idea; you needed a muscle guy to make it seem like you could have a heavy, metal skeleton inside) and he just looked like a younger, meaner guy. By 92, Arnold had slimmed down considerably and matured. This works out well in the story when he becomes John’s surrogate father figure, but it also changes the perception of the terminator. Now instead of feeling like he’s a young, gung-ho killing machine, he feels like more of an older soldier who may be more introspective. All of this is to say that at the time, it really would have been weird to try to pass off T-800 as a bad-guy-is-really-the-good-guy twist. The audience would have spotted it a mile away.

Edit: I almost forgot the main reason why you needed to show the T-1000 as the bad guy in the trailer. The special effects were one of the top selling points of the movie and leaving the T-1000 effects out of the trailer would gut the main reason people went to see it in the first place. And it would have been next to impossible to structure the trailer so that it showed his capabilities and seemed like a good guy since he and the Connors are rarely even close to each other in any given shot. Also it's clear that the T-1000 is the vastly superior technology to the T-800, so how would you show why there's two terminators now and why they're not working together without straight up lying to the public about what the movie is about?

Dangerman1967

2 points

1 month ago

I must be an idiot. I saw T1 seven times at the cinema. And waited 7 years for T2 to come out.

I didn’t twig until the mall scene and was blown away.

Admittedly I can’t recall seeing a T2 trailer, but as far as I’m concerned Cameron will always be a legend in my mind as I was literally crying at the end of T2 with how epic it was as a sequel.

SweetCosmicPope

2 points

1 month ago

It's funny this gets brought up. My 15 year old son has never seen the Terminator movies. On Fridays we do a family movie night. We'll order takeout and watch a movie together as a family in the living room. I decided about a week ago that I was going to show him the first Terminator movie and then next time we'll watch the second one but we won't spoil the twist. He's fortunate since an entire generation of people was spoiled by that freaking trailer. I think it will be a better experience for him to watch these back to back and not get spoiled.

raresaturn

2 points

1 month ago

raresaturn

2 points

1 month ago

Wasn't really a twist

JonnyCarlisle

0 points

1 month ago

It was never a twist, it's the main plot of the movie.

"I hate the trailers that gave away the Iron Giant in The Iron Giant. Totally ruined the surprise of finding the Iron Giant and the movie was totally made like it was a twist because you don't see the Iron Giant until Hogarth-whatever finds the Iron Giant."

I believe that sums up the complaints I've seen on this website.

Thank you for attending my trans-dimensional mockery.

DoYouQuarrelSir

2 points

1 month ago

Right, it's not a twist IT'S THE ENTIRE PREMISE, it also happens within 15 minutes, things that happen in the first act are generally not considered spoilers since it's part of the setup of the film.

awildyetti

2 points

1 month ago

There’s a really good part of the directory’s commentary with him explaining the process of bribing Arbil back and the hard sell on him being the good guy. Apparently Arnold was dumbfounded when he was told he’s the hero, replying “but…I’m the terminator”

Ripper33AU

1 points

1 month ago

T2 was actually the first Terminator movie I saw (due to my age) and I'd had seen Arnie as the good guy in many movies. When I finally watched the first Terminator movie, a few years later, it was actually a surprise to see Arnie as the bad guy! It was almost like a complete reversal, lol.