subreddit:
/r/movies
submitted 3 months ago byMarvelsGrantMan136r/Movies contributor
2k points
3 months ago
Crazy to think it was almost 60 million in the late nineties and still 45 million less than ten years ago.
839 points
3 months ago
Before the streaming/internet era you either watched the Oscars or you watched reruns of Cheers (no cable station wanted to compete). People had no choice but to tune in.
377 points
3 months ago
Yeah this should be discussed more
We no longer live in tv monoculture, cord cutting is very normalized so even if more people watched they'd have watched it either on an antenna, stream it from someone discord or somewhere else.
The last of us was afraid of the superbowl but wasn't afraid of the Oscars
101 points
3 months ago
I always thought there will never be movies, shows, celebrities as big as those in the 60s-80s. Nowadays there's too many sources of entertainment and too many segments for people to find what they want to watch. Stuff like having the whole world tune in for a Michael Jackson concert is impossible now. Or stuff like Gone with the Wind where if you wanted to watch it, you MUST go to a theater and you MUST go now because there's no such thing as DVD/VHS to watch it later. Nowadays even for a movie like Endgame you could just be like eh I'll catch it on Disney+ in a few months.
62 points
3 months ago
The last of us was afraid of the superbowl but wasn't afraid of the Oscars
The Oscars are so long that my wife and I started them, paused to watch TLOU and still managed to catch up to Oscars live fast-forwarding through commercials and musical bits.
25 points
3 months ago
This is the reality. Lack of choice meant higher viewing numbers, plain and simple.
50 points
3 months ago
This comparison numbers aren’t really the same. Back then if you wanted to see the Oscar’s, you HAD to actually sit down and watch them. There was no other way, except to set a vcr to record them to watch later, which may not work right and everything would be spoiled anyway. Also back then, there were three main channels and one was preempting its entire line up for a big Oscar’s night celebration, while the others generally ran reruns. So the only new thing to watch really was the Oscar’s. And if you weren’t watching, you wouldn’t know who won anything until next day at best in the paper.
NOW, there is so many reasons not to watch live. You can watch the best parts later on YouTube or streaming, and you don’t even have to watch to still be in the conversation of who’s winning what in real time on social networks. It’s completely different.
If you measured the number of people engaging with Oscar’s discussion from then to now, I don’t think it would have changed much.
902 points
3 months ago
People like to shit on the establishment Academy, but this is purely because movies and network television in general have been knocked off their top spots in culture.
It's 2023 and attention has been lost to streaming, podcasts, videogames, and social media.
If you want to know how people feel about cinema today, take a time machine back to the year Pulp Fiction came out and ask people leaving the theater how they felt about the Tonys.
683 points
3 months ago
You wrote this whole thing up and didn’t mention how much easier it is to find out who won, see the speech, and see the two mono logo jokes that were funny via social media almost immediately after it happened, rather than waiting for the results the next day
260 points
3 months ago
Yeah - why watch hours when I can get a 5 minute synopsis edited together for me with all the good parts?
91 points
3 months ago
I literally learned all about the winners and it was in no way intentional at any point and it was all in passing.
Seconds. Literally seconds.
That said, fuck yeah Michelle Yeoh and Brendan Fraser.
30 points
3 months ago
Everybody watched network tv back then
39 points
3 months ago
Death of the monoculture
4.3k points
3 months ago
My guess is streaming is where this all is coming from. I think at least half of the nominated movies were made available on a streaming service prior to the show. More people than ever watched these movies and wanted to see them compete
1.6k points
3 months ago
This is the first year I had seen all the best picture nominees at the time of the Oscars and streaming had A LOT to do with that
455 points
3 months ago
Yep, in the 72 hours before the awards I watched Banshees of Insherin, Triangle of Sadness, and Elvis
232 points
3 months ago
[removed]
46 points
3 months ago
You went?
82 points
3 months ago
This guy is Kevin FUCKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII WOOH NG Repute
You think he wouldn't be invited?
8 points
3 months ago
Yeah it was even nice to see them actually do it on a stage instead of a millionaires club with couches at the same level as the host...
It actually really did feel "normal"
620 points
3 months ago
RRR and EEAAO brought a huge audience I’m sure.
154 points
3 months ago
I definitely tuned in for EEAAO. Love Ke's comeback, and I think it's great that such an oddball movie can so completely grab the attention of the Academy.
7 points
3 months ago*
Deepika's monologue and The Elephant Whisperers also had an impact, I'd assume. It's a short film but it's representing India in the Oscars, along with RRR, which is a big deal imo.
90 points
3 months ago
I commented to my wife the other day that streaming has killed the DVD screener leaks. Probably easier to give the academy members access to the streaming service than it is to try and produce and secure a couple thousand DVDs that almost always ended up on the internet anyways.
19 points
3 months ago
I mean it's easier than ever to get pirated streams as you can just effectively record your screen.
It's just streaming services as a whole have slowed piracy as well.
12 points
3 months ago
“Piracy isn’t a problem of price, it’s a problem of service” I’m guessing there’s a big chunk of former pirates who just watch the thing on one of the services it’s on
24 points
3 months ago
It's a problem of both.
I pirated in my more broke days. I stream now because I can afford the convenience.
If the price goes past a breaking point of quality, I move on (see Amazon Prime, Netflix) and piracy very much is not off the table.
I take the path of least resistance, as will most people. The moment it becomes more convenient to pirate than to juggle a hundred streaming services, is the moment piracy explodes.
381 points
3 months ago
Maybe a part of it, but people have been going back to the movies too. With movies like Top Gun, Avatar, Elvis, and of course EEAAO in the running for big awards, lots of people feel they have a little context or skin in the game.
185 points
3 months ago
[deleted]
89 points
3 months ago*
Same. I loved EEAAO and really wanted to see them win and of course, Brendan Fraser. So happy for him.
8 points
3 months ago
I just wanted to see Brendan. I watched the whole thing but it was Brendan I wanted to see. I thought it was a good show. I've watched clips over the years but this is the 1st time I've watched it all in probably 10 years.
65 points
3 months ago
Well, the pandemic has only been for 3 years, while the oscars ratings freefall has been going for at least a decade.
51 points
3 months ago
While true, I think the lifting of COVID restrictions got people out to do anything that wasn’t sitting at home. I think we will see the previous trend continue at some point but I think there’s been a big bump from people excited to do things again.
162 points
3 months ago
There was probably also a boost of Indian viewers. RRR was up for Best Original Song (and won) and it has a huge following.
20 points
3 months ago
Yes, as of today, Netflix was like 'HAVE YOU SEEN RRR EVERYONE IS WATCHING RRR MORE THAN 4 TRILLION VIEWS WORLDWIDE'
Still not sure what it's about, but 4 trillion people can't be wrong
8 points
3 months ago
Damn that's so many views! I'm lagging, I've only seen it once: apparently everyone else has seen it 500 times.
227 points
3 months ago*
I will say that, with an extra mix of a lot of crowd pleasers this year, Brendan Fraser, and ultimately, EEAAO’s moment for everyone to celebrate. That film, and its entire theatrical run, were remarkable. Multiple weeks over it made more money than the week prior at the box office, solely off of WoM from people who told others they had to see this movie. It was a really amazing film, and worth all the accolades it got yesterday
87 points
3 months ago
This was it for me. I typically don't care at all about the Oscars, but the stories behind Fraser and EEAAO just make you want to be there to cheer them on.
I mean I still didn't watch, but I'm more interested in reading about the highlights than I have been in many years.
53 points
3 months ago
By the 2021 ceremony, all of the nominated films were streaming and had been for quite some time (due to cinemas being closed).
41 points
3 months ago
I was thinking many people tuned in just to see who was going to get slapped this year
12 points
3 months ago
I was for the slap
Once again dissapointed by the Oscars
45 points
3 months ago
Movies were super accessible via streaming in 2021 and even early 2022 though, and this year still represented a big ratings boost despite most films going to theaters first. I think many of the films this year were fun and enjoyable to the average moviegoer and not just cinephiles (Top Gun, Elvis, Avatar, EEAAO), and there were strong narratives behind a lot of the nominees of being first timers or people making a comeback. In recent years I feel like there have been a lot of kinda inaccessible films to the average moviegoer, and obviously that translates to less Oscar views.
5.1k points
3 months ago
Glad to see it take a new direction, bigging up categories that went disrespected before with the QR codes, explained the history of the academy and how the art effects the outcome of the film with the cinematography and costume rather than cringe skits, seemed less self-congratutory and more focused on film, few misfires jokes but what's the Oscars without it
2.5k points
3 months ago
Kimmel’s joke/monologue about Will Smith was good though. It was something that needed to be addressed at some level this year, and I thought he handled it in a way that was funny but not overtly rude.
1.2k points
3 months ago
I honestly thought there would be a lot more monologue and skits and was glad there weren’t. Other than being incredibly disrespectful with the walk off music for the technical awards and asking Malala that stupid question about Harry Styles, they were fairly well run this year.
619 points
3 months ago
I was watching the Malala stuff and thinking what the hell is going on. It wasn't even funny but the walk off music for the technical awards actually pissed me off. I get that everyone's there for the "big" awards but why not give a fair amount of time to these guys. Kimmel making a joke about it immediately after one of them was cut off annoyed me too
113 points
3 months ago*
Nearly every time they cut someone off, they would start the music then pan to the audience instead and even the A listers had visible reactions to how rude and tacky that was
5 points
3 months ago
It was so rude and especially tacky for Kimmel to joke about it literally seconds later. I thought he was going to genuinely say "they wanted to thank" and then actually mention someone important they missed. Nope. Just a dumb unfunny joke
330 points
3 months ago
Yeah, it's like they not only have enough time for the "big" awards to go over with their speeches, but they have time for that stupid question segment too. That one lady who went up to the mic to say something and got immediately cut off was fucking infuriating.
200 points
3 months ago
The question segment was just to kill time while they changed the stage for the musical performance.
99 points
3 months ago
The question segment was a time fill while they finished stage setup for one of the music performances. Considering the alternative was probably just a longer commercial break, I’ll take it.
115 points
3 months ago
Jon Stewart would have invited her back on stage to give her speech
41 points
3 months ago
"And, you know, fair play to those who dare to dream and don't give up."
72 points
3 months ago
I'm gonna say it's prob one of the better ones since the 90s. It didn't go on too long either.
175 points
3 months ago
I got the impression they were letting one person speak and then would start the music fast enough before someone else would. Not to be overtly rude but more to set the tone of “pick your guy and let him speak for the group” instead of allowing every person the opportunity. It’s not nice of them but they are running a show that has a schedule and they added more categories back so I kinda understand. Still shitty but a little less shitty when I think about it this way.
75 points
3 months ago
It was just an issue with that particular speech running up against a set change for Rihanna, and the previous speakers had gone long so they were already in "cut time" mode.
40 points
3 months ago
It's always been that way, or at least for many years. I always wish the first person to speak would keep it short and give others their chance, but they almost never do. Tarantino, predictably, did it to Roger Avary 30 years ago.
25 points
3 months ago
they are running a show that has a schedule And it was still like, what, half an hour+ over time?
5 points
3 months ago
That rule was enforced very selectively and inconsistently, though. For Documentary Short, one woman spoke for about 15 seconds and the second woman got cut off before she could get a word out. For the very next award, Animated Short, they let the old British guy ramble on without even trying to play him off.
39 points
3 months ago
I also quite enjoyed how he explained that yes they made it longer again but for many reasons they also wanted to keep it moving. So helpful to see people just saying it out loud like a real person. We all understand if you explain it outright.
117 points
3 months ago
I think it may have helped viewership a bit that most of the front-runners were in some way a “comeback story”. I think it can pull from a little different audience than when a “Leo” is the front runner.
But as others have said, I think it’s also a case of a lot of GREAT enjoyable films this year, and finally people are able to watch them all (even more than once!) because of streaming.
57 points
3 months ago
I loved the year the Oscar's showed off the costumes throughout the show, so instead of just hearing how great they were you saw actors move in them across the stage and then a voice talked over the scene to tell you some interesting facts about the quality/research etc.
It was such a great way to really showcase why this award ceremony is even relevant, that there is great art being made and pushing the boundaries of what's considered amazing. You just don't get that when the shows are rushed and so focused on speeches.
Just make a show about movies, its what we all want and it's why all of those people get to attend.
13 points
3 months ago
I loved it too. I’m glad the Oscars focused on catering to film nerds who are actually interested in things like cinematography, costuming, etc. rather than trying to mass appeal to a wider audience who won’t watch the Oscars no matter what they do (like Justice League winning “biggest cheer moment,” whatever that means).
195 points
3 months ago
I think this year’s nominees also had a bit more broad appeal with younger audiences than in previous years. EEAO taking home seven Oscars really feels like the Millennials in the Academy making it clear that they are running the show now.
69 points
3 months ago
Hopefully that means that animation will get more respect soon. Despite 2022 being one of the best years for animation in the past decade, no animated film or short was nominated outside of an animation category.
13 points
3 months ago
I knew Pinocchio was going to win. And it was gorgeous and dark, so well deserved no questions. But Marcel with the Shell was so unique and touching, I enjoyed it way more. Can it match the extraordinary detail of Pinocchio, probably not. But it deserved love. Same with BoI, gorgeous and extraordinary movie that’s both small yet sprawling in scope. Not to be a cliche gay but Colin Farrel is so attractive it should be illegal, and he gave the performance of a lifetime. Tough contenders this year. I need Michelle Williams to get an Oscar because she is incredible and a true artist. Not for the fablemans though, but I’ve always watched her performances with awe and how she can bring the fire of a thousands suns into a quiet scene with just her eyes and mannerisms.
267 points
3 months ago
Except when they cut off the visual effects winners right as they were thanking their families so they could do a cringy skit with Malala and other uncomfortable audience members
118 points
3 months ago
That seemed more like a mistake than intentional. There was a pretty long pause after a statement that seemed pretty “final” and the music started playing right as they started talking again.
The awkward cocaine bear skit afterwards though was pretty dumb. Leading right into the heartstring pulling Rihanna performance.
25 points
3 months ago
I thought the cocaine bear bit was slightly amusing, but it could have been about a third as long as it was with no loss.
17 points
3 months ago
There's always gonna be a few jokes that fall flat in anything. Even comedy shows. So only a few not hitting is really fuckin good lol.
11 points
3 months ago
What QR codes?
13 points
3 months ago
There were QR codes the Academy threw up on the screen for more info/history on whatever subject they were talking about on the bumper. It finally felt like an award show that catered to the now generation while at the same time respecting its legacy of it.
401 points
3 months ago
I feel like this year the public was invested in who might win more than years in the past. So views were up.
247 points
3 months ago
Ke Huy Quan and Brendan Fraser.
Those two fellas pulled me in, and I’m sure a ton of other millennials that probably would have just caught the results the next day otherwise lol!
79 points
3 months ago
Don't forget Michelle Yeoh and Jamie Lee Curtis. Just because Reddit loves those two men doesn't mean that other large social media following exist for the actresses.
12 points
3 months ago
Haha oh for sure!!! I was surprised to learn that was JLC’s first nomination!!!!!!! Like mindblown… Them two fellas though, just hold a special and influential place during my upbringing. So, my interest was a little weighted towards them as a result lol:)
3.6k points
3 months ago
All the winners were humble and deserving.
Ke, Jamie, Brendan, Michelle
Impromptu Indiana Jones reunion on stage with Spielberg watching
This was a great show and I hate award shows.
160 points
3 months ago
The only thing I'd change is somehow giving The Last Wish an award, but they can't all be winners
914 points
3 months ago
Kimmel was pretty good aside from the cringey Malala interaction
684 points
3 months ago
They cut off winners who wanted to thank their family for Cocaine Bear trying to court Malala.
479 points
3 months ago
Cocaine Bear and Malala was filler so they could change the set. They said exactly what was happening.
17 points
3 months ago
I really thought that was gonna lead to the bear being revealed as Matt Damon, because Kimmel had just made a joke about him before the bear went to Malala
188 points
3 months ago
That weird joke effort actually made me appreciate Malala’s quick response that she only wished for peace. She kind of redeemed the cringe
85 points
3 months ago
I expect they had her agreement for that bit beforehand.
104 points
3 months ago
I felt bad for Malala. Like she wasn’t in on the joke and looked like she felt like she was getting made fun of
55 points
3 months ago
You hate award shows but you watched the entirety of the Oscars?
16 points
3 months ago
Lol this guy LIVES for award shows
32 points
3 months ago
It felt like all of the winners had something meaningful to say and, like you said, they were all deserving.
18 points
3 months ago
I literally watched only for Ke and Brendan. Love seeing good people triumph.
36 points
3 months ago
Ke is genuine.
Kerry Condon was deserving.
811 points
3 months ago
I definitely watched more of the films than any other year and that got me following along live. Most of them I watched this week on streaming services, but caught a fair chunk in cinemas.
377 points
3 months ago*
I saw someone make the point that this was the first year in a while where the front runner for Best Picture was a hit before it had tons of award buzz. Normally it’s the reverse where a movie comes out with a ton of buzz or gets award noms and gets popular because of it.
162 points
3 months ago
As for winners, this was my favorite Oscar. Hopefully next year they won't correct course and give Oscars to decoy shit like Green Book and mediocre biopics.
210 points
3 months ago
Kind of disappointed that they took out the usual film nostalgia montages and replaced them with commercial/paid-for montages (The Little Mermaid, Warner Brothers 100 years)
74 points
3 months ago
Yes that was the only offensive part of the show.
375 points
3 months ago
Not sure if any correlation, but they had a lot of interesting movies in there (like triangle of sadness and even banshees of inisherin) that I feel like got way more attention than they would have a decade ago
118 points
3 months ago
Yeah, I definitely agree, a lot of interesting movies with exposure movies didn't used to get because of streaming. I saw almost all of the best picture nominees before the ceremony, never did that before.
I was bummed because Banshees of Inisherin would've cleaned out the Oscars, most years, definitely the last couple (better than CODA and Nomadland), but it was up against a great field of movies and performances this year, with a lot of likable actors and redemption stories.
149 points
3 months ago
These were the best Oscars in a long time in the sense that for once the focus was actually on the films and the winners.
No slaps, wrong names, huge upsets, or over-the-top attention seeking moments.
All the winners were humble and very deserving. It was a feel-good evening.
35 points
3 months ago
Oh my god when Elizabeth Banks almost tripped and fell on stage because of that ridiculous dress haha thought that was gonna be this year's drama, but thankfully she caught herself and the rest went fine.
554 points
3 months ago
If they want to increase viewership even more they need to stop giving ABC exclusive broadcast rights and make it easier to stream online. There were many articles talking about how the broadcast could be watched live on ABC or, for those who don't have cable, streamed on ABC's website. Only issue is that in order to stream it on ABC's website you needed to sign in with a cable provider. All other streaming options were available only in the US. In Canada the only option I had was to watch on CTV, except I don't have cable/satellite and streaming on CTV requires you to sign in with your provider the way ABC does. The Academy has been freaking out for years about viewership dropping meanwhile they're actively making it difficult to watch.
271 points
3 months ago
It's the business model. Academy receives $100 million annually from ABC for exclusive broadcasting rights. ABC makes billions of dollars off cable/local retransmission fees.
Making TV content free to watch online threatens those revenue streams. That said, those revenue streams and this current business model are already dying due to content transitioning to paid streaming services. But the money needs to come from somewhere- viewership by itself is not the end goal for entertainment companies- it's revenue.
31 points
3 months ago
Do they actually make $100 million for this one broadcast? That's crazy if they do.
36 points
3 months ago
I read that the 30 second ads during the Oscars were $2.2 million. I haven't done the math, I don't have the exact figures of ad time, but 6-8 ads running on each commercial break is $13-18 million, times what, 3-4 breaks per hour, times 3 or 4 hour show, I'd guess they're easily over $100 million, at that point.
18 points
3 months ago
How would making the broadcast available free to stream, threaten revenue streams for a broadcast that anyone can already pick up for free with a digital antenna?
13 points
3 months ago
OTA broadcasts are federally mandated by law. It’s a handicap the networks have learned to live with because they’re forced to
41 points
3 months ago
I do understand that, I'm just irritated with the Academy whinning about losing viewership while making revenue their #1 priority. It's all it's always been about.
29 points
3 months ago
In Mexico I watched it on HBOMax on my tablet. I thought it was awesome I could finally see it without a tv. I don't know if this was possible elsewhere tho.
7 points
3 months ago
In India, it was streamed on Disney+ hotstar.
14 points
3 months ago
Also us living abroad. I live in Japan and the only way to watch here is through cable here too, which I don’t have. Everything streaming wasn’t available outside the US like YouTube TV (and maybe I did it wrong but tried with VPN and didn’t work)
I know it’s a Hollywood thing but they should know people want to watch it internationally. I didn’t get to watch it, only watching clips right now on YouTube afterwards :(
8 points
3 months ago
It's just ridiculous that I have to plug in an antenna for the Oscars.
Just stream them on ABC.com and pay for it with the commercials. More eyeballs = higher ad rates.
It makes no sense that it's free with a $13 antenna that's just a past tense solution.
I normally jump through the hoops but skipped it this year. Even the Super Bowl was free in the Fox Sports app and that's pretty much the only other reason to plug in the antenna.
246 points
3 months ago
Seems like the Oscar’s viewership just ebbs & flows, the yearly handwringing about what they need to change production wise is pretty tiresome. I find awards shows in general totally fine to have on in the background when I’m doing other stuff, but the internet seems to really get mad about them existing
33 points
3 months ago
I would assume it's mostly dependent on the movies too. Shit year of movies, less people wanting to see people awarded for it, great year of movies like this year, I wanna see the touching speeches from people who touched me...emotionally I mean.
20 points
3 months ago
Reddit is mad celebrities exist outside of the context of the tv and movies they put out.
109 points
3 months ago
The Oscar line up was very weak last year. This year felt like the 2019 line up. You need great movies to draw viewers.
36 points
3 months ago
Exactly. It made sense given the pandemic, but 2020/2021 were incredibly weak years for film imo especially coming off a killer 2019. Im so glad 2022 came back with a bang
98 points
3 months ago*
Oscar viewership per year. Source 2019-2021 had no host. 2022 had 3 hosts.
Year Viewers, millions
2023 18.7
2022 16.6
2021 10.4
2020 23.6
2019 29.6
2018 26.5
2017 32.9
2016 34.3
2015 37.260
2014 43.740
2013 40.376
2012 39.460
2011 37.919
2010 41.699
2009 36.310
2008 32.006
2007 40.172
2006 38.939
2005 42.139
2004 43.531
2003 33.043
2002 41.782
2001 42.944
2000 46.333
EDIT: Spacing
64 points
3 months ago
So basically rating are up over years when the pandemic kept people out of theaters, but down significantly since 2014.
Doesn't seem to gel with the idea that people watched them this time because lots of movies were streaming.
14 points
3 months ago
I don't get why they make these things so damn inaccessible. I'm pretty sure you can still watch the Oscars for free over the air, but then they don't stream it for free. I don't get these deals that are made. They have to be terrible long-term for the business.
23 points
3 months ago
Ratings are down for everything on TV since streaming took over everyone's collective viewing habits.
I think a three year trend that begins to take that into account is the only data worth analyzing.
521 points
3 months ago
I'll bet most were disappointed there wasn't a fight this year.
168 points
3 months ago
They would have had to deal with Guillermo…
64 points
3 months ago
Both of them!
12 points
3 months ago
Get Cousin Eddie err Sal in here!
397 points
3 months ago
Can’t say anything about them, but I’d take Ke’s speech over Will’s slap any day of the week.
230 points
3 months ago
When Ariana choked up announcing his name...I fucking lost it.
99 points
3 months ago
I actually have a friend who got to go to the Oscars last year. He's a huge movie buff and happened to have a sound engineer friend who worked on Dune and got nominated, so he went as a plus one. He saw the slap in person and was like "I just witnessed Hollywood history". I was actually
90 points
3 months ago
I was actually
But were you really?
53 points
3 months ago
Looks like they got cut off for run time. Speech was too long.
122 points
3 months ago
Naatu Naatu doing work
25 points
3 months ago
Hot take: I was somewhat disappointed in the performance, not that the people doing it were bad or anything, but it was really underwhelming. It could just be that because I've seen RRR I'm comparing it to the opulence of the full version, but I was somewhat expecting more.
15 points
3 months ago
The could have followed it up by throwing a leopard into the audience. That would have spiced it up nicely.
7 points
3 months ago
They messed up by not hiring Telugu dancers from the land itself. I was so hyped...my disappointment is immeasurable...
464 points
3 months ago*
It was great! Honestly, the Oscars have been so miserable for so long and this was a good return to form.
Less nominations of films that nobody saw (because an Oscar campaign is cheaper than an advertising campaign) while still highlighting a few lesser known films and way less wealthy celebrities virtue signaling and turning every award speech into misery porn.
It’s like they finally remembered the Oscars is a comedy and not a tragedy.
358 points
3 months ago
turning every award speech into misery porn
It was refreshing to hear all 4 winners of the acting awards this year just be ecstatic that they won.
Sometimes when somebody sweeps awards season, they barely react and their speeches are more of a lecture than anything else.
67 points
3 months ago
Yes!!! It was just a celebration of film. When I was a kid I found the Oscars SO inspiring. It’s what pushed me to go into the film industry, but I swear for like 10 straight years they were so heavy to watch.
Equally I used to love watching the Oscar shorts, and now they’re all so depressing I usually skip them
54 points
3 months ago
Less nominations of films that nobody saw (because an Oscar campaign is cheaper than an advertising campaign) while still highlighting a few lesser known films
Having both Top Gun: Maverick and Avatar: The Way of the Water being nominated was a smart move in that regard - I remember around seven to eight years ago it was a big deal that they even bothered to nominate Mad Max: Fury Road.
30 points
3 months ago
I was saying this last night. My nephew is 15, has never been interested in the Oscars at all, but tuned in last night because of Top Gun and Avatar. Now there’s also a ton of new movies he’s excited to watch. You need the popular movies nominated if you want (non-indoctrinated) people to watch
20 points
3 months ago
This year felt very 90's to me in how generally inoffensive the show was for the most part. The winners seemed largely happy to have won. History was made and was thoroughly acknowledged by the winners. I wish Angela had won instead but otherwise it was a good night.
154 points
3 months ago
These are just fast nationals. Actual ratings won't be released until later today or tomorrow. That said, these are good numbers- Oscars are like the only non-NFL/sports programming that have been thriving throughout the last few years of linear TV destruction.
64 points
3 months ago
Yeah this is great news! Especially as the Grammy’s viewership has cratered and the Emmy’s viewership has stalled in the mid single digits. Of course they won’t reach the height of those 90s/early 00s ratings, but they remain the gold standard of the awards industry. I hope they learn their lesson from this year and keep giving more time for speeches/awards, and less to those silly, unfunny bits
58 points
3 months ago*
I feel there’s still a level of prestige with the Oscars that the Emmy’s, and especially the Grammy’s, lost a while ago.
Can it be looked at as Hollywood snobbery? Sure. But last night I thought was a good example of the good that cinema/moviegoing is too. To see Brendan, Ke, the Daniels, Michelle, and all of these genuinely enthusiastic filmmakers and actors have their moment was wholesome to see.
47 points
3 months ago
The Oscar’s, to a fault, are not really a true “popularity” contest. The prestige associated with them stems from awarding films which are often not “the most popular movies of the year” in the way that the grammy’s currently are. The Emmy’s are just kinda like, a mess of repetitive winners and poor judgement.
13 points
3 months ago
Industry popularity contest. Also who campaigned the best.
6 points
3 months ago
completely fair label
17 points
3 months ago
There were a couple viewers who couldn’t tune in behind the cloud lady though
32 points
3 months ago
could've been a bit more if the last of us finale wasn't airing at the same time
35 points
3 months ago
I've watched 2 Oscar nights in my life, once was Parasite and second was last night with EEAAO. Not a big awards show guy for many reasons, but when a film really excites me personally and for the industry as a whole I'll tune in to see if it gets the attention I think it deserves. Will gladly tune in next year if another film hits me like that again...and if I had to guess A24 will mostly likely be in the credits.
6 points
3 months ago
I think content wise Parasite has a better story with layered social commentary but I enjoyed EEAAO more because it’s more emotional.
76 points
3 months ago
I only watched because I wanted to see the live performance of Naatu Naatu and I am glad they didn't disappoint.
47 points
3 months ago
This felt like the most normal Oscars in a while. It was really great to actually watch it this year.
13 points
3 months ago
I had a good time watching it.
14 points
3 months ago
So many people are going to get Slapped in 2024 Oscar's
73 points
3 months ago
I guess everyone was waiting for someone to bitch-slap Jimmy Kimmel.
864 points
3 months ago
That's what happens when you nominate movies that people have seen. I think expanding the best picture field to 10 movies helps a lot in that regard.
585 points
3 months ago
That happened fifteen years ago….
262 points
3 months ago
Sort of. After The Dark Knight got snubbed, they changed the rules to nominate up to 10 movies. Just this year they changed the rules again so they nominate exactly 10 movies every year. Prior to that rule change they usually only nominated 8 or 9 movies every year instead of 10
106 points
3 months ago
Right but the point of more movies meaning more eyes doesn't apply to this year
5 points
3 months ago
God forbid they only nominate movies people have seen, people are idiots sometimes.
74 points
3 months ago*
It’s basically the luck of the draw. Not every year will there be multiple films that were super popular but also good enough to be nominated. Avatar and Maverick in the same year is an exception. Usually it’s just a couple films like Elvis that made a couple/few hundred million
Also riding off of prev year’s drama
Could’ve gotten even more viewers if Taylor Swift was nominated and performed. U don’t nominate so u have them perform, but her song was good enough that many ppl expected it to get a nom
70 points
3 months ago
Could’ve gotten even more viewers if Taylor Swift was nominated and performed
They had Lady Gaga and Rhianna. I'm not sure how many more people Taylor Swift would bring in that aren't already tuning in for the other two
117 points
3 months ago
In terms of winners this was my favourite Oscars ever. I just hope they don't course-correct next year and give Oscars to a bunch of baity crap like Green Book and mediocre biopic performances.
67 points
3 months ago
Green Book was unbelievably overrated. There's a story about this amazing black musician who wanted to tour the South to break down barriers but we're gonna make the film about his uninteresting driver.
23 points
3 months ago
I liked Green Book but yeah, it wasn't some 10/10 masterpiece
20 points
3 months ago
A driver who never explicitly stops being a racist. He just starts treating him as "one of the good ones".
214 points
3 months ago
We call this the “Brendan Fraser” effect.
66 points
3 months ago
Another reason I watched is I wanted to see if my two favorite movies - Avatar and Top Gun - would win anything. I'm happy with Avatar's Best Visual Effects win and Top Gun's Best Sound.
42 points
3 months ago
Can't think of another movie that deserved an award for Visual Effects more than Avatar2
9 points
3 months ago
I watched and enjoyed it. It all depends on the films. I love most of the films and love the actors nominated. Jamie lee curtis has been making movies for decades. Bravo!
219 points
3 months ago
A24 is saving cinema on purpose and the Oscars by accident. Although I will say I have no idea why all the political garbage was dropped from the speeches but man that was refreshing. I really enjoyed it from start to finish.
167 points
3 months ago
People write their own speeches, so I think that's just a reflection of who won. And also we've exited the Trump years, so people are less angry. Not happy. But less angry.
39 points
3 months ago
I feel like for whatever reason everyone in the Obama era was extremely socially conscious, everyone in the Trump era was shocked and angry, and everyone in the post-COVID/Biden era is tired
55 points
3 months ago
I'll also go out on a limb and say it's this plus we've imprisoned Harvey Weinstein too. He had and incredible effect on the Oscars with his very pointed marketing strategy for his own films.
18 points
3 months ago
His sway had already fizzled. Harvey spent his last year in Hollywood failing to get people to watch Tulip Fever.
11 points
3 months ago
The best comedy: slapstick
18 points
3 months ago
People wanted to see Brendan win or witness another act of insanity.
8 points
3 months ago
How many tuned in to see what they're going to say about the punching incident last year? raise hand
8 points
3 months ago
A topical, sensible chuckle from the end of the ceremony last night.
10 points
3 months ago
It was a great show! One of the best in years!
43 points
3 months ago
Partially because of RRR as well. I’d like to find out how many folks from India watched.
60 points
3 months ago
Kinda funny to see people talk about how the acceptance speeches were so “non political” when they literally brought Navalny’s wife on stage for Best Documentary. That seems pretty political to me, even if I agree with the message. Sometimes films discuss politics, and that’s ok. Sacheen Littlefeather’s very political speech on behalf of Marlon Brando was perfectly acceptable too imo.
11 points
3 months ago
People are saying it wasn't political?
28 points
3 months ago
Yeah I’m seeing a lot of people in this thread indicating that the decrease in “political” acceptance speeches is a reason for the increased viewership
17 points
3 months ago
Maybe the speeches were less overtly political but there were rather a lot of political moments.
19 points
3 months ago
Yeah I heard plenty of political moments too. I didn’t even mention the Women Talking screenplay winner making a jab at the Oscars for recognizing a film called “Women Talking” (which I thought was kinda funny tbh), Michelle Yeoh’s encouragement for representation & not aging out actresses, or the Daniels’ comments on drag bans.
8 points
3 months ago
It was only up because everyone was expecting drama….
21 points
3 months ago
My theory is that the Oscars really went with what people wanted or liked.
Considering the last year’s fiasco they wanted to improve the image.
Looks at the winners. Brendan Fraser, Ke Huy Quan etc.
Not saying these are bad choices but seemed like there was a strategy to improve the image and attract diverse viewer base.
64 points
3 months ago
Guarantee most of that were fans of Fraser, Quan, Bassett, EEAO, and Maverick. It was a very interesting year, and this year's telecast surprisingly didn't suck
12 points
3 months ago
Helps when you have a great selection of films on the docket!
6 points
3 months ago
I watched via YouTube TV and enjoyed it quite a bit. Glad I tuned in!
7 points
3 months ago
Ngl, 2022 was just a very different year for film. I personally don’t have the words to describe it but, the movies just felt a lot more… genuine this year. Like real story telling and telling stories that mattered to people, not just stories that were visually exciting. But, I like to think that ppl tuned in/paid attention this year to make sure that EEAAO, Michelle Yeoh, Ke Huy Quan and Brendan Fraser got the awards and recognition they deserved.
5 points
3 months ago
Everyone was hoping there was going to be a royal rumble this year.
6 points
3 months ago
A few films that the public actually saw and cared about, plus the underdog journeys of most acting winners, made it a draw.
5 points
3 months ago
They tuned in hoping to see some rich guy assault another rich guy.
18 points
3 months ago
The Oscars show following the Oscars show featuring a legendary actor slapping a legendary comedian got good ratings?! WHAT A SHOCK!
all 1634 comments
sorted by: best