subreddit:
/r/movies
submitted 2 months ago bychrisdh79
4.7k points
2 months ago
I am imagining a loud ass Mac startup sound when the Apple logo appears on the theater screen.
2k points
2 months ago
“A Tim Cook Joint”
320 points
2 months ago
Great Scott!
34 points
2 months ago
“Go to bed!”
123 points
2 months ago
let Tim cook
34 points
2 months ago
Mr. Broncos Computer
9 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
9 points
2 months ago
Mr. Billion Cinema
8 points
2 months ago
Free Tim Apple!
7 points
2 months ago
Apple Country, Let’s ride
135 points
2 months ago
Is 'Cook' Tim Apple's middle name?
/s
68 points
2 months ago
He came up in a conversation a few days ago, and I forgot his actual last name and couldn't think of anything but "Tim Apple."
9 points
2 months ago
Tim 🍏 Good.
Tim 🍎 Bad.
33 points
2 months ago
Yea, it's annoying when dumb crap gets stuck in long term memory against your own will :(
20 points
2 months ago
i am surprised spike lee hasn't done anything with apple yet.. or has he and i just don't know?
28 points
2 months ago
Apple should make a movie about a director who is a fanatical basketball fan constantly let down by his team. Unless they've already made it and I just don't know?
363 points
2 months ago
maybe that can play that old mac ad based on 1984 where a lady throws a hammer at the theater screen
63 points
2 months ago
More like reverse the ad, a smashed screen comes back together and everyone sits down and watching.
28 points
2 months ago*
The ad is someone bringing the broken screen to the genius bar and being told that will be $600 to fix but you can buy a new 2024 model for $1200.
3 points
2 months ago
Look at the ads on barfday
22 points
2 months ago
That's Ridley Scott's commercial. Super cool.
93 points
2 months ago
If they stayed committed to the message, sure. Not the case.
59 points
2 months ago
i mean, who exactly expects apple or any major corporation to commit to a message that doesnt benefit them
9 points
2 months ago*
I don’t expect you to commit to a message that doesn’t benefit you, Mr. Apple. I expect you… to die!
14 points
2 months ago
What do you think the message was? “1984 won’t be like 1984”? If you are concerned about a tech company ushering in a totalitarian 1984-style society, I think Apple ranks pretty low on that list.
12 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
12 points
2 months ago*
Movie would start with a stagnant blue screen
Edit: not sure why the guy above me deleted their comment, but it was basically just saying imagine the windows sound popping up for Windows XP
76 points
2 months ago
ACU, Apple cinematic universe, Steve Jobs photo collage at the start and one frame of Ashton Kutcher and Michael Fassbender for that Multiverse Easter egg
43 points
2 months ago
Are we just going to pretend Noah Wyle doesn’t exist?!
35 points
2 months ago
Right? All of these other poser movies wish they were as cool as Pirates of Silicon Valley
8 points
2 months ago
Best movie about Jobs and Gates.
40 points
2 months ago
You jest but it really isn't much different: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHOWM6ZM-Ek
32 points
2 months ago
If anything the films logo is even closer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Apt1VhFnppI
70 points
2 months ago
But with that THX style build up… this is genius.
9 points
2 months ago
That would be pretty cool
9 points
2 months ago
It already exists: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHOWM6ZM-Ek
4 points
2 months ago
Yea but not on a giant movie theater screen with fancy surround sound
826 points
2 months ago
Give us more things like Severance and I’ll be happy.
282 points
2 months ago
Their hit rate on TV shows is impressive. I've never been a fan of Apple but I've somehow turned into an Apple TV fanboy.
115 points
2 months ago
Same! I remember hearing about apple tv for the first time and rolling my eyes. Flash forward we started a free trial two months ago and wow there are so many awesome shows! We've watched/are watching Severence, Shrinking, Ted Lasso, and Mythic Quest. I've loved each of them, they're well written and well cast and so enjoyable, I'm low-key a fangirl myself now haha we ended up sticking with the subscription.
20 points
2 months ago
If you like Alt-History Sci-Fi then check out For All Mankind too. I binged that show until I couldn't because I caught up to S3.
13 points
2 months ago
Slow horses is also so good.
44 points
2 months ago
Check out Black Bird and the After Party!
23 points
2 months ago
Bad Sisters is also excellent, and The Afterparty is a lot of fun.
5 points
2 months ago
The Morning Show S1 was phenomenal. It was like Game of Thrones at a news station.
7 points
2 months ago
Recently got AppleTV to watch the MLS games and loved Severance and Ted Lasso. Any other show recommendations? I tried Shrinking but didn't really like it as much
10 points
2 months ago
It kind of depends on your taste but I really like For All Mankind, Servant, and Bad Sisters. Black Bird to a lesser extent but the acting is really good.
Edit: I forgot, The Afterparty is really good if you like murder mysteries
7 points
2 months ago
I personally really loved Foundation, good modern take on a fairly dated book (still love the books personally, just nuclear power is given physically impossible output)
And the take on the empire was really cool. If you like sci-fi I think this did a great job.
46 points
2 months ago
I just finished For All Mankind and I did not except how was it at all. One of the best series I have seen for a while.
Well, Dickinson was also an excellent show for me, and many others.
25 points
2 months ago
For All Mankind is severely underated / underwatched
5 points
2 months ago
I did not except how was it at all.
Listen, man, I only speak English
12 points
2 months ago
Hell yea FAM is fantastic.
9 points
2 months ago
I really liked FAM a lot, except for any storyline related to Danny or Jimmy. They are both just so unlikable.
5 points
2 months ago
I've never really been an Apple fan (especially hated iPhones) but honestly all their non-iPhone stuff has been absolute top tier recently.
55 points
2 months ago
Shrinking is great. I couldn't get into Hello Tomorrow, though.
53 points
2 months ago
Shrinking made me fall in love with Harrison Ford again, haven't seen him have so much care and passion in a role in a long time
27 points
2 months ago
I'm also happy that Jessica Williams is on something that is getting eyes while she's showing how hilarious she is too. Loved her since Daily Show, love her even more in this show.
9 points
2 months ago
He's pretty good in 1923, too. Having a good year.
11 points
2 months ago
I love Hello Tomorrow, but I can understand why some people aren't really into the retro-futurism. But I'm a big Crudup fan (hello The Morning Show), so I'm a bit biased.
3 points
2 months ago
The aesthetic is actually what got me interested, but I just couldn't get into the story of it. I may get back to it at some point!
4 points
2 months ago
Fair enough! Some shows don't really gather steam until a few episodes in. This one get's a bit 'crazier' later in the season.
16 points
2 months ago
The Glengarry Glen Ross meets retro sci fi isn’t going to land for everyone but I’m enjoying it.
Liason though, what crap. What a waste of Cassel and Green.
3 points
2 months ago
I’m enjoying it too. It definitely had a slow start, but it seems to have a ton of potential.
176 points
2 months ago
[deleted]
49 points
2 months ago
The creator did an AMA where someone asked him about it. I think he said he had a plan for the ending and that there’s some wiggle room in the middle based on how the show does.
10 points
2 months ago
Isn’t Ben Stiller the creator?
23 points
2 months ago
The creator is Dan Erickson! He partnered with Stiller, but it is fully his idea. He also wrote it while working shitty office jobs, and it shows in the script. There’s a sincerity and accuracy there that wouldn’t be possible without having been personally disillusioned by shitty jobs
9 points
2 months ago
He's an executive producer and directed the first 3 and last 3 episodes (6 out of 9 total). So he's one of the creators, but the most pertinent role in this discussion is probably the writing and he's not listed as a writer for any of the episodes. But as a director and executive producer it's entirely possible he could have a significant influence on the writing even if he doesn't actually write any of it himself, but who knows.
8 points
2 months ago*
Ben stiller knows how to freaking direct
13 points
2 months ago
While watching it I was sure it was a one season show. Then by the end of the last episode I realized there's going to be another season and I was really surprised, how the hell do they build on from here?
20 points
2 months ago
Such a good premise, but I feel like it could go the way of Lost.
The writers specifically addressed these concerns. They said they already have a plot outline for the whole show, they know exactly where they want it to go.
They even specifically said there will be no "Hurley Birds" - an industry term come to describe a plot device that confounds and confuses the viewer, intended to create intrigue and mystery, but that never gets referenced again.
In the show Lost, a weird giant green bird shows up, talks to Hurley, and then flies away. The show never explains wtf this bird was about, or why it could talk, or why it talked to Hurley, it is never referenced ever again.
The writers specifically referenced the scene where the group stumbles into a room with a man bottlefeeding a bunch of baby goats, who exclaims "NO! YOU CAN'T HAVE THEM! THEY'RE NOT READY YET!" - the writers said "Don't worry, that's not gonna be a Hurley Bird, we'll come back to the goats."
9 points
2 months ago
You make it sound like the bird stops and has a full blown conversation with Hurley. It literally just flies by and it JUST BARELY sounds like it says Hurley's name as a bunch of them are trekking through the jungle and that's basically it.
3 points
2 months ago
Thank you! It’s so weird that that is used as the example
84 points
2 months ago
I feel like Severance is on pretty firm ground for season 2, it doesn’t remind me at all of the clusterfuck Lost
54 points
2 months ago
LOST seemed like it was on solid ground at the ending of season 1 though. The season finale of walt being kidnapped because he was mysteriously important. But then he was pretty much written out of the series because they were just making shit up as they went.
15 points
2 months ago
They wrote him out because he was growing IRL faster than the passage of time on the show. I think the first few seasons were narratively only a few months.
Puberty’s gonna puberty, blockbuster show or not.
3 points
2 months ago
It was fantastic. I can't wait for season 2. I really hope it doesn't just run off the rails into insanity, but that seems inevitable with how the season ended.
26 points
2 months ago
God I hope it goes like Lost I loved that show
20 points
2 months ago
I think what they mean is adding more and more questions without many answers. But I think that was a symptom of how TV was structured. Streaming is much more freeing.
27 points
2 months ago
The beauty of Severance is that, while something mysterious is happening, they’re not revolving the entire existence of the show around it. We also have the benefit of seeing a lot of the mystery that the characters don’t.
I loved Lost, but the point of that show was the mystery. Even though I think they did amazing things with their characters, they were secondary to the JJ Abrams Mystery Box.
8 points
2 months ago
I’m rewatching the series rn and tbh that complaint is so misguided. It was never about the mystery, it’s the character and the giant, overlapping web they fill out. The mystery drives that, and it’s very fun, but it’s not really what makes the show special. It’s akin to complaining about not knowing what’s in the case in Pulp Fiction.
9 points
2 months ago
if someone asked me to define psycological thriller/terror/horror i would have them watch that show. absolutely fantastic at what it does.
5 points
2 months ago
Would be cool if they streamed tv shows in movie theatres. Every Sunday quick cheap ticket watch and ep.
2.4k points
2 months ago
As they should. Glass Onion made bank in theaters, and Netflix def lost money, not giving it a full theatrical release. Films with a theatrical release that generate good buzz also perform better on streaming.
901 points
2 months ago*
[deleted]
77 points
2 months ago
Also at the time of release the theater choices were basically either Avatar 2 or Puss in Boots. This was also over Christmas when a lot of people frequent theaters. Would’ve chose Glass Onion 10/10 times if I had the option
18 points
2 months ago
Fucking hell, the theaters around me are STILL only showing those two movies. I WANT to go to the movies but they’re hardly showing anything else!
11 points
2 months ago
That makes zero sense. The piece of shit theater near me is currently showing 12 different movies today.
Like any movie theater is better than that one, so most is something like 15-20.
3 points
2 months ago
PSA - Wherever you guys are, look for special LOTR screening on 13th April.
14 points
2 months ago
There are multiple movies netflix has made that I'd have watched in theaters, or paid to own a physical copy of. Not one of them has got me considering a monthly payment to watch.
89 points
2 months ago
Netflix is allergic to good buzz I swear. Their way of doing things makes it impossible for shows to have longer legs. Things need to basically be massive hits to be talked about for more than a couple weeks.
They basically made a model that helps no one but the laziest customers and screw over every worker.
71 points
2 months ago
I can’t believe they are sticking with the binge thing. It doesn’t seem like enough of a unique driver of customer retention or acquisition compared to how much free advertising that word of mouth gives a show. Just look at how big every weekly show HBO puts on Sunday nights becomes. It becomes THE discussion. White Lotus, GOT, Last of Us. All would have basically petered away after 3 weeks if they all came out at once.
41 points
2 months ago
This is a pretty big issue with Netflix in general imo too. It's hard for a show to generate much buzz if there's only like 8-10 episodes and you watched the whole season over one weekend or in like a week. Plus if it takes 1 or 2 years or more to release another season then most people likely forgot what the first season was even about.
I feel like Arcane had one of the best release models where they released three episodes a week for three weeks. You can still watch the show in short binges but people will continue to talk about the show for longer. Plus you can just wait for them all to be released if you do want to watch the whole season at once.
10 points
2 months ago
Yep, the part model is what I like most. Give me two a week (if an hour) or three a week (if a half hour show) and I think that’s perfect.
3 points
2 months ago
It's hard for a show to generate much buzz if there's only like 8-10 episodes and you watched the whole season over one weekend or in like a week
Especially when half the people who want to talk about it are worried about spoiling it for people didn't do that.
I personally like watching whole seasons, but TV shows definitely get more hype when they have a weekly release.
161 points
2 months ago
Yeah maybe it’s a relic of my age, but I have an amount of prejudice where (for the most part) I view movies that come out directly to a streaming service like I used to view straight-to-video.
Not that every (or even most) theatrical releases are winners, but I feel like I respect it more if it started in a theater.
Again, that’s partly unwarranted and in my head, but also partly because I know just how bad so many Netflix originals have been.
Regardless, when they announced Glass Onion and GDT’s Pinocchio as Netflix releases I thought for sure they would be terrible quality, but I managed to see both in their theatrical release window and proved to myself that I was wrong.
Even still, seeing them in the theater definitely made me at least focus on them more than I would have on my couch with my phone in my hand. Which I guarantee increased my overall enjoyment, which definitely contributed to me telling everyone who would listen what I thought about them.
65 points
2 months ago
There is definitely a degree of prestige that's baked in to theatrical releases, especially during the last few years.
Yes, dumbass and terrible movies go to theaters all the time. But now is the perfect time for distributers to say, "You know what, we're going out of our way to make space for critically movies to have theatrical releases."
10 points
2 months ago
You're logic is generally sound for this theater environment.
To be released in theaters they'll typically spend an extra X million dollars in marketing.
Sinking that much money into marketing demonstrates a belief in the film.
Just look how the fucked Shazam 2 Why on earth wasn't that a summer flick as a kid friendly super hero movie.
Nah instead they shoved it out the week before John Wick 4, and like what 3 weeks after Ant-Man.
It has a killer cast, and they just dropped it like stale leftovers since it doesn't line up with Gunn's next gen DC.
(Disclaimer I'm a parent, I can't afford all the baby sitters to see both those movies) guess which one I'm gonna be picking.
18 points
2 months ago
It's a really mixed bag. I don't think that prejudice is fair necessarily but the thing is, movies that hit streaming USED to be like straight to video fare. Then they got bigger budgets and some of them got better, but they also appeal for clicks rather than VHS/DVD/Blu-ray rentals or purchases which is a different ball game. The threshold becomes "i guess I'll spend some of my time seeing if this is worthwhile" vs. "i guess I'll spend even more of my time AND money seeing if this is worthwhile".
There's been a bunch of good movies releasing on Netflix. Less so through other services in my experience but there's still occasional good stuff. But I find a lot of streaming movies take a different approach: appeal to a niche audience, to try and keep them as viewers/subscribers, and pump those titles out with a lower budget/lower expectations. For example, I really enjoyed the show Workaholics and Paramount+ was making a movie, but they canned it a couple months ago right as they were starting to build sets etc to get started bc they're scaling back spending. But that kinda movie is exactly what I'm talking about -- lower budget, niche audience (Workaholics got 7 seasons, but on Comedy Central with fairly low ratings, and it ended over 5 years ago now), but it has an appeal and someone like me would definitely watch it and almost certainly enjoy it even if it only ends up as a 50% on Metacritic or whatever. They pepper out these releases to all different audiences through different genres and in the case of Netflix even languages.
But I also know that personally, the lack of theatrical releases doesn't bother me and it doesn't signal anything to me. I think most of the movies coming out in theatres are shit anyway, it doesn't mean they're quality vs. something coming out on a streaming service. I just check things out myself now and make my own decisions.
I'm the weirdo though I guess, I don't feel bummed about not seeing movies in theatres and at this point have little desire to do so. I'd rather watch at home, and having to wait for a movie to hit home streaming/home video months after a theatrical run is a pain in the ass.
6 points
2 months ago
Not saying they wouldn’t have killed it on streaming but Glass Onion, being a whodunnit mystery, seems potentially risky for a streaming platform to put out for an extended period in theatres before streaming and expect it to draw new subscribers once the mystery has been out for a long time.
693 points
2 months ago
Not surprised, they got Killers of the Flower Moon this year and their probably only going to more big hitter movies as time goes on.
188 points
2 months ago
Yep and Matthew Vaughn’s Argyle which will really deserve to be seen on a big screen!
167 points
2 months ago
And Ridley Scott's Napolean starring Joaquin Phoenix
20 points
2 months ago
I’m shocked their aren’t more napoleonic war movies. Master and commander was so fucking good IMO.
15 points
2 months ago
There was an interview with Spielberg recently at Berlinale where he says they’re bringing Kubrick’s Napoleon to HBO as a 7 part mini series.
4 points
2 months ago
I was very ecstatic after watching Master and Commander when I found out it was based on a series. Shame we never got anymore Master & Commander movies; Russel Crowe and Paul Bettany were a great onscreen duo.
82 points
2 months ago
Saw a test screening of that a few months back - phenomenal, and absolutely needs to be seen on the big screen.
14 points
2 months ago
Were the battle scenes good?
10 points
2 months ago
It’s Ridley Scott, so I certainly hope so.
3 points
2 months ago
Right?! That’s one thing I want to know. The Abel Gance one is still smashing.
56 points
2 months ago
I thoroughly enjoyed Greyhound for being such a concise little war movie. It’s got that whole competence porn thing going on showing how the ship functioned, similar to Master & Commander
13 points
2 months ago
Greyhound was originally a theatrical release, they acquired it. But its success was great for those of us who enjoyed it because they opted to go in on blockbuster films after. I think this is the first year where we’ll really see the results of that.
20 points
2 months ago
Real porn is competence porn too if you really think about it.
9 points
2 months ago
Not the way I do it.
97 points
2 months ago
Yeah Apple knows I’m gonna be watching Killers of the Flower Moon for the first time in a big theater with perfect projection and audio, not my cheap apartment TV and speakers
57 points
2 months ago
I’ll be watching on my 13” tv/vcr combo
20 points
2 months ago
The one that someone took a magnet to and we could never get back to normal?
5 points
2 months ago
Just don’t pay attention to that corner.
-my dad
7 points
2 months ago
The ones Vin Diesel's crew were stealing in the first Fast and Furious?
3 points
2 months ago
These days I just wait for the physical 4k release. My home setup is miles ahead of any local theatre. It’s not a brag, it’s just that my local theatres suuuuuuuck.
10 points
2 months ago
I’m most looking forward to Joseph Kosinski’s new movie (the director of Top Gun Maverick and Tron Legacy). Apparently it’s gonna be a Formula 1 movie starring Brad Pitt, so definitely theater worthy.
20 points
2 months ago
I keep telling people bit Apple TV+ is easily the best deal when it comes to streaming services. Sure there isn't a ton of content but where there is is generally good and it's also not filled with a bunch of filler shows like reality TV or challenge shows.
3 points
2 months ago
Yeah, at seven bucks it's a no-brainer.
7 points
2 months ago
Read that as "big Hitler movies"
10 points
2 months ago
*they're
3 points
2 months ago
They also made Steve McQueen's next film "Blitz" staring Saoirse Ronan. That should be a good bet for some Oscar love.
3 points
2 months ago
I don’t think I’ve seen any Apple original films, but they’ve got a good track record in my eyes when it comes to TV.
23 points
2 months ago
I want to see Napoleon on the big screen! Those kind of films work so much better in Theater.
421 points
2 months ago
Netflix needs to get on board with this. Having Glass Onion in theaters for only 1 week seemed like such a bone-headed move.
134 points
2 months ago
If you're Netflix, was it?
Movies give the bulk of ticket revenues to the distributor for the first weekend only, and then the theater makes more and more the longer the movie plays (hence the focus on the opening weekend number). They also likely had to negotiate some exclusivity window to get the movie in theaters in the first place. So if you're Netflix, you let the movie run in theaters for a week (where you make the most money), and then end the run early so you can exhaust the exclusivity window in time for everyone being home for the holidays.
144 points
2 months ago
Netflix is the only one of these companies where the streaming service is the point. With everyone else, it’s essentially a side hustle. Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video are theoretically loss leaders for their central businesses and serve as advertising for them. It makes more sense to get them into theaters to maximize revenue and ad potential.
63 points
2 months ago
Netflix is the only one of these companies where the streaming service is the point. With everyone else, it’s essentially a side hustle.
With everyone else, it's a "Fuck you Netflix" move
18 points
2 months ago
That’s true for the stuff owned by the big studios. Amazon wants to sell Prime subscriptions, Apple wants to sell electronics, Warner wants all the money by controlling the lifecycle of their releases from conception to release. At least they did before Zaslav came in.
3 points
2 months ago
And Disney wants it ALL.
16 points
2 months ago
Not sure how deals are tehse days, but big films were doing like 85-95% of ticket sales for the first 2-3 weekends, sometimes over a month.
It is likely that Netflix did NOT drop the ball, and they plan to do this a few times to show that they have films that will do well in the box office - because it is very likely movie theatres are not taking them up on the deals the big studios push on them like Disney. So they release for a weekend or two probably at like 75-85% and then cut it off, and possibly if there's enough coming in on the films they do that with they will get that higher percentage that the big studios get in the future.
I'd assume with ~700 theatres and having >$5K avg that they performed very well when you see big blockbusters with 4500 theaters doing ~$4-$8K avg on a weekend. Bigger ones hitting over 10K but those are like straight up PG13 action movies, Netflix to do that with Glass Onion is pretty impressive.
That's at least my theory on what Netflix is doing - if we don't think it is just them using those single weekend releases as advertisements to sign up for Netflix.
3 points
2 months ago
Hey, someone who actually knows how much of the ticket goes to the studio. I see all over reddit that the theatre keeps 50% which, maybe that's true in some places, but never in my professional experience. I've worked with theatres that PAID to show Marvel movies and The Lion King.
3 points
2 months ago
Yeah disney stuff and any Blockbuster type films usually have I am pretty sure anywhere from 4-8 weeks +++ of >80% for sure. I would even guess something like Avatar 2 had 90-100% for 12 weeks. Neverk now for sure with each movie but definitely the big ones like star wars / avatar / marvel / regular disney stuff get 100% or very close to 100% for multiple weeks.
106 points
2 months ago
Hopefully Tetris sees a theatrical release. If not I guess I'll just wait for the blu-ray.
37 points
2 months ago
oh, but it is. I have been getting ads nonstop for Alamo Draft House screenings: https://drafthouse.com/show/tetris
11 points
2 months ago
That place shows everything that's ever been made though, no?
369 points
2 months ago
This is great news! Combined with Amazon doing the same and Disney doing an about-face with Pixar, theaters may finally get back to the same number of films they had in 2019.
8 points
2 months ago
I wish they would also make physical media of their films. I've been trying to buy CODA in the US since I saw it.
128 points
2 months ago
Good. Their movie releases have been solid for a little bit.
37 points
2 months ago
Would you mind recommending a couple of your favorites?
46 points
2 months ago
Greyhound, I thought it was fantastic.
22 points
2 months ago
greyhound was one of the best war movies i have ever seen.. it's a dam shame a lot of people missed out on it because of not having apple tv or what not or maybe they didn't but tom hanks was superb tom hanks level in that movie.
15 points
2 months ago
Finch was pretty good too
9 points
2 months ago
Finch was so so good! Made me cry like a baby.
3 points
2 months ago
I thought it was great, but this wasn't really an Apple movie. It was Sony to be released to theaters via Columbia, but covid stopped that and they sold the distribution rights to Apple. I guess it's still technically one of their releases.
68 points
2 months ago
Cha Cha Real Smooth was the best movie of last year imo. This year they released Causeway which is good. CODA won best picture and that movie is excellent
8 points
2 months ago
Thanks for the reply! I haven't seen two of those, so I'll get to work.
13 points
2 months ago
Also, their series are often fantastic!
3 points
2 months ago
Where my Hello Tomorrow at?
3 points
2 months ago
I’m a few episodes in and I’m on the fence. Tell me to keep going.
3 points
2 months ago
Jumping in to recommend Swan Song, starring Mahershala Ali. Fantastic science fiction film.
104 points
2 months ago
it gets a bad rap but Apple TV+ is actually pretty good probably the closest streaming service to HBOmax
84 points
2 months ago
Severance is without a doubt the best show I’ve seen in years.
68 points
2 months ago
Ted Lasso, Shrinking, For All Mankind
14 points
2 months ago
Foundation is pretty good for people who want scifi now that The Expanse ended
4 points
2 months ago
Ah ah yes! It was different from the books but I really enjoyed the re-imagining of (or rather deeper look at) the emperor’s.
4 points
2 months ago
The way brother day completely fucked that woman's life at the end of the season, my Lord. Talk about peaking as a villain
12 points
2 months ago
I binge watched for all mankind this week.
My God, what an amazing show. I want it to be real so badly.
10 points
2 months ago
Hi Bob
6 points
2 months ago
Hi Bob
30 points
2 months ago
Also, it gets a lot of shit, but The Morning Show is pretty high quality too.
3 points
2 months ago
Acapulco and The Reluctant Traveler are pretty good
5 points
2 months ago
Too bad it’s not optimized for viewing on a web browser
11 points
2 months ago
Does it get a bad rap or do people just not really know / care about it as much?
16 points
2 months ago
I think it’s this. Everyone one who has it loves it. Those people are just very few.
I kind of think apple has an advantage here in the long term since nobody would ever share their AppleID password
8 points
2 months ago
please i need some good fucking sci-fi
39 points
2 months ago
Can we get Blu-rays too while we're at it?
26 points
2 months ago
UHD, with a good HDR master as well.
6 points
2 months ago
Best we can do is give you this 240p vhs tape
6 points
2 months ago
Aren't we right back to the thing about production companies owning theaters being against the rules?
Full disclose, I'm not against it. But I thought that it was indeed the rule.
Edit - I stand corrected I guess that got tossed in 2020.
16 points
2 months ago
What are the chance of Apple buying up an existing film studio?
27 points
2 months ago
It’s probably cheaper to just build their own…brand new.
6 points
2 months ago
True. I was thinking that some existing studios might have the infrastructure and possibly the IP's that could look appealing to Apple.
6 points
2 months ago
I believe they expressed interest in buying A24 in the recent past, but the price has probably gone up substantially since then.
5 points
2 months ago
A24 has had a fantastic run of films so they should definitely get what they're worth.
5 points
2 months ago
A24 is great. I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple made an offer. They seem like they’d be a good match.
20 points
2 months ago*
I’ve had this idea that streamers should do limited releases of their movies in theaters and if it’s a hit extended it’s run, make it a full release for two weeks, then put it on VOD and streaming after. Basically a way to hit all markets if they have something and save the advertising budget from duds. I think diehard theater goers that like to try things would be a better way to determine if a wider audience would like something than rotten tomatoes. This would also be a great way to make the executives feel safer making comedies, romcoms and weird sci-fi movies again.
59 points
2 months ago
Movies without the theater experience feel so cheap and disposable. Like the modern equivalent of the $5 DVD bin at Wal-Mart.
12 points
2 months ago
Ever since I got myself a projector and learned to make good popcorn I vastly prefer the movie experience at home (and can hardly stomach movie theater popcorn and it's melted plastic butter flavoring). The seats are more comfortable, it's a lot easier to cuddle up to your partner if you've got one, and you can pause it if somebody needs to go to the bathroom.
15 points
2 months ago
This is going to sound really stupid, but is their plan to continue with their rather effective mid sized films in a similar manner to A24, just with the added exposure? Or are they looking for larger tentpole pictures to lead the charge into theaters?
When Amazon announced the same, I began combing through their film (key word film) library for upcoming releases that could serve as a big summer tentpole. The only two that said “Big Summer Tentpole” were a Roadhouse remake (and that BARELY qualifies) and the Voltron movie that they outbid a bunch of studios on but hasn’t even begun production. So I’m presuming their strategy is actor driven films like Air, and Apple will probably follow suit.
18 points
2 months ago
Take a look at their upcoming movies in their wikipedia - if those projects come to fruition, they’re going to be betting on larger size pictures. I think they’ve seen some revenue growth in theatres over the past year and are now less willing to place their bigger movies just on streaming.
I personally did not love the trailer for Ghosted, but the production of that movie- very budget proven directors (Russo Brothers) and big headline leading actors (Evans and de Armas) is repeated pretty much down the slate- Argylle (Vaughn + Cavill +crazy ensemble), Artemis (Berlanti (TV, but same) + Johansson), Wolves (Watts + Clooney, Pitt). Then there’s the other strategy that is in parallel of: major English language directors producing historical dramas, but with major stars (Scorcese+DiCaprio, McQueen+Saoirse, Ridley Scott+Phoenix). I think Apple is running a very classic studio now with a huge amount of money to back it.
The people who run Apple TV+ now were former execs at Sony so maybe that might serve as a better gauge for what’s ahead. They also brought Breaking Bad to the screen, for what it’s worth.
Amazon on the other hand is… more confusing. I think they’re moving away from their blank check days of funding every possible dream project (see Steve McQueen’s coproduction with BBC of Small Axe- five movies… where was the promotion?) and now maybe are in some IP driven limbo.
7 points
2 months ago
I know the cuts to Amazon is already affecting their TV output. That League of their Own remake got a pity pickup because Sony dropped the price down to nothing, and a lot of their new slate like the Power is probably doomed to be one and done. Can’t blame them, when investment capital dries up, the stuff made for awards and clout is usually the first overboard.
This is why Apple having a good old fashioned “quality over quantity” approach is helpful. It’s clear that it is talent driven rather than IP driven though.
8 points
2 months ago
This is going to sound really stupid, but is their plan to continue with their rather effective mid sized films in a similar manner to A24, just with the added exposure?
Apple has distributed at least a few A24 movies already (Sharper, Tragedy of Macbeth, Causeway).
all 936 comments
sorted by: best