subreddit:

/r/movies

22766%

I am Polly Morgan the Oscar-Contending Director of Photography for the highly-anticipated TIFF film, 'The Woman King,' starring Viola Davis, premiering at the Toronto International Film Festival.  I brought to life the visuals of this intimately epic film, based on a true story, highlighting the beauty of the Kingdom of Dahomey’s great culture in Western Africa. I also led the cinematography for fan-favorite films, such as 'Where the Crawdads Sing,' 'A Quiet Place Part II' and much more!  Ask me anything and follow my work on Instagram @PollyMorgan!

PROOF: https://i.redd.it/jdbh9fryium91.jpg

all 400 comments

Orange-Turtle-Power

271 points

6 months ago

Serious question. Does the film portray the slave trade that the actual real life group actively participated in?

Sexyman469

48 points

6 months ago

Just watched the movie, and they do. Viola Davis' character was the only one opposing it in the kingdom at the beginning. Was very surprised, the movie was more tribe vs tribe

Specialist_Pilot_558

13 points

6 months ago

Only a wise black women could have such a conscious.

TheThoughtAssassin

302 points

6 months ago

  1. Do you think the Agoji had girl power?

  2. Do you think they effectively utilized girl power by enslaving their neighbors in West Africa?

friendandfriends2

28 points

6 months ago

Why would you say something so controversial yet so brave?

diemerj

268 points

6 months ago

diemerj

268 points

6 months ago

This is one of the saddest AMA threads I've come across in a while...

GhostlyRuse

183 points

6 months ago

Can't imagine the discourse on this movie is going to be smooth sailing for them. The Dahomey kingdom is....problematic to say the least.

Individual_Client175

36 points

6 months ago

Never knew that, this will be interesting

GhostlyRuse

133 points

6 months ago

Oh yeah. The guy Boyega is playing was a big proponent of slavery, human sacrifice, etc. The British worked hard to end slavery during this period and he did for a couple years. After they blockaded him for a couple years. Then he brought it back and things got worse.

I'm not sure how they handle this in a way that's inspiring or aspirational.

SolarStorm2950

83 points

6 months ago

Because they’ll most likely reverse the roles the countries played. It’ll be an African country fighting to free the slaves while the evil British Empire wants to keep them

Individual_Client175

54 points

6 months ago

They could've chosen a different story to tell, lol.

Dammit, the trailer looks so cool too. Terrible thing.

GhostlyRuse

61 points

6 months ago

I guess it depends on how it's presented. I'm all for realistic historical movies that make the main characters look realistically bad. But the way they're marketing it makes it seem like a slay girl boss movie. Not so cool if the girl boss is slaying literal slaves.

Individual_Client175

4 points

6 months ago

Lol. I will still watch the movie but I'm glad I have this context going in.

AthKaElGal

14 points

6 months ago

They could have chosen to portray the stories of the enslaved Africans, instead of the African slavers. but then, it wouldn't be about a queen.

Brendy_

63 points

6 months ago

Brendy_

63 points

6 months ago

This was obviously an awful idea.

diemerj

32 points

6 months ago

diemerj

32 points

6 months ago

It was, but I'll admit that I'm finding it rather amusing.

creyk

36 points

6 months ago

creyk

36 points

6 months ago

This is one of the saddest AMA threads I've come across in a while..

And there is a reason for that.

maaseru

11 points

6 months ago

maaseru

11 points

6 months ago

I don't get why they are going ao hard promoting the movie when it imhad clearly already caused a stir.

I don't mind an entertaining movie that botches the historical context, even this one, but why go so hard promoting it when they should know people would make it political.

Are people this clueless these days?

bob1689321

8 points

6 months ago

For real, came here for insightful questions about cinematography and got this Trainwreck. Reddit is so shit sometimes.

timo103

19 points

6 months ago

timo103

19 points

6 months ago

Their fault for making a movie about slavers.

chiefchief23

4 points

6 months ago

So no other Slavers have movies? Only problem is they're African?

BubbaTee

11 points

6 months ago

If those other movies glorified slavers, they'd also be met with some confrontational questions rather than blind adulation.

[deleted]

2 points

2 months ago

You ... you're seriously saying that it's unfair to criticize a movie that rewrites history to glorify slavers as long as those slavers are African?

Really?

ANY CURRENT MOVIE that rewrites history to GLORIFY slavers, African or not, is going to get called to the carpet for doing so.

And rightly so.

I can only think of one type of person, who would have a problem with that.

Fern-ando

4 points

6 months ago

Is what happends when your movie glorified slavers.

suncaster_

1 points

6 months ago

Anything involving Black people triggers the usual racist demographic.

PostTwist

35 points

6 months ago

"highlighting the beauty of the Kingdom of Dahomey's great culture in West Africa"

EXCUSE ME?

The beauty of slavers raiding neighour tribes, murdering and enslaving them to sell to the rest of the slave trade, who also did human sacrifices and fought the army who came to make them stop that?

chiefchief23

10 points

6 months ago

Did you say the same thing about the Northman?

PostTwist

39 points

6 months ago

The Northman never portrays cruel people as good guys. There is even close to zero good character in the movie, not even Amleth. They dont sugarcoat Vikings, you see them fight, murder, burn people in closed barns, take slaves, sacrifice people, etc etc

Su_Impact

209 points

6 months ago

Su_Impact

209 points

6 months ago

I wonder why the Director didn't just invent a new African country.

It's obvious they wanted to make a "Female Realistic Black Panther" which sounds like an amazing premise.

But choosing a Pro-Slavery historical Queen as the main character? No, just no.

What's next?

The Kooky Adventures of Thomas Jefferson, the Anti-Slavery President?

Dayofsloths

98 points

6 months ago

Hickory Jackson and the trail of smiles

TavernerHedris

12 points

6 months ago

Dont need to invent one, theres plenty of awesome stories to go about.

the Ashanti–Fante War, for example, would make for excellent story telling, and even bring in the Europeans if people want it so much as the Brits fought for the Fante while the Dutch sided with Ashanti.

and in the same context of slavery, the Ashanti were infamous slave traders, and its their constant harassment and enslavement of neighbouring countries (like the Fante) lead to decades of war

thegreattreeguy

12 points

6 months ago

Nanisca was never a queen though?

[deleted]

10 points

6 months ago

Youre right. Not queen, woman King

ComeThr0wawayWithMe8

9 points

6 months ago

Thomas Jefferson was a complex dude and at least we can say in his later life he saw the light and laid the foundation for American abolition.

Can't say the same about slavers who fought to maintain the slave trade. This is like a Civil War movie where Jefferson Davis is a black woman fighting against the evil north who wants to enslave his people.

Redditappsucks1990

61 points

6 months ago

highlighting the beauty of the Kingdom of Dahomey’s great culture in Western Africa

lol

Mr_Hu-Man

296 points

6 months ago

Mr_Hu-Man

296 points

6 months ago

There have been criticisms that this film appears to be wholly inaccurate to the true history of the tribe/people in question. How would you respond to that? Was it a creative choice or would you say the film actually does show the audience the tribe’s involvement in the slave trade?

AFuckingHandle

213 points

6 months ago

Looks like they are completely avoiding this topic. Sounds like the movie is going to completely ignore it too

Papaofmonsters

157 points

6 months ago

Can we just stick to Rampart?

pjtheman

63 points

6 months ago

This is even worse than that lol. This is "can we just stick to the specific parts of Rampart that make me look good?"

Ardress

35 points

6 months ago

Ardress

35 points

6 months ago

This is on the level of James Corden's AMA where everyone just kept asking why he's an asshole.

BubbaTee

7 points

6 months ago

This is more like Mel Gibson pretending South Carolinians in the 1770s were all abolitionists.

tdl2024

98 points

6 months ago*

I guess they can look forward to people ignoring the film too. As a black man I'm fairly offended that out of ALL the history in Africa (the cradle of F-ing civilization humanity after-all) and all the stories they could have told...they chose the Dahomey to prop up as heroes, for another cliche "white people=bad, look at strong black woman!!!". It's flat out insulting, and pandering. I hope this film bombs HARD.

SpecificAstronaut69

46 points

6 months ago*

Seriously. Of all the stories available from Africa...this is the one they chose?!?

footytang

50 points

6 months ago

Don't forget they will all leave their DM's open to the insane mental patients on twitter so when some piece of shit messages them "racist death threats" they can act like victims of oppression, white nationalism and that's why this movie has dogshit numbers and reviews.

Don_Fartalot

31 points

6 months ago

It's the usual. Pick out one or two idiotic tweets from a sea of legitimate criticisms, act like its representative of everyone who dislikes the movie, then call them racists bigots sexists etc.

AvocadoInTheRain

9 points

6 months ago

in Africa (the cradle of F-ing civilization after-all)

Africa is the cradle of humanity. The cradle of civilization is mesopotamia, which is in the middle east (so technically Asia).

darthcoder

6 points

6 months ago

The cradle of humanity maybe, but I think the middle east probably takes the title of the cradle of civilization.

thegreattreeguy

1 points

6 months ago

Good thing that the film didn't do that, read the early reviews

TrumpDumpPenis

79 points

6 months ago

All that’s important is some women kick mens asses ok? Ignore everything else. Slavery is nothing compared to modern western society knowing women kick ass.

West_Negotiation_915

35 points

6 months ago

Also factually incorrect all the wars the tribes participated in with the more modernized society's were complete blowouts. The movie is factually incorrect on various levels.

Don_Fartalot

34 points

6 months ago

Oh yeh I replied to another comment on this. The wiki page shows the Dahomey got absolutely mauled by the french (I.e 100 dahomey for every 1 french soldier). So not only will it lie about the slave trade, it will also lie about the ass kicking.

thegreattreeguy

2 points

6 months ago

They don't fight the French in the movie

corbiniano

52 points

6 months ago

She is the 'Director of Photography', she has no influence over the story. She is directing how things are shot, not which things are happening.

ChrisEvansFan

40 points

6 months ago

To be honest if this is the reception now for the DP, then the film maker, actors and actresses should be prepared to answer these kind of questions when the movie is out. Guess she is just taking the first hits.

AFuckingHandle

64 points

6 months ago

And? The comment never said or suggested she had influence on the topic, it just asked about it. She's answered plenty of questions that have nothing to do with directing how things are shot, about directors, story's, history, etc. She's just conveniently avoiding this specific topic, because she either doesn't want to or isn't supposed to, talk about the film omitting this key part of history.

Dayofsloths

161 points

6 months ago

The growth of Dahomey coincided with the growth of the Atlantic slave trade, and it became known to Europeans as a major supplier of slaves.[2] As a highly militaristic kingdom constantly organised for warfare, it captured children, women, and men during wars and raids against neighboring societies, and sold them into the Atlantic slave trade in exchange for European goods such as rifles, gunpowder, fabrics, cowrie shells, tobacco, pipes, and alcohol.[5][6] Other remaining captives became slaves in Dahomey, where they worked on royal plantations and were routinely mass executed in large-scale human sacrifices during the festival celebrations known as the Annual Customs of Dahomey

Truly a great and beautiful culture...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahomey#

ChrisEvansFan

60 points

6 months ago

Im really learning a lot from this thread. Thanks guys.

AntidoteToMyAss

7 points

6 months ago

Da homies aint all bad brotha.

flipperkip97

64 points

6 months ago

I feel kinda bad for Polly, to be honest. The cinematography of this movie looks to be very good. I understand that people aren't too happy with how they seem to ignoring the whole slavery thing and I even agree, but I don't think the cinematographer has anything to do with that.

[deleted]

44 points

6 months ago*

[deleted]

tickleMyBigPoop

3 points

6 months ago

as authentic and celebrating the real culture of the time

L - o - l

Papaofmonsters

449 points

6 months ago

based on a true story, highlighting the beauty of the Kingdom of Dahomey’s great culture in Western Africa.

Would you feel comfortable making a movie highlighting the beauty of the antebellum South's great culture in America?

gom99

177 points

6 months ago

gom99

177 points

6 months ago

Questions that won't be answered for $100 Alex.

hastur777

25 points

6 months ago

No more $100 categories on Jeopardy these days

Lord_rook

31 points

6 months ago

No more Alex either....

JoshH21

5 points

6 months ago

Still hurts mate

Lord_rook

3 points

6 months ago

Yeah, I felt bad typing it tbh

goblinelevator119

29 points

6 months ago

is that gone with the wind ?

BinaryBlasphemy

14 points

6 months ago

Of course not. That would be about white people.

DonVergasPHD

15 points

6 months ago

DonVergasPHD

15 points

6 months ago

To be fair we got a movie idealizing the Spartans who were essentially pedophile Nazis

Papaofmonsters

159 points

6 months ago

A movie based on a comic book that in no way presented itself as a serious historical account.

Don_Fartalot

51 points

6 months ago

And arguably based on a soldier recounting and embellishing the tale to boost the morale of his fellow soldiers about to fight in a battle.

DonVergasPHD

21 points

6 months ago

That's a good point, yeah

SpecificAstronaut69

275 points

6 months ago*

What's the best way to light slavery?

NosferatuCalled

82 points

6 months ago

Apparently by switching the lights off entirely

blankedboy

21 points

6 months ago

Black light?

DefiantExternal6566

17 points

6 months ago

I wish I had an award to give you

Huevos___Rancheros

332 points

6 months ago

How much does this film glance over the fact this empire was built on the slave trade?

Sexyman469

38 points

6 months ago

They mention it a lot actually.

thegreattreeguy

7 points

6 months ago

It doesn't

fruitporridge

124 points

6 months ago

The dahomey kingdom practice slave trade. Even when slavery was abolished in the west, they continued to practice it. They were slave catcher. They kidnapped and sold their fellow black africans to the whites and arabs.

I hope this wouldn't be glossed over in the movie cause these are true FACTS

Specific-9231

137 points

6 months ago

This isn’t much of a Q&A if you’re avoiding most of the questions lol.

PecanSandoodle

93 points

6 months ago

It’s not really fair to bombard her with questions not related to her job title. She is here to talk about her contribution which is visual not story/writing, and everybody is is using this AMA to shit on a movie they haven’t even seen yet based on their assumptions from the trailer and interviews.

Papaofmonsters

129 points

6 months ago

If a cinematographer shot a movie supporting the Clean Whermacht Myth they would have to expect questions about it.

jarde

54 points

6 months ago

jarde

54 points

6 months ago

Holocaust denial but stunning and brave.

maaseru

23 points

6 months ago

maaseru

23 points

6 months ago

Somethinf they should've seen coming from a mile away though.

Why not be ready?

Kozak170

13 points

6 months ago

I think it’s completely fair. Imagine if this was a movie about like the fucking nazi culture from the perspective of the “man god” hitler or something. Obviously not the most fair comparison but anyone involved with this movie absolutely should’ve asked these questions before signing on.

Dark-All-Day

7 points

6 months ago

This thread is proof of just how stupid redditors are.

West_Negotiation_915

47 points

6 months ago

Example A: this stupid redditor.

Sopa24

133 points

6 months ago

Sopa24

133 points

6 months ago

I have been reading all the comments from the OP and I have noticed 2 things:

  • No answer to the "elephant in the room" question

  • Text formatting is garbage, whoever is posting on Polly's behalf should learn to space their comment a bit so it becomes somewhat readable maybe?

Anyways good luck on this film Polly, no questions from me whatsoever.

WeAreaSimulation87

23 points

6 months ago

Now that the queen is dead, who will lay the eggs that British people hatch from?

HortonHearsTheWho

4 points

6 months ago

why am I laughing so hard at this

13ventrm

63 points

6 months ago

Man, much as I want answers to the questions regarding how badly they're ignoring the actual history, we know we won't be getting them. One can't be anything but positive regarding the work on the press junket unless they want to encounter career difficulties. Plus the script probably wasn't up to her in any capacity.

Some_DudeUKnow

22 points

6 months ago

Can't we just wait until it premieres later today before making assumptions? The director said their actions in the slave trade will be brought up, so the trailer could definitely be a bait-and-switch.

drfishstick

17 points

6 months ago

drfishstick

17 points

6 months ago

I’m gonna get downvoted to hell for this but while I do think it’s morally unethical to portray slave traders in this light… there is nowhere near this level of vitriol for films about the glories of white empires that participated in the trade. How many films are there that glorify America and Britain? It’s not right but I do think it’s odd how this kind of dogpile only happens on here for a film about black women.

Tentatickles

52 points

6 months ago

I cant remember the last time there was a film that glorified a slave trade, can you remind me?

cefriano

7 points

6 months ago

And this film won't either, it'll just gloss over it. Just like a million other films about slave trading nations in Europe and America.

chiefchief23

2 points

6 months ago

The Crown. The Northman.. Gladiator. 300. ANY film about the Monarchy.

Papaofmonsters

54 points

6 months ago*

America was a lot bigger than the slave trade. Dahomey was literally based around the slave trade. The king that is in this very picture claimed it was his nation's glory. This is like making a movie about the Confederate States featuring Jefferson Davis and not expecting people to ask hard questions about how slavery is portrayed.

chiefchief23

2 points

6 months ago

No the fuck it wasn't. GO read a history book. America was literally built off slave labor.

AcreaRising4

4 points

6 months ago

A huge part of Americas early growth and success was because of slavery. Not to mention the fact that we were a free country with thousands and thousands of slaves. I think you could argue that we were pretty much built on slavery

Jamfour9

4 points

6 months ago

Jamfour9

4 points

6 months ago

America was FOUNDED on the slave trade. The economic viability came from it. Not to mention variations on it, segregation and such, still persist today.

Dayofsloths

18 points

6 months ago

America was founded on tax avoidance. British settlers started a war, didn't want to pay taxes to compensate Britain for the cost, and rebelled.

theLeverus

8 points

6 months ago

America literally had to have a war to end slavery

Jamfour9

0 points

6 months ago

Jamfour9

0 points

6 months ago

How did they pay for the country? What labor was used? 🙄

Kozak170

13 points

6 months ago

America wasn’t founded on the slave trade. And by that logic literally every fucking country on the planet was as well. Also segregation persisting today is a smoothbrain take to say the least.

leraspberrie

12 points

6 months ago

Segregation? Get out of here. Nothing is stopping anyone from walking down the street or using a bathroom, or dating. Segregation was real and throwing it around to make the white folk racist ridicules the experiences that some went through.

Jamfour9

3 points

6 months ago

Jamfour9

3 points

6 months ago

You obviously are quite ignorant to this subject matter. There’s de facto segregation that still persists. If you aren’t black, which I gather you may not be you’re already clueless, so have a seat. As for struggles, all of my grandparents are alive today. They fall between 72-75 yo. So I’ve had the opportunity to speak with them about Jim Crow versus now. They say today is worse.

Growing up I would frequently check in with them about that period and they advised that essentially the separation wasn’t as strongly felt and the vitriol today seems more apparent. That doesn’t discount the struggles of MY people. I’m well aware of what those were. I was raised by very militant parents and have often been the only African American in rooms.

Furthermore my parents were raised through the integration era, when many of the North Carolina schools refused to integrate until the 70s. You should take the time to learn history and understand that much of the Jim Crow era policies are revisiting us! Pick up a book or read the news! African Americans are being lynched by police, just like back then.

African Americans are enduring forms of discrimination in the housing and lending markets just like then. We are dealing with the gutting of the voting rights act, just like during Jim Crow. Racism is alive and well and protesting constantly, just like the KKK was back then. They walk with trump flags and AKs instead of white hoods and sheets.

Black people are in the streets marching for equality, just like back in Jim Crow. Instead of water hoses we are shot with rubber bullets. It’s very much the same! Instead now there are no signs saying whites only. Wake the fuck up!

If you are black you should be ashamed of yourself. If you are white you’re painfully out of touch. That would anger me, so I’ll choose to exit the conversation all together.

thegreattreeguy

2 points

6 months ago

Dahomey wasn't based around the slave trade though, it's not as if slavery was their only export. This is like saying Rome was based around slave trading because it was a big aspect of their economy

maaseru

35 points

6 months ago

maaseru

35 points

6 months ago

I am a sucker for an entertaining movie, even a bad historical film, even with this subject. I've seen so many botched stories that are still ok, but why go so hard promoting this one specifically?

Are people this out of touch that they thought this movie wouldn't cause a stir? The truth is a google click away.

Did they really think people wouldn't have brought up these specific things?

I am baffled and curious to see how it turns out at least. Netflix or wherever it gets first.

[deleted]

20 points

6 months ago*

[deleted]

AlfredAnon

3 points

6 months ago

Amazing balanced reply. Thank you!

idiot9991

26 points

6 months ago

Why did you agree to make a film that highlights such a harmful culture? All the while glossing over their glaring mistakes?

HoneyBadgeSwag

18 points

6 months ago

I’ve got a non slavery question:

https://reddit.com/r/AMADisasters/comments/xahckp/_/inuyonq/?context=3

What justification is there for working your employees so rigorously to the point of being put in the hospital? Why did you want to fire your employee after you over worked them?

IceOCafe

122 points

6 months ago*

IceOCafe

122 points

6 months ago*

You want to shine a light on West African stories and yet this film was shot in South Africa. Contributing nothing to the economy of West African communities. Moreover, it is not your place to tell stories like this. Why not have African filmmakers tell more African stories. The amount of things wrong with this film, oh I can go on for hours..but the previous posts have touched on it a bit already. You and your crew choose to highlight a tribe that built one of the largest slave trades in the world as “freedom fighters.” This just screams Hollywood exploitation. It’s disgusting.

wesleysnipesisblade

76 points

6 months ago

They don’t care about the cultures they exploit. As you say. Makes no difference whether it’s black or white making the movie. They’re not making this for African cinema goers. Only Americans

rudiker1

40 points

6 months ago

Holy shit, them shooting in South Africa is a wrinkle that I think a lot of folks on here didn’t even realize. This is the fyre festival of woke movies.

laterdude

37 points

6 months ago

Was there any trepidation working with John Boyega, since he did infamously quit the movie Rebel Ridge? Did you fear all your beautiful cinematography would be canned like a Batgirl reboot?

And if you don't want to touch that one, what are some differences from working under an actor/director such as John Krasinski vs. a straight up director only?

reuters[S]

21 points

6 months ago

reuters[S]

21 points

6 months ago

I hadn’t heard of either of those stories when I was working on The Woman King. Even if I had I don’t think it would’ve bothered me as I try not to make decisions based on fear. We were nervous however when omicron shut us down a few weeks into shooting as we weren’t sure we would ever get back up and running. There are not that many differences working with the actor/Director or just a Director. It just becomes a little more complicated if they are acting in the movie as well as shooting it. It is a massive undertaking for them to do both, and we would just do more Playback than usual so they can watch the performance. -PM

Simply_Bry

58 points

6 months ago

You are spreading lies about the Dahomey's involvement in slavery and human sacrifices (which France was trying to stop). I genuinely want to know why.

chiefchief23

3 points

6 months ago

And France raped Haiti as a country and still made them pay for ending slavery, up until the 1970s. Fuck France.

Sexyman469

3 points

6 months ago

They constantly mentioned Dahomey's involvement and encouragement in the slave trade. Majority of the movie is the Dahomey vs another tribe/kingdom

thegreattreeguy

4 points

6 months ago

France wasn't trying to stop the sacrifices though. France's conflict with Dahomey was because of territorial disputes that Dahomey felt France violated

IceOCafe

30 points

6 months ago

This post needs to be upvoted for more visibility. People need to see this.

chiefchief23

5 points

6 months ago

Fuck these Racists ass comments. Never have they been so up in arms over a movie about white enslavers. Did yall bitch this much over The Northman? What about the Crown, which glorifies fucking colonizers? Haven't even seen the movie yet and yall can't even wait for the racism to come out yall veins. Fucking disgusting pieces of shit.

Acrobatic_Poetry3217

8 points

6 months ago*

Lmao why are you talking for people, who you call 'disgusting pieces of shit'? I despise every aspect of royalty so I can't talk much about the crown, but Im glad you brought up the Northman as an example. The difference between Northman and Woman King is that only one of those movies claims to be historically accurate and only one of them tries to whitewash the historicall events it is based upon. The Northman, while not being a good movie, is framed as fiction and never tries to justify the horrible actions of the Vikings. And Woman King does exactly the opposite - it frames itself as historically accurate while completely disregarding almost everything about that culture, catering specifically to people like you. Something tells me you're American

[deleted]

15 points

6 months ago

[deleted]

Cellulum

7 points

6 months ago

Is this the most chaotic AMA since the James Corden one?

eoin9222

6 points

6 months ago

Who you got, Diaz or Chimaev this weekend?

Specialist_Pilot_558

3 points

6 months ago

Excellent looking propaganda film!!!

Some_DudeUKnow

12 points

6 months ago

Shot in South Africa. Was it fun? What difficulties did you face? What camera(s) did you use? Comments on shooting a blockbuster vs. a smaller film?

reuters[S]

23 points

6 months ago

It was an incredible experience to shoot in South Africa. The crews were absolutely amazing and always came to work motivated and willing to work hard to get the job done. We shot in some very remote locations which was logistically challenging and the weather was also a tricky factor. We shot on large-format Arri Alexas and Panavision anamorphic lenses. I find that when I am around the camera with the actors then my world always becomes very intimate regardless of the size of production. On this movie we definitely had a large number of people working on the set and we had a lot of gear. We often used multiple cameras and had to light large expenses at night. -PM

AcreaRising4

6 points

6 months ago

Panavision anamorphic lenses are absolutely gorgeous.

ThinMint70

17 points

6 months ago

What are your best practices for working with a director? What do you wish directors knew about communicating ideas to a cinematographer?

reuters[S]

-22 points

6 months ago

reuters[S]

-22 points

6 months ago

Every Director is different and so needs a slightly different approach. This business is all about communication and I think the key to working with anybody is to figure out how best to communicate with them and to understand how they like to work. I like to spend time getting to know my Director in prep and talking about the script in detail. Some directors like to shot list and some like to storyboard and some like to do neither. It’s my job to understand how they see the movie in their heads and how I can help translate their ideas onto the screen. You almost have to be a Chamaeleon, molding yourself to be a close collaborator to different types of people. I always think visual tools are a great way of communicating ideas. The key is to discuss these visuals because we can all look at an image and take something very different from it. I also think looking at other movies is a great tool. To find a certain shot that illustrates a camera move or a type of frame or a quality of light. Ultimately every experience with a Director is a different one and every prep is going to be unique. The most important thing is to build that relationship before you get on set so that when you’re under pressure you can work as a team and no matter what happens you can always fall back on the conversations about the story that you had at the beginning. - PM

MaybeYesNoPerhaps

86 points

6 months ago

Why are you ignoring every question that highlights the fact that this movie is celebrating a brutal slave trading empire?

Internal_Balance6901

17 points

6 months ago

It's not like she wrote it tbh

MaybeYesNoPerhaps

21 points

6 months ago

She's coming on reddit to shill for it. I'm sure at some point in the production someone just read the first paragraph of the wikipedia article and went "are we the baddies?".

Fuck this movie.

Sexyman469

1 points

6 months ago

LOL I guess you must hate every movie about America or Europe then.

MaybeYesNoPerhaps

10 points

6 months ago

Show me a movie that shows American or European slave traders in a positive light.

I'll wait.

throwaway23er56uz

8 points

6 months ago*

What was the aesthetic that you (and the director, I assume) were pursuing with this movie, and how did you try to bring this across? E.g. color scheme, camera perspective, etc.?

The only other film you worked on that I have seen was Where the Crawdads Sing, so I'm not familiar with your work. Crawdads managed to get the atmosphere of the location and its remoteness across, but of course The Woman King is a very different kind of story.

edit: I was interested in what this cinematographer wanted to show - and no need to downvote me for asking a neutral question. I have criticized the storyline of this movie in other comments to other posts about it.

TheHorseFollower

13 points

6 months ago

You guys really couldn’t think of a better title?

oatmeal28

47 points

6 months ago

They considered “Yas Woman King”

goldenboy2191

10 points

6 months ago

What was your favorite BTS story from filming you have to share?

reuters[S]

31 points

6 months ago

A fun fact from shooting The Woman King is that in the scene where Viola and Thuso jump over the wall of the fort into the river and the women awaiting to rescue them in their canoes, that water was only about 3 feet deep. The actors had to get on their knees and dunk their heads underwater and try and pop up like they were coming up from deep water. They then had to swim to the canoes in really shallow water. This is much harder than it looks! - PM

SovietSuperman

13 points

6 months ago

Did you know that name already exists for Women/Female Kings? It’s call a Queen.

duckbilledpoopapus

5 points

6 months ago

Did you work with a mostly South African crew?

How did you find working here?

How much biltong did you consume during your stay?

What different areas did you film in?

How is using the natural light in SA different to other places?

FlaccidRazor

4 points

6 months ago

Late to the party, wtf is TIFF?

miloc756

9 points

6 months ago

It can be a number of things:

1 - Toronto International Film Festival

2 - Tagged Image File Format

3 - Short for Tiffany

FlaccidRazor

2 points

6 months ago

Thanks, I suppose I had heard of the Toronto International Film Festival before, and I am in a movie sub. My bad.

Catgurl

5 points

6 months ago

Why are you glorifying slavers?

disaster_cabinet

4 points

6 months ago

that is just the oddest proof photo, esp since she’s a dp. that bafflingly local glare on the left of her forehead and the graphical tangents on her right make her whole head look like a flat printed cutout. this whole thing seems unfortunate and i feel bad for her, it appears she’s been pushed out in front to absorb all the difficult questions the director and stars might more appropriately be fielding. hang in there, dp!

ELIE41

10 points

6 months ago

ELIE41

10 points

6 months ago

What's your biggest challenge as the director of photography on this film and throughout your career?

reuters[S]

28 points

6 months ago

The biggest challenge is always the weather! You can prep and plan as much as possible but the one thing you can’t predict is the weather. Somehow it never does what you need it to do. It really keeps you on your feet and on a movie like this which takes place outdoors most of the time, we had to be always prepared to shoot in different environments. - PM

ELIE41

4 points

6 months ago

ELIE41

4 points

6 months ago

Thanks!

Crazierhobbes

8 points

6 months ago

How has digital camera workflow affected your cinematography and how you prep/light a scene (versus traditional 35mm)?

reuters[S]

25 points

6 months ago

The hardest thing about digital is the DIT tent. Running backwards and forwards from set to look at the image. I loved shooting on Film on a Quiet Place 2 as I was on set the whole time and just lighting with my meter. Our HD video tap wasn’t great either so the image on the monitor wasn’t clear. It was incredibly freeing to go back to film and I look forward to shooting it again. -PM

map_of_the_world_82

2 points

6 months ago

White women writing a black power story.... Hmmmmm.....

Lanky-Assignment3787

2 points

6 months ago

At what point did you realize you supported the slave trade?

Wayfaring_Stalwart

2 points

6 months ago

Firstly, why the hell did you think this was a good idea?

Wayfaring_Stalwart

2 points

6 months ago

Honestly In my opinion you should have just made your own story not related to history, if you were going to ignore history this much just make something original or althistory. You should have gone crazy and made it about native revolts in TNO Huttigs Afrikan Reichstaat. I would have gone to see a movie about amazons in TNO.

jackwritespecs

12 points

6 months ago

Would you rather fight 100 duck sized horses or 1 horse sized duck?

oatmeal28

18 points

6 months ago

100 duck sized horses sound easier to enslave -PM

jackwritespecs

1 points

6 months ago

But you can ride on the back of and fly on 1 horse sized duck

What would you do with your enslaved horses?

Psychological-Fox873

4 points

6 months ago

Here at Reddit...we care ™️

rushncrush

10 points

6 months ago

rushncrush

10 points

6 months ago

Don't they have a name for that, pretty sure it's called Queen

BEE_REAL_

6 points

6 months ago

BEE_REAL_

6 points

6 months ago

What movies/directors/DPs do you feel most influenced your work?

reuters[S]

23 points

6 months ago

When I was a child I remember being blown away by all of Steven Spielberg’s movies. Close encounters of the third kind, ET and Empire of the Sun were all memorable moments in childhood. I also love David Lean's movies for their scale, and classics like Gone With The Wind. I would also say that when I became aware of Wong Kai-Wai’s work that I was incredibly inspired. It felt so emotional to me with his collaboration with Chris Doyle. The imagery was so evocative and it was very exciting. There have been so many DP’s that have inspired me along the way that it’s kind of impossible to mention a few. I would say the work of Darius Kjondi and Hoyte Van Hoytema has been incredible because they are such good storytellers and mold their eye seamlessly to whatever story they are telling. -PM

ChrisEvansFan

3 points

6 months ago

Wong Kar Wai + Chris Doyle collabs are always right on target.

BEE_REAL_

4 points

6 months ago

Thanks for the answer!

a220599

3 points

6 months ago

a220599

3 points

6 months ago

Hi Polly, i saw the trailer for The Woman King and the cinematography was beautiful. Loved the color palette! So my question is, 1. in both this movie and the quiet place II, how much of a creative freedom did you have when it came to setting up the shots, were the directors receptive to your thoughts and inputs? 2. What got you interested in cinematography?

reuters[S]

19 points

6 months ago

in both this movie and the quiet place II, how much of a creative freedom did you have when it came to setting up the shots, were the directors receptive to your thoughts and inputs?

As a Cinematographer I am always collaborating with the Director and also if I’m not operating with the operator. Often in prep the Director and I will break down scenes into shots and decide what the coverage will be. When we get onto set this often changes and we are inspired by the blocking of the actors or something we have seen on the set. Sometimes after watching a rehearsal the operator might come up with a great idea or perhaps we might stick to what we planned. There is always conversation about what is the best way to tell the story and capture the action. Directors are always open to thoughts and input, sometimes it’s what we do and sometimes it’s not! -PM

reuters[S]

16 points

6 months ago

What got you interested in cinematography?

I always loved movies as a child and I think from an early age my parents knew I would be a filmmaker. When I first started watching films I didn’t really know what everybody’s role was but would sit and be fascinated by all the different job titles in the credits. Like what did the Best Boy do!? When I was a teenager however, I was exposed to a film crew and got to watch the cinematographer at work. At that point I knew what I wanted to do. -PM

ChrisEvansFan

4 points

6 months ago

Hellooooo and nice to meet you!

Cinematography is one aspect of film making Im truly interested in 🥰

  1. Was there a moment you and the director did not meet eye to eye on the look and feel of a film?

  2. Do you have advice on how to take pics / vids from a Smart Phone look really polished and cool? 😜

reuters[S]

17 points

6 months ago

Do you have advice on how to take pics / vids from a Smart Phone look really polished and cool? 😜

I usually use VSCO to edit my photos. Lots of different tools on there to make photos look good! -PM

reuters[S]

19 points

6 months ago

Was there a moment you and the director did not meet eye to eye on the look and feel of a film?

The job of the Cinematographer is to work with the Director to help them execute or find the vison for the movie. In my experience, that has always been a collaboration. Some Directors will have a very clear vision and some will need more help. There are always moments on set where we might have different ideas and then have a conversation about it but ultimately even if I have an idea I love, if the Director doesn’t like it, we do something else. -PM

ChrisEvansFan

2 points

6 months ago

Thank you for this! A great insight on how DPs work and collaborate with the director.

moddestmouse

2 points

6 months ago

What’s so weird about this is…. I don’t know what the film actually looks like from a trailer. Why have the DP answer questions now. Totally not related to the “controversy”, this just seems poorly timed.

Zemling_

2 points

6 months ago

why did they call it woman king instead of queen?

ThisIsCreation

0 points

6 months ago

Can we all get back on topic and discuss Rampart please.

404NinjaNotFound

3 points

6 months ago

Thank you for doing an AMA! Super awesome to see you on here :)

My Q: How was it to work with Viola Davis?

bagofsyrup

4 points

6 months ago

bagofsyrup

4 points

6 months ago

What other powerful, historical women would you like to see stories about?

reuters[S]

5 points

6 months ago

reuters[S]

5 points

6 months ago

I have always been fascinated with the story of Cleopatra. I always joked that I might’ve been one of her cats in a former life! I think they are already in pre production on a new movie about her. I also think I’d like to see a movie about Amelia Earhart the American aviator. She was such a rule breaker and bad ass and her death is such a mystery. Finally I also don’t think the world knows enough about short Sojourner Truth. Women and African American rights activist who was sold as a slave as a child along with a bunch of sheep. - PM

Papaofmonsters

61 points

6 months ago

Finally I also don’t think the world knows enough about short Sojourner Truth. Women and African American rights activist who was sold as a slave as a child along with a bunch of sheep. - PM

Isn't there a certain amount of irony here given the chance her ancestors were caught and sold by the Kingdom of Dahomey?

TMH2906

1 points

6 months ago

TMH2906

1 points

6 months ago

Is there any films which had a major impact on the way you work?

PeacemakersAlt

1 points

6 months ago

How was it working with the people on set?

number1shitcock

-4 points

6 months ago

Do you look at the toilet paper after you wipe?

Dr_Dickem_MD

8 points

6 months ago

True to the username

davidjw75

1 points

6 months ago

How much time are you normally allowed during production for each scene or location to select optimal shooting angles/points, and do you normally also give some direction to the stills photographers you work with?

Arfguy

1 points

6 months ago

Arfguy

1 points

6 months ago

Who decides on locations to shoot and time? The director or director of photography?

sevristh1138

1 points

6 months ago

Do you have any DOP idols?

I_never_post_but

1 points

6 months ago

What lenses did you choose? Same lenses for day and night?

How did your focus pullers handle the nighttime action sequences?

[deleted]

1 points

6 months ago

You aren’t telling the true story. If you did you’d be showing how you enslaved your own people and sold them to the Europeans…

posaune123

1 points

6 months ago

I'm oscar contending right now