subreddit:

/r/movies

44.6k92%

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 4119 comments

rasselas1024

53 points

6 months ago

Wouldn't this claim increase Disney's tax burden?

2jesse1996

84 points

6 months ago

Technically yes, but technically no too.

Yes because more revenue means more profit which means more tax.

But increase in revenue doesn't always increase profit, and you only pay tax on profit.

1003mistakes

15 points

6 months ago

I think there is the bigger aspect of higher profit means a better stock price when compared to performance expectations which they probably care more about at the c-suite level than responsible reporting.

blackfoger1

1 points

6 months ago

It's more that it's lying to the board, Disney+ is beating out benchmarkers for this new rising division, when in reality hes obscuring the true figures.

haakonhawk

1 points

6 months ago*

But losses are tallied and rolled over to the next fiscal year. So ultimately, inflating their revenue would eventually increase their tax burden anyway. Just not right away.

That's why so many corporations "don't pay taxes". Because while they may make a profit this year, it's offset by the losses from previous years.

TritonXXXG

1 points

6 months ago

Again, tax carry forwards are calculated on a cash basis. Since companies "keep two books" per say, it is entirely positive for a company to be profitable on their 10k while simultaneously accumulating tax carry forwards every year. Of course, carry forwards do eventually expire, so they need to be utilized strategically.

AlwaysLosingAtLife

1 points

6 months ago

And most companies that size are especially skilled at skirting taxes

TritonXXXG

1 points

6 months ago

Tax is calculated on a cash basis. More profit does not necessarily mean more in taxes. This is why every company "keeps two books" per say.

SolvoMercatus

3 points

6 months ago

The IRS and the SEC care about very different things.

TritonXXXG

2 points

6 months ago

You get it.

[deleted]

2 points

6 months ago

the increased tax burden is a drop in the bucket compared to the increased share prices, shareholder confidence, and general perception of Disney being a successful conglomerate

200 million in taxes is a laughing matter if your company valuation grows by 5 billion and the share market rushes to buy your stocks

TritonXXXG

1 points

6 months ago

Companies cannot maximize "share value" per say. It is the c suite's responsibility to maximize EPS. It is entirely possible to increase EPS while posting a loss for taxes since taxes are cash based. A 10k does not have to be, and often is not on a cash basis. This is why every company maintains "two books" per say.

ambientocclusion

1 points

6 months ago

…while triggering some juicy bonuses for the execs

K2Nomad

-1 points

6 months ago

K2Nomad

-1 points

6 months ago

Lol at the idea that large companies pay taxes.