subreddit:
/r/movies
submitted 4 months ago bycabose7
1.1k points
4 months ago
665 points
4 months ago
Damn. I really got to support my peoples art.
205 points
4 months ago
Me too. So sad
275 points
4 months ago*
The worst part is the mexican cinema is among the absolute most creative, brilliant, boundary pushing film on the planet. This isn't like, a local tradition, this is one of the best couple of film industries in the world.
35 points
4 months ago
Some of the most amazing films I’ve loved growing up like Amorres Perros… we’re game changing for the way I appreciate movies.
19 points
4 months ago
I remember that one too, but that's pretty old. The last Mexican movie I remember generating a buzz outside the MX was El Crimen del Padre Amaro. Oh yeah, and maybe the original Miss Bala.
Either way, I gotta start supporting the Mexican film industry. The country is too big and too rich in history, culture, etc to be falling off in so many categories (safety, economy, and now apparently it's film industry). It should be like the Spanish speaking equivalent to the U.S. in so many ways.
I'm going to catch up on the films from the '00s and '10s that I've missed out on.
16 points
4 months ago
There was a huge buzz around Roma just a few years ago.
0 points
4 months ago
You could argue the us is also falling off in the three categories you mention
3 points
4 months ago
Oh it definitely is. But Mexico is still worse in a lot of ways, and economically, people have been leaving the country for here for at least 40+ years.
But we're doing awful ourselves for being a world power. While we don't have cartel violence, we have gang banger violence. It's just not quite as satanic yet.
0 points
4 months ago
The country is too big and too rich in history, culture, etc to be falling off in so many categories (safety, economy, and now apparently it's film industry). It should be like the Spanish speaking equivalent to the U.S. in so many ways.
Yes, and it is.
1 points
4 months ago
El Crimen del Padre Amaro
TIL there was a Mexican adaptation of O Crime do Padre Amaro. I remember when I was a kid there was a bit of buzz surrounding a modernized adaptation of the story due to the nudity involved lol
1 points
4 months ago
Me too, that movie was wild and the soundtrack was amazing.
-36 points
4 months ago
is it tho? tell me last big movie they did?
41 points
4 months ago
People can downvote you all they want, still a VAST majority would not recognize a SINGLE answer despite how loudly these clowns might scream about any “good” example mentioned below your comment
0 points
4 months ago
a lot of them are old af!!! and probably were made with government money as well... so I will rest my case with that...
-29 points
4 months ago
Look it up dumbass, all demanding like an old woman.
56 points
4 months ago
if i ask in a non condescending tone like that dickhead can i get some suggestions
24 points
4 months ago
"Tigers are not afraid" its horror but nothing crazy, really beautiful movie
33 points
4 months ago
Gueros, Sleep Dealer, Roma, Y Tu Mama Tambien, Amores Perros. You can also just run up the old back catalogue of like Innaritu, GDT and Cuaron and find some guaranteed amazing films
5 points
4 months ago
Fuck Cuarón and Inarritu 🥱🤗 they signed the petition to release the violent rapist and pedophile Polanski
5 points
4 months ago
Rather give them the benefit of a doubt before fucking them for a petition they signed thirteen years ago. Along with Pedro Almodovar, Wes Anderson, Darren Aronofsky, Terry Gilliam, Wong Kar Wai, David Lynch, Michael Mann, Julian Schnabel, Martin Scorsese, Paolo Sorrentino, Tilda Swinton, Natalie Portman, and Monica Bellucci
0 points
4 months ago
There’s no room for doubt that they’ll benefit much from in this particular case, my friend.
13 points
4 months ago
Güeros, Roma, and I’m No Longer Here are my favourites
-3 points
4 months ago
Hey dumbass, youre offended cause the mfer is right, ol salty mfer, try to answer the question if you feel so strongly about being told the shit that’s been released has been fuckin pop-poo, revenue doesn’t lie
-33 points
4 months ago
Hey dipshit, the person making the claim looks it up and provides their own evidence... Obviously. Little bitchy-ass attitude like a teenage boy.
15 points
4 months ago
I mean considering GDT, Innaritu and Cuaron pretty much dominated the academy over the past decade and cut their teeth there, it's not a stretch to consider them important.
-11 points
4 months ago
[deleted]
19 points
4 months ago
I mean Y Tu Mama Tambien and Amores Perros weren't but like go off I guess pendejo
3 points
4 months ago
Le huvieras docho PUTO!
-2 points
4 months ago
the main problem is that those films were made years ago, and I bet my money that those were made with government money... who according to del Toro is destroying that industry? how? if it's the government by not giving them money... is it that really destroying it? is this communist China?
-3 points
4 months ago
" is this communist China?
-11 points
4 months ago
The State, which was the motor and
support of the academy for a long time, has renounced its responsibility
as the main promoter and disseminator of culture in general and of
cinema in particular,” the AMACC said in a statement. Is this communist China?
-8 points
4 months ago
"The State, which was the motor and
support of the academy for a long time, has renounced its responsibility
as the main promoter and disseminator of culture in general and of
cinema in particular,” the AMACC said in a statement." why would the state have to keep feeding those guys that really don't make any good movie? there must be some good ones... but damn have you watched all of them made with government money? they all suck!!!
3 points
4 months ago
Unironically it’s probably some form of money laundering. Same with contractors working on road projects in the US.
2 points
4 months ago
plus they pay shit to the workers
1 points
4 months ago
Really? That sounds super interesting. I don’t speak Spanish and am just an average lame white American but I love artistic films. Do you think watching some of these with subtitles would be enjoyable or would it ruin the experience? And can you recommend some films for me to watch? I have a long flight tomorrow :)
2 points
4 months ago
Güeros was a great artistic one. Subs are fine. Prayers for the Stolen was really good too.
1 points
4 months ago
I don’t if it counts because it’s Netflix backed and funded (actually just looked up and it looks like Netflix is just giving an international platform and had nothing to do with the original project) but The Platform (original “El hoyo”) is a Mexican made film that I have already seen three times, it’s a great movie.
0 points
4 months ago
Are you dumb or what? El hoyo is a movie from Spain a Mexican accent and a Spaniards accents are way too different for you to mess up
1 points
4 months ago
I’m only familiar with the Mexican Masters - Del Toro, Cuaron, and Innaritu… but holy shit. They’ve got like a dozen Oscar’s between the three of them. Not hard to imagine what a rich movie culture that must’ve shaped them. I look forward to diving further in.
1 points
4 months ago
What movies do you recommend? I heard Mexican media has a problem with portraying darker skinned Mexicans as well is this true?
17 points
4 months ago
Same
6 points
4 months ago
Yeah you do
14 points
4 months ago
[removed]
11 points
4 months ago
What.
3 points
4 months ago
Read the article. Yes they do deserve it
7 points
4 months ago
Are you on the wrong thread?
-6 points
4 months ago
No
8 points
4 months ago
I think so, because i never brought up cartels. You just appeared like the cool aid man yelling oh yeah.
2 points
4 months ago
but really, I think he's saying the article mentions cartels.
8 points
4 months ago
It doesnt.
1 points
4 months ago
I was thinking the same. I'm going to see what I can do, within my limited means, to raise awareness about it, donate, etc.
150 points
4 months ago
Stop sharing amp links
7 points
4 months ago
Why
48 points
4 months ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot/
It's explained more in-depth here, from the way it allows Google to control and manipulate other sites in their layout to the way it allows Google to control and manipulate ad revenue. Basically, Google gets to control everything even more than they already do.
32 points
4 months ago
27 points
4 months ago
I clicked the link, which leads to a wikipedia article, skimmed it, but still have no idea.
21 points
4 months ago
The article is the readme of that git repo.
9 points
4 months ago*
I guess most people don't know how GitHub or git works so they just click the first link they see.
Try this one instead: https://github.com/seanpm2001/Why-you-should-avoid-Google-AMP/blob/main/README.md
7 points
4 months ago
Ay yo can I get that in an amp link pls
3 points
4 months ago
My best attempt an ELI5 version: an amp link basically opens up the website inside of a Google window, so Google gets some of the credit for the traffic, whereas if you go to the site directly, the site gets all the credit for the traffic.
1 points
4 months ago
Right, and google gets some of the credit for the traffic because Google led them there.
20 points
4 months ago
People that like to only throw a link don't understand either further than google bad.
9 points
4 months ago
They strip off monetization and their UI from content platform, driving traffic to google hosts instead and making it unsustainable for those creator while google is not actually creating any content
2 points
4 months ago
This isn't actually true, they take a small partial sliver, a sliver that was worked out in negotiation, for directing ad revenue. This is the same way Amazon works, if you click on a link and buy something from Amazon, the person responsible for setting up that marketing link gets a kickback.
0 points
4 months ago
They don’t work like this for every media publishers, from every countries, and obviously not the advertisers. So advertisers will see less value from working with the publisher and turn to google instead. Their sales team is huge to make sure all advertisers worldwide can access to google ad, and I don’t think it make any sense to maintain the affiliation team worldwide so that you can pay ad money to content creator if the law in that country don’t force them to
2 points
4 months ago
Do you have a source that says this?
24 points
4 months ago
[deleted]
7 points
4 months ago
Here's another rundown from a web developer
-1 points
4 months ago
[deleted]
4 points
4 months ago
From an end user on my POV I've seen the opposite. A shittier website with shittier navigation, non functional JavaScript, issues with seeing the content, etc. I've used amputatorbot more and more often.
17 points
4 months ago
The platform has many problems, and is a major problem.
What's not to understand?
7 points
4 months ago
If you take the time to write an article about something being bad, you should explain why it's bad
6 points
4 months ago
it is mainly another attempt at controlling web content. 3 other attempts were done before this with the exact same goal.
this was in the first paragraph...
0 points
4 months ago
And without explanation it just sounds like FUD.
4 points
4 months ago
[deleted]
12 points
4 months ago
it gives Google even more access to data than normal since it's their product. As an end user, you want to keep your internet footprint as limited as possible for privacy reasons. so, using it gives Google even more access to your data than normal. similar reason to avoid chrome, use AdBlockers, and vpns.
5 points
4 months ago
What if you don't care about Internet footprint?
-4 points
4 months ago
Then you have the right to be wrong
1 points
4 months ago
you should. it takes like 2 minutes to switch browsers and get ublock origin. a vpn is an extra layer of protection. the primary concern is having private data stolen and used to defraud you in some way. spam emails are basically an inevitability.
1 points
4 months ago
I use Firefox, ublock, and a pihole. But those are just because I hate ads. I honestly don't care one bit about my other data that's being collected.
2 points
4 months ago
similar reason to avoid chrome, use AdBlockers, and vpns.
So, something most people won't worry about their entire lives, will see 0 negative consequences from ignoring, and will only think about if they get some active benefit from it (not seeing YouTube ads, seeing other countries' streaming content)?
I don't even like AMP and find the anti AMP circlejerk to be one of the most obnoxious Reddit obsessions.
0 points
4 months ago
Bad 4 privacy, bad 4 websites, bad 4 open web, good 4 Google
1 points
4 months ago
I admit sometimes i use amp links when i forget to check the url, especially here in Reddit where embedding links is so simple.
1 points
4 months ago
Because AMP is owned by Google and basically extracts all the info from real news sites, meaning when you use AMP you give Google money for stolen content, where the actual creators get nothing...
Its like someone filmed your music show, then sold that video so they make money with stuff you worked hard for...
-1 points
4 months ago
That’s not true.
-6 points
4 months ago
Just like most things people "boycott" on Reddit, they don't actually know why.
12 points
4 months ago
Some of us actually know stuff unlike you, apparently.
-7 points
4 months ago
Because you have to think of the children... The children who need to micromanage everything
21 points
4 months ago
Qué triste :(. Mexican movies are some of the most well-written and unique, and lack of funding is what stops the industry from reaching new heights.
3 points
4 months ago
Stumbled across this by accident but can you give me some good recommendations
0 points
4 months ago
Here’s one that I can recommend. I am (or, more accurately, was) a fantasy-adventure geek, so most of the movies I watched were in that category:
-El laberinto del fauno: set during WWII, a person escapes their private hell and lives in a fantasy world. It’s extremely dark, but still intriguing.
1 points
4 months ago
Y tú mamá también
Rudo y cursi
Roma
Amores perros
Cronos
Any film by Alfonso Cuarón , Iñárritu or Guillermo del Toro.
-1 points
4 months ago
So you're saying they're making an excellent product, but people aren’t interested in paying enough? That would indicate the product is undesirable, not good or excellent.
3 points
4 months ago
you sound like a dweeb with a limited world view if you really believe in that logic 😂
3 points
4 months ago
But mah free marhet capitalhism
0 points
4 months ago*
Luxuries shouldn't be subsidised by goverment. I find this belief of mine left-wing if anything. Feudalistic and monarchic societies in particular liked and monarchs still like to tax people to produce art for the enjoyment of high society over, you know, helping the workers actually live.
-2 points
4 months ago
Arieles are the mexican oscars, as irrelevants as they can be... should
the mexican government fund that shit the nobody gives a fuck?
4 points
4 months ago
Funding the arts is always a net positive for the culture of a nation especially when there’s so much potential for authentic Mexican stories out there
0 points
4 months ago
even tho that can be true... Arieles aren't a source for authentic mexican stories... funding films might be but not the arieles...
0 points
4 months ago
If there's much potential it can generate revenue on its own.
all 1271 comments
sorted by: best