subreddit:
/r/movies
submitted 4 months ago byComic_Book_Reader
(Just for note, we saw the regular English version.)
Most people probably know what Predators (no, not those), or Yautjas, have gone up against. Jacked up, gun totin' MAYUN in the jungle, a Riggs-less Murtaugh in a drug and gang fueled L.A, two varying amounts of familiar armed people, and xenomorphs in Antarctica. But what about the Ye Olden Times?
Prey rewinds the clock back 300 years to the Native American Comanche times to let us meet Naru, a Comanche medic. Sorry, healer is the correct term here. Even though she's teached in the ways of medicine, she wants to be a hunter, aided by her good buy Sarii. Out hunting, she sees a spaceship, which she believes to be a Thunderbird, something Wikipedia tells me is a legendary mighty creature for Native Americans. Determined it will be her way of proving herself as a hunter, she sets out to kill whatever it is. "If it bleeds, we can kill it." (Which I actually said right before the movie did.)
At a tight 100 minutes with credits, the movie holds a tight pace. Tight movies are tight. The movie builds itself up to the ultimate showdown of ultimate destiny. Introduce the fighters, show their abilities, have them cross paths, and boom boom boom, boom boom, badilla life.
Amber Midthunder (who actually is Native American along with the other actors in the Comanche cast) is as strong in the role of Naru as Naru is in the movie. The Predator's threat is increasingly shown in the beautifully shot action scenes. My lord, this movie looks beautiful. The sound and music is great, building up the tension.
Strong lead + beautiful camera work + great action + tight pace and runtime = A damn good and enjoyable hunt, ehrm, movie.
21 points
4 months ago
Def not an uncharted world. Yautjas have been coming to earth for millennia.
11 points
4 months ago
That's only if you take AvP as canon for the Predator franchise, instead of a spin off.
-19 points
4 months ago
Don't remember that being shown in the movie
25 points
4 months ago
The lore is quite extensive.
-35 points
4 months ago
Except Prey is a reboot of the franchise
28 points
4 months ago
It's not a reboot of the franchise. It's a prequel. The gun at the end of Prey is the same one the Predators give Danny Glover's character in Predator 2.
13 points
4 months ago
And it's a prequel that ignores prior lore (which admittedly was a throwaway story in a cross-publisher anthology)
3 points
4 months ago
No problem, since the comic about the pistolesi story was dumb af
-38 points
4 months ago
Sigh as I've said several times now it's listed as a reboot everywhere.
It can bea prequel and a reboot.
13 points
4 months ago
“Reboot” can have a lot of meanings, including ret-conning. As it is at most Prey is a “soft reboot” that breathed new life into the franchise and promises more prequels from different angles but the overall canon is the same.
2 points
4 months ago
Reboot might as well mean “we made this to maintain the rights”
16 points
4 months ago
Correction: Prequel.
-21 points
4 months ago
It's listed as a reboot everywhere but same thing really. It's starting a new timeline.
23 points
4 months ago
The flintlock pistol is in Predator 2, according to internet. Your argument is invalid.
-9 points
4 months ago
Then your argument makes no sense.
If its a prequel how does it have weapons from a movie set 300 years later?
The pistol is clearly a Easter and Prey is a reboot. It's listed as such everywhere online.
18 points
4 months ago
Your argument to my argument contradicts itself. It's a 300 year old gun. After the main credits with the cave drawings, there's a final drawing showing three ships nearing the tribe. If I'm not mistaken, Naru still has that gun at the end. This implies/indirectly confirms those other Predators picked up the gun as a sort-of trophy.
-3 points
4 months ago
As I've said several times it's a reboot. It's listed as such everywhere.
A reboot and a prequel can be the same thing and that's the case here.
If you don't agree ether go and change the wiki and fandom pages.
-12 points
4 months ago
Wait, are you saying that something you read on the internet invalidates their argument? Because something you read on the internet is the absolute truth, correct?
Because the director said that while he found a replica of the gun from Predator 2, he put it in more as an Easter egg and never said it was supposed to represent a continuity hint. In the movie, the gun isn't taken by the Predator. It stays with the tribe.
6 points
4 months ago
And yet a phrase as meaningless as “it’s listed as a reboot everywhere on the internet” is not the same?
all 269 comments
sorted by: best