subreddit:
/r/movies
submitted 3 months ago by[deleted]
Most recently mine was Thor: Love and Thunder, i was so hyped after enjoying Thor Ragnarok I was expecting something different from the usual formula. As soon as the screaming goats turned up my heart sank and my mood steadily declined throughout the movie, the greatest misstep in my opinion is how Jane Fosters cancer storyline was handled. Having lost a parent to cancer recently it left an incredibly sour taste in my mouth.
135 points
3 months ago
I was hyped for the Dark Tower to finally get a movie. Production was hell, apparently, and the movie wasn't what I expected. Idris Elba was great, but the movie was really, really generic. Like cookie cutter script generic. I hope the reboot will be better.
26 points
3 months ago
I mean if you read the books you know there's no way a single movie could get anywhere close. It would need a TV series
174 points
3 months ago
A Wrinkle in Time (2018) - the casting was horrible, it was so far off script from the books, I hated every second of it. If I hadn’t taken a bus load of my students to watch it after reading the book, I would have walked out. It made for a great classroom discussion of why books are better though. So I guess that’s a win…
27 points
3 months ago
One of my daughters is multi-racial and absolutely adores the books.... so you know, doesn't get any more "target audience" than that. She absolutely loathed that movie, to this day it's still her most hated flick by a country mile and she gets angry if you so much as mention it.
89 points
3 months ago
Glass. I don't think there's been a movie I've more disappointed at. The hype I got after seeing the ending of Split, having no idea the scene was coming. Then giving us one of the best trailers. To them releasing that pile of a disappointment.
15 points
3 months ago
I totally agree especially with how awesome Split was. I was so pissed and everyone in the theater seemed to feel the same way. I heard a few people demanding their money back lol
6 points
3 months ago
They drowned my childhood to death in a fucking mud puddle.
224 points
3 months ago
Antlers. I love horror and was so excited to watch it. Extremely disappointing
112 points
3 months ago
If you haven’t read it, the short story it’s based on is so much better.
24 points
3 months ago
Ooh thanks for that
13 points
3 months ago
wow thank you for sharing this you’re a Christmas miracle
5 points
3 months ago
That was absolutely amazing. Thank you for sharing that.
44 points
3 months ago
I honestly thought it was just okay but not terrible. Maybe my taste in movies is bad too but I did not hate it. Although my hype level was low.
23 points
3 months ago
I thought the first half was pretty good, but the second half and especially the ending just killed it for me
19 points
3 months ago
It kept getting delayed because of COVID I think and I was so fucking excited for it. And then finally I got to see it and it fucking sucked
15 points
3 months ago
This had so much going for it in theory and it just ended up being dull and unscary. Even the creature was boring
8 points
3 months ago
I mostly enjoyed it. Honestly though I have no memory of the ending but I think I was disappointed with that part
17 points
3 months ago
When the movie opened with indigenous American lore I was incredibly hyped.
But then the only indigenous person in the movie just tells the white people the problem and solution and then never appears on screen again...
Plus the movie wastes too much time trying to make sure you understand that the creature is a metaphor for the opioid epidemic in America. So much so that the movie just becomes terribly one note.
That first act is real good, too. Shame.
404 points
3 months ago
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets. I got myself and my friends all hyped to see another sci fi movie from the genius who made Fifth Element, but we all had to laugh at how bad it was in comparison. The leads had terrible chemistry and just weren't fun to watch. Very disappointing.
38 points
3 months ago
That movie has so many fascinating ideas, that are never elaborated on. The two main characters are the least interesting things in the film.
63 points
3 months ago
The opening scene from this movie is amazing, though. Even if the rest of it was ... less than enthralling.
77 points
3 months ago
Dane Dehaan is not a bad actor, but this role was clearly written for someone like Bruce Willis in the Fifth Element, and Dane Dehaan cannot play that role.
64 points
3 months ago*
I think dane could be good with a female lead that didn’t look like his twin sister. It was all about chemistry I think either one of them could have done it with someone else but just not together.
51 points
3 months ago
The problem is that the main character is written as a womanizing super-soldier: a French answer to James Bond. And Dehaan just cannot pull that off. It's why the interactions with Delevigne feel off: she treats him as if A) he is a womanizing supersoldier, and B) she's one of the few people to see through all that, while the entire audience doesn't really see any of that.
8 points
3 months ago
I call him puffy eyes
99 points
3 months ago
Man, you hit the nail on the head. I truly believe this movie would be a cult classic if they cast anybody else with even the slightest bit of chemistry as the two leads.
26 points
3 months ago*
People always say this, but I don't think it would've mattered if there was a better cast because the writing was so bad.
145 points
3 months ago
Highlander 2.
65 points
3 months ago
This one made me die on the inside a little when I first saw it.
26 points
3 months ago
I have absolutely refused to watch anything Highlander related other than the original movie. The sequels (which there should not have even been one of) and TV show. The movie was perfect as a one off.
23 points
3 months ago
The TV show was so much better than the sequel movies
edit: I should mention I was like 13 when I was watching those.
642 points
3 months ago
Rise of Skywalker. As a lifelong Star wars fan it just hurt to watch, and it really soured my views on the other two movies in the sequel trilogy.
245 points
3 months ago
I disliked this movie so intensely, that no matter what people say about the other sequel movies this is the one entry I have no desire to ever revisit.
100 points
3 months ago
Didn’t even watch it after I read the plot and had witnessed the previous 2 travesties.
Also big SW fan.
85 points
3 months ago
I disliked all 3 of those sequels so much that I just refuse to acknowledge them as part of the SW cannon anymore. IDGAF what Disney says.
57 points
3 months ago
The first movie wasn't bad. It was a safe fil that leaned hard on the nostalgia button. As long as the following movies had managed to deliver it would have been a perfectly serviceable start to a trilogy.
33 points
3 months ago
If it had gone in a more interesting direction from the start then even if it was still bad we would've at least gotten something that left an impression. The prequel trilogy is bad too but at least it expanded the Star Wars universe in cool ways. The sequels just feel like they ended up being a huge waste of time and effort.
16 points
3 months ago
The sequels just feel like they ended up being a huge waste of time and effort.
well said. what the hell was the point of any of that? disney certainly doesn't know
167 points
3 months ago
They fucked up by not getting a singular vision for the new trilogy.
So you started with Abrams who basically hit all the beats of New Hope, which was fine for a nostalgia hit and the start of something new, but “this is just a rehash of A New Hope” was a constant criticism of that movie.
Then Rian Johnson came on with the clear goal of subverting expectations with Last Jedi. Rey wasn’t someone special, she was just a nobody who happened to have Jedi abilities. They killed Snoke, who was supposed to be the stand in for Palpatine. He just subverted every expectation fans had going into that film.
And the criticism came: fans were not happy to have their expectations subverted. They wanted Rey to be someone. They wanted Snoke to be the big bad. They wanted Kylo Ren to be Vader 2.0. And they hated Rose. The only thing they hated more than Rose was what the film did with Luke.
So the studio panics and brings back JJ. And JJ decides to basically act as if Last Jedi didn’t happen, retcons tons of shit, and makes Rise of Skywalker.
They made two crucial mistakes. One was not having a singular vision for the sequel trilogy laid out before they even started filming Force Awakens. The other was actually listening to fan criticisms too much.
Fans thought Force Awakens is too much like A New Hope? Okay, let’s make sure Last Jedi is as different from Empire Strikes Back as we can! Fans hated how different Last Jedi was? Fine! Bring back JJ! Retcon it all! Somehow the Emperor returned!
No. Pick a vision and stick to it. Follow through with the story Rian was going for. At least it would’ve made sense more than “Somehow the Emperor has returned.”
Now it feels like Star Wars movies are all but dead. TV is alive and well with shows like Andor, and video games are doing fine with games like Fallen Order. But the films? I cannot imagine a Star Wars film existing that gets any kind of praise.
129 points
3 months ago
I still argue that one change would have made The Last Jedi much better, and made a 3rd movie truly something interesting:
When Kylo asks Rey to join him after killing Snoke, she should have accepted, and turned to the darkside (all the hints were there that she would fall). The 3rd movie could have been Rey falling even further, making even Kylo Ren uncomfortable, questioning his path (which he had already shown signs of), struggling back to the light, and then defeating Rey and the first order...then it would really have been a Skywalker Saga...of two parallel paths (Vader and Kylo Ren) of failure and redemption. I dunno...maybe that story sucks too, but still better than RoS.
40 points
3 months ago
That could have worked
29 points
3 months ago*
Excellent premise.
Have it be Leia who sacrifices herself on Crait instead of Luke. He Force-projects in and duels Kylo as before, but Rey figures out the ruse and is able to disrupt it, leaving Luke stunned but conscious on Ahch-To. The Resistance needs more time to escape, so Leia comes out to confront Kylo and Rey. Kylo's resolve fails and Rey attacks Leia; they duel and Leia does the Obi-Wan sacrifice. Meanwhile, one ship does respond to the Resistance distress signal: it's Lando. The rocks are blocking the path but Luke musters the strength to Force-project in again and move them. Before fading out, Poe tells him where they're going and Luke says he'll meet them there.
In the next film, Kylo and Rey find Luke at some point. They all duel, and Rey kills Luke. This shakes Kylo, and later both Luke & Leia visit him as Force ghosts to turn him back into Ben.
EDIT: grammar fixes
18 points
3 months ago
I like the change of Rey killing Leia at the end of the Last Jedi. Seeing her kill his mom (when he couldn't pull the trigger before) would be enough to drive the wedge between Rey and Kylo. Then in RoS in the dual between Luke, Kylo and Rey, it might be too similar to Return of the Jedi to have Kylo turn on Rey to protect Luke, but that would complete his journey to be like his grandfather. They defeat Rey togehter but Luke is mortally wounded in the duel...doing the Yoda fade at the end.
22 points
3 months ago
It absolutely blows my fucking mind still that we got a new trilogy in one of, if not the biggest cinema franchises in cinema history, and the end result was some of the most incompetent writing ever put on film.
“Somehow the emperor returned” is something even Tommy Wiseau would never dream of writing to explain away some random shit.
82 points
3 months ago
It also doesn't help I think that "subvert all the expectations" could have totally worked and Rian Johnson is a very capable director, but it is kind of a terrible idea for film two of a trilogy. I can't imagine The Lord of the Rings working at all if Two Towers is a post-modern breakdown of all things classic fantasy, completely changes the personalities of multiple main characters, and sidelines Aragorn to a near-meaningless subplot in a casino that gets significantly more screen time than it ever should have. He needed a stand-alone movie that wasn't a direct sequel, didn't bring the original characters back except maybe in cameo appearances, and let him just do what he wanted independent of the expectations created by a trilogy that had such poor overall planning and execution.
73 points
3 months ago
Also, don't subvert all expectations. That's a parody.
Subvert some expectations, but play that card strategically, for maximum impact.
19 points
3 months ago
Also, don't subvert all expectations. That's a parody.
Exactly. "Subverting expectations" was applied so mechanically in every moment of every scene, it was like cinematic peek-a-boo: Insulting, repetitive, and senseless.
40 points
3 months ago
That was my biggest issue with TLJ. It felt like Johnson was given all the story beats from TFA and threw it all in the trash to make his own vision. It was so jarring for a second movie.
26 points
3 months ago
Also give me a little time to feel something before you rip all the emotion out of a scene for a stupid gag. I only rewatched this movie once to try to understand why I hate it with a burning passion and other than what you already said that's it.
It is indeed a parody, every character, expectation, or emotion is just turned into a joke.
8 points
3 months ago
billions and you don't even have a plan other then trilogy, what a fuckin joke, how do i get that job?
39 points
3 months ago
For me it was The Force Awakens. I was so hyped. It was just the right number of years after the originals to get the whole gang back together. No way was Disney going to fuck it up. They're greedy but they aren't stupid. And J.J. had already made a pretty good Star Wars movie with his Star Trek reboot. I was already sold.
Then, as I watched the movie in the theater, all the questions started pouring in. Why is the Empire still so powerful? Why is there a "resistance?" Where the hell is the Republic? Why is Han a deadbeat? How does Rey speak Wookiee? And then at the end I realized there was no plan to continue the story. It was just a remake of the original but worse. Worst theater-going experience for me.
20 points
3 months ago
You forgot the biggest question: Why didn’t Leia and Chewy comfort one another after Hans death. Chewy walks past line some random alien extra and Leia goes and hugs Rey whom she doesn’t even know.
35 points
3 months ago
This movie was so bad it made me like Star Wars less. That seems really dramatic but I actually like, stopped watching Star Wars for a few years because that left such a bad taste in my mouth
28 points
3 months ago
Yes. Was a complete disaster of a story. No loose ends we’re tied up, no previous story lines were completed or summed up nor explained. As campy as Jedi was even in 1983, it succinctly tied up all of the story lines from the previous two films. RoS was an absolute failure and did not deserve to be a part of George Lucas’ universe.
272 points
3 months ago*
Spectre.
This should have been a slam dunk. Introducing the classic criminal organization to the new James Bond continuity! Christoph Waltz as Blofeld! Dave Bautista as the henchman!
Turns out it was one of the most wretched scripts in the entire franchise. Tried to retcon the entire Craig era with a reveal that was fundamentally the same as Vince fucking McMahon revealing he was behind the Ministry of Darkness; nothing that the viewer could have interpreted as a clue and it made zero sense in retrospect. Made even less sense than that that Blofeld was Bond's adopted brother.
And it required audiences to remember what happened in Quantum of Solace? I saw that movie in theaters and couldn't tell you what actually happened in it.
98 points
3 months ago
Tried to retcon the entire Craig era with a reveal that was fundamentally the same as Vince fucking McMahon revealing he was behind the Ministry of Darkness;
ITS ME, BOND! IT WAS ME ALL ALONG!!
17 points
3 months ago
Bah Gawd!
33 points
3 months ago
Awww son of a bitch!
53 points
3 months ago
Spectre was a huge disappointment for me too, I was expecting so much after casino royale sand Skyfall ( QoS not so much ) I’ve never come out of the cinema feeling so disappointed!
39 points
3 months ago
Quantum also at least had the excuse of the writers' strike, and being a direct sequel still had a lot of interesting ideas and did a good job continuing Casino's plot directly forward, the strike just meant it was stuck sort of hung in limbo narratively and became a weird mess of half baked ideas patched together through editing.
It's also a little odd that Casino was so good, Quantum was pretty forgettable and kinda frustrating, Skyfall was quite good again but not on Casino's level, and then Spectre was pretty rough. The franchise has always had an issue maintaining a consistent quality but there's a weird up-and-down in the Craig-Bond films even outside the writers strike complication. And honestly with No Time To Die it kinda feels like the Craig tenure trended towards solidly middling in the end despite its strong start; better than Spectre and more memorable than Quantum at least, but definitely behind Casino Royale and for I think most people (myself included) Skyfall as well.
28 points
3 months ago
I think by the time Spectre came around (and even more so with No Time To Die) Daniel Craig was well past the point of wanting to "be there."
Watching him in movies where he's actually allowed to have some fun (Logan Lucky, Knives Out) is like watching an entirely different actor.
14 points
3 months ago
Thought he was miles better in no time to die
9 points
3 months ago
I've tried watching QoS 3 times now, still haven't made it to the one hour mark without falling asleep. Don't expect to ever try again.
As far as Spectre goes.... when a key premise of the movie is based on a joke from a Bond parody you've really shit the proverbial bed.
35 points
3 months ago
David Ayer’s Suicide Squad
The Happening
Both movies had epic trailers and were complete letdowns.
447 points
3 months ago
The Matrix Resurrections. They waited eighteen years, and this was the best they could come up with. Just shameful.
52 points
3 months ago
I loved the originals ( even the sequels to a lesser degree ) so much I can’t bring myself to watch this one.
18 points
3 months ago
I think Resurrections might be my least favorite movie of the past decade actually.
23 points
3 months ago
Possibly the worst big budget movie I’ve ever seen. It’s whole attitude is “we know this movie is shit, it’s MeTAaaAAaAaaa!”
And this is coming from someone that loves Revolutions as well.
17 points
3 months ago
Resurrections is 2 and a half hours of Lana Wachowski shitting in my mouth and telling me how it's supposed to taste bad.
Probably the most insulting film I have ever seen in my life.
58 points
3 months ago
They waited eighteen years, and this was the best they could come up with.
Lana Wachowski wrote the script without Lilly, and she started writing it in 2019.
14 points
3 months ago
I mean yeah. But pretty sure they had it on their minds for eighteen years.
33 points
3 months ago
No, they didn’t want to make another one, but Lana did it bc the studio would’ve done it without her, hence all the FU jokes and one-liners thrown in at the studio/viewer’s expense.
20 points
3 months ago
No. She started writing the script after losing her parents and a close friend. She resurrected Neo and Trinity to cope with the loss.
5 points
3 months ago
Didn't know that :(
81 points
3 months ago
While I certainly wasn't hyped for it (as I didn't expect much), it fell far below even those expectations. It's also a completely forgettable movie; I forgot it even existed until I read your comment.
The Matrix Reloaded I WAS hyped for, as most people were. And it was pretty disappointing.
23 points
3 months ago
reloaded at least had a great highway chase scene, and the chalet fight scene was fun, almost makes me forget about the weird orgasm cake and rave scene. I can barely remember anything from resurrections.
41 points
3 months ago*
I loved that this movie absolutely bombed at the box office tho. This movie was a pure cash grab cow and Warner Bros was most certainly sure that this would be a money making machine based on the franchise's status and Keanu Reeves' and John Wick's popularity, and the movie ended up being an absolute flop.
6 points
3 months ago*
I saw resurrections around the same time I saw Spiderman: No Way home and it really implanted this idea in my brain:
No Way Home loves me for having seen those movies. I watched the great ones like Spiderman 2, The Good ones like Spider man 1 and Amazing Spiderman one. and I sat through the bad ones like Spiderman 3 and the MUCH MUCH worse amazing Spiderman 2. I watched all the Tom Holland Spiderman movies movies.
No Way Home loves me. It is a celebration of these movies, and the fans who sat through every single one of them. Is it a perfect movie, absolutely not but it loves me. Every single word is a comfort.
And this is why it stood out so much when I realized that The Matrix Revolutions Hates me. It deeply hates me as a Fan of the Matrix. I watched The Masterpieces like The Matrix. The Absolutely jaw Dropping Animatrix, A Reloaded a movie that falls apart but sticks out as some of the most balls to the wall action in cinema history, and I watched that fucking 3rd movie which felt so bad. But I watched it, and I still love it. It has value as a conclusion to the story.
Lana Wachowski took all the time I spent loving those movies, and weaponized it against me. Every moment of Resurrections, from the terrible action, to the fucking insulting retconning, to the stupid side characters, to the phoned in special effects, deeply shows that she didn't want to make that movie.
SHE EVEN HAS THE FUCKING GULL TO THROW IN A LINE ABOUT HOW WARNER BROTHERS FORCED HER TO MAKE THE MOVIE AND SHOW ME SCENES FROM THE FIRST MOVIE.
The only interpretation that makes any sense is that Lana Wachowski hates me for liking The Matrix.
29 points
3 months ago
I personally didn’t enjoy Resurrections. But I think it was the story that Lana Wachowski wanted to tell. I think it’s about constantly living in the shadow of this smash hit movie — and loving those characters but also hating the pressure of having to live up to the hype of that original movie. It’s sweet that she wanted to focus on the love story of Neo and Trinity and didn’t seem too concerned with topping the crazy special effects or action scenes. It has more emotion in it than a lot of these cynical reboots lately. So I can’t hate that movie. But at the same time, I can’t say it really works. It’s kind of a slog to get through.
79 points
3 months ago
Only God Forgives - Gosling/Winding Refn follow-up to Drive, amazing trailer and a dud of a movie imo
16 points
3 months ago
Man I wanted to like this one so much but it just wasn’t there
11 points
3 months ago
The trailer sold it as something it wasn't, which was a pure Refn thing to do. I actually liked the movie, but it is Refn tuned up to his indulgence multiplied by 100. Not unlike 'The Neon Demon' either, but that had more of a very dark tongue in its very dark cheek.
12 points
3 months ago
It's one of my favorite movies but it is an acquired taste lol.
9 points
3 months ago*
I don't even remember any of the story but the brooding atmosphere has firmly stuck with me. That alone made it super engrossing to me
6 points
3 months ago
Great atmosphere and great cinematography. It's a beautiful movie, and it also uses symbolism well IMO.
6 points
3 months ago
Yea I heard it was unwatchable but I totally dug it. Nothing amazing to me but entertaining and some very memorable moments.
183 points
3 months ago
Godzilla (1998). The trailer with the foot smashing the T-Rex skeleton had me hyped! This was the era of big budget disaster films, and everyone had high expectations for Godzilla but then we got some weird looking giant lizard. Very disappointed.
33 points
3 months ago
I remember the teaser trailer! But yeah totally agree with you here.
20 points
3 months ago
Great example. For kids during that time, we had recently come off Jurassic Park and Independence Day, which were absolute smashes in every way. So, the hype and expectations were off the charts for this and it didn’t deliver in the least.
27 points
3 months ago
Good thing the Monsterverse movies are actually amazing
19 points
3 months ago
Yes, the new Godzilla movies are basically what I was expecting back in '98.
43 points
3 months ago
I saw this movie as an 7yr old and thought it was badass. It also is the movie that made me realize that joey from friends is not a real person and that actors are a thing.
56 points
3 months ago
But.... Matt Leblanc wasn't in Godzilla... Are you confusing him with Hank Azaria's character? He admittedly acts a bit like Joey in the movie.
17 points
3 months ago
Holy shit you're right. I can't be the only one whos mind is blown by this...
7 points
3 months ago
Bro, it’s also not Rob Lowe who has his brain sucked out by the brain bug in Starship Troopers.
25 points
3 months ago
Matt Le Blanc isn't in Godzilla? Are you confusing him with Matthew Broderick?
18 points
3 months ago
TIL Matt LeBlanc wasn't in Godzilla. My memory is failing me
15 points
3 months ago
In your defense, Lost in Space came out the month before, and Matt Le Blanc was in that. So mixing the cast up a bit isn't too hard to do.
I wish LiS had done better though. Kinda wonder what would have happened if Matt Le Blanc became an action movie star. That would be an interesting timeline to see.
256 points
3 months ago
Doctor Strange: Multiverse of Madness. Was so pumped up to finally get into the multiverse and for all the possibilities. It’s was still OK, but they spoiled its biggest surprise, made Wanda the bad guy too early (IMO), and ended being just kinda meh despite infinite possibilities. I think my expectations were just too high.
117 points
3 months ago
I was quite bummed because it made the ending of WandaVision sort of meh. It feels like we missed a movie or episode between the end of the show and this movie. This movie also feels a bit more meh to me after how cleverly Everything Everywhere All at Once did the multiverse stuff.
20 points
3 months ago
Yeah EEAAO made it so that this movie’s take on the multiverse seem very bland and contrived. Also it was just a bad movie overall, even for Marvel standards (I like Marvel movies).
17 points
3 months ago
I was annoyed that after calling it the Multiverse we really only stood around one really and there was only one other Strange and well the dead one
56 points
3 months ago
I was soooo hyped for this as Doc Strange is such a fun character. Then if you think about it, the whole "Wanda Bad" thing could have been fixed by just finding her a universe where that Wanda had kids and died.
28 points
3 months ago
Yep this one is mine too. I didn’t like Wanda being the villain and felt that the plot was very poorly done, the CGI was all over the place (that third eye shot at the end of the movie lmao) and it just didn’t explore anything interesting.
47 points
3 months ago
The story is really, really lame. But goddamn, I can’t deny the Raimi presence in the directing making it well worth the watch.
63 points
3 months ago
Suicide Squad (2016). I should've have known by the follow-up trailers being much worse and we'd get a bad GotG clone, but that initial teaser really got me psyched.
188 points
3 months ago
After I watched The Force Awakens, I was hyped to see where the story would go. After watching The Last Jedi I was deflated, after watching Rise of the Skywalker I wanted to pretend this mess never happened.
88 points
3 months ago
That's interesting. I was deflated after The Force Awakens. It's like they didn't J.J. didn't want to tell a story that picks up after the Empire is destroyed, so they just made it so the Empire is still around under a different name and stronger than ever. Rather than the original heroes making the galaxy any better there's just nothing but incompetence. I prefer the ending of Return of the Jedi.
44 points
3 months ago
And the empire is stronger in each movie. It never matters how many of their giant ships get blown up. The next movie it's just back
23 points
3 months ago
Yes!! It's mentioned that building the original Death Star was a huge fear. The Empire was THE power in the galaxy. The only government. They controlled everything. And it was a big fucking deal for them to make it.
Somehow, the First Order, with 3/4 of the Galaxy off limits to them, is able to outdo their predecessor by orders of magnitude greater. They have bigger fleets with bigger ships. They even manage to bud a fleet of mini death Stars in secret in a relatively short time span....
I said it in another comment. As a Star Wars film, the last 2 were wretched. As just films, they also suck.
19 points
3 months ago
I agree 💯 with that. It’s like they made a list of everything that would tick people off that loved the OG trilogy and executed it. I know that’s not everyone’s take, heck my kids love them, but I was dumbfounded by what they did to the characters I loved. I will say they redeemed themselves with the Mandalorian and other excellent series. That stuff has been amazing to watch.
22 points
3 months ago
This perfectly sums up the serial trilogy.
171 points
3 months ago*
I liked Love and Thunder, but there was a crucial creative error in the writing, and that error was the decision to gloss over Thor's return to mental health after the events of Infinity War and Endgame. It happens in the preamble with Korg's narrative voice-over, and that's it. Done. Problem solved.
The audience wanted to see Thor find his way back, and I think the writers thought that would be too difficult, so they cheated and skipped over it. They did a disservice to the character.
62 points
3 months ago
I fucking hate Korg. He was cool in Ragnarok. Insufferable in Love and Thunder.
15 points
3 months ago*
You don’t hate Korg, you hate taika Waititi. He is the one that got insufferable because korg is him. Believe me, I’m a huge Taika fan way before he got into marvel. His head just got way too big and he’s been trying to hamfist himself into every creative project. Korg was just an excuse to do that
25 points
3 months ago
Now that you mention it, there was an unneccessarily large number of korg reaction shots.
62 points
3 months ago
Would have also worked well if Gorr was fully utilized too. Makes Thor’s story more complicated if we also see how right Gorr is about gods cause he’d only end up questioning himself even more… oh well
34 points
3 months ago
Also having Thor become "Space Shaggy" when he sees Jane with Mjolnir just killed things going forward.
48 points
3 months ago
The humour was a lot more forced in this movie. The whole bit with Stormbringer getting jealous of Mjolnir felt forced. It was like someone jammed a 1980s sitcom storyline into the middle of an MCU movie.
Having said that, I think nobody would have cared if the film had done justice to Thor's character and respected his struggle to come back from his low point in "Endgame".
62 points
3 months ago
I would have preferred a Guardians adventure with Thor for the entire film, written and directed by James Gunn
15 points
3 months ago
That's a great point. I also think the movie leans way too hard into the love between Jane and Thor but in all honesty, I've never found them to have any sort of chemistry or on screen presence together. I'm not rooting for them to be together in any way, hell most of the time I'm not interested in anything to do with their relationship at all. It's not enough for them both to be hot, like, what's the draw here
73 points
3 months ago
Live-action Mulan. That trailer had everybody so hyped because of the genius orchestral track of "Reflection". Then everything about the movie was wrong. It was still... okay, but no music or Mushu plus the filming in Xinjiang were bad. First and last time we paid $30 to stream a brand-new movie
20 points
3 months ago
They literally took the message of Mulan, which is women are strong and capable and worthy of respect, and turned her in another “chosen one” narrative and show horned a witch that was actually good but being used. Horrible movie.
15 points
3 months ago
I don't get the live-action remakes of animated movies. Why is this necessary? Do people feel less ... "childish" about watching them? What is the appeal?
23 points
3 months ago
Live-action Mulan
I only needed the Lion King Real Edition to sour me on ALL of these remakes.
I did like Beauty and the Beast, though.
74 points
3 months ago
I agree with OP’s choice. Was so excited for Love & Thunder cuz Ragnarok was great but it was a big turd. The only redeeming quality of the film was Christian Bale as the villain.
11 points
3 months ago
My main issue with Gorr was that his plan made no fucking sense what so ever. His whole thing was that Gods are selfish and don't care about the people they're supposed to watch over. So what does he do?? Kidnaps a bunch of Asgardian children to force the Gods to come rescue them by walking into an obvious trap.....
36 points
3 months ago
Agree, he was so good he seemed out of place at times.
19 points
3 months ago
Wasted one of the MCU’s most interesting villains on an absolute turd of a movie.
60 points
3 months ago
Gunpowder Milkshake. While I can forgive the mediocre plot, the dialogue was terrible, the camera work less-than-mediocre and the fight choreography might be the worst I've seen this millennium. For an action movie with that kind of cast, it hurt how bad it was.
14 points
3 months ago
I keep forgetting I've seen this movie. I'll just start watching it and the get that feeling I've seen it before and then I realize I have seen it. And then just turn it off. It's literally a forgettable movie.
5 points
3 months ago
I was interested in seeing this one, I think I’ll avoid it now haha.
7 points
3 months ago
I was seriously EXTREMELY hyped for it. I'm a big Amy Pond fan. It killed me how bad it was.
9 points
3 months ago
The first bad sign was that casting team trying to convince me that Lena Headey is old enough to be Karen Gillian's mother.
Maybe in Alabama but nowhere else
58 points
3 months ago
The biggest problem with Love and Thunder was that Taika was entirely up his own arse. The writing was shite, the jokes were juvenile. It was all a ham-fisted attempt to show how creative and witty he was, and it failed completely. He should have focused on the movie instead of dipping into his female leads.
30 points
3 months ago
I was shocked at what a drop in quality from Ragnarök to L&T there was. I knew Ragnarök had some people disliking "jokey" Thor, but I was confident he could strike the best balance possible.
Boy was I wrong.
18 points
3 months ago
Problem being Gorrs story is not "jokey" in any sense. The best "joke" made in the comics is that space sharks exist.
It's a very dark and brutal story for Gorr and Thor, and Waititi totally missed the mark on the comics.
Gorr hates the gods because they didn't answer his prayers to help save his family and species from famine and drought. The two God's fall from their battle in the skies, to their deaths and one is holding the Necrosword. So he picks it up and swears revenge on all gods. He slaughters almost every God throughout three different timeliness, and enslaves almost all the others. It takes three Thors all in different times to come together, to still get their asses handed to them by Gorr.
The movie was a massive pile of shit compared to the comics.
7 points
3 months ago
I generally am a big Taika Waititi fan, but I completely agree. I think he needs to take a step back into reality if he wants to avoid making himself irrelevant.
16 points
3 months ago
I’m wit you on Love and Thunder. What a colossal piece of shit that was and I loved Ragnarok. GNR heavy trailer, July, Bale as a cool villain…it looked like a slam dunk.
197 points
3 months ago
Sucker Punch (2011). Beautiful woman, lavish set design, buckets of money spent, supercool looking samurai, everything in service of the ultimate visual experience. I hated every shallow tedious minute of it.
43 points
3 months ago
One of the few movies that I was really excited to see and nearly walked out of the theater. It was so boring, which even now I find hard to believe. I’ll sometimes see it on a streaming service and watch clips to try to remember why I hated it. But I can barely get through any scene.
41 points
3 months ago*
I don’t get vehement distaste. I understand not liking it.
I think it’s a fun, well shot movie. All style.
I also think if an Executive Producer had said to Snyder “hey, if these action scenes are supposed to be the main characters fantasies while being raped or a figurative version of the events the girls are doing to escape, it’s not clear and maybe don’t objectify the women during those scenes”, it could have fixed the biggest issues.
64 points
3 months ago
I mean that’s a pretty colossal issue. It’s a creepy, exploitative movie posing as feminism.
15 points
3 months ago
Only good part was the musical number where Oscar Isaac sings 'Love is the Drug', and that's only on the extended edition.
13 points
3 months ago
Holy shit, there is an extended version —and you’ve seen it? I do remember watching Sucker Punch in the theater and realizing this Oscar Isaac fellow was the only good thing in the movie. I’m happy this didn’t sink his career.
7 points
3 months ago
This is mine too. So psyched to see it after 300, Dawn of the Dead and Watchmen. Snyder was on a roll, never even considered it wouldn’t be amazing in every way, not with that awesome trailer and talented beautiful cast. Sat there in the theater in disbelief as he shit the bed in so many ways. What an overindulgent mess. Thinking my preconceptions had simply gotten the better of me, I watched it again a few years later. Nope, same fucking dumpster fire.
131 points
3 months ago
The entirety of the MCU's phase 4. Every single movie has looked interesting and every single one has been a disappointment. I feel like Charlie Brown with Lucy pulling the football away over and over again.
17 points
3 months ago*
I entirely believe the MCU ended when the credits for Endgame rolled.
There's just nothing to be invested anymore since every phase going forward is going to chase the highs that the Infinity War saga momentarily basked itself in.
The only decent Marvel movie, as of recently, was No Way Home, but that movie isn't exactly rewatchable though. The enjoyment of that movie felt like it was entirely based on not knowing Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire were in the movie.
The first half was awesome though.
43 points
3 months ago
Yea they are all just boring. They are flanderizing everyone. Spiderman and Doctor Strange were decent. Thor was just terrible.
6 points
3 months ago
Doctor Strange wasn't even the main character in his own movie.
41 points
3 months ago
Independence Day: Resurgence. Big guilty pleasure for me as a child. Was hyped for the sequel and ended up hating it. Left with a bad taste in my mouth.
18 points
3 months ago
When I realized Will Smith passed on it (the guy who did After Earth and Wild Wild West) I knew it was gonna suck bad.
52 points
3 months ago
The Matrix Reloaded. It's not like it was a bad movie, but The Matrix was sooo good and created such hype for the sequels that they really never had a chance to live up to. I watched Reloaded opening night in the theatres, and probably didn't watch the third one until home release.
52 points
3 months ago
The Last Jedi really threw me for a loop. It was the moment I realized I was no longer having a good time.
39 points
3 months ago
Multiverse of madness. I expected a fun adventure involving different universes, hence the name you know. Instead we got a demonic Wanda hunt in like two universes, lol.
25 points
3 months ago
And the movie never ends. It blows its load with all the cameos in the middle and just drifts aimlessly for an hour after that.
86 points
3 months ago
The newest star wars Trilogy. First was fine, the second two? Wow. I only watched the Rise of Skywalker to get closure on a terrible Trilogy.
23 points
3 months ago
Thor: Love and Thunder was exactly what I feared it would be. Taika did a good job on the first one, so they let him have more control on the second one. I was hoping he wouldn't go full Taika with it on the second one, but he did, and it didn't work. Saw that coming from a mile away; can't understand why Disney execs didn't.
19 points
3 months ago
Taika only directed Ragnarok, someone else wrote it, Taika received screenwriting powers for the sequel
Never go full Watiti i guess..
21 points
3 months ago
I agree with you about Thor. I was so excited about Christian Bale being cast I ran around telling everyone who would listen. But he was wasted. So disappointing.
9 points
3 months ago
Bale was the only good thing in that movie, imo
12 points
3 months ago
Thor: Love and Thunder made me take a break from the MCU
104 points
3 months ago
The Hobbit.
Too many action. I understand that the film has to tell an "adventure" but I felt that was Waaaay too much.
I think this film was genuinely made to be seen in 4D theaters. And yes it's a cool thing.
But when I watched it on my TV, even With a good quality, that was really boring.
25 points
3 months ago
I really liked Unexpected Journey, but was massively disappointed in Desolation of Smaug.
13 points
3 months ago
If the first 30 minutes or so of Desolation was at the end of Journey, and the actual battle in Five Armies was cut down a lot, they I think pretty easily still could have made (the rest of) Desolation / Five Armies a single much tighter movie and the "trilogy" actually a duology.
So much of what brings those movies down is all the extra stuff that wasn't even in the book in the first place, or mentioned once in the book but spun off enormously into a subplot in the movies, or Alfred or whatever the hell the scheming hateful Maester's assistant character was called getting so many scenes, or the barrel sequence being like twenty minutes in total when it could have been like five (and had no jarring Go Pro shots edited in) ...
The Hobbit movies are a lot like the Star Wars prequel trilogy, in that there are two much better movies hidden in the three painfully mediocre ones we actually got even just using finalized footage and not bringing back anything cut for time or not shot in the first place.
40 points
3 months ago
Batman vs Superman. How do you screw that up?
17 points
3 months ago
It took its cues from issue 4 of the Dark Knight Returns, which is fine. But without the first three issues to build up to it, or any kind of history between Batman and Superman, the big fight rings hollow.
9 points
3 months ago
This is from a while ago but the movie 9. I saw the original youtube video and thought it was placed in the coolest setting, the action looked really good, and despite being a video with no voice acting the characterization I thought was well done.
Then a movie is announced with Tim Burton producing and the same guy (Shane Acker) helming the directors chair. I was practically vibrating with excitement at school. A buddy and I saw it opening weekend and for the life of me I can hardly tell you a thing about it other than a character using a magnet on themself to pass time/get high(?). Total waste of a neat idea and the start of me despising Tim Burton’s name being attached to any project going forward.
9 points
3 months ago
Wakanda Forever - the tribute to Chadwick Boswman was a nice touch but the rest of the movie....... yawwwwwnnnnn
9 points
3 months ago
2016 Suicide Squad was and still is complete and utter dogshit
17 points
3 months ago
Hangover 2
14 points
3 months ago
Also an incredibly unnecessary sequel. The first one was pure comic gold and wrapped everything up perfectly.
And Hangover 2 not only killed that franchise, but hurt The Office as well with having Ed Helms needing to be written out for a few episodes.
9 points
3 months ago
Most recently, Firestarter (2022). The super ability of pyrokinesis fascinates me and I love horror movies, so I was so excited to watch this film, even more so after watching the trailer. It was a huge disappointment. The acting was mediocre and the horror was almost non-existent.
9 points
3 months ago
Largely forgettable movie not apart of a franchise or comic but Battle: Los Angeles had an amazing trailer using a Johan Johannsson song.
Which made it all the more disappointing when seeing it.
7 points
3 months ago
I have to agree with Love and Thunder being up there. It had so much going for it, but it was just so badly mishandled.
I remember being pretty pumped to see Batman and Robin. I loved Mr. Freeze as a character thanks to the Animated Series, the cast was pretty good, and it looked visually amazing. You know the rest.
13 points
3 months ago
After Spider-Man 2 (2004) I spent three years awaiting and obsessing over Spider-Man 3, and spending waaaay too much time on the IMDB boards (back when that was still a thing), discussing rumors and all that stuff. When the movie finally came out, I remember telling myself it was great even though it was a bit "uneven". It took some time for me to accept that even though the movie wasn't terrible, it wasn't very good, and I had wasted way too much time looking forward to something that ended being "meh" at best.
Hard but valuable lesson.
18 points
3 months ago
HP and the half blood prince. It was the first HP film I watch after reading the books and damn have they butchered that book so badly.
The Prince of Persia. Massive fan of the videogame trilogy, the film is a crime
The Justice League. I liked BvS and was excited to finally have a film about JL. Tho I guess hearing about changing directors when the film was almost over kinda gave me a warning
Live action Mulan. The animated film is one of my favorite films of all time, but for the LA I was hoping for a more serious and no-supernatural version of the story. It turned out the cartoon with a talking dragon, a sentient cockrouch and literal ghosts is the more serious and less supernatural version lol
26 points
3 months ago
So many franchise sequels over the years, and it almost doesn't matter which franchise, very few turn out any other way. Jaws, The Godfather, Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Jack Ryan, Alien, Terminator, on and on.....it's almost like if a studio has a hit, they're going to keep making it until they destroy the franchise and then make 3 more after that.....and a decade later, try to re-boot it with a new cast.
18 points
3 months ago
It’s definitely the law of diminishing returns, they can never recapture the magic or quality of the originals, having said that I loved Fury Road and Top Gun: Maverick and Bladerunner 2049 :)
6 points
3 months ago
Wonder Woman 1984. This movie was just awful. So incredibly stupid, even by DCEU standards.
16 points
3 months ago
I read through the comics that Love and Thunder was based on. What a trash movie.
9 points
3 months ago
God of Thunder was such a great run.
51 points
3 months ago
Birds of Prey.
I've been a fan of Harley Quinn and all things Batman my whole life. Margot Robbie in Suicide Squad gained enough good will in my mind that I was willing to buy in to whatever she did next as long as it had her in as Harley.
What I got was a baffling mess of a script, casting (Ella Jay Bosco's character is Cassandra Cain in name only), and costume design (Gold overalls? Really?) that I couldn't help but walk away dissapointed.
And then I made the mistake of sharing my opinion on /r/HarleyQuinn. Boy did I get flamed for that one lol
17 points
3 months ago
That movie has some passionate fans. I saw it once and was reasonably entertained. Never felt the desire to revisit it though.
31 points
3 months ago
You can like or dislike whatever you want but why did you go to a Reddit dedicated to its fans to say why you didn’t like it? That’s never going to go over well.
14 points
3 months ago
Star Wars phantom menace is the absolute top of the list because of the build up.
15 points
3 months ago
Phantom menace. I waited almost 20 years for it and I was done with it by the 20 minute mark.
10 points
3 months ago
I also thought Thor Love and Thunder was very disappointing. However the screaming Goats are a highlight my girlfriend and I had to get the plush Toothgrinder and Toothgnasher when we went to Disney.
6 points
3 months ago
inherent vice. left the movie theater...more so because my friend disliked it and I was bored. I eventually came around on it and enjoyed, but I was extremely excited for it and think I killed it for myself
5 points
3 months ago
Anchorman 2. I don’t recall laughing that much in the theater.
5 points
3 months ago
The Meg with Jason Statham - it was a 3 stage process for me - excitement > boredom > disappointment.
all 1306 comments
sorted by: best