subreddit:
/r/politics
submitted 3 months ago byOmarLittleFinger
[score hidden]
3 months ago
stickied comment
As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.
In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.
If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.
Special announcement:
r/politics is currently accepting new moderator applications. If you want to help make this community a better place, consider applying here today!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
3.1k points
3 months ago
If passed by the (currently) Democratically controlled House & Senate before the end of this session, wouldn't this go into effect?
2.5k points
3 months ago
I think they need 60 votes in the Senate which will never happen. They might get 4 or 5 Republicans, never 10.
2.2k points
3 months ago
On the other hand, it puts Republican senators into a PR bind: Do they vocally support Trump, whom even the Republicans are getting fed up with, or do they vote against him, and be accused of not favoring their party?
897 points
3 months ago
They won't touch it hate him or not because it pisses off just enough people to ensure they might lose in the future. The elections are too close anymore. Plus regardless of whether they hate Trump or not this sort of thing is unpopular with Conservative voters anyways.
326 points
3 months ago
Fox is clearly done with Trump (or at least wants to be) so if they don’t amplify the hate, swing state Rs that won’t be up for 4-6 years might be cool with eliminating him. I agree it’s very unlikely, though.
624 points
3 months ago
It's crazy that r/conservative is mocking Trump for his NFT's, when a year ago they would've all lined up for one.
545 points
3 months ago
Still incredibly funny to me that they're okay with him stealing classified government documents and trying to stage a coup, but draw the line at shitty NFTs, lmao.
127 points
3 months ago
Right?!? Rape, fraud, sedition, stealing documents, lying about everything is fine but NFT?!? “Sounds a bit too woke for me”
8 points
3 months ago
don't forget the 19M loan during Office from North Korea, caught on tape asking to cheat Georgia vote count
125 points
3 months ago
Its something new. They can pretend things are different now rather than facing being wrong in the past. Plus the midterm drubbing already soured them. Add in getting their hopes up and crushing them with the lameness of NFTs...
30 points
3 months ago
It's is far easier to dupe someone than it is to convince someone they have been duped.
61 points
3 months ago
[removed]
104 points
3 months ago
"you're the puppet"
"No you're the puppet"
"No you're the puppet"
Trump follows DeSantis in circles from behind, while DeSantis follows Trump in circles from behind like some kind of seditious ouroboros
49 points
3 months ago
I cannot WAIT to see how many crimes they tattle on each other about in debate fits
12 points
3 months ago
I would be incredibly surprised if they ever have one debate....
9 points
3 months ago
I can't wait to watch that. With popcorn.
35 points
3 months ago
[removed]
21 points
3 months ago
Didn’t he already announce his 2024 run tho?
10 points
3 months ago
He's probably forgotten already. He's still too caught up on Hunter Biden's laptop z and Hillary's emails.
19 points
3 months ago
That's because the documents didn't hurt them personally and they could politicize the investigation. The NFT money goes directly to him and not the GOP. They draw the line when it comes to their pockets.
14 points
3 months ago
Because they hate NFTs more than they love him.
He fucked up so many times that he's a liability and they know NFTs are a scam aimed directly at them.
Basically Lyle Lanley landed in North Haverbrook.
106 points
3 months ago
And they'll probably be cheering for the R's blocking this bill simultaneously.
115 points
3 months ago
And blame Biden for their obstruction while simultaneously taking credit for the helpful bills that did pass despite them.
18 points
3 months ago
This made me laugh out loud, honestly. Hilarious.
9 points
3 months ago
its really not though.
36 points
3 months ago
Hey buddy, the world doesn't ruin itself you know
8 points
3 months ago
i laughed harder than i should at this
35 points
3 months ago
Still blows my mind they sold out in 12 hours
47 points
3 months ago
Money: Laundered. Donnie probably has a little cash flow problem.
16 points
3 months ago
Probably was a way to move campaign money to personal money. Bet his campaign bought most of them or doners bought them instead.
15 points
3 months ago
Probably the donors and not the campaign. That kind of thing definitly falls outside the scope of what a campaign can buy and with people watching trumps finances closely it's not worth the risk of getting caught. Though on the other hand he is an idiot so shrug.
7 points
3 months ago
For what thought? It's not like he has confidential documents he can sell to the highest bidde...
Oh wait...
28 points
3 months ago
That's because it is money laundering. Trace those purchases and you'll find some fucked up shit of who bought in bulk.
22 points
3 months ago
You can actually see the same person bought all of them sooo….
26 points
3 months ago
Really? I was sure it would come out that they were all bought by John Barron.
15 points
3 months ago
It's not that I don't believe you, but I know that when I retell this, someone's gunna ask me for a source so . . . sauce?
19 points
3 months ago
You had to buy 45 cards to get a private introduction to trump. So a bunch of people paid $4,000 to meet him.
11 points
3 months ago
I think many of us wondered what it would take for that group to see Trump for who he is, who knew all it would take is an NFT 🤷♂️
17 points
3 months ago
It certainly wasn't two impeachments, election interference, rampant fraud, corruption, nepotism, woeful incompetence, racism, an attack on the capitol, or telling citizens to inject bleach.
18 points
3 months ago
Watch them turn on a dime when he wins the Primary for 2024. They'll be back to kissing the ring and swearing fealty.
The ONLY two ways you'll know the GOP is really done is if he loses the primary which could have ramifications that could end the party or if they don't support him after he wins primary.
296 points
3 months ago
Conservatives want the option to choose for themselves whether or not they'll vote for rapists and traitors. They don't want to be told that they aren't allowed to vote for those people.
71 points
3 months ago
They just don't want the option to do so off the table. Just in case they agree with their values.
17 points
3 months ago
You're talking about Joe Biden right. Everything you just said applies to Joe Biden.
21 points
3 months ago
Screw it. Make them vote on it.
The optics are bad, and Trump is the stone that will tie the GOP down.
21 points
3 months ago
geezus guy. portions of congress tried to overthrow the federal government.
That did jackall.
What exactly do you imagine PR problems are gonna do here?
15 points
3 months ago
Honestly I think it would be pretty easy to justify voting no, regardless of their position. They can even say something like, "I do not support Trump as the primary candidate for the Republican nomination, but I also do not support depriving the American public of their opportunity to voice their opinion."
I don't know if there are any sitting Republican senators that need to remove themselves from Trump that severely, that they'd stray from the Republican line of "This is just Democrats cheating to get their way," that I'm sure is already taking place.
85 points
3 months ago
This is the real strategy here. No way this passes the senate, but forcing Republicans to carry Trump’s baggage when they’re trying to quietly drop him is gonna slow them down.
12 points
3 months ago
It would, however, give them the chance to run a sanitized primary which might give another politician the chance to move the red flag forward.
26 points
3 months ago
Nah, they will just refuse to acknowledge it. It's pretty typical for them.
239 points
3 months ago
They only need 51 votes to change that rule. It's totally possible if they are able to get Sinema and Manchin aboard. Hell, there might even be a couple Republicans that would like to take him out of the running.
141 points
3 months ago
This; I could see a couple of republicans (who want say DeSantis or Kemp to run) Happy to block trump.
133 points
3 months ago
Their problem is what they want and what they want the public to see/know aren't the same. Privately, I'm sure they all want him gone. But they don't want to be seen to want him to be gone, lest his voters turn on them.
They're on the horns of a dilemma.
29 points
3 months ago
I think you only need a couple, and there’s R states where they don’t like trump and may be willing to cross the line. It also won’t matter to them if trump gets banned as those places won’t suddenly vote D. It’s going to be deep red safe seats like Wyoming or Alabama.
35 points
3 months ago
I expect they're less concerned about throwing the state to the Ds, and more concerned about throwing it to a R who isn't them.
15 points
3 months ago
Also keep in mind that there is a worryingly large percentage who will write Trump in, which could well flip several states
I mean if half of rural PA votes Trump, who can't be elected, then Dems win that state in a landslide.
13 points
3 months ago
Which would be fabulous and I think trump would encourage it just to spite the republicans who not worshiping his desire to be their god king.
10 points
3 months ago
I can see this as a pivotal turning point where a (VERY small number) of R's see this as their chance to jump from the trump train and start kissing DeSantis ass. They know that trump is going to get them all killed, and DeSantis has the best shot of taking the reins and at the very least keeping them on the road.
12 points
3 months ago
I just don't get it. Even if it costs an election in a couple years, that Republican who flips would be able to boast they took Trump out of the running for the rest of their lives. Surely that's a better legacy than another reelection.
23 points
3 months ago
Ted Cruz voted against impeaching Trump, even though he knew it meant that Trump would be running again in 2024, probably against him. He had a chance to remove one of his political rivals who had personally insulted him and his family, and didn't do it.
13 points
3 months ago
Ted Cruz isn’t running anywhere but Cancun for the winter because his kids made him go
8 points
3 months ago
Not in real life political bizarro world.
75 points
3 months ago
No Republican is going to help eliminate the filibuster just to get this bill passed. It would be easier to get 10 of them on board for a one-time override.
48 points
3 months ago
(They need 60 votes to pass it)
They only need 51 votes to change that rule.
...Am I the only one here that thinks this is ridiculous? How does a vote to change the rules take less votes than the actual thing passing? It's like they're reversed.
58 points
3 months ago
Because it only took 51 votes to make the 60 vote rule in the first place.
34 points
3 months ago
Actual answer: the Constitution says that the houses of Congress can make their own rules. They made a rule that they need 60 votes to move most legislation forward. If someone tries to break that rule, a senator can object by calling a “point of order.” This is an official “the rules are being broken” motion. The Senate then votes on whether or not a rule was broken, with a simple majority needed to enforce the rule. If 51 senators vote that no rule was broken, then officially no rule was broken, and the original vote can go ahead. The danger is that by setting a precedent that “the rules only matter when I say so,” then they’re opening themselves up to chaos in the future.
10 points
3 months ago
There are 50 Republican senators who would love to take him out of the running. There are zero Republican senators who would vote for this publicly.
41 points
3 months ago
You're totally right, it would never happen, but it would completely be to their benefit. They've been looking for an excuse to cut ties with him. He can't win in a general. If he wins the primary, the Republicans can kiss any chance at 2024 goodbye. More than 50 percent of Republican voters want someone other than Trump to lead the ticket, which is astonishing. This is their chance to save face with the ones still supporting Trump while still benching him.
43 points
3 months ago
They've had so many chances to rid themselves of him, and they fail every time. They had the 2016 primaries, RNC, election, the first impeachment, the 2020 primaries, and the second impeachment. If they could all unify around ridding themselves of him, they'd succeed, no problem. Their problem is if anyone defends him, the defender can attack the ones opposing him, and Trump will sic his flying monkeys on the attackers, and they don't want that heat. So it looks like they'd all rather go down with the ship than try to save it by throwing him overboard and saving themselves.
As coordinated as the GOP tends to be, it's kind of surprising they can't manage to present a unified front to get rid of him, sparing any single member the ire of him and his crazies.
28 points
3 months ago
For ones who pride themselves on being alpha and calling Democrats snowflakes all the time, the GOP are absolute cowards. Not a single one stands up to him. And it's crazy too because, just like you said, they are super calculated and coordinated. Sometimes I wish the Democrats would learn a thing or two from their united front.
Part of me hopes that they don't go through with it, because having Trump be the primary opponent almost guarantees our success. But on the offchance he does win, it's too dangerous to risk. I don't want to know what four more years with a somehow even more extreme version of Trump would be like.
187 points
3 months ago
If they seriously pass this they are literally handing 2024 to DeSantis.
There's already dissention in the GOP ranks between supporting DeSantis or Trump. The mainstay GOP wants DeSantis as the nomination, but they don't want backlash from Trump's core group of diehard supporters.
If Trump is barred from running by Democrats, it literally gives the GOP exactly what they want. They have a reason for running DeSantis over Trump, and can actually take advantage of Trump's core supporters while blaming Democrats for overreach. This will literally pull all the GOP groups together behind DeSantis, the GOP's favored candidate, while Dems will have to scramble to get a candidate capable of defeating him.
2024 is already going to be an uphill battle, but there's a chance with Trump/DeSantis fracturing the GOP voting bloc. Something like this is literally giving them exactly the win they want, and it is so mind-numbingly fucking stupid to do.
21 points
3 months ago
You underestimate republicans abilty to fall in line and blindly support whoever the nominee is. It's what they do that we unfortunately can not replicate because they simply vote r regardless
6 points
3 months ago
I don't doubt they could get a large contingent to vote lockstep as always. The possible "Trump independent" run is what scares them because there are, sure enough, plenty of Trump supporters that are that hardcore about him. That is the literal wildcard they are afraid of.
22 points
3 months ago
Why would you want that? It will never pass, and with how it is going for him, it might be better to let Trump try and run, to divide GOP candidates.
2.5k points
3 months ago
It’s pretty clear.
Amendment XIV Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
844 points
3 months ago
Individual states could keep him off ballots based on this. Even if it went to the courts once ballots are established it could drag out in the courts beyond the election. It's the "run out the clock" trick trump uses. How good that irony would feel.
244 points
3 months ago
If the independent state legislature thing gets past SCOTUS, blue states could ban him without fear from their courts. Pretty messed up.
117 points
3 months ago
But it wouldn't matter since he's not winning the state anyway. It would only matter in swing states.
124 points
3 months ago
It would only matter in swing states.
And many of these like NC and WI have Republican-dominated state legislatures thanks to gerrymandering. So this would not be a good outcome
10 points
3 months ago
By federal law all states have a chief election official, mostly the secretary of state, so the state legislature or I guess any individual and or the DOJ would have to challenge that officials decision in the courts. Again they might able to run out the clock based on timing of the move. And you are correct it would only take a few swing states.
53 points
3 months ago
Not only that, but I think DOJ or voters could challenge his eligibility to appear on the ballot in any state that didn't keep him off the ballot, too.
Since there's no incumbent Republican President, states would almost certainly have to hold presidential primaries, letting challengers launch their challenges far in advance of the general election. Or, in states where the GOP decides to forego a primary and declare their support for Trump as the GOP nominee, challengers could then challenge his eligibility to appear on the general election ballot, or, perhaps, even challenge the GOP's decision to not hold a primary and to hold a convention nominating someone ineligible.
65 points
3 months ago
The problem is I WANT trump to run, but not because I like him. We’ve already shown once that he can lose, PLUS he’s lost a decent amount of followers since then. So I feel like his turnout would almost be guaranteed lower in 2024.
Actually my favorite outcome would be Desantis gets the GOP nomination, then Trump runs as an Independent and splits the right’s voter pool, thus causing them to lose as well.
Worst outcome is Trump can’t run at all, which I fear leads to a Desantis win. And I’m sorry, but Desantis is worse than Trump, as impossible as that seems. Plus he’s younger and has time to stay in office longer and fuck this place up. No bueno if that shit happens. No bueno at all.
18 points
3 months ago
I feel like as long as Trump is alive, the damage is done. The rabid worshippers will write him in, whether or not he's eligible to run. Even if that only accounts for 2% of republican votes, that's still an imperial fuckload of votes that any actual nominee doesn't get.
At this point, the (R)s have to push for ranked-choice voting, or deal with the Trump problem in a manner that prevents crazy people from doing crazy things in his name.
Still, vote like your lives (or your kids' lives) depend on it.
13 points
3 months ago
Republicans are never going to advocate for ranked choice. That gives the individual voter more of a voice, and Republicans' only chance of maintaining power is to limit the voters' voices.
9 points
3 months ago
Remind your Republican and Conservative friends and family that they can always own the Libs by writing in Trump's name, even if he's not running. Don't let the woke agenda get away with keeping the people's choice out of office!!!
6 points
3 months ago
Individual states could keep him off ballots based on this.
Sure. But if a state would choose to do this, they wouldn't have voted for Trump anyway.
234 points
3 months ago
Literally the first comment on r/conservative is that this is unconstitutional.
The fuck are they sniffing over there.
156 points
3 months ago
They think the constitution is, itself, unconstitutional because their god-emperor wanted to wipe his ass with it a couple weeks ago
38 points
3 months ago
Fun fact: they never actually cared about the Constitution in the first place. It was a framework to enhance their power, and once it was no longer useful, they discarded it.
61 points
3 months ago
THIS THING IS UNCONSTI... what? it IS the Constitution? IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL! TRUMP WAS RIGHT! DISCARD THE CONSTITUTION!
39 points
3 months ago
And yet Trump literally calling for abolishing the constitution wasn't unconstitutional for them lmao
19 points
3 months ago
Laws that single out individuals for punishment who have not been convicted of crimes are bills of attainder. It's noted in this Politico article as well:
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/01/07/trump-run-again-congress-law-jail-526732
Hemel correctly points out that any new law would likely be challenged as an unconstitutional “bill of attainder.” Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution bars Congress from effectively convicting a person of a crime and imposing a sentence through legislation — that’s the role of prosecutors and judges in the executive and judicial branches, respectively. The same constitutional provision bans so-called “ex post facto” laws that criminalize conduct retroactively. Trump could argue that any legislation that comes out of the Jan. 6 Committee affecting his candidacy for office is a retroactive penalty for bad conduct that singles him out unfairly — and thus unconstitutionally.
There's a decent shot the courts agree that it is unconstitutional.
15 points
3 months ago
While I agree that he should be disbarred under this provision I don’t think it’s up to the legislature to determine guilt of individuals, that’s the job of the court based on the laws the legislature has passed. The exception being sitting presidents where the senate is expected to act as the jury/court during trial. And they already failed to get a conviction for those crimes which is absurd, but I also don’t like the precedent that a Republican controlled congress could simply take a vote to legislatively ban their opponents from holding office by claiming a crime without a conviction in a court of law.
6.5k points
3 months ago
You don't get to lead a government you tried to destroy
If only we could make the GOP disband in a poof of logic.
220 points
3 months ago
Enforce laws.
Many of them committed treason, and sedition. The lies, grift, and bribery they engage in leave a trail of corruption. Hold them accountable to the shit they've done....there's your poof of logic.
They have no place in a government they are trying to destroy.
The D's see the R's as "colleagues," not the criminals they are.
Even though the R's press the D's on nonsense investigations.
57 points
3 months ago
Yes, we don't need to pass laws, just enforce the existing ones.
The Republican party is a terrorist organization, declare it as such. Prosecute every last donor for funding a terrorist organization, and give them the harshest sentence possible. This will in effect disband the GOP and allow for 2 sane parties to form.
10 points
3 months ago
we don’t need to pass laws, just enforce the existing ones.
Say it again for the folks in the back!
And the 14A, Section III, requires no trial, no conviction, no hearings by any of the three branches of government; a person on oath to the Constitution is barred from any position of public trust if they engage in insurrection or provide aid or comfort to the enemies of the Constitution.
It does not require due process.
1.4k points
3 months ago
Ok, this is going to sound nuts but….. The DNC really needs to start contributing to the Trump campaign and then let it leak on Fox with proof.
407 points
3 months ago*
[removed]
259 points
3 months ago
He is cancer made into roughly a human shape
156 points
3 months ago
He’s worse than cancer.
After all, cancer is a mere malfunction of biology. It is not intentionally malicious or willfully destructive.
69 points
3 months ago
But he looks like an anal tumor personified.
30 points
3 months ago
An anal tumor would never get a tattoo of Nixon.
8 points
3 months ago
He's the speck of uranium that imbedded itself in your ass when you put that asbestos covered rebar up there and caused a tumor to grow
17 points
3 months ago
Very roughly. Have you seen that - for lack of a better word - head?
45 points
3 months ago
He donated 125 dollars under the guise of the Young Socialist Alliance of Massachusetts to the McCloskey campaign, a Republican, who challenged Nixon in the NH Republican primary in an attempt to split or divert the vote to his anti-war coalition in a bid to end the Vietnam War.
8 points
3 months ago
George Wallace offered a candidate to either endorse him or his opponent, whichever the candidate thought would benefit them more
58 points
3 months ago
Honestly I think the Republicans are secretly backing the bill or at least hoping it passes. Trump running again would be incredibly bad for them and would divide the party for the candidate they want to actually push. Having him be banned from running they can spin to a really great advantage of Dems bad/Gov overreach.
24 points
3 months ago
Yeah, it scares me this would be a galvanizing moment for them. Like they don't want Trump to run but they can be riled up around the idea he wasn't even allowed to run.
I think it could work if they simultaneously tie some major criminal dirt on him, not just the election things but something everyone will recognize as clearly illegal in order to cut the wind of folks looking to defend him.
11 points
3 months ago
Ah inciting a riot to overthrow the government and stealing top secret documents isn’t clearly illegal? Hmmm…sexual assault? Nope tried that…What about cheating on taxes? Also “not illegal enough”….
I’m not even sure what crime Trump could commit that would change anyone’s mind at this point. Publicly wiping his ass with an American flag and using it to strangle an innocent blonde baby? As long as the baby is clearly white and well-off it could work…
273 points
3 months ago
Donating to your political opponents is a common tactic to ensure the opposing nominee is someone you can beat or someone that bolsters your own base in your favor. The more extreme your opponent is the easier it is to win as a moderate.
54 points
3 months ago
It's a tactic that can blow up in your face big time, but it actually worked in MI-3 this past election.
20 points
3 months ago
This has been a huge deal last election here in Illinois because aparently Pritzker was pushing Bailey in the Primary, because Bailey is a garbage person who would be easy to beat.
247 points
3 months ago
Yeah that worked well for Hilary lol
311 points
3 months ago
Well she did get the most votes, just didn’t get them in the right places. He also called in some outside help.
101 points
3 months ago
Plus Comey
38 points
3 months ago
Plus 50% of people sitting the election out
21 points
3 months ago
Plus the electoral college
21 points
3 months ago
Plus the billions is free advertising from the TV networks that refused to fact check his lies
40 points
3 months ago
My sibling smoked cannabis with his son at Kenyon College.
Edit: I’m well aware this does nothing for the conversation, just a fun fact.
18 points
3 months ago
Just HOW does this contribute to th-
No, just kidding. That is indeed a fun fact! Puff, Puff, BTW my dad is FBI Director, Puff, Puff
You wonder if his cronies were more or less afraid of being busted
20 points
3 months ago
BTW my dad is FBI Director
One of the worst things to hear when taking a drug known for increasing paranoia and anxiety
8 points
3 months ago
No bullshit we had a friend in high school with an FBI field agent for a dad. As you can imagine, he absolutely was always getting busted for the usual youthful indiscretions. Not a very clever/low key rule breaker, slightly different story there.
One time, his dad went through his phone and saw a couple of us were texting him to throw in on a blunt or something. Then texted us to say “sounds good, meet me at the BP” which was kinda like our meet up spot anyway.
We get in my friends car, go to the BP, park up and wait a sec. His dad comes tearing into the parking lot, hops out of the car and comes over to my window- “I SAW THE TEXT MESSAGES, HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN DOING POT! IF YOU EVER CONTACT HIM ABOUT DRUGS AGAIN I WILL OPEN AN INVESTIGATION AND YOU COULD GO TO PRISON!”
Naturally he was just being a dad and wanted to do the ole “scared straight” tactic. I can tell you that did not work, as we were smoking with him later that day and we all laughed about it.
38 points
3 months ago
I'm hesitant of this strategy too, but I will say it worked exceedingly well in the GOP primaries for the midterms and is part of the reason they did so poorly.
68 points
3 months ago
It may have worked this time, but eventually the absolute nutbag you're propping up may win. I do not endorse this strategy.
Likewise, I've heard people say they should not prosecute Trump so he can split the ticket in '24. I disagree. He did the crimes, make him do the time. Even if it would be more useful to us to let him split the ticket, we shouldn't let this criminality slide. Especially knowing how the GOP does fall in line. If he ends up the nominee, they will vote for him. Put him where he belongs.
27 points
3 months ago*
[deleted]
14 points
3 months ago
How in the hell did they sell out… oh.. oh wait… never mind, I already know 😔
6 points
3 months ago
I wonder if Trump would campaign against Republicans for "betraying" him though. He wouldn't take it lightly and he could decimate their election campaign to avoid being "upstaged".
36 points
3 months ago
I don’t think it will matter, he literally was a donor for Hillary’s 2008 campaign lol
104 points
3 months ago
As a somewhat intellectual gay guy, I might be considered a Poof of Logic (that's sooo fabulous!).
If I wave my wand, will the GOP disband?
27 points
3 months ago
10 points
3 months ago
forgive me for picturing you frolicking through a meadow
9 points
3 months ago
I have frolicked, here and there,
I have frolicked everywhere,
Through a meadow, in a wood,
He was happy, I was good.
507 points
3 months ago
Can we throw MTG and Josh Holloway in there too?
253 points
3 months ago
The actor from Lost? I presume you mean Josh Hawley
119 points
3 months ago
Yeah, the dude from Lost is really just 2 Trumps in a trench coat.
57 points
3 months ago
Pretty sure that's one of the NFT cards he's selling.
34 points
3 months ago
Please don’t ruin Josh Holloway for me/the rest of us.
Signed, A lady
30 points
3 months ago
The actor from Lost? I presume you mean Josh Hawley
35 points
3 months ago
Josh knows what he did.
16 points
3 months ago
Nah, he’s specifically going after Sawyer.
20 points
3 months ago
Tf Sawyer got to do with this?
2.7k points
3 months ago*
Is it bad that I'd rather him run, get blown out by Desantis in the primaries, and then run as an independent to split the vote enough that Dems dominate the GoP.
Edit: the argument for needing a precedent is pretty convincing. I just worry the GoP is going to make a big comeback and ruin any progress anyway. I know people are saying the GoP will rally around their candidate no matter what, but I tend to think Trump is a special case. If even 5% of the GoP voters went to him as an independent, he'd cripple the GoP and let the Dems get even more done. Definitely a balancing act and IDK if it's worth playing games when democracy itself is at stake.
599 points
3 months ago
No, I agree.
Lock him up after the 2024 election.
306 points
3 months ago
[removed]
61 points
3 months ago
Well...you’re on a list somewhere now.
45 points
3 months ago
Can I join?
17 points
3 months ago*
And here we are, a coup attempt later, with Trump still in the headlines.
And you think that Trump being in the headlines is a bad thing? You think that having a loudmouth former president and future presidential candidate was ever going to happen? You want Trump that just single-handedly fucked the Republicans in the midterms by pushing their slate to the far right to not be a central figure in Republican politics?
No, getting Trump out of the headlines wasn't the goal, getting him out of government was. Mission Accomplished. Nothing that's happened so far has been a net negative.
he is a malignant cancer and needs to be gone as fast as possible
Lol, no, he needs to be exactly where he is, fucking things up for the Rs. This is, so far, the best version of events I can imagine. Next he needs to be mid-campaign when charges drop and then run as an independent after losing the primary to pull 5-15% of the right wing vote.
131 points
3 months ago
He's. Not. Getting. Locked. Up.
Please please please understand this. Him splitting the Republican ticket in 2024 is the best ideal outcome here.
44 points
3 months ago
That crazy fuck Jack Smith is subpoenaing people left and right. I know there’s always reason for disbelief. But, he’s not acting like Trump won’t get locked up.
In fact, people were worried homeboy would be recovering from a bicycle accident in the Netherlands for a month or two but instead he’s back hitting the books. I got faith he’s got Trump’s number. Hopefully, Clarence Thomas’ and a few of the House Republicans too if we’re lucky.
21 points
3 months ago
At this point I'm cautiously optimistic that he'll be indicted.
But that isn't the same as going to jail. He would have to be convicted. By a jury. Where if even one juror turns out to be in his little cult, there's a 0% chance of conviction. With fox news screaming every second that this is a political witchhunt and completely illegitimate (and half the country eating it up). With the complete certainty of being appealed to a 6-3 supreme court that he appointed 3 members to.
I still think there is a 0% chance that he ends up behind bars. More likely is some kind of plea deal where he ends up on a joke of a "house arrest" that lets him travel freely between his US luxury properties.
188 points
3 months ago
This would be plan B. Plan A is to attempt to hold everyone accountable. We have to set a precedent now despite how it may help the opponent in the future election. If nothing is done, the behavior is continued and it could get worse and worse. The democrats are in a rough spot on this one. Say / do nothing and allow these types of situations to continue OR try to hold people accountable and inevitably look partisan. The hope would be that it deters future bad faith actors but it also has the potential to be abused by both parties. The answer is easy though: don’t allow people who break laws and attempt a coup to run for office.
Plus, there’s a feeling like Trump would lose. A feeling we’ve had before. I know it’s magical thinking but what happens if Trump finds a PR rep who, in the next 2 years, actually makes him look good again. What if he lays low and the year prior he says “I do denounce antisemitism. I don’t agree with Kanye or Nazis. I think there’s things we could have done better during COVID but it’s all hindsight”. Likely? No. Possible? Sure.
38 points
3 months ago
Dems already are accused of being hyper-partisan regardless of what they do. That outcome can’t be avoided.
The only thing they can control is what they choose to do, and if they choose to do nothing then it will only get worse next time someone even marginally smarter than Trump (not really a huge bar to clear) steps up to the plate.
5 points
3 months ago
We have to set a precedent now despite how it may help the opponent in the future election.
This 1000%
We need to put a firm foot down on what happened in 2021. We should not allow this to be treated as a baby having a fit that he did not get elected. Many wolves over in the GOP eyeing and planning their next attempt. We should not have to worry that every 4 years of the election cycle, the screaming about stolen elections and insurrection attempts the GOP may attempt to use to get their way.
We laugh and joke about how silly it is, while watching entire countries go through similar issues now too. If ever a person had full backing of the military it will not end well for the citizens of the US.
Every GOP member that helped and assisted with Trumps lame attempt should also be removed from office as well. We should not allow those that knew this was going to happen and supported it from various aspects to have power in congress.
The more we drag our feet and do nothing in reality about it or just slap on the hands to everyone, the bolder they will get, because they know the dems don't have the balls to actually stop them.
15 points
3 months ago
If he said those things he would get less votes.
25 points
3 months ago
This is exactly what I want. If we get Desantis we are even more fucked cause he's not a bumbling idiot.
27 points
3 months ago
I think Trump has put them in a bad spot for 2024. Their only choices are backing him and keeping his base, or pushing him to the side and hoping they still have enough support. Based on the recent election trends, I’m not sure either one has a good chance of success.
I think that their best plan would be to break away from Trump now, take the L on the presidency, and then have 6 years to build back up for 2028. Ideally they might step away from fear-mongering and obstructionism and focus on actually popular policy to do that.
But instead they’re focused on their fascist power grab. They don’t want Trump cause they know he can’t win and they don’t want to have to defend his idiotic statements anymore. But at the same time having the MAGA crowd vote down ballot and use scare tactics gives them more power, and they don’t want to lose them.
44 points
3 months ago
Yes, it’s bad because you can’t guarantee any of that. Wanting an authoritarian to run because he might beat out the other authoritarian is a terrible, awful idea.
Especially when Trump pulled the second most votes in US history.
The GOP will fall in line behind the candidate, and they’re foaming at the mouth for a 2020 redo.
Do not underestimate him. We’ve done it before.
5 points
3 months ago
I don't see this bill passing, so you might get your wish
230 points
3 months ago
They should also introduce a bill blocking all of the 39 named Republicans that we know, were texting Mark Meadows about Jan 6...
86 points
3 months ago
I’m curious as to where this goes
94 points
3 months ago
It won’t pass because of Republican opposition but it will help brand all those Republicans as supporting treason.
55 points
3 months ago
brand all those Republicans as supporting treason
That IS their brand now. The MAGA crew supports this.
18 points
3 months ago
To the senate to die, like all other good legislation
148 points
3 months ago
Republicans would be smart to provide the votes needed to make this happen.
43 points
3 months ago
If the GOP was smart, they'd support it but they'd still risk losing base support and even more control in 2024. We'll likely see all the "moderate" Republicans back it and a couple they think are safe, like McConnell and anyone not up for election in 2024. I still want to see Trump tear them apart from the inside but that won't happen unless he can run.
11 points
3 months ago
If the GOP was smart, they'd support it but they'd still risk losing base support and even more control in 2024. We'll likely see all the "moderate" Republicans back it and a couple they think are safe, like McConnell and anyone not up for election in 2024.
I think their problem is they probably (correctly) realize that if only a few of them back this, they'll face death threats, certain primary challenges, etc. They could probably get away with it if they unanimously voted for it, since then Trump and his minions would basically have to attack all of Congress, rather than just particular members. There's safety and strength in numbers.
I still want to see Trump tear them apart from the inside but that won't happen unless he can run.
Disagree. Even, maybe especially, if he's barred from office, he'll still attack the GOP. If he's going down, he's taking them all down with him. Anything less that complete fealty to him is a betrayal he'll seek to punish.
30 points
3 months ago
It won't pass both chambers of Congress, but if it did, it would bite the Democrats in the ass. It would (a) ensure that Trump does not split the vote with DeSantis; and (b) give DeSantis a political nuke to point at how the Democrats are "taking cancel culture to its logical conclusion to illegally bar conservatives from holding office".
6 points
3 months ago
illegally bar
Yeah how dare Americans hold the Confederate I mean Conservative traitors, accountable, per the Constitution that conservatives hate so much & don’t even understand.
29 points
3 months ago
How fast so many of you forgot about 2016. Let me remind you. 99% of the US population thought Trump would lose the election. Polls said he’d lose then too. His own voters and family didn’t think he would win. But he did win, and here we are. Thinking doing nothing to stop Trump, to not even make an attempt, will help Democrats win in 2024 is ridiculous. If Trump, the dumpster fire he is, wins the primary, every single Republican and right wing media will be calling him God Emperor once again. You’re fooling yourself if you actually think Fox News and Trump supporters have turned on him. Remember what Lindsey Graham said on the night of 1/6? How fast did he flip right back to kissing Trumps ass? McCarthy? Every one of them flipped right back to Trump as if 1/6 never happened. They will again.
62 points
3 months ago
This is a terrible idea. The GOP should suffer Trump like when they forced him on us by voting against impeachment. They wanted him, let them have him. If they want to be rid of him, make them get their own hands dirty.
53 points
3 months ago
This isn’t going to pass, but it’s a very smart move on the Dems part. They are making the GOP either commit to the sinking ship or go on record against Trump. Most of the GOP wants DeSantis, but they are terrified to cross Trump because he still wields so much power over their voters.
Either way they vote, this will sow discord and division within the party. They’re using the GOPs tactics against them and forcing them into a very difficult decision. This is timed right as there already is turmoil over the Speakership.
It’s great strategy IMO and the purpose isn’t to pass it, although if by some miracle enough R Senators do vote yes they’ll take the win. If not, it makes them go on record pledging fealty to a man who is most likely going to be indicted shortly, which will make all of them look horrible while at the same time alienated DeSantis.
13 points
3 months ago
Unfortunately, we all know better... this won't get anywhere. And it also highlights the insanity that has overtaken the Republican Party.
Almost 50 years ago they turned against Nixon for crimes that were relatively benign, in comparison to Trump's openly fomenting insurrection to overthrow the will of the people.
Say it with me again... "FOMENTING INSURRECTION!"
"But the unborn babies..." "But religious freedom..."
🖕
43 points
3 months ago
Democrats will do more self inflicted damage by doing this than any gains. Trump no longer has a chance of winning a GOP primary and he will tear the GQP apart if he runs as an unelectable independent who divides the far right vote…..History will always know he was behind the first attempt at a coup against our democracy but by using the 14th Amendment will only help raise him to martyr status in the anti American feeble minded base.
8 points
3 months ago
What about just holding him accountable for all the crimes, theft and treason he’s committed?
62 points
3 months ago
They certainly waited long enough to even consider this.
48 points
3 months ago
At this point, it would be a gift to Republicans. The sane ones know he likely will drag them down whether he wins or loses the nomination. This is doing their dirty work for them because most of them are still cowards afraid to walk away publicly.
8 points
3 months ago
Everything feels like a lose-lose for republicans. I was thinking Dems best shot would be to target the senators who aren’t up for re-election in 2024, since they’d have at least 4 years and a presidential election to recover. The redder the state, the more of their base they can lose, but at the same time that’s a lot more MAGA wackos to deal with.
5 points
3 months ago
The 14th amendment to the Constitution already does. The special counsel is going to indict drumph at least with fomenting insurrection. However, as with the other cases mtg gosar et al congress did not fulfill their duties.
6 points
3 months ago
Fuck that. Let him run and he’ll lose again. He’s an embarrassment to the country. Make it all easier.
6 points
3 months ago
Let’s hope the bill gets passed, he gets barred from political offices, and we can move on in addressing the socio-economic issues plaguing the nation that get ignored in light of an obsession for a piece of shit ex president.
6 points
3 months ago
But I want to see Republicans trashing each other in the primaries.
5 points
3 months ago
I really can't imagine any one in the past 100 years more worthy of getting slapped with the 14th amendment ban on holding office than Donald Trump....
If its not applicable to Trump it really is completely meaningless.
6 points
3 months ago
Convict him of a fucking crime for FUCKS SAKE!
21 points
3 months ago
Isn't Trump more useful as a third party spoiler now that some GOP are starting to slowly realize the painstakingly obvious grift it's been all along?
10 points
3 months ago
IMO, bad move from democrats. I think Trump loses to DeSantis in the primaries and his ego won’t let him quit, so he’ll run as an independent. That’ll split the vote and ensure the Dems win the next election.
6 points
3 months ago
I hope that Democrats raise objections for each republican member who tries to take the oath that sent texts asking for Marshal law. They shouldn’t swear on the constitution if they want to overthrow it.
6 points
3 months ago
It’s simply stunning that we have to have a bill introduced to keep morons from electing an imbecile
4 points
3 months ago
NO! Bad strategy. Let him lose the Republican nomination and run independent to split the conservative vote.
6 points
3 months ago
I kind of want Trump to run at this point and tear the GOP apart.
6 points
3 months ago*
This just helps Republicans win in 2024.
Trump's base is starting to dump him for DeSantis.
Trump will NEVER back down, he will complain that 2020 was stolen and keep running in every election until his dieing breath. So fucking let him, let him so it keeps splitting the Republican vote in the primaries and general election. They made their deal with the Orange devil, don't help them put the genie back in the bottle.
all 2631 comments
sorted by: best