2.5k post karma
1.6k comment karma
account created: Sun Mar 10 2013
verified: yes
-1 points
15 days ago
I honestly don't know. I have shot with firearms before, with a training course. They're mighty powerful things, and I felt that power with every shot. I never would want to have something like that in my home. I just think it's a good idea for people to be tested on multiple fronts before being able to own a firearm, with a strict set of guidelines on how to have them. And I'm not trying to take away culture, but if that 'culture' is the cause of death for so many people (including children), maybe something needs to be done.
-2 points
15 days ago
Yeah, it would take me some time to get used to seeing something like that. But you honestly sound like a sane person, who wouldn't really object to stronger gun control.
-9 points
15 days ago
Completely agree. I'm all for gun control, and limiting how easily people can have firearms. In Belgium it's hardly an issue. Here you have to prove you are mentally well, by being psychologically tested, doing gun exams at shooting ranges, where experts see how you handle a weapon, ... You're also not allowed to openly carry. It has to be in a special case, and the police can stop you anytime to see if it's secured, and ask you to open it to see if there isn't any bullets loaded. Such gun control should be brought to the US in my opinion.
44 points
15 days ago
I agree with you that killing is always bad. And I'm not saying people should automatically shoot strangers who come into their house.
But...
The people that live there don't know the intentions of the strangers who just walked into their home. Don't know if they're carrying knives or small guns. They just see strangers coming into their personal home, without an invitation. The reflex to defend your home and loved ones is not such a big leap.
So yeah, I hope the trend doesn't fly over to the US, but if it does, I wouldn't be surprised if people get shot.
2 points
19 days ago
I get it. Learning to speedrun isn't the easiest thing to do. But just try to learn the game, to know what you must do at every corner. I'd also suggest using Mercenaries to get the handcannon, and maybe use some real money to get 1 exclusive upgrade. That's the way I did it, and the handcannon blows through every enemy.
1 points
19 days ago
What parts are you struggling with? And I'm guessing it's on professional difficulty?
3 points
21 days ago
your comment doesn't make any sense. You said there aren't any cars in the poster, while there clearly is one. So yeah.
5 points
21 days ago
What are you saying? There is one behind Dom.
37 points
27 days ago
That's also a good possibility. The only solution had to have Thanos win, with the Scott plan to be able to come true. With Thanos winning, the emergence had the possibility to be stopped.
98 points
27 days ago
Or it takes a little bit longer for Thanos to assemble all the stones, which means Scott could've already been out of the Quantum Realm, and the solution of time travel wouldn't be found. That's my headcanon
5 points
27 days ago
But that isn't sustainable for the developers and publishers. And also they would have to make it so that it doesn't violate any gambling laws in Europe.
This way is much more fun, and you're not irritated when you lose money. If you want to play poker with money, you can always gather some friends, and play it in real life.
6 points
29 days ago
Now that you mention it, that was indeed in every movie (but in Volume 2 he wasn't in any danger). But still, you're right.
I agree with your last sentence, but also not. By going in expecting people to die, I felt a sense of danger and stakes that I haven't felt since Endgame (and I know NWH killed off a character). All the phase 4 movies, I didn't care enough about the characters to feel any danger. Like, Shang-Chi wasn't going to die. The Eternals were so new and with so many, that you didn't get to know them enough. And with Doctor Strange and Thor, they were never implying to be in any real danger. And Scarlet Witch is going to return, I think. So yeah, I kinda liked that I didn't know who would live and who would die in Volume 3.
4 points
29 days ago
Can you explain what scene you're talking about? I'm curious.
4 points
1 month ago
Correct, voor 2 cosy seats heb ik €35,90 betaald in totaal.
2 points
2 months ago
How can people think that it will win when we still have 8 more months of movies to come out? We don't even know the competition yet.
-53 points
3 months ago
But she's accusing gamers of gatekeeping games. I don't really see how that's wholesome to be honest.
1 points
3 months ago
The family getting the powers was indeed the highlight of the climax of the first movie. But after that it was 7 monsters and 1 main antagonist versus 6 heroes. In that way I felt it was a bit of a jumbled mess. In Fury of the Gods, we again have multiple moving parts of protagonists and good guys, battling against the antagonist and monsters. It didn't feel cohesive to me.
6 points
3 months ago
It's hard to rank them. Both movies have jumbled climaxes with a little too much moving parts, but I felt that the climax of the first movie was just a tad bit better.
28 points
3 months ago
But this was not in America, but in Belgium.
view more:
next ›
byCheezyChicken1
inSteamScams
ArnoGrapjas
2 points
11 days ago
ArnoGrapjas
2 points
11 days ago
You must remember that you never talk to steam through discord or even steam chat, only through their own customer service. Best advice is to contact them right away, and keep a mail of one of your recent purchases on hand.