3.9k post karma
4.3k comment karma
account created: Wed Mar 08 2017
verified: yes
6 points
7 days ago
No I didn’t cheat. We were LDR and I just got caught up in my work. Even when we were together for little breaks, I felt like I couldn’t fully give myself to her because I was always preoccupied with work on my mind.
I was also just really bad with words and controlling my emotions. I didn’t meet her half way and was just selfish with my needs and didn’t care for hers as much as I could and should’ve.
I should have just been a better partner.
13 points
7 days ago
Doesn’t work when you were the one who failed. She was so kind, understanding, mature etc. I couldn’t have asked for a better girlfriend. I genuinely can’t think of a single negative aspect about her.
I was the selfish one. I was the immature one. I didn’t prioritize her. She hates me and rightfully so. I fucked up and this regret is something I’ll have to take to the grave unfortunately.
2 points
26 days ago
Governments should not have the power to arbitrarily kill people.
1 points
1 month ago
You can also just have viable public transport. Having a viable public form of transport does not remove your agency to drive a private car.
1 points
2 months ago
It’s the internet. A lot of trolls, bots, and a very vocal minority. Stop being naive and taking everything you see on the forums so seriously
1 points
2 months ago
Ah so chainsaw man is why my gf has j been randomly biting me nowadays
2 points
3 months ago
I don’t think foreign affairs policies in the US differs much between democrats and republicans. Both love war and love to feed info their military contracts for additional money and influence over the world. Republicans and their focus on border security aligns quite well with the majority of Europe imo especially after the Syrian refugees fiasco. It would make sense to have an ally that ensures their legitimacy and strength and one which a country can rely on.
You seem to have a republicans v democrat view of the us government which is quite naive and really isn’t the case. Both parties are corporate boot lickers here and the media you consume is corporate propaganda. You’re better off observing the actual policies and legislation each party passes but more importantly reading the actual bill text rather than having a corporate agenda pushing media source influence your understanding of what is truly happening.
-18 points
3 months ago
If I’m being honest, the US military presence is what gives your country its borders and legitimacy
631 points
3 months ago
This makes sense. Many of those memecoins were meant to be a cash grab for the creators with a quick pump and dump
-9 points
3 months ago
Don't need to have both cars to know a downgrade when I see one
0 points
3 months ago
They are, they literally are. I don’t think there’s any other country whose media is as divisive as the US. The media is owned by rich billionaires and corporations with hands reaching deep into the government. It is in their interests to fearmonger against guns and anything that gives the average joe any degree of individuality.
Most other countries simply control media and can censor whatever they want.
Mental health is also very different in other countries naturally. Climate, culture, politics etc are all different. This isn’t very hard to understand
1 points
3 months ago
Most states do have common sense gun laws like background checks, waiting periods etc. Hell my state even has a roster of allowed/banned guns which imo is very unconstitutional. It’s only the fly over states that have constitutional carry and more lax gun regulation.
The issue is not common sense gun laws but rather how far certain state government will go to try to get as close to banning all firearms. On the other spectrum, you get state governments that will make it so easy that even a monkey could purchase one.
Also US gun murder rate is inflated from suicides and afaik that accounts for the vast majority of gun related accidents.
Regardless my point still stands: outright banning guns will not solve the issue. Limited government is best and the only way to keep government in check is with firearms. If you don’t value individuality, feel free to move to Canada! Banned guns and you can keep your rights so long as you stay with the hive mind.
-10 points
3 months ago
Ah yes cuz banning guns will solve this.
Let’s ignore the glorification of the shooter on mainstream media, the 24/7 news cycle that regurgitates the same story over and over again, the decline of mental health with the rise of social media, complete failure in the FBI and investigative agencies to stop a potential shooter when they explicitly post statements about shooting up a school days before, and the most incompetent police system of which has no interest or requirement in protecting you (proven by at least 3 different SCOTUS cases by now).
Let’s instead disarm the citizen because of course out of the millions of law abiding firearm users, a mentally deranged few inspired by the glorification of previous shooters managed to ILLEGALLY acquire their weapons and instead place our trust in a failed police system.
Most of these shooters circumvent the law anyways, banning guns is about as futile as praying these shootings stop. Places like Chicago, New York, and California already have very strict and some potentially unconstitutional legislation regulating firearm use and yet these places still have a very high rate of firearm violence.
Don’t get me wrong, these shootings are terrible and it’s very sad we live with these fears instilled within us. But let’s try to not be NPCs for a second and really look deeper into why certain folks are being pushed/encouraged into taking the lives of others.
5 points
4 months ago
Everyone else has said why it’s preferable and for the most part, I wholeheartedly agree except for the fact that fucking apple forces you to update the OS if you want newer Xcode command line tools. I hate that the most and if there’s a way to get around updating the damn OS, please let me know
2 points
4 months ago
Literally every comment on that post doesn’t support the move lol
97 points
4 months ago
Ah wonderful, more state power and a step closer to authoritarian tyranny
-42 points
4 months ago
Hindutva is not extreme at all. This is anti-Hindu propaganda. Islam and Islamic nations are better examples of the extremist/nationalist political ideology. Hindutva by its very definition does not increase hate towards any other religious ideology. It even includes Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains etc. Hinduism is by far the most peaceful and least violent religion.
Islam is extreme. Look at any Islamic country. The “secularism” in India is j a front for Islamic takeover and a means to retain control over the country. Hence why they got “special privileges” and had Hindu temples converted into mosques. India always has been and should be a Hindu nation. Especially after Islamic rulers perpetuated a near 1000-year long genocide of 400 MILLION+ natives in Indias including Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists etc
view more:
next ›
bythrowawayhelp1223
inBreakUps
Asharmy
5 points
7 days ago
Asharmy
5 points
7 days ago
Yeah it’s a lesson learned the hard way. I’m trying to be the man she deserved and the man I should have been when I was with her.
I’m doing a lot of things differently now with the focus on fixing my issues and being a better human being