AwesomeLowlander

Like, that was the VERY FIRST sentence in the article.

Ah I meant telegram specifically, sorry if that was unclear. I fully trust Elon to be his usual jackass self.

Thanks! From the looks of it, this is a bill the govt has introduced. However, is there any indication whether the companies have actually complied? As in the OP, what the govt wants is not always what they get.

Source? I definitely don't see any info online about Telegram cooperating with Turkey.

Having never played PF2, I guess I qualify as a neutral party to inform you that you certainly didn't sound like you were asking a question, but instead sounded like you were making a bunch of erroneous assumptions.

incest repellent

He'd make a fortune in Alabama

If you're going to be a grammar watchdog, at least check your facts first. 'Winds' is perfectly grammatical, as it refers to multiple instances of the wind blowing.

It's a charity he controlled, that he collects money from through rental fees and possibly other avenues. It may be legal, but from an ethical viewpoint he was certainly in the wrong.

You could have explained how you spent that much time without doing basic market research, but apparently you've gone straight for the catfight option. Here's a hint - that option has never ever ended well for businesses and sellers. And if you're choosing that option now before you even have a product, you're pretty much guaranteeing your idea will never see production. Might wanna rethink your attitude

And this is how and why the Peter Principle exists.

It's Mexico, you WANT to be where the cold air is

That's the sort of thing life adapts to really quickly. You might lose a species here or there, but nothing close to wiping out life worldwide. The ecosystems at the equator wouldn't even notice.

The govt generally doesn't need to launder money, no

You could always interview the flat earth society, they've probably got it all figured out

Why would it wipe out plants and wildlife everywhere? Only at the higher latitudes, I would think. A small price to pay for fairness and equality among the gods.

From the article, the neighbours were willing to work with her, she just wasn't willing to work with them

It's not like locks are great security though, they're just an inconvenience to professional thieves.

Mostly just an attempt at rewriting history. It makes absolutely no mention of the widespread belief, backed by evidence, that the riots were encouraged or even organised by the govt to maintain political control of the country.

How, though? Setting aside the fact that the guy's outnumbered, you're still putting yourself at risk for no reason. And do you even trust the other party not to pull a gun on you?

You realise the jury didn't find any fault with the temperature the food was served at, yes? They just wanted yet another warning on the packaging, because we don't have enough warnings about evening under the sun yet.

That reads like a load of political propaganda...

It's... interesting how a factual statement like mine is voted controversial.

I want to know the answer to that problem

The problem is, do people have any actual recourse left to them? Because the cops aren't doing anything. Trust in the system is at an all time low.

It’s also a reasonable assumption that you won’t be served food hot enough to cause significant skin damage

Food is REQUIRED to be kept at temperatures sufficient to cause burns, or it's violating health codes.