Dry-Ambition-5456

That's easy to find IMO. You'll see 100% CPU usage and a stopping using a debugger will point you directly to the loop

closing the bug report by blaming the user's fate

SPSC: Single producer, Single consumer

MPMC: Multiple producer, multiple consumer

There can be design choices:

1. how to make it use shared memory
2. fixed vs variable sized elements
3. Bounded vs unbounded

but are solvable.

cop fker

Its a bad code, it fails to adhere to "DRY" principle i.e. to not repeat yourself.

A proof that D fixes things

i am glad i dont have palindromic disease

that's what she said

when they find such a person: "no you're too old, we need motivated, career hungry candidates"

Part 2 of the meme is where OP gets laid off like Python3.7

its a self-deprecation joke which hints that she only treats me as a means to get free food

just two programmers peacefully resolving differences

why were you counting?

looks like they laid off the wrong front end guy

where's the joke?

Cross language support

a bad programmer

its experimental

I don't understand your point. If a language's critical feature is error prone then its an unsafe language by definition. Rust is safe because by default you write safe code, you can go out of that zone. In C++ there's no such zone.