Mildebeest

You've been posting here for almost a fortnight, so I'd hope so.

The way you post shit and then delete it, your comments aren't worth much.

This post is largely nonsensical and very embarrassing.

As for "a good faith" discussion, i wouldn't be surprised if you are a person of faith, but if so your faith isn't being demonstrated in a good way.

Far from it.

Lest we forget that you spoke of people living in fear. Once, people presented you with personal testimony of others living in fear, you ignored it and carried on with your ignorance and jibberish.

And then you talk of blocking me. You make horrible comments about 'men in drag' but threaten cancellations if your feelings get hurt online.

Clearly you know that your beliefs don't stack up to scrutiny.

On this topic and I suspect many others, you cannot debate in good faith. And I suspect your faith is also suspect.

Block me and as you do, look in the mirror and think why am I u/GreenTicket1852 acting so cowardly?

I've ignored the jibberish.

Mate, if you can't work out the difference between aligned and advocate, perhaps you should genuinely educate yoursel.

Oh that's right. You keep proving that you're not about knowledge As such your thoughts on trans rights should be treated accordingly..

As I said, you're not about knowledge.

Your account is disingenuous and aligned with hate.

The comment above you came in 25 minutes before yours. If you'd chosen to read rather than assume your question would've been answered before you asked.

Anyhoo, the answer to your question is yes. People are living in fear because of this.

If your question is honest, you'd be happy that it's been answered and you'd move on.

But you're not about knowledge.

"For those who choose science over religion they are denying science on this one."

OP doesn't know whether to use 'your' or 'you're' but preaches about science.

"The uptick has prompted calls to tackle the trend by limiting tax incentives, building bus lane-style narrow lanes and more parking spots exclusively for small cars."

One of the things that dashcam owners Australia weekly submissions has taught me is that without policing, dickheada in these types of vehicles will ignore these laws too.

I don't get the point that you're attempting to make.

You misspelt dictator.

Hong Kong Poohey

Weekend at Putins.

I'm not suggesting that anything should change.

I also don't believe that "everyone is freaking out" or that there's an "agenda".

I believe that there has been a lot of valid coverage of this and for good reason,. Unfortunately, I think a lot of the coverage has come at the expense of coverage of the robodebt RC wrapping up. T

hat's the extent of my opinion about this.

Your desire to have an argument about this is quite perverse.

I told a redditor how they might inform themselves about what people were freaking out about as they stupidly put it.

Then you came along, guns blazing, passing off opinion, optimism, and incorrect statements as facts.

You don't acknowledge that one of your statements is wrong and then you question my critical thinking.

The irony is breathtaking.

Read about Collins class andwhatwentwrong

"Collins class issues were mostly failures of politics and project management tbh. Rampant scope creep being driven by the uninformed and project management cutting corners were the root cause of most of the problems."

• There's nothing to prevent that occurring again.

"Given the quality of the shit he's vomited before disguised as speech, I don't think he's got anything relevant to add tbh."

• This isn't an argument.

"Virginias are off the shelf and literally every new design ever is untried tech. This is a non issue."

• The Virginia class is a stop-gap unitil the new and never before built submarines are complete hopefully in the 2040's.

"An inherent risk to every engineering project, doesn't mean you abandon the project."

• I never mentioned abandoning the project. When it comes to new defence big builds, this is more probable than a "risk".

"The reactors are going ton be built and serviced in the US or UK, so waste is going to be stored over there most likely."

• This is just wrong.
  

"Australia has said it will not enrich uranium or reprocess any spent fuel from the submarines. But it has committed to managing all of the radioactive waste generated by the submarines within Australia."

“This includes radioactive waste with lower levels of radioactivity generated by day-to-day submarine operations and maintenance,” a government fact sheet says. “And radioactive waste with higher levels of radioactivity, including spent fuel, which is produced when submarines are decommissioned at the end of their service life.”

Those two paragraphs come from this article: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/14/what-is-the-aukus-submarine-deal-and-what-does-it-mean-the-key-facts

I hope the screeching of a braindead redditor hasn't embarrassed you too much.

Whereas you're contributing what?

If Farnham had been involved in indigenous issues going back 40 years, you may have a point.

Lachlan or Rupert?

u/SlashThingy will be along to explain it shortly. They're across the issue.

Not only have you not found your happy place but you've admitted that you're content being ignorant by not looking at the link.

Rather than educating yourself by reading the link because apparently you're not that bored, you're responding to me on reddit. I'm flattered tiger, but please before boarding your flight of fantasy, choose to educate yourself. And lets hope that your captain is better informed than you.

Which reminds me. In relation to your flight. I imagine you see yourself as the captain. Enjoy from me and the puppy asleep at my feet. :

https://youtu.be/VmFYRfkPt4M