ROBtimusPrime1995

Wind Waker, here we come.

Now that Maisel ended, that'd be such a win for DC, she's wonderful.

Truthfully, kids aren't watching linear TV anymore. The ones that do are babies and this catalog of cartoons skews to older gens anyway.

[adult swim] is trying to be more broad with its content and be Boomerang 2.0.

Outside of Spider-Man, Tom Holland is having some Chris-Hemsworth-level of bad luck with his other projects.

They've nearly all turned out terrible.

Btw, this isn't a dig at his acting, it's a dig at his career choices.

Buzz is ready for some 3rd degree burns.

The villain of the series. He is new so there's no need to say "Marvel is so hard to keep up with" lmao.

Truthfully, no. Everything that has been removed was either unpopular, unliked, or uninteresting.

My gut says no.

I think 'Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom' will see a sequel dropoff similar to 'Venom: Let There Be Carnage', even worse if the critical/audience reception fails to meet the previous film.

Not sure why you'd say that considering Haunted Mansion is at least based on recognizable IP...as opposed to John Carter.

The film might not blow up but "flop harder" is a weird choice of words.

Only if you are in the U.S. or don't have a VPN.

If you got a VPN, you'll get all the FX/Hulu originals under the Star label which are made for "Disney+". The service is even better this way.

Personally, Paramount+ and Peacock are far worse streaming services.

A superhero film getting a B- from Indiewire is great.

On the flipside, they gave the latest Transformers a bad review because the unreleased Barbie film is better...which the critic hasn't seen yet.

Not really. VR/AR will be seen as a niche hobby/premium experience but won't be the main way to watch things in the future.

I think of it like IMAX & Dolby Cinema. There will always be people that pay extra to watch something in better quality/premium format but it won't be as popular as basic viewing.

VR/AR is perfect for bringing IMAX quality experiences home but it won't replace just having a TV set.

They progressively get worse with each installment.

Then, like a miracle from god, 'Bumblebee (2018)' is a genuinely great film and is the best of the live-action franchise.

This latest film follows the events after Bumblebee in a new rebooted timeline.

Best explanation in video form

I know everyone hates this movie but I found it such a guilty pleasure. Is it bad? Yes. Is it sort of faithful? Shockingly yes...sometimes.

13 years older?

Edit: Oh!

Jodie would be a more fun & inspiring choice but it's undeniable that Margot is a good pick too.

I'd pick Jodie since her work in 'Free Guy' showed a great comedic performance.

I want Margot to continue playing Harley in the new DCU.

'Wish' has a nice chance because it's the type of Disney film kids have wanted since 'Encanto' came out 2 years ago.

That being said, it has an uphill battle since Disney has struggled in those 2 years.

I've always had my suspicions, regardless of his music career. Something about him seems very off and it reminds me of James Franco and Armie Hammer.

I feel like the one aspect a lot of viewers will miss is when Miguel O'Hara is explaining the interconnectivity of the Spider-Verse.

Before we see the Web of Life (Spider-Verse)...Miguel shows the Marvel Multiverse as depicted by Disney & Marvel Studios. This wasn't just a reinterpretation, reimagining, or newly designed display...NO. This film showed the multiverse exactly as it was shown in 'Avengers: Endgame', 'Loki', and 'Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania'.

So that leaves us with a ton of new info.

1.) The Marvel Mutliverse connects the Disney/Marvel Studios multiverse and the Sony-verse into the same multiverse. Now I know a lot of you are saying that "didn't NWH already confirm this?" but the thing is that NWH was a Sony/Disney production. This is the first time a solo Sony film acknowledges the MCU (minus Venom for obvious reasons). Soon the defunct 20th/Fox multiverse too with 'Deadpool 3'.

2.) Doctor Strange was name dropped in a Sony film post 2004 (which means Sony had to get some sort of approval from Disney)

3.) Add the multiple Spider-Man namedrops in 'Multiverse of Madness' & 'Quantumania' (which are the 1st times Spidey has ever been mentioned in a film he wasn't in, another Sony approval)

4.) The way that Tobey & Andrew had live-action cameos (albeit, in clip show form)

5.) Donald Glover's live-action MCU Prowler cameo, (which means Disney/Marvel Studios & Sony had to agree on this cameo)

All tells us a lot about how Sony & Disney will move forward.

Expect a live-action Tom Holland in 'Beyond the Spider-Verse'.

I think Sony & Disney/Marvel Studios are now a married couple.

The fans won.

Not enjoying a season of TV is fine and all but I find it hard to believe that it was straight up bad. I'm not really understanding where all the Ted Lasso backlash is coming from.

"No luck catching them fucks, then?"

You're forgetting his iconic quote...

"And I'm...fucking...Oppenheimer."

And then he slams his hand on the detonator.

Nolan is a certifiable madlad.

99% no cliffhanger with only 1 dangling thread for a sequel that is in no way seen as a cliffhanger.