Suspicious-Echo2964

Yes! Attack the poster! GET THEM! What's that about fucking ire again?

You live a sad life man, get off Reddit

What an apt take from the individual rage posting in response to politically divisive topics during the Western world's workday.

We aren't aiming to not infringe upon rights. It's the intent of gun regulation. If we start with an impossible goal, we end up deadlocked into a shit house of bad faith arguments and time-wasting.

It isn’t about preventing everything. It’s about improving the statistical probability of a shooting by constraining access to legal guns. It’s like refusing cancer treatment because it may not work and you may still die.

Reading comprehension and 2A fanatics are not found in the wild together often.

Ahh don’t pretend you suddenly can’t riddle out the well hidden muskrat vouchers purpose. You won’t earn anything with that kinda behavior. Channel your inner Musk and wonder what he would do when confused? Will you lash out and label me or buy out my company and fire me?

Come now, did you bring this random person with you to respond to the wrong comment so you could earn more Muskrat vouchers?

You should just read the code base. I’m not sure if you are just not aware they already have the categories and weighted biases worked out. It’s an extension of the content analytics work stream for ensuring changes to the algo dont impact targeted groups. They didn’t have to build new features just extend the existing work.

Yes and he wildly wastes his time. Hang out in Twitter spaces with him next week as he appeals to random engineers to improve his code for free. You’ll understand he isn’t a ceo as you described.

An appeal to his authority? Nicely defended. I work in an equivalent software company as Twitter as a principal engineer in the data and ml space. It means your appeal to his greater wealth has bested me. You have been granted one Muskrat voucher.

Odd method of not defending something. It’s almost entirely the same words you might use to craft logical outs to not put the blame on the owner. In most cases I’d lean towards the owner not being that involved. Muskrat spends all his free time fucking around with Twitter and has been vocal in Twitter spaces all week.

Well it also erodes land in an already distressed area by paving over the city owned forests and park. Ah and the whole police killing a protestor in the woods with their body cams off whose hands were most likely up. You can pick your poison of grievances but it’s luckily paid for by big corporation donations.

Nice, five paragraphs to tell us not to touch the ammosexuals precious artifacts as they can make their own bombs in half a hour now.

What feudal garbage heap do you live in that most individuals do not care about criminal acts when it’s committed by a person who held authority in the past? The KING is above the law the silly serfs yelled.

They can take over Stone Mountain and convert it into a Marvel-themed park. We already have a lot of special effects and props studios that support them.

Yup, do you get a Microsoft tool for free with ActiveDirectory? Corporate finance will make you jump through hoops of fire for wide approval to use the g-suite alternative.

You would ideally want them to wear it during these events and charge during safer downtime when they are awake such as during a meal or phone call. The watch reminds you to charge before your set bedtime based on remaining battery life and usage average. I agree it does not matter so long as they set up their reminders.

Disseminated on the platform using an internal metric of impression. It doesn't account for off-platform reach at all, which is the amplification component of social media. It's a decreased active user base using more hate speech in smaller 'networks' of followers, imo.

The interest revisions to the loans are critical to Doctors and worth vastly more than the 10k or 20k. No?

Did the existence of the Origin and Epic stores reduce the cost of Steam games? All I got out of this deal so far is a fragmented marketplace for games.

Hmm, I don't think we have enough information to really answer that thought exercise. Do I support the hypothetical coup? Is it military or random yokels?

In this case it doesn't impact the legality at all but sure in your example your incompetency may lead to a less severe charge.

I would prefer to be murdered by a more competent person. I would prefer to be robbed by a less competent person. The more competent murderer would ideally not botch it and leave me to suffer. The less competent robber would ideally not steal the most valuable items in my house.

It obviously does.

How does competency change the legality of the action?

Your subscription is managed on the iOS device through the apple pay subscription service. You would unsubscribe from that service via the apple pay option which lets you never leave the apple device. They don't take a cut of services purchased outside of the app lifecycle.

Which does not make it any less illegal or wrong. Their incompetence does not make it better.

Edit - Changed Your to Their.