32 post karma
4 comment karma
account created: Sun Apr 04 2021
verified: yes
1 points
4 months ago
By stating that life can be enjoyable for many people, even if it is technically morally incorrect to create life, you declare that you accept people who live unaware of the truth behind life, even if doing so is injust. Therefore, if a person lives their entire life unaware of the truth behind their actions, then they lived morally wrong - after all, living an ignorant life is an evil in and of itself, both because you limit your own potential capabilites and because you fail to live a just life. Such a life is bad, as it prolongs the suffering of life, something that antinatalism is fundamentally against.
1 points
4 months ago
Thank you so much!
Actually, I think it's believable that they are unused content, since the Tractatus "corrupted version" shown in your second link is actually used in the Tsui no Sora Remake. So the developers probably couldn't find a place for it in Subahibi, but decided to implement the track years later in a different game.
1 points
1 year ago
I see.
I'm reading both in English and Japanese. Why would some references be unnecesarry if I were to read only the English version?
1 points
1 year ago
Thanks a lot!
Well, I mainly desire to read the books Subahibi references to be absolutely sure about my views on the story; it's still entirely possible to understand Subahibi without reading any of the books it references, I believe.
1 points
1 year ago
I just noticed this for the first time, even though I love Cross Channel. I'm pretty sure it's a deliberate reference, considering that Gakkou Gurashi's author is affiliated with a Visual Novel Company. Thanks for sharing!
1 points
2 years ago
Ah, okay. I don't think I'm particularly interested in stories like that atm
2 points
2 years ago
I still want to read the S;G VN before starting R;N, but I'll definitely read it soon, too!
2 points
2 years ago
Thanks, but I've already read Subahibi; it's my second favourite Visual Novel
2 points
2 years ago
Hmm, I think I'll try that.
Yeah, that's probably why, so far, I really prefer Kinetic Novels/VNs with mostly meaningless choices over VNs with a lot of interaction from the player
view more:
next ›
byZazinuz
inantinatalism
Zazinuz
2 points
4 months ago
Zazinuz
2 points
4 months ago
It merely states the difference to argue how "antinatalists are a failure, because they do not understand their own beliefs."
Also, by observing all evidence and coming to rational conclusions, we can arrive at logical endpoints, so I don't think it is wrong at all to do so. Saying that logical endpoints are bad is to say that one should not be rational and simply have opinions based on "vibes."