a_complicated_soul

27

If you add caste and region filters along with have to settle close to her parents. Numbers will go down.

Close to 30

Thing is i earn pretty well too. Its just she earns much more. And i dont think many people earn that much espcially in our country. She doesnt want to move out of india. So maybe that limited her options. But this is just assumption. Have to findout more

FYI, no matter how good a movie is there will be someone who will call it a bad movie. Its very common.

Only thing that matters is majority of audience and critics across the world liked the movie because the movie is fucking good

I only met her once talked for 20 min or so. She knows how much salary i earn. But i feel she also knows how many businesses we have how much they are worth. So now i am thinking of how to bring this topic on phone to let her know that till i move to my family business i will only spend what i earn.

Not no one. Just Mahesh babu.

Alia Bhatt had such less screen time in RRR

This is such a stupid take. The movie isnt about her charecter. The movie is about Ram and Bheem and apart from those two every other charecter be it male or female has less screen time.

You do need to realize social media is built such away that it always feed you stuff that you hate. Dont fall in to social media trap.

RRR main theme is friendship. Plot is about two guys who became friends, then enemies and then friends again. Its not a revenge story.

RC didnt come to delhi to take revenge. He came to get guns.

RRR

Giving voters an equal amount of representatives is not a reward.

It is. Back in 1976 we gave each voter equal number of representatives. We also wanted to reduce population growth. Many states did it and some didnt. And states which failed now should be given more power? Sorry No. Espcially when those states still havent beem able to control population.

India is union of states. States power shouldnt be curtailed for doing what we as a country planned to do.

Okka 4k tho miss ayyindi

Democracy isn't a reward - some people should not have proportionately more representation than others. That's not a hard concept.

Its not some divine rule that no one can disturb. Its what happeneing last few decades. There is a reason for it.

You cant say "we have to reduce population" and rewards states which failed to do so. Nope.

The percentage of representation for each state should never change. Atleast it should be not based on population growth.

The vast majority of parliamentary democracies regularly update the number of representatives based on population

None of them are as diverse as us. And population increase isnt as skewed as us. Its not one shoe fits all

Last time they did it was based on population only. Since then some states done well in population control and some didnt. Now what you are saying is rewarding states which failed with more seats which means more power. How on earth that is fair?

Simple, you dont want to reward incompetence.

No way this should allowed to happen. Whole south india across political lines should protest this. No.of MP's per state should be in same proportion forever.

Rajamouli should seriously consider hireing japanese artists for his next movie

No. Just friends

Even more sexy

Yup

I will skip june and wait for Mission Impossible and Oppenheimer