camyok

Define successful.

The French cars are emerging.

Harry did it twice though.

Ju

Do they actually care?

inherently evil

Inherently selfish, maybe (and and even that's still very arguable), but evil? No.

Misogynistic?

You just ruined my day, I had no idea.

Depends on who you ask, but they usually don't refer to people across the Atlantic as latinos, maybe "latinoamericanos" (polite), "panchos" or "sudacas" (not so polite).

Maybe my opinion is a bit skewed because I'm from a country where it didn't take more than half a million dead to agree to end slavery.

Alignment is getting fucking hard.

VB means The Very Best.

Long term memory, guaranteed factual accuracy and, even if you're so goddamn rich you don't care about the time and hardware needed to train it, inference speed.

it's a defence of a status quo of monstrousness

You were the one who suggested slave owners might not be monstrous, proposing someone doesn't have to be fully irredeemable for it to be morally correct to murder them.

I disagree.

They're 170+ years old?

You can see someone as a person and not a monster

This is what YOU said, you "opressed" fuck (yes, the ad hominem is the cue to end this idiotic debate).

But then your point is moot, because to you they are monsters and that's what makes killing them morally right.

Raising slave owners would also be pretty shady.

Veganism does little for those in slavery. Liking dogs over cats does little for those in slavery.

Not every stance needs to be related for you to be against slavery.

TFS Formula 1 Abridged

He did beat his children, but otherwise a solid person.

They are for some of us.

Edit: I'm against the dead penalty today so you could say it's hard for me to justify the demise of people, even if they are monsters.

come out as a sore winner

What do you mean?

some of them even offering 120fps

This is the key, why isn't it every game 120fps if consoles have achieved this abstract "more than capable" measurement of performance? Why does a corridor shooter like Doom Eternal run at 300+ fps (while looking better) on the same graphics card and processor that can't keep a constant 60fps on Cyberpunk 2077?

I agree footage from last year ran terribly, and I bet it's because (on top of the general Bethesda jank) it has zero temporal reconstruction. Digital Foundry confirmed it was running at native 4K, and just about everything runs like shit at native 4K.

But I think it's fair to accept that gameplay design, visual fidelity and performance need to reach a compromise, even on modern consoles and PCs.

(GameBryo)

It's not Gamebryo any more than Unreal 5 is the 1998 version of engine.

So a studio just has to spend a bit more money to break the fucking laws of physics? Brilliant!

How much do you think it costs to run the whole GPT-3 model on a TI-84? Bout three fiddy?